Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I thought it might just be a typo on the online rules for Harry, but after picking up the WD issue, it is not in there either.

Nowhere in his rules does it list that he counts as a hero, a lord, or his mark status.

Or am I just missing something?

I would personally make him a Lord, but there is no rules there. It seems that he was made to be used only for the scenario provided or on agreement with opponents.

Lord, MoCU is how I would / will run him. Good point though, I noticed the same.

As Gav wrote the rules apparently, not totally surprised :S

- Salvage

I guess they will have to do a Harry the Hammer FAQ... coming circa 2012.

I vote lord that cannot be used as a general *nods*

I would say a Lord choice, simply because he costs so much.

What Im curious about is how many people will let an opponent play Harry? Especially undead players. My buddy plays undead and LOVES that his army is all unbreakable and ItP, so Im DYING to bust out with Special Character Harry and watch him have to make leadership tests.

Also, in light of him and the new Deamon book, im VERY curious about the Horde list in the White Dwarf coming up.