Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I've ordered quite heavily. Manynew minions.

 RiTides wrote:
Wow, lots of saltiness in this thread

I'm liking the new rules and cards a lot so far! Some nerfs, but overall really happy with the changes.

Overall I'm fine with most of the nerfs and the new rules, but damn has this release been sloppy as hell and filled with errors. There's already been a lot of errata and rules changes. Black dry erasable tokens in the new battle boxes is a dumb oversight as well.

 Azreal13 wrote:
I'm starting a Legion army and the game for the first time.

I'm definitely considering legion, especially with the new character beast render I posted a few pages back. The Hellmouth looks really fun too, and I've always liked their look in general.

So Precursor Knights, Cosntance Blaiz and Gallant and aren't included the Cygnar Warroom deck? FFS....

I am mostly positive so far, few changes up put down a order for 3 army's today, and a seperate order for each army box :0 too much awesome will be coming !
Otherwise my army's mostly stay similar with a few changes mostly being by choice

Yeah, the war room mercenary/minion changes (restricting things a lot more) seemed a bit unnecessary

I don't understand, when I check the Cygnar deck (that I haven't bought so it's locked) , Constance and the precursor knights are displayed

 .Mikes. wrote:
So Precursor Knights, Cosntance Blaiz and Gallant and aren't included the Cygnar Warroom deck? FFS....

They're in there. I just looked.

Okay, to be fair, I have the full bundle. But under Cygnar Warcasters and Cygnar they show up. Are you sure?

 motyak wrote:
Yeah, the war room mercenary/minion changes (restricting things a lot more) seemed a bit unnecessary

What are you referring to, and are you sure it's not just an initial bug?

For instance, right now in War Room you can't add Goraxes to Arkadius (bug) or add multiple lesser warlocks to an army (bug afaik).

 B0B MaRlEy wrote:
I don't understand, when I check the Cygnar deck (that I haven't bought so it's locked) , Constance and the precursor knights are displayed

Just checked my Menoth deck (still have to buy Mercs), and Idrians show as not purchased, though they show up in the Menoth deck. PP have specifically said that Partisan models will be included in faction decks though, so probably an error.

Circle Mist Rider models:

Oh hello.

OI hang on did they sculpt nuts on dem goats?

i cant unsee it

Well! First Circle release since... oh my gosh... since the release of Mk2 that I want to buy based on looks alone!

The cynic in me says these are going to have all the abilities that were just deleted from the regular Druids.

 lord_blackfang wrote:
Well! First Circle release since... oh my gosh... since the release of Mk2 that I want to buy based on looks alone!

The cynic in me says these are going to have all the abilities that were just deleted from the regular Druids.

I don't know what was deleted from Druids but they have Chain Lightning and Summon Vortex as their magic abilities.

 Desubot wrote:
Oh hello.

OI hang on did they sculpt nuts on dem goats?

i cant unsee it

Quite a few of the Cav models have a detailed undercarriage actually. They're just not usually rearing and showing it off quite so prominently.

I dont recall it on my Goatvhana. maybe i mentally blocked it or something.

Well all the horses I have from PP ARE anatomically correct on that regard
It does look like Goatvahnna's mount is lacking such details though

I don't have any cavalry models so I need you, dear Dakka people, to answer a very, very important question: which percentage of PP's anatomically correct horses are male? I am asking for a friend, ofc.

PLEASE STAY ON TOPIC HERE.

NOTE - 28MM MINIATURE HORSE ANATOMY ISN'T IT.

 ImAGeek wrote:
Circle Mist Rider models:

Oh wow. I might have to start collecting. That just looks awesome. Too bad the experience I had with Troll Blood miniatures turned me off PP and hordes. Was about to start Legion of Everblight. Maybe it's time to get back in. Too bad nobody plays in my area, but starting a collection if the minis are better than the starter set of Blood Trolls, then maybe I will have to reconsider and start collecting again.

 Alpharius wrote:
PLEASE STAY ON TOPIC HERE.

NOTE - 28MM MINIATURE HORSE ANATOMY ISN'T IT.

The fact this had to be said makes me lmao.

 B0B MaRlEy wrote:
I don't understand, when I check the Cygnar deck (that I haven't bought so it's locked) , Constance and the precursor knights are displayed

They're displayed, but they're locked. Like the Mercs section in War Room 1. Just checked and they were available with just the Cygnar deeck in WR1,

The bug report button says 'for bugs and inventory errors' so I emailed them on the chance this is just an oversight.

 Maddermax wrote:

 B0B MaRlEy wrote:
I don't understand, when I check the Cygnar deck (that I haven't bought so it's locked) , Constance and the precursor knights are displayed

Just checked my Menoth deck (still have to buy Mercs), and Idrians show as not purchased, though they show up in the Menoth deck. PP have specifically said that Partisan models will be included in faction decks though, so probably an error.

Just wanted to say that the Partisan bug is now, and are correctly included in their partisan factions deck as well as Mercs Now my one fault I've had with war room is fixed, it's bloody awesome, definitely appreciating the new features

Does anyone know when the new two player starter will be out? My Cryx thirst for reinforcements.

From what I've seen 10th or 16th of August.

Yeah, looks like August. Which is too bad, since I want the new Cygnar battlegroup. Waiting makes too much sense, though, since I also would like the Cryx and the two-player box is therefore a significantly better deal.

Why are there only 3 unique druids out 5?

I hoped new edition would improve sculpts/amount of sculpts as well.

They look pretty, but 2 pairs throw me off, so that`s a pass from me.

3 of 5 is pretty standard.

As a circle player I find them pretty meh, but then again I find the druids pretty meh anyway.

 malfred wrote:
3 of 5 is pretty standard.

It IS standard, but wouldn`t it be nice, if they raised the bar after all these years?