<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "dissection of tactical squads weapons."]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/69.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "dissection of tactical squads weapons."]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>dissection of tactical squads weapons.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Tactical squads: a dissection of the use of heavy weapons in Space marine Tactical squads<br /> introduction<br /> Whether you find them useful, or hate them to point of oblivion, everyone has to respect the useful and flexibility of a tactical squad. They’re so powerful, considering their stats, and their weapons.<br /> <br /> Aim<br /> The intention of the article is to Give an objective POV on the weapons used by Tactical marines<br /> <br /> Basic equipment: active<br /> Bolter:<br /> An essential piece of gear, and by far one of the best weapons available to the imperial army <br /> <br /> Good points:<br /> Acceptable strength, dependable, fairly good rifle acceptable range <br /> <br /> Bad points<br /> Range when moving, can’t fire into assault<br /> <br /> Bolt-pistol<br /> Essentially the best risk-free pistol-grade weapon available to the imperium, great for charging into combat, and create a great tactical asset for infantry. <br /> <br /> Good points<br /> Acceptable strength, dependable, fires into assault, Pistol <br /> <br /> bad points<br /> Range<br /> <br /> Basic equipment: passive<br /> Frag and Krak grenades<br /> Frag grenades are pretty much useless during the main course of combat, and even in an assault almost uncalled upon, but when they’re needed, they’re great. Their only real purpose is to stop assaulting marines from loosing their initiative when charging through dangerous terrain, whereas a Krak grenade allows infantry to resolve anti-tank results at strength 6, broadening their ability to cause damage to hard targets. <br /> <br /> Good points<br /> Free to almost all marines, essentially useful when needed, no risks, only benefits (however slight) <br /> <br /> Bad points<br /> There are no bad points to these grenades, they’re basically useful and free, therefore no problem can come of them.<br /> <br /> Power armour<br /> Best available protection across almost all armies at least for a basic marine this armour is better then most. <br /> <br /> Good points<br /> Free basic armour, excellent for increased survivability. <br /> <br /> Bad points<br /> None known of.<br /> <br /> Specialists weapons<br /> Flamer<br /> The free specialist weapon, acceptable strength, ability to deny both cover and armour saves while killing high-amounts of troops <br /> <br /> good points<br /> Acceptable strength, never misses, potentially hits a lot of troops, denies cover and a 3rd of armour saves. <br /> <br /> Bad points<br /> Terrible range, even if it’s template.<br /> <br /> Meltagun<br /> The best a marine can get. This weapon is for specialist as Chainsword is for assault. very powerful, with the potential to kill almost anything with one shot. <br /> <br /> Good points<br /> Excellent strength, can fire into assault, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(1);'>2D6</span> armour pen. Fairly cheap. <br /> <br /> Bad points<br /> Only it’s bad range.<br /> <br /> Plasma rifle<br /> The very top in infantry killer, even if it can be dangerous for it’s user. <br /> <br /> Good points<br /> Better then your average rifle, sears through armour and can instant kill quite a few troops. <br /> <br /> Bad points<br /> Mediocre range when moving, expensive, has Gets hot N: being a marine, the chance of getting killed by gets hot is 2/36 which is very miniscule. Meaning it’s not that much of a worry, but it’s still important to note it.<br /> <br /> Heavy specialist weapons<br /> Heavy bolter<br /> Good for taking out hordes, and fairly effective at it but it’s surpassed by the other weapons available. <br /> <br /> Good points<br /> High rate of fire, range, free. <br /> <br /> Bad points<br /> Comparatively weak compared to other free weapons<br /> <br /> Missile launcher<br /> The main-stray heavy weapon of the space marines, it is capable of more then one fire mode, and equally effective against weaker tanks and smaller horde-type armies (such as guard.) <br /> <br /> Good points<br /> Good against light vehicles and smaller horde enemies, excellent range, free. <br /> <br /> Bad points<br /> Not too specialised, meaning it can have difficulty killing any enemy it’s faced against on it’s complement, it’s by far the most flexible weapon available.<br /> <br /> multi-melta<br /> Potentially high killing power, and much better at it then it’s younger cousin, yet also not as effective. <br /> <br /> Good points<br /> Better range then Meltagun, free. <br /> <br /> Bad points<br /> Poor range for a heavy weapon.<br /> <br /> Plasma cannon<br /> Need killing power for small armoured contingencies like terminators? Look no further then the great plasma cannon, a personal favourite, and by far one of the most deadly anti-infantry weapons around. Despite the ‘Gets Hot!’ special rule, it’s the best possible rule available. I suggest it to any budding commander who trusts hid <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(24);'>D6</span> not to get a 1. <br /> <br /> Good points<br /> Excellent range, blast weapon at S7, AP2 great for both heavily armoured units like terminators and for light tanks like rhinos and predators <br /> <br /> Bad points<br /> The Gets hot! Special rule could loose your asset. <br /> <br /> Lascannon<br /> Need anti-tank menace? I suggest a lascannon. Lascannons are very powerful for infantry weapons, but are probably less effective then a plasma cannon against soft targets in hordes, but it’s worth using against, say, a terminator lord and any tank has something to look out for. <br /> <br /> Good points<br /> It’s Range, strength and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(6);'>AP</span>. <br /> <br /> Bad points<br /> High point cost, low horde-killing power.<br /> <br /> This is my own ideals, and may change between people. Don’t take my words on such rules as gets hot for granted, as there is still a chance a trooper will die.<br /> <br /> Hope this is useful!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/284050/1408015.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/284050/1408015.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:53:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Captain Solon]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>dissection of tactical squads weapons.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Their weapon options are ok, but its their rules that set them apart, I think you should add in <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(8);'>atsknf</span> and combat squads to this summary.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/284050/1408778.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/284050/1408778.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:00:01]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ CKO]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re:dissection of tactical squads weapons.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ You might add that lascannon's have their usefulness greatly diminished by the prevalence of cover saves in this edition.  In almost all cases you are better off with a missile launcher.  You pay 80 less points per squad for the weapon and only lose 1 strength for penetration purposes.<br /> <br /> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/284050/1409190.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/284050/1409190.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:00:52]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Halsfield]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>dissection of tactical squads weapons.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Lascannons don't cost 80 points.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/284050/1409623.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/284050/1409623.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:36:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Kingsley]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>dissection of tactical squads weapons.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Regardless of points, lascannons are less than ideal for their cost. <br /> <br /> I run <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(330);'>MM</span>, <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(331);'>PC</span> and <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(328);'>ML</span>.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/284050/1409803.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/284050/1409803.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:18:46]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ kaptaink]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>dissection of tactical squads weapons.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ missile is bropably´the best  weapond begose it dont make alloys to squad to engage apc and infandry]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/284050/1409814.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/284050/1409814.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:29:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Devastator]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>dissection of tactical squads weapons.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Devastator wrote:</cite>missile is bropably´the best  weapond begose it dont make alloys to squad to engage apc and infandry</div></blockquote>In English next time please.<br /> <br /> A nice little write-up. Solon, I'd suggest altering the format slightly so it's easier to read, add some proper headings, full stops, and the like.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/284050/1410092.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/284050/1410092.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:28:52]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ unbeliever87]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>dissection of tactical squads weapons.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ was originally an article <br /> (i.e. they did have headings) but I wanted a response, so I wrote it up here.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/284050/1410140.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/284050/1410140.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:21:42]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Captain Solon]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>dissection of tactical squads weapons.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><div><cite>Fetterkey wrote:</cite>Lascannons don't cost 80 points.</div></blockquote><br /> <br /> notice the spot where i say "per squad" ie a squad of 4x lascannon havocs.  I was talking about the point difference (lascannon weapon costs - xxxx weapon cost) between the two weapons as well, not the total cost of a lascannon.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/284050/1425637.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/284050/1425637.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:51:50]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Halsfield]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>dissection of tactical squads weapons.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hal, this is aimed at tactical squads, i.e. <span class="glossaryitem" onmouseover='gp(95);'>MEQ</span> marines.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/284050/1425659.page</guid>
				<link>http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/284050/1425659.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:08:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Captain Solon]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>