Switch Theme:

'Minor' nations in FOW: any good?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Executing Exarch




Romania uses the Peasant Army Table, which is divided into Regular and Elite, and changes in each time period. In EW, the results are as follows -

Regular

1. CC
2. FC
3. FC
4. CT
5. CT
6. FT


Elite

1. CT
2. CT
3. CT
4. FT
5. FT
6. CV


However, once the initial stages of the invasion are over, at the end of Early War, the Romanians start to wonder why they're deep in the Soviet Union (one of the primary reasons for joining Barbarossa was to retake two regions that the Soviets had seized from Romania the year before; for obvious reasons, that was accomplished almost immediately). Both charts have a 50% chance of generating a Reluctant result, and a Confident result otherwise. The Conscripts are gone, though, which means that even if your troops don't want to be there, they're at least competent at their jobs (and sometimes very good at those jobs). In Late War, with the front lines approaching Romania (and Romania switching sides), the R and C motivation rating chances switch to 33%/67%. You still have the same chance at each skill rating, though.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/10/07 06:44:14


 
   
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka






Sheffield, UK

@ Avatar 720. Sorry I should have been clearer. I know the mechanic i just don't have any experience of how it plays.

For example many people look across the table at my T-35s and assume they're unstoppable behemoths. They don't realise that every bit of terrain is a potential death trap to them which severely limits where I can attack.

Spain in Flames: Flames of War (Spanish Civil War 1936-39) Flames of War: Czechs and Slovaks (WWI & WWII) Sheffield & Rotherham Wargames Club

"I'm cancelling you, I'm cancelling you out of shame like my subscription to White Dwarf." - Mark Corrigan: Peep Show
 
   
Made in es
Inspiring Icon Bearer




 mdauben wrote:

Italy - I've got a bit of first hand experience with these fellows. They are stictly an Early War and Mid War force.


They do have LW lists too. Not much in the way of variety, but they work.

They drop the 8 million bayonets rule LW, too.

You can choose between FV paras, CT fucilieri with mission tactics and stormtrooper with plenty of support options and the CT Gruppo Esplorante a funny list with recce infantry teams that can take a zillion guns (like 2x4 PaK43 and 2x4 105 howitzers).

   
Made in gb
Courageous Grand Master




-

Some good replies here.

IN all honesty, I'll probably opt for an Italian force for the following reasons:

1) The tactical challenge - that 8 million bayonets rule should be fun, and of course taking on Russian tanks should be fun as well.

2) Budgetary reasons - as an Italian force will allow me to use them in Russia and Africa, thus increasing the scenario opportunities, which I prefer.


Was very tempted by the Polish armoured train, but they're too bloody expensive!

"Our crops will wither, our children will die piteous
deaths and the sun will be swept from the sky. But is it true?" - Tom Kirby, CEO, Games Workshop Ltd 
   
Made in es
Inspiring Icon Bearer




 Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:
Some good replies here.

IN all honesty, I'll probably opt for an Italian force for the following reasons:

1) The tactical challenge - that 8 million bayonets rule should be fun, and of course taking on Russian tanks should be fun as well.

2) Budgetary reasons - as an Italian force will allow me to use them in Russia and Africa, thus increasing the scenario opportunities, which I prefer.


Was very tempted by the Polish armoured train, but they're too bloody expensive!


Great choice.

Italians are my main FoW army.... so much that I'm building an Italian bolt action army at the moment.
   
Made in gb
Courageous Grand Master




-

jouso wrote:
 Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:
Some good replies here.

IN all honesty, I'll probably opt for an Italian force for the following reasons:

1) The tactical challenge - that 8 million bayonets rule should be fun, and of course taking on Russian tanks should be fun as well.

2) Budgetary reasons - as an Italian force will allow me to use them in Russia and Africa, thus increasing the scenario opportunities, which I prefer.


Was very tempted by the Polish armoured train, but they're too bloody expensive!


Great choice.

Italians are my main FoW army.... so much that I'm building an Italian bolt action army at the moment.


Just wondering where I can buy cheap Italian troops in 15mm...

"Our crops will wither, our children will die piteous
deaths and the sun will be swept from the sky. But is it true?" - Tom Kirby, CEO, Games Workshop Ltd 
   
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka






Sheffield, UK

Peter Pig has a fairly extensive Italian range as does Old Glory.

Spain in Flames: Flames of War (Spanish Civil War 1936-39) Flames of War: Czechs and Slovaks (WWI & WWII) Sheffield & Rotherham Wargames Club

"I'm cancelling you, I'm cancelling you out of shame like my subscription to White Dwarf." - Mark Corrigan: Peep Show
 
   
Made in gb
Courageous Grand Master




-

 George Spiggott wrote:
Peter Pig has a fairly extensive Italian range as does Old Glory.


If I had a quid for every time I've super glued metal miniatures to my fingers over the years, I'd be a rich man!

I avoid metal minis like the plague - plastic and resin for me.

I need plastic Italian minis...I smell a kickstarter coming on

"Our crops will wither, our children will die piteous
deaths and the sun will be swept from the sky. But is it true?" - Tom Kirby, CEO, Games Workshop Ltd 
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran




I enjoy using my Romanians. And the best part is in LW you can play them as either Axis or Allies with just a few minor tweaks.

Pros
Either side so you can play the guy that won't fight against an ally.
Huge platoons if you go that route.
Pretty good support units. HMG and mortar platoons can be built into companies and/or taken as a separate slot (get those numbers even for reserve missions).
Access to German equipment even if you field an Allied force.

Cons
Troop ratings. You don't know what they are until first turn is ready to begin. Nothing is more aggravating than having a platoon you set up to move forward with rool Reluctant Trained while the one you deployed for defense roll CV.
Artillery - The guns themselves are not bad but only spotters or Arty units can call in strikes. Commanders can't

   
Made in es
Inspiring Icon Bearer




 Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:
 George Spiggott wrote:
Peter Pig has a fairly extensive Italian range as does Old Glory.


If I had a quid for every time I've super glued metal miniatures to my fingers over the years, I'd be a rich man!

I avoid metal minis like the plague - plastic and resin for me.

I need plastic Italian minis...I smell a kickstarter coming on


That's the pity of playing minnows, plastic infantry is a no-no (though you can make decent Hungarians and even Finns out of German stuff).

You can also play the co-belligerent Italian army LW (mostly US-equipped) with US minis though there are no official lists (use a generic US list)

   
Made in gb
1st Lieutenant







You know which minor nation you can do with US minis - Brazillians....

My FOW Blog
http://breakthroughassault.blogspot.co.uk/

My Eldar project log (26/7/13)
http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?p=5518969#post5518969

Exiles forum
http://exilesbbleague.phpbb4ever.com/index.php 
   
Made in gb
Courageous Grand Master




-

jouso wrote:
 Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:
 George Spiggott wrote:
Peter Pig has a fairly extensive Italian range as does Old Glory.


If I had a quid for every time I've super glued metal miniatures to my fingers over the years, I'd be a rich man!

I avoid metal minis like the plague - plastic and resin for me.

I need plastic Italian minis...I smell a kickstarter coming on


That's the pity of playing minnows, plastic infantry is a no-no (though you can make decent Hungarians and even Finns out of German stuff).

You can also play the co-belligerent Italian army LW (mostly US-equipped) with US minis though there are no official lists (use a generic US list)



I'm pretty big on authenticity, so the absence of a decent plastic mini, is annoying.

If anybody from PSC is reading this, give us plastic Italians!!


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 Reaver83 wrote:
You know which minor nation you can do with US minis - Brazillians....


Is there an army list for them?


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Boss GreenNutz wrote:
I enjoy using my Romanians. And the best part is in LW you can play them as either Axis or Allies with just a few minor tweaks.

Pros
Either side so you can play the guy that won't fight against an ally.
Huge platoons if you go that route.
Pretty good support units. HMG and mortar platoons can be built into companies and/or taken as a separate slot (get those numbers even for reserve missions).
Access to German equipment even if you field an Allied force.

Cons
Troop ratings. You don't know what they are until first turn is ready to begin. Nothing is more aggravating than having a platoon you set up to move forward with rool Reluctant Trained while the one you deployed for defense roll CV.
Artillery - The guns themselves are not bad but only spotters or Arty units can call in strikes. Commanders can't



I don't like the look of Romanians that much - would rather crush them with my Soviet tanks

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/10/08 11:55:10


"Our crops will wither, our children will die piteous
deaths and the sun will be swept from the sky. But is it true?" - Tom Kirby, CEO, Games Workshop Ltd 
   
Made in us
Major




In a van down by the river

 Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:

 Reaver83 wrote:
You know which minor nation you can do with US minis - Brazillians....


Is there an army list for them?


Yessir. Here you go: http://www.flamesofwar.com/Portals/0/Documents/Briefings/Brazilian-Intelligence-Briefing.pdf

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/10/08 12:34:31


 
   
Made in us
Executing Exarch




 Reaver83 wrote:
You know which minor nation you can do with US minis - Brazillians....


And post-Africa French forces.


I don't like the look of Romanians that much


The Romanians have what is quite possibly the single most annoying mini in the game - a 15mm infantry figure with an arm that needs to be superglued into place. Kind of an interesting idea, as it provides a bit of posability, except -

1.) Supergluing anything that small tends to be an exercise in frustration
2.) Due to the way that the figure is set up, you have a very limited range of positions in which the arm doesn't look very awkwardly posed.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/10/08 18:34:08


 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut






UK

Eumerin wrote:
The Romanians have what is quite possibly the single most annoying mini in the game - a 15mm infantry figure with an arm that needs to be superglued into place. Kind of an interesting idea, as it provides a bit of posability, except -

1.) Supergluing anything that small tends to be an exercise in frustration
2.) Due to the way that the figure is set up, you have a very limited range of positions in which the arm doesn't look very awkwardly posed.


That reminds me of the mandatory motorcycle figure that comes with the LefH18 box. Both arms are attached to the handlebar of the bike and is a single separate piece that needs to be attached to the body of the rider and the right place on the bike simultaneously. I removed the LefH18s from my list both because they were unnecessary but also because I tried to build that figure, and I decided it was safer to not build it and avoid an aneurysm than to get it done after 90% of my blood vessels have burst. It's impossible to line up both the arms to sit flush against the body and also to have the handlebar even attached to the bike. I was sorely tempted to throw the entire figure in the bin.

Mandorallen turned back toward the insolently sneering baron. 'My Lord,' The great knight said distantly, 'I find thy face apelike and thy form misshapen. Thy beard, moreover, is an offence against decency, resembling more closely the scabrous fur which doth decorate the hinder portion of a mongrel dog than a proper adornment for a human face. Is it possibly that thy mother, seized by some wild lechery, did dally at some time past with a randy goat?' - Mimbrate Knight Protector Mandorallen.

Excerpt from "Seeress of Kell", Book Five of The Malloreon series by David Eddings.

My deviantART Profile - Pay No Attention To The Man Behind The Madness

"You need not fear us, unless you are a dark heart, a vile one who preys on the innocent; I promise, you can’t hide forever in the empty darkness, for we will hunt you down like the animals you are, and pull you into the very bowels of hell." Iron - Within Temptation 
   
 
Forum Index » Historical Miniature Games: WW1 to Modern
Go to: