Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2014/11/21 17:00:58
Subject: New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
Wishing I was back at the South Atlantic, closer to ice than the sun
|
Couldn't see anyone else post this up so if its a doubler, sorry.
DA players are going to be upset methinks;
Page 64 – Power Field Generator
Add ‘If the bearer is embarked upon a Transport vehicle,
the power field’s effects only apply to models embarked
upon that vehicle’.
So no more PFG'd Land Raiders.
Cheers
Andrew
|
I don't care what the flag says, I'm SCOTTISH!!!
Best definition of the word Battleship?
Mr Nobody wrote:
Does a canoe with a machine gun count?
|
|
|
|
2014/11/21 17:48:26
Subject: New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Battlefortress Driver with Krusha Wheel
|
Did the same with the ork KFF, it was only a matter of time as they try and cut back on the power.
|
warhammer 40k mmo. If I can drive an ork trukk into the back of a space marine dread and explode in a fireball of epic, I can die happy!
8k points
3k points
3k points
Admech 2.5k points
|
|
|
|
2014/11/21 17:48:47
Subject: New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
that's the way it was with 6th, no dark angel player will be saddened by this old news, however I am upset it took them this long to put it back up
|
|
|
|
2014/11/21 17:49:12
Subject: New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
Well that seemed to be on the cards from they way they handled all the power fields in the ork codex
(although I'm astounded that GW has actually got round to releasing another FAQ, I thought that department had been laid off they've been so quiet recently)
|
|
|
|
|
2014/11/21 17:59:53
Subject: Re:New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I buy the english books only but for those who purchase translated versions there are more changes. The german errata pack has updates for the rulebook for example
There are also many updates in the LOTR/HOBBIT section
|
|
|
|
2014/11/21 18:36:51
Subject: New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
Wishing I was back at the South Atlantic, closer to ice than the sun
|
Formosa wrote:that's the way it was with 6th, no dark angel player will be saddened by this old news, however I am upset it took them this long to put it back up
I thought in 6th the PFG also affected the LR as well, just no 'bubble'. Now it doesn't even affect the transport vehicle.
Did I miss an old FaQ?
Cheers
Andrew
|
I don't care what the flag says, I'm SCOTTISH!!!
Best definition of the word Battleship?
Mr Nobody wrote:
Does a canoe with a machine gun count?
|
|
|
|
2014/11/21 18:39:05
Subject: New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
I always played the power field like that anyways. Doesn't really bother me that much.
|
|
|
|
|
2014/11/21 20:03:33
Subject: Re:New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Been Around the Block
|
Fateweaver having Daemonologie Malefic now! Sweet
|
|
|
|
2014/11/21 23:12:28
Subject: Re:New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Judgemental Grey Knight Justicar
USA
|
I'm a fan of this change.
|
Check out my list building app for 40K and Fantasy:
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/576793.page |
|
|
|
2014/11/23 09:28:39
Subject: Re:New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
If the power field only affects the models inside it's surely better to lose the vehicle than the squad of badasses inside (though if it's a Land Raider or Thunderhawk I suppose that'd be an upsetting loss lol)
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/11/23 09:29:14
|
|
|
|
2014/11/23 11:10:03
Subject: New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Stubborn Dark Angels Veteran Sergeant
|
Just drive your librarian with PFG up behind the Land Raider on his bike, like you've been doing since the 6th ed FAQ, surely? It's more versatile anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
2014/11/23 12:26:47
Subject: New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
Yep Ian, thats what I do, except I use a techmarine as I can repair the raider too
|
|
|
|
2014/11/23 13:06:46
Subject: New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
oh hey, new FAQs. Maybe they will release one for Lizardmen next year.
|
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
|
|
2014/11/23 14:45:53
Subject: New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
yeah,
Ian Sturrock wrote:Just drive your librarian with PFG up behind the Land Raider on his bike, like you've been doing since the 6th ed FAQ, surely? It's more versatile anyway.
Formosa wrote:Yep Ian, thats what I do, except I use a techmarine as I can repair the raider too
Why havn't I been doing this with my Mek??
Panic...
|
|
|
|
|
2014/11/23 18:01:26
Subject: New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Shrieking Traitor Sentinel Pilot
Burbank, CA
|
Great that they updated fateweaver there, but why no update on the rules for mark of Tzneetch? The reroll 1's is great, but the +3 to LD for manifesting psychic powers is useless in 7th. How does this keep getting overlooked?
|
|
|
|
|
2014/11/23 18:19:59
Subject: New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Sword-Bearing Inquisitorial Crusader
|
skullking wrote:Great that they updated fateweaver there, but why no update on the rules for mark of Tzneetch? The reroll 1's is great, but the +3 to LD for manifesting psychic powers is useless in 7th. How does this keep getting overlooked?
While not overly powerful, the +3 LD does help with perils of the warp tests. So it is far from useless.
|
|
|
|
2014/11/23 20:27:31
Subject: New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
skullking wrote:Great that they updated fateweaver there, but why no update on the rules for mark of Tzneetch? The reroll 1's is great, but the +3 to LD for manifesting psychic powers is useless in 7th. How does this keep getting overlooked?
Because FAQs do not make major changes like that unless the rule is broken.
I would like to see it change in the next daemon book though. Instead of Tzeentch getting easy access to L3 psykers and the mark as it stands, why not cap daemon princes and heralds at ML2, Lords of Change at ML3, and make the Daemon of Tzeentch (daemons of Tzeentch may reroll a single dice when attempting to cast or deny a psychic power)
|
|
|
|
2014/11/23 20:41:04
Subject: New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Gargantuan Gargant
|
work blocked. Would someone be so kind as to just link directly to the PDFs so I can read them ?
|
|
|
|
|
2014/11/23 20:52:36
Subject: New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
|
|
2014/11/23 21:00:24
Subject: Re:New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Gargantuan Gargant
|
Still can't read them. They must have updated their meta tags to include the word "game". In the past I was able to read them as long I went directly to the PDF and bipassed the BlackLibrary wesite.
Thank you for trying.
|
|
|
|
|
2014/11/23 21:18:07
Subject: New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Stealthy Grot Snipa
|
skullking wrote:Great that they updated fateweaver there, but why no update on the rules for mark of Tzneetch? The reroll 1's is great, but the +3 to LD for manifesting psychic powers is useless in 7th. How does this keep getting overlooked?
You're assuming it's unintentional. I don't think that's the case.
Daemons in 6th:
1. Fearless with no disadvantage (can still go to ground).
2. Introduce disadvantage (daemonic instability with low leadership values).
3. This screws over Tzeentch which is based around psychic powers.
4. Introduce special rule to fix Tzeentch's psychic issues.
5. 7th comes out, 3 is no longer an issue and 4 becomes irrelevant.
In short, there's nothing to fix.
|
"The Emporer is a rouge trader."
- Charlie Chaplain. |
|
|
|
2014/11/24 23:59:43
Subject: New FaQs up. Dark Angels and Chaos Daemons.
|
|
Shrieking Traitor Sentinel Pilot
Burbank, CA
|
Thud wrote: skullking wrote:Great that they updated fateweaver there, but why no update on the rules for mark of Tzneetch? The reroll 1's is great, but the +3 to LD for manifesting psychic powers is useless in 7th. How does this keep getting overlooked?
You're assuming it's unintentional. I don't think that's the case.
Daemons in 6th:
1. Fearless with no disadvantage (can still go to ground).
2. Introduce disadvantage (daemonic instability with low leadership values).
3. This screws over Tzeentch which is based around psychic powers.
4. Introduce special rule to fix Tzeentch's psychic issues.
5. 7th comes out, 3 is no longer an issue and 4 becomes irrelevant.
In short, there's nothing to fix.
Well, they usually post a comment saying 'Ignore this particular sentence' if something is no longer relevant. And this seems like an important enough one to mention, as it pertains to a now altered game rule, which effects a bunch of models in the army. They've been pretty good about faq'ing , stuff as of late, so maybe they'll catch it, and make a comment on it one way or another.
|
|
|
|
|
|