Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2016/06/02 07:27:29
Subject: Re:GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Sword-Bearing Inquisitorial Crusader
|
No space wolves?
Interesting...
|
|
|
|
2016/06/02 07:37:09
Subject: GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Major
London
|
No Rainbow Warriors?
Interesting......
|
|
|
|
2016/06/02 07:40:38
Subject: GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
These are just examples of how you could paint the Marine miniatures in the Vedros box
Edit: Ninja'ed by Fenrir Kitsune
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/06/02 07:41:28
|
|
|
|
2016/06/02 08:06:33
Subject: Re:GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
What they show are marines that can be painted from the paint set. And that includes no grey colours at all.
|
|
|
|
2016/06/02 08:38:57
Subject: Re:GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Sword-Bearing Inquisitorial Crusader
|
NoggintheNog wrote:
What they show are marines that can be painted from the paint set. And that includes no grey colours at all.
Technically, modern 40k space wolves are blue-grey. But still, you can paint all the founding loyalist legions except for one. That's definitely odd.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/06/02 08:39:54
|
|
|
|
2016/06/02 08:56:14
Subject: GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Sergeant
|
I actually really like that stat block. I've been playing simple rules people put online for free after using them for their DIY convention games (whether it's ancient battles, WW2 games, sci-fi, whatever) and they are often this simple and straight forward. If you play to see what happens then rules like this can work really well. Automatically Appended Next Post: Woah, check the trade contacts out After Kirby has been bragging about how taking direct control over distribution was the best thing GW ever did, it's amazing to see a giant list of independent sales and marketing people all with a traditional sales territory by region break down. I never thought I'd see GW open up their sales to independent contractors in a traditional sales model. Automatically Appended Next Post: At the same time, some things never change:
POLICY REGARDING ONLINE SALES AND ADVERTISING OF GAMES WORKSHOP BV PRODUCTS
1. Online Sales Reserved To Games Workshop:
GAMES WORKSHOP does not permit the online retail sale of BV Products by Retailers located in the United States or Canada.
Retailers are not permitted to sell BV Products on any website, web-portal, third-party web-portal or other Internet-based platform of any kind. This prohibition includes any form of online shopping cart that would enable a consumer
to order or purchase BV Products online.
-----
I wonder how that's going to work out for them. Stores that have tons and tons of stuff might just put everything they sell on their website as there are too many manufacturers selling stuff and then if a distributor or GW calls them up and says "you can't sell our stuff online" and then what? The toy store already has tons of products and options and doesn't need GW the way a game store might need Magic: the Gathering.
|
This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2016/06/02 09:08:47
|
|
|
|
2016/06/02 09:57:37
Subject: GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Gun Mage
|
The GW anti-online-shopping policy manages to be both insanely harsh and laughably ineffective, given how many online GW retailers I can find with a quick Google search.
|
|
|
|
2016/06/02 10:38:15
Subject: GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
It's really not hard to see why they picked those Marine colours as examples. Anyone suggesting it's odd you can't paint SW with the colours in the paint set isn't looking too carefully. No grey/blue, no space puppies! It's not an omission, it's a selection to fit the paints they're selling you.
|
Stormonu wrote:For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules" |
|
|
|
2016/06/02 10:42:56
Subject: GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
It's a bit weird though that the Blood angel is apparently in a different art style than all the other chapters.
And it's hilarious to see that Gorkamorka era trakk/buggy being featured in a new release in the year 2016!
|
|
|
|
|
2016/06/02 10:44:11
Subject: GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Locked in the Tower of Amareo
|
JohnnyHell wrote:It's really not hard to see why they picked those Marine colours as examples. Anyone suggesting it's odd you can't paint SW with the colours in the paint set isn't looking too carefully. No grey/blue, no space puppies! It's not an omission, it's a selection to fit the paints they're selling you.
Though of course adding 1 more paint wouldn't have been THAT hard.
Not that it really matters.
Oh and another reason: Wolves tend to look bit different to others due to extra bits. That might be also one factor.
|
2024 painted/bought: 109/109 |
|
|
|
2016/06/02 13:00:25
Subject: Re:GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Pragmatic Primus Commanding Cult Forces
|
Clearly it's a little sneak peak at what's to come soon. That page shows loyal, intact chapters.
In the coming fluff advancement, the DA will destroy Fenris and cripple the SW. This drives the SW away from the Imperium (although not 100% into the clutches of Chaos either), and they become a ragtag, fleet-based marauding force. As more of a "neutral" force, they cease being loyal dogs and more "lone wolves," like their chapter name has suggested all along. And their new raiding, marauding nature fits the Viking motif better. Expect to see their ally table significantly changed, with Imperial forces becoming less favored, and "bad guy" forces a little more favored across the board.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/06/02 13:05:05
|
|
|
|
2016/06/02 15:09:42
Subject: GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Major
London
|
Except the picture shown wasn't fenris.
|
|
|
|
2016/06/02 15:29:30
Subject: GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Sneaky Striking Scorpion
|
Not sure where that Hammer & Wikan is in Seattle. The only one that comes up when searching is the one in AK.
|
agnosto wrote: To the closet, batman and don't forget the feather duster!
|
|
|
|
2016/06/02 15:54:27
Subject: Re:GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Stubborn Dark Angels Veteran Sergeant
|
gorgon wrote:
Clearly it's a little sneak peak at what's to come soon. That page shows loyal, intact chapters.
In the coming fluff advancement, the DA will destroy Fenris and cripple the SW. This drives the SW away from the Imperium (although not 100% into the clutches of Chaos either), and they become a ragtag, fleet-based marauding force. As more of a "neutral" force, they cease being loyal dogs and more "lone wolves," like their chapter name has suggested all along. And their new raiding, marauding nature fits the Viking motif better. Expect to see their ally table significantly changed, with Imperial forces becoming less favored, and "bad guy" forces a little more favored across the board.
I hate space wolves but that sounds awesome
|
RoperPG wrote:Blimey, it's very salty in here...
Any more vegans want to put forth their opinions on bacon? |
|
|
|
2016/06/02 15:56:36
Subject: GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Haughty Harad Serpent Rider
|
xraytango wrote:Then you may want to educate yourself on the subject, those steel molds are only having soft plastic put through them.
Depends on if they are steel tools. Often steel is not milled when there is a definite end-of-life, as it's much cheaper to use, well, cheaper metals, for tools. Automatically Appended Next Post:
Looks like the much-feared Age of Sigmarification of 40k has begun. Good.
That stat block makes me want to play 40k again, like Age of Sigmar did to reinvigorate my interest in Warhammer.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/06/02 16:00:32
"...and special thanks to Judgedoug!" - Alessio Cavatore "Now you've gone too far Doug! ... Too far... " - Rick Priestley "I've decided that I'd rather not have you as a member of TMP." - Editor, The Miniatures Page "I'd rather put my testicles through a mangle than spend any time gaming with you." - Richard, TooFatLardies "We need a Doug Craig in every store." - Warlord Games "Thank you for being here, Judge Doug!" - Adam Troke |
|
|
|
2016/06/02 16:06:35
Subject: Re:GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
I like this from the retailer terms and conditions:
The BV Products should not be displayed in stores where other products deemed obscene or
inappropriate for customers under 18 years of age are displayed or sold.
As compared to what? Some might consider some of GW's products "obscene or inappropriate for customers under 18".... So, don't sell these products in stores that sell other GW products?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/06/02 16:07:06
Six mistakes mankind keeps making century after century: Believing that personal gain is made by crushing others; Worrying about things that cannot be changed or corrected; Insisting that a thing is impossible because we cannot accomplish it; Refusing to set aside trivial preferences; Neglecting development and refinement of the mind; Attempting to compel others to believe and live as we do |
|
|
|
2016/06/02 16:20:41
Subject: Re:GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
agnosto wrote:I like this from the retailer terms and conditions:
The BV Products should not be displayed in stores where other products deemed obscene or
inappropriate for customers under 18 years of age are displayed or sold.
As compared to what? Some might consider some of GW's products "obscene or inappropriate for customers under 18".... So, don't sell these products in stores that sell other GW products?
I don't think I've ever seen anything I'd consider "obscene" in a hobby shop, unless they have some very obscure statuettes for whatever reason. I wonder what they're trying to refer to?
gorgon wrote:
Clearly it's a little sneak peak at what's to come soon. That page shows loyal, intact chapters.
In the coming fluff advancement, the DA will destroy Fenris and cripple the SW. This drives the SW away from the Imperium (although not 100% into the clutches of Chaos either), and they become a ragtag, fleet-based marauding force. As more of a "neutral" force, they cease being loyal dogs and more "lone wolves," like their chapter name has suggested all along. And their new raiding, marauding nature fits the Viking motif better. Expect to see their ally table significantly changed, with Imperial forces becoming less favored, and "bad guy" forces a little more favored across the board.
That actually sounds like a lot of fun.
|
Black Bases and Grey Plastic Forever:My quaint little hobby blog.
40k- The Kumunga Swarm (more)
Count Mortimer’s Private Security Force/Excavation Team (building)
Kabal of the Grieving Widow (less)
Plus other games- miniature and cardboard both. |
|
|
|
2016/06/02 16:22:14
Subject: Re:GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Sinful Hero wrote: agnosto wrote:I like this from the retailer terms and conditions:
The BV Products should not be displayed in stores where other products deemed obscene or
inappropriate for customers under 18 years of age are displayed or sold.
As compared to what? Some might consider some of GW's products "obscene or inappropriate for customers under 18".... So, don't sell these products in stores that sell other GW products?
I don't think I've ever seen anything I'd consider "obscene" in a hobby shop, unless they have some very obscure statuettes for whatever reason. I wonder what they're trying to refer to?
Totally depends on what you're considering "obscene", but I've definitely seen some stuff at a comic shop that sells GW stuff which I would put under "inappropriate for customers under 18".
|
|
|
|
2016/06/02 17:41:52
Subject: GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard
|
Actually, its not only SW missing from the "chapters of the space marines".
There are no Ultramarines
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/06/02 17:42:59
|
|
|
|
2016/06/02 17:59:42
Subject: GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
judgedoug wrote:
Looks like the much-feared Age of Sigmarification of 40k has begun.
Ah someone who doesn't know what is going on or is trying to make a bad joke.
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
|
|
2016/06/02 18:54:33
Subject: Re:GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
Kanluwen wrote:
Totally depends on what you're considering "obscene", but I've definitely seen some stuff at a comic shop that sells GW stuff which I would put under "inappropriate for customers under 18".
I agree; I personally would consider a great amount of GW's products to be PG13 and the setting in general to be that way but not all people would share my view. What yardstick will GW use to determine if a stockist is compliant with this condition?
Most likely this is just legal garbage thrown into T& Cs for some obscure (to me) reason.
|
Six mistakes mankind keeps making century after century: Believing that personal gain is made by crushing others; Worrying about things that cannot be changed or corrected; Insisting that a thing is impossible because we cannot accomplish it; Refusing to set aside trivial preferences; Neglecting development and refinement of the mind; Attempting to compel others to believe and live as we do |
|
|
|
2016/06/02 19:07:00
Subject: GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
That paint set is fairly cost effective.
|
"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."
This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.
Freelance Ontologist
When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. |
|
|
|
2016/06/02 19:54:19
Subject: Re:GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
I think I want to get some of those Wartrakks so I can take their treads to attach to my Hunter cannons to make Thunderfire Cannons. 100% GW parts, 0% Finecast!
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
|
|
2016/06/02 20:28:00
Subject: Re:GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
casvalremdeikun wrote:I think I want to get some of those Wartrakks so I can take their treads to attach to my Hunter cannons to make Thunderfire Cannons. 100% GW parts, 0% Finecast!
The tracks are the best thing in that kit. I've used them for a variety of conversions over the years.
|
|
|
|
2016/06/02 22:37:50
Subject: GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Agreed.
I wonder do you get full size containers?
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Davor wrote: judgedoug wrote:
Looks like the much-feared Age of Sigmarification of 40k has begun.
Ah someone who doesn't know what is going on or is trying to make a bad joke.
Based on what my buddies who play 40k's current edition say, AoS-ification may not be a bad thing.
Back on topic, the base set is going to be a really good value esp. if you're building an ork force.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2016/06/02 22:40:51
Thread Slayer |
|
|
|
2016/06/02 23:43:19
Subject: GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Sergeant
|
They're like a half or a third of the paint of a normal paint pot. Like 4 ml or something.
|
|
|
|
2016/06/02 23:48:19
Subject: Re:GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
It also shows Dark Angels though
|
|
|
|
2016/06/03 00:43:45
Subject: Re:GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Gargantuan Gargant
|
I didn't see anyone mention this before:
Ork boyz are 4 to a box
Space Marines are 3 to a box
Also there a functioning link to a Storefinder
My two local gaming shops are both carrying it, so looks like I'm in for at least a starter.
|
|
|
|
|
2016/06/03 01:17:53
Subject: GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Monstrous Master Moulder
Space Cowboy Cruising Around Olympus Mons
|
This is excellent! I won't be buying it but the way GW is approaching it and distributing it seems like a good thing! More retailers and getting more kids into the hobby would be excellent.
I'm interested if Michaels or somewhere like that will pick it up. If it goes into big stores I hope it'll be successful!
Someone being hopefully for GW...weird eh?
|
|
|
|
2016/06/03 01:26:59
Subject: Re:GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
That's just their normal Store Finder, the same as the one on the main Games Workshop website. I don't believe it indicates which stores will be carrying the Vedros kits.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
|