Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I know there are some warperson units, but what about getting a solo with the attached[warperson] rule.
Do they activate together as a unit or are they separate?

They are seperate. But most require you to be near the caster for them to work, some B2B

That's what i thought but decided to ask just in case.
Thanks.

I can't think of any Solos that are weapon attachments. Is the someone specific in mind. Unit attachments and Weapon attachments do become part of the unit and must follow all the rules for being part of a unit.

The attached rule is different. It, usually, applies to a War (noun). The attached model does not become part of a caster unit or even part of the caster's battle group.

Are you talking about warcaster units like 3Butcher and his puppies?

 darefsky wrote:
Are you talking about warcaster units like 3Butcher and his puppies?

He's talking about models with the 'Attached' rule, like Cygnar's Squire.

Leo_the_Rat wrote:
I can't think of any Solos that are weapon attachments. Is the someone specific in mind. Unit attachments and Weapon attachments do become part of the unit and must follow all the rules for being part of a unit.

The attached rule is different. It, usually, applies to a War (noun). The attached model does not become part of a caster unit or even part of the caster's battle group.

Unless they're also a Companion like Finch or Deryliss.

Wow so many facets, guess it'll be a while until i can fully grasp all these different rules.

It's not the attached rule that makes them part of the battle group. That takes a different rule- Companion.

 HoverBoy wrote:
Wow so many facets, guess it'll be a while until i can fully grasp all these different rules.

Just remember the words mean exactly what they say. People coming from GW rule sets find this a bit of a change. If something does not specifically say it is part of a battle group or unit it is not.