Latest posts for the thread "Article Discussion: Dakka Modeling FAQ: Airbrushing"

Topic Update

Anonymous — GMT

This is an automated message added by the articles system.

A new article titled FAQ%3A+Airbrushing">Dakka Modeling FAQ: Airbrushing has been added to the dakka articles system.

This message thread is for the discussion of content in the article. Any updates to the article will be automatically added to this thread and (if you are logged in), you can get automatic email updates as and when the article changes by clicking 'Email me when this thread changes' below. If you are the author or have added a lot to the article then it is a good idea to do this to ensure that you maintain control over the content of the article.

If you have anything to add to the article, then just jump in and edit it by going to the actual FAQ%3A+Airbrushing">article page and clicking 'edit' (the link can be found just above the article). If there is no edit link then the article is locked for now, so just add your comments or content to this thread and if they are appropriate and the article owner checks this thread, they should get merged in.

If there is something in the article that you wish to debate, then this is the place to do it. Just hit the reply button and get chatting. You need to be registered and logged in to post in the forums so if you are an anonymous article editor then now would be a great time to register and join in dakka's great forum discussion!

Article Discussion: Dakka Modeling FAQ: Airbrushing

Sarigar — GMT

Pretty good write up for beginning airbrush users. It's a lot better than what info you get with the airbrush and compressor (read: none). I'm still in the beginning phases of using it and it's been pretty entertaining, especially using it without an air pressure regulator.

Another good use for an airbrush is terrain. I can knock out buildings/ruins pretty quick.

All in all, a lot of fun to use.

Article Discussion: Dakka Modeling FAQ: Airbrushing

yakface — GMT

As you gain more experience don't be afraid to take some pictures and add your opinions (and pictures) to the article.

Re:Article Discussion: Dakka Modeling FAQ: Airbrushing

Redbeard — GMT

I've got a couple of questions.

First, I've been airbrushing, using Citadel paints, for three years now, and have never felt the need to add windshield wiper fluid to my paints. I think the acrylic paints with water and they work just fine. This article doesn't really cover why adding wiper-fluid is a good idea. Knowing that using the non-toxic paints and non-toxic water as a thinner means I don't need to buy any expensive ventilation hood system seems good to me, whereas using wiper fluid seems to mean that I need to worry about breathing while painting.

Second, and this is a more general question - what's considered good etiquiette when editing someone else's article? Clearly I disagree with KoNemesis on at least one aspect of the article, but that doesn't necessarily make me right, and it's his article. By the same token, while I have several pictures I could add to this article that demonstrate some of the techiniques described, I don't want to hijack his article. I know one of the strengths of the wiki-article system is the community can add, but some guidelines for what's expected here might be nice, and prevent stepped-upon toes and hurt feelings.

Re:Article Discussion: Dakka Modeling FAQ: Airbrushing

legoburner — GMT

Citadel paints are no longer all non-toxic. The foundation paints especially contain large amounts of lead in their yellow and red (just go look at the pots... they no longer say 'non toxic' whereas older revisions of the citadel paints did). There was some kerfuffel here in the EU about GW paints and their labels due to their lead content too.

The wiki-quette is basically, post a comment in the article discussion area and make your changes to the article. If the changes are rejected by the author they can be debated and then the best compromise can be decided on and used (and this can be enforced by a mod locking the article if needed). In a lot of wikis, information will become outdated or just be plain wrong and so you should never feel any hesitancy about diving in and correcting things. Every now and then, a user will submit an article then never check it again, so it is better to have it updated than to let it rot too!

Article Discussion: Dakka Modeling FAQ: Airbrushing

Stelek — GMT

Question, what do you mean by 'degrading' in regards to airbrushing?

Or more specifically 'degrades'?

Article Discussion: Dakka Modeling FAQ: Airbrushing

Sarigar — GMT

Interesting note about simply adding water. My local shop employees all advise using distilled alcohol as a thinner as it won't afffect the pigment. They advised against water as it did affect the pigment. Good to hear contrary and something I may try in the near future.

Article Discussion: Dakka Modeling FAQ: Airbrushing

Redbeard — GMT

I haven't noticed anything changing with the pigments. I've touched up other mistakes over a airbrushed basecoat with the same paint and can't tell where, so I don't think there's anything to it. Like I said, I've been thinning with just water for a couple years now and see no reason to change now.

Article Discussion: Dakka Modeling FAQ: Airbrushing

Sarigar — GMT

Thanks for the advice. Have you used strictly GW paints or have you used other lines, such a Vallejo to the same effect?

Article Discussion: Dakka Modeling FAQ: Airbrushing

Redbeard — GMT

I've only airbrushed with GW paints. I have them nearby, and after watering them down, I can return the paint to the bottle, unlike those medicine-dropper bottles.

Article Discussion: Dakka Modeling FAQ: Airbrushing

biztheclown — GMT

OK, I am still working on my own articles, but this is my $.02 on the "wiki" aspect of the article system. I think you should go for it. He can always post an "unedited"version of the article on a blog with a link to it in the wiki version if he doesn't like what you do.

For things like typos, I think change away.

For things like other opinions on a subject, I think that if you feel you have something to say, you should feel free to add an "another view by..." section. As a reader of the articles, I think this could be the coolest aspect of the dakka article system and I'd like to see it used more, (including by slacker me.)

As long as you do not include personal attacks you should add pictures and your views freely to the system, without regard for the article's original integrity. If the original writer decides to put different pictures in later, then he could just then move yours to the bottom, or you could.

Just my opinion on this.