Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2014/09/21 23:31:17
Subject: the 7th edition CSM book and their codex specific FOC
|
|
Dakka Veteran
|
So far the codex specific force org charts have been hit and miss, it seems. the Ork FOC was dubious at best, space wolves were a tad bit ridiculous, with 6 HQ slots, but I can see it being useful sometime, and then on the other end of the spectrum, we have Grey Knights with 4 elite slots and ludicrous bonuses to deep-striking, which friends at my FLGS were saying is the best thing about the new book, and would be an auto-take for a long time.
Now, what do we predict GW will do for CSM? FOC swaps are going out of style, so cult troops are likely to not be troops anymore, which turns CSM into Grey Knights with less psychic control, unless you take thousand sons, but GK do that better anyways. I'm thinking it will be the standard CAD with more elite slots, and less of everything else, or maybe, 3 troops, 4 elite, 2 FA/HS and only one HQ slot?
What do we think?
|
I went to Hershey Park in central PA this year, and I have to say I was more than a little disappointed. I fully expected the entire theme park to be make entirely of chocolate, but no. Here in America, we have "building codes," and some other nonsense about chocolate melting if don't store it someplace kept below room temperature. |
|
|
|
2014/09/22 02:24:45
Subject: the 7th edition CSM book and their codex specific FOC
|
|
Blood-Raging Khorne Berserker
|
Probably an extra HS or Elite slot, with no real other changes. They're really crowded spots for CSM, with a lot of good choices in each. Possessed, Termies, cult troops, and maybe even Chosen, in the elite, and havocs, dinobots, oblits, and LRs in the HS. There's a lot of hard decisions in there, and army could really benefit from a little more in those departments.
|
|
|
|
2014/09/22 02:38:59
Subject: the 7th edition CSM book and their codex specific FOC
|
|
Steadfast Grey Hunter
|
I really hope they get some formations involving the cult units. Since the FOC changes are out, I wondered about chaos and dark Angels. As both of them are centered around characters making units troops. Chaos specifically tho, maybe either cult specific formations or supplements. Something to not negate many peoples armies
|
|
|
|
2014/09/22 03:34:28
Subject: Re:the 7th edition CSM book and their codex specific FOC
|
|
RogueSangre
The Cockatrice Malediction
|
If I had to hazard a guess it would most likely be something like - the Chaos Warband detachment is the same as the standard CAD but before deployment roll a D6 and consult the following table:
1. HQ
2. Troops
3. Elites
4. Fast Attack
5. Heavy Support
6. Lord of War
A randomly selected unit from that Force Organization slot is sacrificed to the dark gods. The unit is destroyed. The army's warlord then gains an additional roll on the Chaos Boon table rerolling any Dark Apotheosis results.
|
|
|
|
2014/09/22 15:37:12
Subject: the 7th edition CSM book and their codex specific FOC
|
|
Tunneling Trygon
|
I'm going to guess something along the lines of a 'cult' chart is going to appear. Heavy emphasis on Cultists in troops, no Space Marines as troop choices but gives a bonus such as Elite Objective Secured or respawning Cultists when a unit is destroyed similar to Tyranid Skyblight and Endless Swarm. Something gfluffy but in now way, shape or form actually good.
|
|
|
|
2014/09/22 16:56:20
Subject: Re:the 7th edition CSM book and their codex specific FOC
|
|
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
CSMs offer HUUUUGE possiabilities for detachments. you could literally give each legion it's own detachment
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
|
|
2014/09/22 17:05:18
Subject: Re:the 7th edition CSM book and their codex specific FOC
|
|
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
BrianDavion wrote:CSMs offer HUUUUGE possiabilities for detachments. you could literally give each legion it's own detachment
And then toss in a Renegade detachment on top of it too. That actually might be the best way to represent the Legions properly now that I (rather briefly) think about it. I kind of hope Chapter Tactics turn into FOC charts as well.
|
|
|
|
2014/09/22 17:12:32
Subject: Re:the 7th edition CSM book and their codex specific FOC
|
|
Shrieking Traitor Sentinel Pilot
|
ClockworkZion wrote:BrianDavion wrote:CSMs offer HUUUUGE possiabilities for detachments. you could literally give each legion it's own detachment
And then toss in a Renegade detachment on top of it too. That actually might be the best way to represent the Legions properly now that I (rather briefly) think about it. I kind of hope Chapter Tactics turn into FOC charts as well.
My mind, like a John with a fat wallet, has been blown. I wouldn't be opposed to something like this.
|
|
|
|
|
2014/09/22 17:14:17
Subject: the 7th edition CSM book and their codex specific FOC
|
|
Depraved Slaanesh Chaos Lord
Inside Yvraine
|
+1 HS slots and +1 Elite slots. So that we can maximize our boring competitive mono-build.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/09/22 17:14:31
|
|
|
|
2014/09/22 17:14:59
Subject: Re:the 7th edition CSM book and their codex specific FOC
|
|
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
reiner wrote: ClockworkZion wrote:BrianDavion wrote:CSMs offer HUUUUGE possiabilities for detachments. you could literally give each legion it's own detachment
And then toss in a Renegade detachment on top of it too. That actually might be the best way to represent the Legions properly now that I (rather briefly) think about it. I kind of hope Chapter Tactics turn into FOC charts as well.
My mind, like a John with a fat wallet, has been blown. I wouldn't be opposed to something like this.
It'd be an easy way to slip in extra rules on top of the standard stuff, and influence people to build their armies to better match the way that army normally organizes (like Iron Warriors having more Heavy Support but less Fast Attack options for instance).
|
|
|
|
2014/09/23 10:27:25
Subject: Re:the 7th edition CSM book and their codex specific FOC
|
|
RogueSangre
The Cockatrice Malediction
|
BrianDavion wrote:CSMs offer HUUUUGE possiabilities for detachments. you could literally give each legion it's own detachment
Except for the fact that the studio hates Chaos legions and wishes they would go the way of the squats. CSM are homogeneous warbands that are all represented perfectly by the rules in the current codex. All the fans who keep asking for legions are doing it wrong.
|
|
|
|
|