| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/08 18:06:21
Subject: New beastman - is it me or have they been hit with an ugly stick. Repeatedly. With a really big one.
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
aerethan wrote:The price per unit changed mostly when Ogre Kingdoms was released. $40+ for 3 plastic 40mm based models is steep.
The true nature of their pricing being based around how many of a product a single army would use was shown when the new plastic Greatswords were released. $41 for 10 plastic greatswords is almost twice the cost of 10 core infantry. I can see a small price difference, but making a unit of 25 greatswords cost essentially $123(assuming you don't Ebay or trade for the last 5 models) makes them more costly than similar units that are still metal. A unit of 20 Black Guard costs around $81, and the same for plastic greatswords is $82.
What GW failed to realize here was that the greatswords kit offered a chance to add in bitz and new torsos and legs that most Empire players would want to more customize their models. So if the kit was only $25 many would buy them even after completing their unit if only to mod characters and unit champions out of them.
Now keep in mind the scuplts for greatswords are actually decent. Why they went with the same pricing strategy for such tragic models is beyond me.
That sounds like a feasable explanation except that the Plastic Skaven units mess it up. The Stormvermin set is in the same price range as the Greatswords and the Bestigors and yes you will only use a limited amount per game but why then is the Plaguemonks set in the same price range as normal core choices? You will only use a limited amount of those as well. It boils down to GW charging what they think people will pay for a unit that they will need in their army to have a chance of winning.
Malfred- it was just one of the new plastic ones. I agree the Doombull looks great (but not £25 great...).
Mick
|
Digitus Impudicus!
Armies- |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/08 18:19:32
Subject: Re:New beastman - is it me or have they been hit with an ugly stick. Repeatedly. With a really big one.
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Newish-long-time-lurker-used-to-be-occasional-poster here.
I really, really like the Beastmen. So much so that I am coming back to Warhammer to play them. The Razorgor is stupidly bad, but everything else is great. The Gors, Ungors, Bestigors all look better than previous models. And I for one dig the minotaurs. The roid-rage, wall of meat and horns look is fantastic. The legs are a bit wonky, but passable. Just wish there was an add-on "torso" sprue that could be bought at say a third of the price of the whole kit, to take advantage of all the wasted plastic.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/08 18:32:47
Subject: Re:New beastman - is it me or have they been hit with an ugly stick. Repeatedly. With a really big one.
|
 |
Wrack Sufferer
|
I love the new minotaur models well the Scibor ones anyway
http://www.sciborminiatures.com/en_,monstrous_news.php?id=867#i/2010/big/minotaurs_01.jpg
Actually the new ones would be alright just not at £27.......
Bestigor aren't priced at game effectiveness as their not that good.......
I quite like the Gor Ungor and Bestigor models I don't like their price however I got the Herds when I could.
The Razorgor means I'll probably be buying either Avatars of War or Heresies Hell Hounds......
|
"From dis day to da ending of da world,
But we in it shall be remembered-
Us gitz, us happy gits, we mob of boyz;
For he to-day that smashes stuff wif me
Shall be my fellow Ork; be he ne'er so vile,
Dis day shall make him proppa Orky;
And umies on Armageddon now-a-bed
Shall think demselves accurs'd dat we're 'ere,
And be right scared uv anyfing green whiles any speaks
That fought wiv us upon Saint Ghazghkull's day."
Looted of Kevin M on BOLS
My P&M Blogs containing reasonably good modelling and alright from a 100 yards painting.
For Swamp dwelling Beastmen: http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/231101.page
For the Conclave of Hrin, Inquisimunda eclectism: http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/279068.page
For the 24th Islandlwanda. An African Tribal IG army: http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/252579.page
For horrid thing's done to innocent household objects:
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/356363.page |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/08 20:00:58
Subject: New beastman - is it me or have they been hit with an ugly stick. Repeatedly. With a really big one.
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I think all the models they released look good. I especially enjoy the disproportions and silliness of the razorgor, but then I enjoy crazy exaggerated models.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/08 20:19:38
Subject: Re:New beastman - is it me or have they been hit with an ugly stick. Repeatedly. With a really big one.
|
 |
Three Color Minimum
|
I'm gonna get hit for this, but I like the Razorgor. It's a hilarious model that looks like it would be really fun to paint. I don't, however, look as a serious model. I don't look at as something to be used in a Beasts of Chaos army, or in any GW army for that matter. It's a fun model (Pumba on crack, how can you NOT love it?), not a GW model. If another company had put that out, with no game to go along with it, I'm sure I wouldn't be the only one feeling this way.
On the other hand, I think basically everything else from the new Beasts of Chaos, except maybe the Gors and the Centigor hero are utter gak.
|
H.B.M.C. wrote:Because this is Dakka Dakka, where there's more salt than the ocean. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/09 10:50:55
Subject: Re:New beastman - is it me or have they been hit with an ugly stick. Repeatedly. With a really big one.
|
 |
Mighty Chosen Warrior of Chaos
|
Humm, yes, the beasties certainly seem a lackluster release (if one compares them to the previous skaven for example). It's a bit too early to say if the armylist is a total flop (there's the looming 8th ed etc.), but the model-line should really have had a nice model of at least one of the new rare monsters. The studioarmy's horrible paintjob didn't exactly help selling me new minos, either.
|
...silence |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/09 16:55:04
Subject: New beastman - is it me or have they been hit with an ugly stick. Repeatedly. With a really big one.
|
 |
[MOD]
PRIMARCH
|
Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:Actually saw the Razorgor today, unpainted. If you did the bulging eye as a pustule, it should look okay. Other than that, out with the clippers, snippity snip, smidge of Greenstuff (eye shouldn't be too hard to resculpt) and it will look pretty sweet. As long as you leave the additional spines off.
Are you reading what you're typing?
Come on now, MDG!
Stop it already!
The new Beasmen range is laughably bad. Sucks out loud bad.
No amount of lipstick is going to help these pigs.
GW whiffed on this one, and I'd love to know how and why.
What is up with the model approval process? Quality control?
This one is a mystery to me.
This army could and should have been so much more than this!
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/09 17:03:25
Subject: New beastman - is it me or have they been hit with an ugly stick. Repeatedly. With a really big one.
|
 |
Oberfeldwebel
|
Alpharius wrote:Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:Actually saw the Razorgor today, unpainted. If you did the bulging eye as a pustule, it should look okay. Other than that, out with the clippers, snippity snip, smidge of Greenstuff (eye shouldn't be too hard to resculpt) and it will look pretty sweet. As long as you leave the additional spines off.
Are you reading what you're typing?
Come on now, MDG!
Stop it already!
The new Beasmen range is laughably bad. Sucks out loud bad.
No amount of lipstick is going to help these pigs.
GW whiffed on this one, and I'd love to know how and why.
What is up with the model approval process? Quality control?
This one is a mystery to me.
This army could and should have been so much more than this!
I guess it's good that "Beastmen" are no longer "Chaos Beastmen". Yeah it sucks that Chaos loses more, but it's better to lose than to get stuck with garbage.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/09 17:32:23
Subject: New beastman - is it me or have they been hit with an ugly stick. Repeatedly. With a really big one.
|
 |
Alluring Sorcerer of Slaanesh
|
I'm part of the 0.25% that actually likes the Razorgor. Yeah, it's cartoonish and ridiculous, but it's a cute little fella  I feel like it could be used as a cheaper, uglier juggernaut replacement too.
|
Albatross wrote: Cannerus The Unbearable - I hereby award you the official title of: 'Cannerus The Unbearable: Sex Mod'. Heartfelt congratulations.
corpsesarefun wrote: Congratulations Cannerus you are the worlds first Omniphile!
Slarg232 wrote: I knew one of us had to be; Can't be Cannerus, he's either a Keeper of Secrets or Slaanesh itself.
Frazzled wrote: Cannerus I dub thee Hound Dog of Dakka.
Chowderhead wrote: Cannerus has spoken. Thread be over.
remilia_scarlet wrote: what the hell man? besides all that, as long as there's deviance in the universe, neither cannerus or I will die.
Melissia wrote: Dogma's the one with the suitcase sitting around like a shmuck. I'm the girl on the left. Cannerus of courseis standing center stage.
Chowderhead wrote: Also, Cannerus has hijacked yet ANOTHER thread.
Lord Rogukiel said: Thank you good sir. Cannerus saves another pointless thread!
www.Ninjabread.co.uk |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|