Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2010/07/17 03:16:15
Subject: Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch
|
I was at the local GW today and someone mentioned that you can't make a Look Out Sir against strange magic attacks(Like Flamestorm, Purple Sun, Pit of Shades, etc.) The Look Out Sir rules only talk about strange shooting attacks(like templates and cannonballs). I'm looking through the BRB and he seems correct so far. Still looking as I think that is very weird, but I wanted to post to get you all's opinion.
|
|
|
|
2010/07/17 05:29:37
Subject: Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
Dakka Veteran
|
The lore of metal spell about gehenna's hounds specifies that a look out sir may be made against each individual hit out of d6. more generally, I don't know
|
Manchu wrote:It's a lie, K_K, pure Imperial propaganda. Where's the Talon of Horus, huh? Plus everyone knows the Imperium planned and carried out the invasion of Cadia itself. Bin Abaddon was just a convenient scapegoat. |
|
|
|
2010/07/17 07:10:55
Subject: Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
Fickle Fury of Chaos
n/a
|
I am guessing that you can only use Look Out Sir against magic when it actually says you can in the specific spell...
|
40K Daemons 8k
Fantasy Daemons 3k
WHFB Beastmen 2k
Tomb King Cycriss Soul Legions 2k
|
|
|
|
2010/07/17 10:27:22
Subject: Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
Knight Exemplar
|
i would of thought it was anything Shooty, So magic missiles, Cannons, bolt throwers, Flame templates.
Plop template and Destroy things i don't think you can look out sir that. Or things where it says Every model in unit takes Blah or Gurh.
My friend was trying to lookout sir a dragon too shortly corrected that
But i still haven't seen the rule book yet :(
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/07/17 10:27:48
Warmachine: Menoth/Cygnar/Mercenaries
40k: Tyranids!
Fantasy: Dark elves
Wood elves! |
|
|
|
2010/07/17 11:53:41
Subject: Re:Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
It says templates specifically. Why would it not work for magic that has a template?
|
Black Templar |
|
|
|
2010/07/17 12:05:56
Subject: Re:Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch
|
Seon wrote:i would of thought it was anything Shooty, So magic missiles, Cannons, bolt throwers, Flame templates.
Epicwargamer wrote:It says templates specifically. Why would it not work for magic that has a template?
Because it says shooting specifically. Magic is not shooting and I can't find anything to indicate a Look Out Sir for magic(except where specified with the Hounds spell).
|
|
|
|
2010/07/17 13:32:19
Subject: Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
no, really it says 'templates' not shooting.
|
Black Templar |
|
|
|
2010/07/17 13:38:08
Subject: Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
Dakka Veteran
|
Just gone over that part and it would appear that
it allows you a 'look out sir' roll but the effect is still a template.
Intresting times ahead for heros !
(IE templates NOT shooting) as epic indicates, and no mention of shooting.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/07/17 13:38:52
-STOLEN ! - Astral Claws - Custodes - Revenant Shroud
DR:70-S+++G++M(GD)B++I++Pw40k82/fD++A++/areWD004R+++T(S)DM+
|
|
|
|
2010/07/17 14:39:34
Subject: Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch
|
The last two paragraphs in the "Champions and Shooting" on page 93:
The only exceptions to this are shooting attacks that do not use the normal shooting, specifically shooting attacks that use some form of template(such as cannons, stone throwers, breath weapons and so on).
Fortunately, in these cases, a champion is so beloved by his unit that ordinary rank and file troops will attempt to save him - as respected by the "Look Out Sr! rule(see below)"
"Look Out Sir!" Rule on page 93:
If the champion is hit by a template as described above, *Insert rest of rule*
The template hit mentioned in the Look Out Sir! rule is described above as a Shooting Attack, not Magic in any way.
On to characters.
On page 97 the BRB once again specifically mentions shooting attacks with no mention of magic for the +4 "Look Out Sir!" for Lone Characters.
Magic is briefly mentioned on page 97 that spells effecting a unit will affect the character if he joins it and vise versa(if capable is affecting a unit). Nothing helpful here.
On page 99 under the Unusual Shooting Rule:
The only exceptions to this are shooting attacks that do not use the normal shooting, specifically shooting attacks that use some form of template(such as cannons, stone throwers, breath weapons and so on).
Look at that, word for word what's on page 93.
If a character is hit by such an attack, *insert rest of "Look Out Sir" Rules*
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/07/17 14:40:14
|
|
|
|
2010/07/18 04:56:49
Subject: Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I'm kinda dense. Could you sum that up for me?
|
Black Templar |
|
|
|
2010/07/18 05:24:48
Subject: Re:Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch
|
Shooting is mentioned quite specifically and Magic never is.
|
|
|
|
2010/07/18 11:57:52
Subject: Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
Dutiful Citizen Levy
AUS
|
I had a game with my high elves vs. lizardmen and got Pit of Shades off against his unit of Temple Guard with Slaan. We had an argument over whether the Slaan got a Look Out Sir! roll or not and I eventually conceded that he could have one. He then proceeded to fail it and roll a 4 for his init. test. Dead Slaan
The book is very ambiguous on the point as it does say template, but it also says that Look Out Sir! only refers to shooting attacks... GW will have to make a ruling in an errata to clarify really.
|
High Elves
Anything You Can Do I Can Do Better |
|
|
|
2010/07/22 13:24:10
Subject: Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
IIRC don't the shooting allocation rules say they apply to magic and anything that's basically a non combat attack?
|
hello |
|
|
|
2010/07/22 13:43:18
Subject: Re:Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
yep as far as i can tell, no where does it say magic allows a LoSir unless the spell says it does, or if it distributes as "shooting"
|
|
|
|
2010/07/22 13:52:12
Subject: Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
The shooting rules seem imply the distribution rules are the default to be used in magic unless stated otherwise though.
|
hello |
|
|
|
2010/07/23 04:11:10
Subject: Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
Superior Stormvermin
|
wouldnt the slann be too big for a look out sir roll? unless he has a rule that says he gets one anyways...
|
|
|
|
2010/07/23 04:20:48
Subject: Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
[DCM]
Dankhold Troggoth
|
Yes, the different base size rule, right? Perhaps it's in the lizardmen errata that he gets one, though... otherwise every cannon would be aimed that way!
|
|
|
|
2010/07/23 04:55:26
Subject: Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
He is model type infantry, so he gets a look out sir if he is in a unit of 5 or more rank and file infantry (2+) or within 3 inches of one (4+).
|
|
|
|
2010/07/23 06:09:14
Subject: Re:Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
Stoic Grail Knight
Houston, Texas
|
yeah its not base size, based on model class.
Slann is infantry, temple guard is infantry. So he gets a LoS roll
|
Daemons-
Bretonnia-
Orcs n' Goblins- |
|
|
|
2010/07/23 14:50:04
Subject: Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
They added Look Out Sir for all template attacks including magical vortexes.
|
|
|
|
2010/07/23 15:03:35
Subject: Weird lack of Look Out Sir?
|
|
[DCM]
Dankhold Troggoth
|
Yep... from the FAQ that is now up:
"Q: Does the ‘Look Out Sir’ special rule apply against all spells that
use templates? (p93)
A: Yes."
|
|
|
|
|