Switch Theme:

Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit  [RSS] 

Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 17:15:14


Post by: Tzeentchling9


What with the prices of Island of Blood and Assault on Black Reach, how is GW really planning to get new players(or rather their parent's money) into the hobby?

At my local GW, new people who walk into the store to see what the hobby is about generally get a quick overview of the game and a demo game with either starter set if they have about 20 mins. After which they are asked if they think it might be something that they might be interested in and the starter set they just used is suggested.

Now, with the price hike on AoBR and the high cost of IoB, I envision many, parents grabbing their child, leaving the store, and never returning. I know I probably would do the same if it was my 12-13 year old getting offered the set, or even if I was 16-17 year old with my own money trying to be introduced via a starter set. Thoughts?


On a side note, anyone else get the feeling that the starter sets are so expensive because of us damn veterans kept buying them to save some money?


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 17:21:04


Post by: Petite Francois


Hey there, thanks for the post. Didn't realize the price for Assault on Black Reach went up. It's still a nice deal, but it scares me a little. Black Reach's price was one of the few things 40K'ers seemed to agree was a very fine thing. I wish they could have held off the price hike a bit longer, but I guess times are hard...

Be well Tzeentchling9! Nice avatar by the way!
Frankie


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 17:24:13


Post by: Dashofpepper


How much does an AoBR cost now?

*EDIT* I just looked on GW's website and see that its $90.....HOLY HELL!

I paid $60 per box x4 two years ago.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 17:26:00


Post by: Catyrpelius


People still seem to be buying them, you just have to bear in mind that the starter sets come with alot of stuff, and its still the cheapest way to get into either game.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 17:26:24


Post by: Tzeentchling9


AoBR is 90 USD.

IoB is 99 USD.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 17:27:13


Post by: Darkness


$90 for AoBR and $99 for isle of blood


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 17:34:29


Post by: HiveFleet


well, still look at what you get

2x units of 20 clanrats = $64
1 warlord = $12
1 warlock = $12
warpfire thrower = $15
Plague Mortar = $15
2 Rat Ogres = $30 (minus the giant rats from the old set)

= $148 for the rats alone.

High Elves.

Griffon = $45 if you are lucky
Swordmaster = now plastic? $35 +
Sea Guard = now plastic? $25 +
Ellyrian reavers = now plastic? $25+
mage = $12 +

= $142 for the high elves, estimated conservatively.

so, we are looking at $300 worth of Models alone for a $99 set? I am still impressed, and I think its a great deal.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 17:40:01


Post by: Tzeentchling9


I know it's a great deal in comparison to all that you get out of it, but 100 USD is an awful lot to drop at once for a parent/teen just introduced to the hobby.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 17:42:39


Post by: R3con


Yep when you add it up like that it looks great, but in reality your asking the parents to drop $100 on something their kid was just "sold"

And as a parent of a teen age boy I can tell you his interests, and the interests of his friends change every single week it seems.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 17:42:58


Post by: agnosto


The problem with them having only one such set per new edition of rules is that they lose out on sales to people that could care less about the two armies they're trying to pawn off on us.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 17:54:40


Post by: Scott-S6


GBP60. That's one and half xbox games. Seems pretty reasonable to me for what you get.

Especially considering that the other fantasy rulebook is GBP45.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 17:59:00


Post by: Reecius


I' sure GW did market research to find the sweet spot of maximizing sales and profit. I highly doubt their market researches just tossed a dart at a list of prices and went with what popped up.

A lot of big boxed games cost that much these days, anyway.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 18:19:52


Post by: 12thRonin


Yeah, but those are generally complete games and not ones that require multiple hundreds of more dollars dropped on them.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 18:25:21


Post by: agnosto


Yeah, you get like 500-600 points for $90? An average game in 40k is 1500-2000....


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 18:30:27


Post by: Sergeant Horse


the prices are fine to me, you get over $300 worth of mini's in it, a rulebook (which retails $60 or $74.25) templates and dice another $10-12)

Most parents I see jump at the chance to get their kids into it as long as you explain to them that its about the hobby aspect as well, modelling, painting AND playing, not just playing a quick 1 hour game. that $100 boxset, gives you about a month's worth of building and painting alone.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 18:32:27


Post by: Gitzbitah


I wonder if this will lead to a swing in the other direction. Will GW go backwards, and release a conservative starter set for the next edition, say 20-30 models a side at around the 50 dollar mark?

It would make it much more approachable for new players, but far less desirable for older players- unless they skimp on the basics and keep the exclusive 'holy grail' units like the deffkoptas. It could be just as engaging, especially if they invested the time to create some training scenarios like Battle for Macragge. Heck, with their new online delivery system they could just release PDF scenarios for what you can do with the boxed set.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 18:40:39


Post by: Belphegor


Wasn't the original Space Hulk about 60 dollars in the late 80s?
I seem to remember earning money and buying it as a young-one. (yeah, what's up paper route)

A Ben to get in is more (as in better) than fair.
As a comparison most video games cost about 50 dollars.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 18:44:29


Post by: MVBrandt


Spectacularly failtastic business practices rear their ugly heads again.

Just have people join a "club" when they buy their first box using a photo ID to add their basic data points to the system, and connect the system electronically, and get it 50% off when they do. Then you can milk the veterans, and entice the starters. You also get all the newbs into the e-mail chain for updates / newsletters / etc.

GW Corporate must be the most toxic, back-biting, politically charged work environment ... with way too much "power" in the hands of way too disparate a selection of executives and designers ... b/c the business approaches they come up with are in no way sensible, lean, or focused.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 19:00:26


Post by: Shas'O Dorian


Eh it seems like a ton of money but keep inflation in mind. 5 years ago I could buy a candy bar for 50 cents (USD) now they're up to $1 money just doesn't go as far as it used to.

Beside its still a great deal and with the rise of video games, board and table top games are hurting. I mean a standard set of risk runs for $45+.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 19:04:55


Post by: MVBrandt


GW costs have actually materially decreased in the last decade, due to their advancement to better crafting techniques and a larger plastic line.

Don't let 'em kid you.

The problem is complex, and relates to everything from a really bass-ackward business acumen to overinflated/politically-retained staffs of underpaid-but-too-plentiful-and-undermotivated ... what "geeks" I guess ... the writers/rules people/etc.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 19:14:57


Post by: Frazzled


As a parent I would say "hey its your money, your funeral."


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 19:15:57


Post by: evilsponge


This isn't inflation at work, just good old fashioned price gouging. Just because the the same models would cost over 300 to buy separately doesn't make them a deal if the customer feels like they're getting taken for a ride, which most new customers will assume. Its alot easier to plop down 60 bucks for the newest halo whatever game and play with a bunch of friends, than it is to drop 100 big ones (thats a lot for kid) on a game not many people have heard of. Thats before you even begin to invest the additional money and man hours needed to paint and assemble before you can even start playing.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 19:20:27


Post by: caddock


Shas'O Dorian wrote:Eh it seems like a ton of money but keep inflation in mind. 5 years ago I could buy a candy bar for 50 cents (USD) now they're up to $1 money just doesn't go as far as it used to.

Beside its still a great deal and with the rise of video games, board and table top games are hurting. I mean a standard set of risk runs for $45+.


More like 25. http://www.hasbro.com/risk/default.cfm?page=Products/Detail&product_id=22163 and I see it in stores for 19.99 all the time. In Canada, AoBR is $108 and IoB is $118.75. I can buy 5 copies of risk for that.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 19:23:11


Post by: Belphegor


Hmmm.
My 60 dollar Space Hulk run through the CPI Inflation Calculator says: 2010 -- $105.57 dollar Space Hulk.
Which came with less stuff than the new fantasy box set.

Yeah, I'm not feeling the price gouge.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 19:29:10


Post by: PanamaG


People act like GW products are as required as bread and milk.

You cant really gouge a luxury product. If people dont want it they will live with out it, so will you.

Vocal minority at its finest.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 19:33:39


Post by: Andrew1975


In many ways $100 is not alot of money for what you get. Sure. Try to tell that to anyone who isn't used to GW sticker shock. I can see it now "Well $100 is a deal compared to this box of blood crushers 3 for $52". GW pricing is off the hook. When I started it was a cheap and fun hobby ($18 for 30 marines). My friends and I in high school and college payed because it was relatively cheap (yes we still complained about some prices back then too). We had multiple armies in 40k, Epic, and warhammer, not to mention things like chaos warbands (kind of like mordhiem). Armies were smaller back then and for giant battles we played spacemarine/epic.

Yes I talk the talk and walk the walk. I have not bought anything new from GW in years, Thanks ebay. And yes stilll play.

Every time I hear people stick up for GW pricing and practices in general I get the douche chills. I cant wait to see how Mantic's pricing plays out vs GW.

Lets face it If Hasbro was making this game these miniatures would be cheap cheap cheap. Lets look at the costs. GI joe action figures cost about as much as GW miniatures. 5 GI joes in a box for $20, the Joes have many more pieces, are pre painted and assembled and are much bigger. (not that i would want pre paints or pre assembled....but its still a cost). Space marines 10 for $40, its just a few sprues of plastic.

GW needs to get real. If the retail stores are not making you money close them, why should customers have to pay the cost of you running retail stores? I really cant figure out how they were doing ok at $1 a miniature and now at $4 they are struggling?

Luxury product my a@@, its a hobby go to a model shop and see what miniatures cost there. Same with forgeworld resin $20 for 10 bolters and some bayonets. By those standards my old $18 dollar box was worth $60 just in bolters. What a load.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 19:36:55


Post by: Redbeard


The vending machine at my office just had a 30% price increase on everything in it.

$100 just isn't what $100 was before. Still, if two kids go in on it together, it ends up being less than a video-game each. I think these starter sets are designed to buy with someone else.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 19:48:29


Post by: General Hobbs




There is no such thing as price gouging. In a free market, you are free to sell your products at whatever price you want. The consumer is free to buy whatever products he wants. Price Gouging to gamers means they aren't selling the products to me at the prices they want.

I'll tell you what will change GW's tune.....

Get the tournament scene to drop the Citadel Only rule. When players start shopping at other companies for orcs and elves and Shock Troops, and get them cheaper, then GW will have to change its business practices.

The only negative result will be you can't play at a GW store or the Las Vegas GT. Big deal.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 19:50:26


Post by: Reecius


GW has a worldwide network of stores. Multiple games that has been going strong for over 20 years. Books, video games, accessories and all kinds of other bs all under their IP.

They get massive web traffic for terms related to their IP.

They have legions of devoted fans.

They spend about NO money on advertising.

Are they perfect? No.

Are they idiots? No.

They are the most successful company in their vertical, ever. That says a lot.

While other game companies come and go like the turning of the tides, GW trucks on through thick and thin and continue to innovate and grow.

They have done this because they run their company like a business which upsets some people who seem to think a game company should be an NPO. They have made mistakes, but they have overcome them consistently.

So anyway, these discussions about GW's business practices are always pointless. A bunch of people with limited information and big opinions all chime in as if they were experts when none of us really know the entire story.

I am sure new people will continue to get into the hobby as they have since the 80's. Some will stay and dump thousands into the hobby like most of us. Some will go after a year and sell their crap on eBay. And through it all, people will always complain (as is their right) about prices.

Same old story and yet pretty much everyone continues to buy the stuff.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 19:51:24


Post by: Hordini


While it is quite a bit more expensive than the Black Reach and Skull Pass sets were originally, the 3rd edition 40k boxed set was like $75 back when I got into the hobby when I was like 14 or something, and it had waaaay less stuff than any of them. It had 10 marines, a landspeeder, and 20 Dark Eldar warriors, ruined buildings and plastic trees, plus rulebook and dice and all the accessories. If they could sell that for $75 back then, I bet they'll get away with selling this for close to $100 now.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 19:52:27


Post by: Belphegor


Yeah 17 dollars for a blood crusher is a great deal for that model.
Especially when you compare it to the original bulldog Juggernaut of Khorne for 12 dollars (approximate 1989 price).
20 years and a 5 dollar increase... wait a second that's 4 dollars less than inflation for a better model... well I just got gouged.

Where GW prices don't line up is in some of their older in-production minis. Like the Necron Immortals.

...and GI Joes aren't models, they are bulk produced toys.
GW models are a little below market in comparison to other serious model kits.

That 30 space marine kit was not the standard, nor the Ork or IG.
The old metals have a level of detail that could be compared to the new plastic kits.
Their old metal models are the standard of comparison, which were around 4 dollars for a single piece infantry model 2 decades ago.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 19:57:15


Post by: Mattlov


Tzeentchling9 wrote:I know it's a great deal in comparison to all that you get out of it, but 100 USD is an awful lot to drop at once for a parent/teen just introduced to the hobby.


But it isn't just $100. It's a $100 for the box.

Not included are the snippers, glue and files you need to assemble the miniatures, either. Hopefully they wouldn't be so silly as to buy them at the GW, but you know the salespeople will push newbies into doing just that.

So we are up to $150.

You need some sort of case to carry those minis in, you don't want them damaged and broken!

Wham! Another $75 bucks.

THIS is how GW robs people.

Your $100 starter just got them $225 for the other stuff you "need."


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 19:59:15


Post by: porkuslime


It reminds me of the time the local pet store had hamsters on sale, and my 3 year old talked Dad into buying one..

$4 for the Hamster..
$90 for the environment, bedding, food etc..



Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 20:06:31


Post by: Sergeant Horse


This topic is pointless, its the same people who like complainging about prices and whatnot, I think Reecius said it best, its a business, deal with with it.

As one of the guys who frequents my store said to someone he heard complaining about the prices, "if you think it costs too much, then your probably in the wrong hobby."


Automatically Appended Next Post:
also, comparing them to Mantic doesn't work, I've seen Mantics models, and most of them are nothing compared to the newer GW stuff, their skeletons have about 4 poses max, are mainly one pieces and are so boring and static looking.

Comparable company models would be Privateer, and its also got comparable prices, but then, nobody ever complains about them


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 20:26:33


Post by: Shas'O Dorian


caddock wrote:http://www.hasbro.com/risk/default.cfm?page=Products/Detail&product_id=22163 and I see it in stores for 19.99 all the time. In Canada, AoBR is $108 and IoB is $118.75. I can buy 5 copies of risk for that.


Wow my local store is just being insulting then, time to have a word with them. . .


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 20:26:38


Post by: Andrew1975


The production that goes into a video game is massive. With GW products you do alot of the production, you have to pay for the paint, glue and other products . You get alot of playability with a video game, especially when you consider on line play. I know people that have easily racked up hours, days, weeks playing video games. How often do most people play more than a couple games of GW products a week? Comparing a video game to GW is apples and oranges.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 20:42:02


Post by: evilsponge


Sergeant Horse wrote:This topic is pointless, its the same people who like complainging about prices and whatnot, I think Reecius said it best, its a business, deal with with it.

As one of the guys who frequents my store said to someone he heard complaining about the prices, "if you think it costs too much, then your probably in the wrong hobby."


I hope the store manager didn't hear that guy belittling his customers opinions. We've had problems with people who do the same thing, they drive business away.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 20:42:37


Post by: mikhaila


Sorry, but I'm laughing my ass off right now at you guys. So much talk about business strategies, and why a set with over 300.00 in stuff is overpriced at 100.00)

I can walk upstairs and watch parent after parent drop 100.00 on videogames all day long. And then watch the kids trade them in a week later for 20 bucks in store credit. Or walk over to TRU and take a look at what the average parent is buying as they walk out. 100.00 is nothing these days.

I've got 50 of these on order, and will probably up it to 100 now that I've gotten a closer look at the set today. You guys can speculate and play business expert all you want. I've got to make decisions on this game that affect me putting food on the table for my family, and I think the thing is going to sell great.

Back to the negative pontification, don't let me slow you down.)


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 20:52:05


Post by: njpc


We all complain about prices but facts are facts. GW and minature gaming is not meant to be a cheap hobby. Period. Its not like we are buying food or things of necessity. So its up to everyone where you draw the line. If you think the cost gets to high, don't buy it, go buy a video game consult, the game, the power strip, the tv, etc. Its the same argument!

Whatever your hobby is your going to drop cash to do it. Your a gamer. You switch to a new system, you need: the rules, the models, maybe templates, paints, glue, etc. Maybe you have another hobby game, so you have a case and all that stuff. Compare that too...

I go buy a PS3. So I hook it up to my TV guess what I spent to do that? $200 for the PS4, $45-50 a game, the cost for the TV $600 that I paid 3 years ago, the power strip, a weekly cable bill... hey i'm over the $300 for the hobby set...

Just my opinion, its all relative. I like my little plastic men. I have my armies, they have brought me years of fun, entertainment, and met a few good friends. That worth it to me. I also recognize, its not worth it to others, and I hope they find something they enjoy.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 21:00:14


Post by: Hellfury


Belphegor wrote:Hmmm.
My 60 dollar Space Hulk run through the CPI Inflation Calculator says: 2010 -- $105.57 dollar Space Hulk.
Which came with less stuff than the new fantasy box set.

Yeah, I'm not feeling the price gouge.


You need to recalibrate the calculator then since the price you are basing the inflation off of was not $60. It was $40. Second edition was $50-$60 (I am not sure what was actual MSRP for second edition because all the shops I frequented at that time had it for varying cost between the two).

That same CPI claculator says that same $40 in 1989 is now worth $70.

There is no contest however that the products within the third edition are head and shoulders above previous editions in quality. Though I have not had a problem with tilewarpage in 1st or 2nd editions as I do with 3rd edition, so I am going to side with price gouging here.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 21:04:46


Post by: Andrew1975


Yeah 17 dollars for a blood crusher is a great deal for that model.
Especially when you compare it to the original bulldog Juggernaut of Khorne for 12 dollars (approximate 1989 price).
20 years and a 5 dollar increase... wait a second that's 4 dollars less than inflation for a better model... well I just got gouged.

Where GW prices don't line up is in some of their older in-production minis. Like the Necron Immortals.

...and GI Joes aren't models, they are bulk produced toys.
GW models are a little below market in comparison to other serious model kits.

That 30 space marine kit was not the standard, nor the Ork or IG.
The old metals have a level of detail that could be compared to the new plastic kits.
Their old metal models are the standard of comparison, which were around 4 dollars for a single piece infantry model 2 decades ago.


Juggernaut of Khone was not 12 Dollars in 1989 i've still got one in a blister from after 1993 $7.99. Expensive at the time because it was a big heavy chunk of solid metal. Metal is expensive or at least that is always the excuse that GW gives. So now they are plastic and more expensive...yes detail is better, but technology has improved vastly, detail should be better. I very much doubt they were using cad in the old shops which cuts down on design time.

GI Joes are pretty detailed now. Each one is made up many more parts that any GW miniature. Hasbro nips them off the sprue, assembles them and paints them. GW just molds them and puts them in a box.

The plastic is cheap.....i mean really cheap, size really should play no part of pricing. Production is minimal. The most expensive part has to be design. Spread that out ove the run......lets say imperial guard cadians. Now of course I dont have the numbers, but i bet they have sold 20 times more boxes of cadians then they ever sold of the old RTB marines. Yet they still raise the price on them.

Why? Because GW hears a few people who have no idea what a great company GW used to be, make crazy comparisons (the old metal blood crusher was $50 so these plastic ones are a steal). If GW thinks they can get away with a price increase they will. Everyone of you that supports GW's price gouging is just telling them to continue to raise prices.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 21:13:39


Post by: Hulksmash


Ahhh, I can remember Khorne Juggernaught riding Space Marines that cost $20 in 1995. Juggernaught and rider are both ass in comparison to now. And a $3 reduction, for lighter and more resilient models 15 years later is totally gouging......

It's a business. If the market will bear it then it's not gouging. As for getting in new players it's the job of vets who love their hobby to bring it to more people too. If you don't enjoy GW or their prices then don't sweat it. Find something else. New blood will keep coming in. Brought in by people who enjoy the hobby. The more I look at it it's the people that have been "playing for 20+ years" (use condescending voice here) that have the most problem with the current set-up. You can't make most vets happy so GW doesn't try anymore.

And having sold Video games and GW product I can tell you parents truly like the idea of GW more even though it costs more. Especially if little timmy has a friend getting into it too. Personal experience only. But consistant with people I know still doing it.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 21:19:11


Post by: aka_mythos


mikhaila wrote:Sorry, but I'm laughing my ass off right now at you guys. So much talk about business strategies, and why a set with over 300.00 in stuff is overpriced at 100.00)
I'm not going to argue the business side of it. Fools and money... and too many parents are fools. I'd argue the philosophical view on this and say its not that players are getting $300 worth of models for a $100 its that players overpay by $200 for $100 worth of models adding to GW's sentiments that they can get even more. Great deal and nice models. I can't blame GW for milking the hobby like they do, but its simple statistics that higher prices on entry level products constrains entry even if only a little.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 21:26:09


Post by: Andrew1975


"it's not supposed to be a cheap hobby", Why not, it was many years ago, metal got expensive so they switched to plastic which is cheaper. What about the game screams it should be expensive. It's plastic army men!!!

"It was always expensive, you knew that getting into". No, no it wasn't at all, I used to get 6 sometimes 7 metal marauder dark elves in a blister for $5.50 (which I still think look great compared to the plastic dark elf warriors we have today...crap). It's plastic army men!!!!

Again in a company like Hasbro put out the same product it would be much cheaper....they would have had movies out years ago to get people into it (even mutant chronicles got a movie, it sucked, but still) and it would be selling like hotcakes. But how many of you would want that? You want to feel like some kind of geek elitists, classic problem in this community. If it was cheap and popular you might actually have to deal with ........normal people.

Please dont tell me how a big company like hasbro would ruin the game. The game has already been streamlined to the point where it is no longer a tactical game. Its all about suicide melta groups anyway.

Mantics first miniatures are not gold standard? Well for first miniatures they are. I'd put them up against alot of gw multipose but really only one straight standing pose works miniatures.



Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 21:28:07


Post by: Ulven


I'm of the belief that this starter set is adequately priced. However, if they somehow raise it by another $20 or so then I may change my mind...


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 21:42:37


Post by: Belphegor


I guess in response to Hellfury & Andrew1975 I will have to raise my fist and -scream- "Damn you allied hobbies!"
(Though I may be wrong about the price I paid for Space Hulk.)

Does anyone remember the MSRP on the Metal Terminators and Patriarchs from 1989?

-typo edit-


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 21:47:11


Post by: Hellfury


Belphegor wrote:I guess in response to Hellfury & Andrew1975 I will have to raise my fist and screw "Damn you allied hobbies!"
(Though I may be wrong about the price I paid for Space Hulk.)

Does anyone remember the MSRP on the Metal Terminators and Patriarchs from 1989?


I do recall the price for the genestealer patriarch. $7.50 for the running patriarch and came with 3 genestealer familiars.
I cant help you with the metal terminators though. The earliest price for them I recall was during late second edition when they were $35. Orginal RT termies I have no idea about.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 22:09:28


Post by: agnosto


Back in the day you didn't see 50-man blobs of IG and it didn't take the Ork player an hour to move his bazillion greenskins across the board. That's the difference to me, the size of the game has increased....the game tables feel a lot smaller now.




Damn, I'm old.


Edit:
As to the rising prices, etc. I'll continue to pay until it's not fun anymore then I'll dump all my toys in the trash.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 22:19:56


Post by: grizgrin


Reccius' post = truth, justice, and win. Vote with your wallets people, as that is the only tru epower you have to influence GW. Find a herd to swim with, mebbe you can do sometyhing as a mass. Caue GW dont give a clanrat's ass about you as an individual. They are a business.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 22:34:39


Post by: warboss


HiveFleet wrote:well, still look at what you get

2x units of 20 clanrats = $64
1 warlord = $12
1 warlock = $12
warpfire thrower = $15
Plague Mortar = $15
2 Rat Ogres = $30 (minus the giant rats from the old set)

= $148 for the rats alone.

High Elves.

Griffon = $45 if you are lucky
Swordmaster = now plastic? $35 +
Sea Guard = now plastic? $25 +
Ellyrian reavers = now plastic? $25+
mage = $12 +

= $142 for the high elves, estimated conservatively.

so, we are looking at $300 worth of Models alone for a $99 set? I am still impressed, and I think its a great deal.


it's not THAT accurate. you're comparing some metal models with plastics (which are generally cheaper) and also comparing current multi-pose plastics with mono-pose snap together kits. while the starter set minis are nice, they're worth LESS than their normal line equivalents (see the secondary market and you'll see how much less aobr marines/dreads and orks go for compared with the normal kits). starter sets should be a loss leader to get people INTO the hobby; you then proceed to suck them dry until they give up.

is it still a good buy compared to the normal plastic line? sure. will it convince someone who isn't planning on playing skaven or high elves to drop $100 on it to just try the rules set? less likely than if they had priced it at a current gen video game price of $60. i was planning on buying the new fantasy set but don't plan to now at $100. i'd rather just get a small rulebook on ebay or a local store that is willing to split the box up instead. two other 40k players i know were thinking about trying it but won't now that the price has been announced.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 22:51:58


Post by: Ailaros


evilsponge wrote:This isn't inflation at work, just good old fashioned price gouging.

No, it's "price correction". At no point did GW claim that their across-the-board 50% price hikes were because of inflation. As for gouging, I think you've taken for granted how cheap it was for so long. Yes, I said it, GW has been keeping their prices LOW all these years, thus the increase now.

As mentioned, everything else in the world has gotten a lot more expensive over time. The price of rice has quadruped in the last 5 years, the price of gold has tripled, the price of gas has doubled. The fact that GW went for 5 years without much rise in prices and then only increased by 50% actually makes their price hike CHEAP in comparison to everything else.

Yeah, hiking the prices all at once may or may not have been a good idea, and yes, increasing price will make it harder for people to start new armies (so will things like the global recession). That said, it's hard to balk at spending $90 on a starter set for your child when it costs you and your spouse and your child $30 to go to a movie nowadays.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 22:52:48


Post by: H.B.M.C.


As has been said a billion times here - new players don't know what the old prices were, so this is the only price as far as they are concerned. That's why it will sell.

HiveFleet wrote:so, we are looking at $300 worth of Models alone for a $99 set? I am still impressed, and I think its a great deal.


Except no new player knows any of that, making everything you said essentially irrelevant.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 22:57:55


Post by: brettz123


Andrew1975 wrote:The production that goes into a video game is massive. With GW products you do alot of the production, you have to pay for the paint, glue and other products . You get alot of playability with a video game, especially when you consider on line play. I know people that have easily racked up hours, days, weeks playing video games. How often do most people play more than a couple games of GW products a week? Comparing a video game to GW is apples and oranges.


No its not both are something I spend my extra income on so it is not an apples and oranges comparison. And i know people that rack up hours, days, weeks, and years playing GW games. That has nothing to do with anything. What is important is how many hours of enjoyment you get from a product compared to your total investment in that product. For some people GW gives a good return on that equation and for some people it doesn't. The same could be said for video games. It doesn't matter at all what kind of production goes into a video game as compared to GW.

I find video games to be a good return for my investment because I usually spend somewhere between 40-100 hours on each game I buy (I only buy 4-6 games a year so it isn't that much) and I usually buy them used so I spend about $1.00 to $0.50 an hour on my video game habit. I think that is pretty good. Now I probably spend about a thousand dollars a year on miniatures (they aren't all GW but lets just pretend they are). So if I play one day a week say for 5 hours a week and probably I play 3 times a month then 180 hours of playing every year, then I probably spend about 6 hours a week doing general hobby related stuff (like painting and converting so that comes to about 300 some odd hours a year, so essentially I probably do about 500 man hours of hobby related stuff every year for a cost of $1000 dollars a year so I spend about $2 an hour on my GW hobby. Now I don't really find that to be all that bad either.

And more importantly I could stop spending money on my GW hobby and still have a wide variety of new gaming experiences while that would be much harder to do with video games and much less convenient.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/10 23:47:05


Post by: Andrew1975


Belphegor wrote:I guess in response to Hellfury & Andrew1975 I will have to raise my fist and screw "Damn you allied hobbies!"
(Though I may be wrong about the price I paid for Space Hulk.)

Does anyone remember the MSRP on the Metal Terminators and Patriarchs from 1989?


If I remember correctly most of the miniatures boxes cost the same whether it was the plastic marines, harlequins, terminators or a regiment of renown they were all $19.99 at the store and $18 if you ordered them from a discount store. Most of the big box games (Space hulk, space marine, blood bowl. Etc) were $55 you could probably get them for $50 at a discount store. Blisters of lead miniatures were packed 3-6 in a blister for $5.50. You could get a 5 man aspect squad for $5.50, now its what $30. You cant tell me those old Jess Goodwin sculpts were bad. In fact the Pheonix lords are the same sculpt, they were $5.50 when they came out, now they are $17. GW has more than made the design costs off them, all they are paying for now is metal and making new molds. Yes making new molds cost money, but GW uses those molds until they are dust...i've seen some models that really should never have passed quality control.



Automatically Appended Next Post:
No its not both are something I spend my extra income on so it is not an apples and oranges comparison. And i know people that rack up hours, days, weeks, and years playing GW games. That has nothing to do with anything. What is important is how many hours of enjoyment you get from a product compared to your total investment in that product. For some people GW gives a good return on that equation and for some people it doesn't. The same could be said for video games. It doesn't matter at all what kind of production goes into a video game as compared to GW.

I find video games to be a good return for my investment because I usually spend somewhere between 40-100 hours on each game I buy (I only buy 4-6 games a year so it isn't that much) and I usually buy them used so I spend about $1.00 to $0.50 an hour on my video game habit. I think that is pretty good. Now I probably spend about a thousand dollars a year on miniatures (they aren't all GW but lets just pretend they are). So if I play one day a week say for 5 hours a week and probably I play 3 times a month then 180 hours of playing every year, then I probably spend about 6 hours a week doing general hobby related stuff (like painting and converting so that comes to about 300 some odd hours a year, so essentially I probably do about 500 man hours of hobby related stuff every year for a cost of $1000 dollars a year so I spend about $2 an hour on my GW hobby. Now I don't really find that to be all that bad either.

And more importantly I could stop spending money on my GW hobby and still have a wide variety of new gaming experiences while that would be much harder to do with video games and much less convenient.


So if your math stands you count building your miniatures as hobby time, but you are not including the costs of your other materials. Also Video games come complete. You don't have to build or paint them. I've never heard of a video game that you had to finish programming before you could even start it.

Play time and hobby time are completely different aspects. Remember that GW passes ALL assembly and paint costs onto the customer, they just pump out sprue! Some people like it some people dont (painting is my favorite part anymore) but if assembly is required those costs including time and materials should be taken into account. For those reasons video games are much cheaper than GW products.

While I have known people to play 36 hours of video games pretty much straight, i find very few people can do it with a miniature game. We used to have 24 hour games during Christmas break college (slaughter claus) with about 10 people on a side. Half the time it isn't your turn and you are BSing with everyone else. Im not sure that we ever really finished a game.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
I remember when GW and Milton Bradely had a short love affair. MB was releasing these games with tones of plastic miniatures, many that were better than the GW equivalent at the time. Battle Masters and Heroquest being the big ones here in the states, I know they launched advance space crusade in the UK with the coolest chaos dreadnought. Battle masters was $25 even less when it went on clearance. It came with a butt load of miniatures.

* 1 Battle mat, 4 1/2 x 5 feet
* 1 Tower

The Imperial Army - 11 Units:
+ 3 Lord Knights mounted (1 unit)
+ 9 Imperial Knights mounted (3 units)
+ 15 Imperial Men-at-Arms (3 units)
+ 10 Imperial Archers (2 units)
+ 5 Imperial Crossbowmen (1 unit)
+ 1 Mighty Cannon with 2 crew (1 unit)
o The Chaos Army - 14 Units:
+ 3 Champions Of Chaos mounted (1 unit)
+ 10 Chaos Warrios (2 units)
+ 10 Chaos Archers (2 units)
+ 10 Orcs (2 units)
+ 10 Goblins (2 Units)
+ 6 Wolf Riders (2 units)
+ 10 Beast men
+ 1 Ogre Champion (1 unit)

That's 21 cavalry models 80 infantry 1 ogre and 1 war machine (with crew) plus a awesome plastic tower . SO YEAH 3 BLOOD CRUSHERS FOR $50 IS CRAZY. Yeah not as good as GW now, but better than GW then. It's a value comparison, they did it then, they could do it now.

So don't tell me that a company like Hasbro, which owns MB, could not put out the same quality for a better price. I'm sure their capabilities are much better than GW.

Now apparently GW's customer service is much better than it used to be, when you got a bad mini before you were pretty S.O.L., from the stories I've heard now they bend over backwards. That costs more than you think, but does not excuse a 600% increase in 20 years.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 01:11:57


Post by: Semper


I heard there was going to be some use of Callidus assassins in the EU and other world wide governments to have Warhammer made a mandatory GCSE subject (or whatever other things useless countries take at that age).

No, seriously now..with the general appearance of the miniatures becoming more cartoon/cliche like, the prices being raked up and some of the wonderful rules being written up to make sure they alienate as many of the old school as possible who wouldn't want to start Warhammer? I can't see why GW had financial issues (i'll ignore the obvious drop in the LOTR market for the convenience of my current point) or are even considering product attraction as a problem because they scream loyalty to me.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 01:28:11


Post by: Da Boss


I don't understand why people get so aggressive and derisive when someone says that they think something isn't good value for money. I've decided the starter isn't worth it for me (if it had orcs or dwarves in it it might be) so I'm not going to buy it. I think a lot of the newer releases are not worth it, so I don't buy them. *shrug* It's not a moral judgement, it's just what I think is value for money. If it happens to enough other people, that'll be bad for GW. Then again, maybe it won't happen. But why get so narky about it?


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 01:59:39


Post by: Andrew1975


I don't understand why people get so aggressive and derisive when someone says that they think something isn't good value for money. I've decided the starter isn't worth it for me (if it had orcs or dwarves in it it might be) so I'm not going to buy it. I think a lot of the newer releases are not worth it, so I don't buy them. *shrug* It's not a moral judgement, it's just what I think is value for money. If it happens to enough other people, that'll be bad for GW. Then again, maybe it won't happen. But why get so narky about it?


I don't know either, it may have to do with an illusion of exclusivity that is really prevalent in many subcultures. Some people feel special when they pay more for things. "ha ha look at you with your black reach marines, i paid $50 for my 5 stern guard, that makes me a real gamer" Eh whatever, I still use my hordes of old plastic beakies, they kill just as well.

I think it is also a fear of the general public, if the game was available to everyone then lots of little kids would play, most adults don't want their strategic combat simulation game to be misconstrued with poke mon. "We are cool, these are war games not kids games."

I just think GW is in the same place the American car manufacturers were a few years ago, no real competition has made them pretty fat and complacent. They have gotten to big for their own good...GW stores I'm talking to you. GW stores to me only exist to force people to play with GW miniatures (my warzone Bauhaus imperial guard would never fly there) . I'd rather play at a friends house with a beer, or at a independent store any day.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 02:30:35


Post by: davetaylor


I think back to the GW store I ran (in Sydney, Australia) 15 years ago. We'd regularly sell 20-30 "starter sets" of 2nd Edition 40K and 4th Edition Warhammer each month. Those boxed sets were $140 each.

One thing we made sure to do was tell the potential customer about the hobby, the joy of the hobby, and explain to them the amount they could expect to outlay for hobby materials (paints, clippers, glue, etc) and for their first army.

Some people said "Pffft, that's ridiculous!" and walk out. Some people would say "Thanks for the honesty, maybe later." and walk out.

Some people would say "Thanks for all the information, this sounds like a great hobby, let's get started" - those sales were often $200+ with the right equipment to get started on a life long love affair with toy soldiers.

Honesty is key, and if the staff in GW stores are honest about the costs and potential enjoyment of getting into the hobby, those who are interested and will stay in the hobby won't be worried about the price.

It's when you try to trick the customer, or be slick, is when you misrepresent the hobby and the purchase and "recruit" those who were never really interested in the hobby to begin with. Quick bucks that can lead to a lean future in your store. I've seen that happen, when a great "salesman" sold 40 40K boxes in a month, but had only a couple of those folks buying armies three months later.

Just my two cents.

Cheers
Dave


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 03:47:14


Post by: kastellan


$165 in Australia. Wow thats gonna take me a while to save for lol. Stupid GW and there ridiculous prices. Yet I'm still going to buy it -.-


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 04:09:45


Post by: Bookwrack


H.B.M.C. wrote:As has been said a billion times here - new players don't know what the old prices were, so this is the only price as far as they are concerned. That's why it will sell.

HiveFleet wrote:so, we are looking at $300 worth of Models alone for a $99 set? I am still impressed, and I think its a great deal.


Except no new player knows any of that, making everything you said essentially irrelevant.

Speaking of irrelevant...

Because EVERY new player buys the starter box with no previous exposure to any miniature game or kit ever.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 04:21:15


Post by: Liquidice281


You have to realize the aspect of running a business, and the changes that GW has made.

The price of a miniature in the 80's did not have to cover the thousands of employees GW has now. It did not have to cover there huge building expenses.
As a public company they have to invest money into stock annalist and other things of that nature. They have interest and pay off debts. They have to throw out some dividens.
They also have to pay the millions in "free shipping" (shipping is not free for them) across the globe. The price of metal has risen dramatically in the past 20 years don't compare metal models to plastics.

Also the term price gouging needs to be defined correctly, raising prices is not price gouging. These prices are not unfair and most GW profits don't even come from the models, its the licensing for the video games.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 04:35:30


Post by: Andrew1975


This isn't inflation at work, just good old fashioned price gouging.



No, it's "price correction". At no point did GW claim that their across-the-board 50% price hikes were because of inflation. As for gouging, I think you've taken for granted how cheap it was for so long. Yes, I said it, GW has been keeping their prices LOW all these years, thus the increase now.

As mentioned, everything else in the world has gotten a lot more expensive over time. The price of rice has quadruped in the last 5 years, the price of gold has tripled, the price of gas has doubled. The fact that GW went for 5 years without much rise in prices and then only increased by 50% actually makes their price hike CHEAP in comparison to everything else.

Yeah, hiking the prices all at once may or may not have been a good idea, and yes, increasing price will make it harder for people to start new armies (so will things like the global recession). That said, it's hard to balk at spending $90 on a starter set for your child when it costs you and your spouse and your child $30 to go to a movie nowadays.


Rice has nothing to do with the cost of miniatures, neither does gold, now gas or better, oil does. But not enough to compensate for a in some cases a 600% increase in 20 years. Not everything has gotten more expensive, computers are way cheaper than they were in the 80s and 90s. As for movies in 1990 first run movies were $7.00 where I lived so $10 now 20 years later is not so bad its about 30%. And while the price of white metal and plastic have gone up, i'm pretty sure that plastic is still cheaper than the lead they used to make the minis out of. Yes i know to produce the actual molds for the plastic is much more expensive, but at the volumes that GW is pumping out its close to nothing. Can you even imagine how many cadians there are in the world?

Its like when forgeworld gives the resin excuse. Well here is the story with resin. Its crap, its heavy, it warps, its toxic, it has bubles in it, but its pretty cheap. Go into any craft store, everything is made of resin. That leprechaun nick nack that is the size of a warhound titan, resin $4.00.

They can charge what they want, it is a free market after all. People pay it. Hell people will pay $20 for 10 forgeworld bolters. I stopped buying years ago, except something from EBAY here and there. But as long as people pay without letting GW know its enough they will just keep raising the prices. Every time I hear some fanboy stand up for the prices I get douche chills. There is no reason for it, why would anybody support a price hike? I don't know, maybe they are banking on their minis being a retirement fund one day.

Well I guess gold does have something to do with it. Now that GW is a public company i guess their executives need golden parachutes.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

You have to realize the aspect of running a business, and the changes that GW has made

The price of a miniature in the 80's did not have to cover the thousands of employees GW has now. It did not have to cover there huge building expenses.


I understand running a business, I own 2. A good one is I own a bar. Now if I was the only bar in town i could charge whatever i want. That is pretty much what GW does.

80's minis didn't cover the cost of employees? Sure it did. They didnt have as many employees sure, but they didn't sell as many minis either. I bet the ratio between minis and employees is much higher now than it was in the late 80's, 90's or even the 00's. While lager does not always equal more efficient. I would bet that GW's manufacturing process as a whole is much more efficient now than it has ever been in the past. These costs were always figured into the price of the goods, the cost of manufacturing per piece does not go up as volume increases, in fact the opposite happens.

As a public company they have to invest money into stock annalist and other things of that nature.

WhAAAAAAAAAAT! Redonkulous! As a ratio per mini these "thinks of that nature" which you speak of must amount to a fraction a a cent for each mini.

They have interest and pay off debts. They have to throw out some dividens.


Yes....so does everyone else, they generally don't do it with a 600% price gouge. See Dividends are paid to share holders, shares (for the most part) are bought giving the company capital to invest. So here is their base of capital, additional loans may be necessary. Responsible companies manage their money and put MODEST strain on the end users, by strategically recouping costs over a production run. What they shouldn't do is raise prices every 6 moths or so on the same product. Destroying whole markets for said product.

They also have to pay the millions in "free shipping" (shipping is not free for them) across the globe. The price of metal has risen dramatically in the past 20 years don't compare metal models to plastics.

Also the term price gouging needs to be defined correctly, raising prices is not price gouging. These prices are not unfair and most GW profits don't even come from the models, its the licensing for the video games.


Shipping isn't free, you know what is? website sales that include free shipping. By not selling through a distributor they are more than doubling their profits. By owning their retail stores they more than doubling their profits (in theory).

Now if you are speaking of shipping to independent retailers, the "free" shipping that you speak of is in essence a volume discount only offered on orders of quantity that more than offset the cost.

I wasn't comparing plastic to metal, metal is more expensive always has been. The fact is that the new plastics are more expensive than my old metal ones. The excuse being that metal is expensive? OK, GW has even made plans to charge as much for plastic as it does for metal.

You sir are drinking the cool aid and have come down with a case of the blind jingoisms. Its not often fatal, but will leave you bankrupt, monetarily, emotionally and spiritually

Again, why would anyone volunteer to pay more? It makes less sense than GW wanting to charge less. At least there is reason there. Increase sales volume, introduce product to more people, create customer loyalty...hell old vets might even buy some stuff, for the games that they haven't discontinued. Cough epic!


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 06:22:47


Post by: Kilkrazy


agnosto wrote:The problem with them having only one such set per new edition of rules is that they lose out on sales to people that could care less about the two armies they're trying to pawn off on us.


If you are new to the game you probably don't have a strong idea about which armies to play.

Anyway, AoBR contains two of the most popular armies. I don't know about the WHFB set.

AoBR is £55 in the UK. That doesn't seem like a terribly high price compared with high quality board games like Agricola, given you get a lot of plastic models in it.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 06:59:48


Post by: Cadichan Support


Tzeentchling9 wrote:I know it's a great deal in comparison to all that you get out of it, but 100 USD is an awful lot to drop at once for a parent/teen just introduced to the hobby.


Yeah, seriously. I mean when i started and i saw the price of a space marine squad i was like "OMG $40 for some random bulky space dudes!!!". This is the sort of thing that scares off beginners in the first place.
What i think should happen is they release more AoBR type packages except get different units (because i don't like space marines ) like IG vs Tyranids or Tau vs Eldar.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 07:40:56


Post by: Chimera_Calvin


Ultimately (as Andrew1975 so eloquently explained), GW charges what they do because they are a big fish in a small pond.

What will be interesting to me is to see how they fare with some serious competition. People have said you can't compare GW to Mantic because the GW multiparts are better. That may be true, but in a 200 model strong fantasy army are you really looking at the individual pose of every Empire State Trooper or Skaven Clanrat? Add into that the fact that Mantic are *GASP* talking to their customers and finding out what people want, not to mention the neat touches like every box of models being its own carry case and all of a sudden Mantic is looking better by the minute - and for a quarter of the cost!

All it will take is for one company to seriously challenge GW in the marketplace (something that, for a whole range of different reasons PP, Rackham et al have failed to do thus far) and you will see GWs current structure overhauled to the benefit of all players.

Mantic may well be able to make that breakthrough and I wish them every success after the start they have made.

Then we'll see if GW has what it takes to survive in a competitive environment...


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 07:52:50


Post by: Arctik_Firangi


AoBR in Australia went up to $150 in the last hike - that's $135USD. $90USD won't even get get you a Battlewagon/Land Raider over here.

Maelstrom Games is your friend - at Australian exchange rates it's about $86, or $78USD, with free postage. Pretty much buy two-for-one and pretend the extra $20 was postage.
Redbeard was absolutely right, though, when he says that even at full RRP it's cheaper than two new release video games for a pair of kids.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 08:24:13


Post by: chromedog


How will they 'recruit' new players?

They'll update an old method.

Dreadsock for belaying pin.

Sign em up and not tell them that there is a penalty for getting out (but it WILL be written in 2pt type on the bottom of the contract of sale).

If they don't read before signing, that's their own bad luck.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 10:00:17


Post by: H.B.M.C.


kastellan wrote:$165 in Australia. Wow thats gonna take me a while to save for lol. Stupid GW and there ridiculous prices. Yet I'm still going to buy it -.-


Why are you buying it in Australia when you can get it for around 40% off from lots of other places. From one Aussie to another - never buy locally. We pay +40% over what the US and UK prices are. Buying here is a complete rip-off.

And if, for some reason, you find yourself needing to buy direct from GW, buy from GWUK. You still get a 40% discount (compared to local prices) and shipping from the UK is quite good (as opposed to the US, where it's ultrastupidexpensive).

davetaylor wrote:I think back to the GW store I ran (in Sydney, Australia) 15 years ago. We'd regularly sell 20-30 "starter sets" of 2nd Edition 40K and 4th Edition Warhammer each month. Those boxed sets were $140 each.


You think wrong.

2nd Ed 40K and... at the time... 4th Ed Warhammer (I believe... 5th was with Lizardmen/Brettonians IIRC, so it must've been 4th Ed, High Elves/Orcs), they were $100 ($99.95 probably), and were like that for quite some time. I remember getting Necromunda for the same price, and only a while after was I shocked to learn that it was now at $120 (). Plus, as I said, Aussie prices are far higher than the US and UK, so any sort of comparison you make between what was then (in Australia) and what is now (in the US) is basically moot.

Hell I still remember tracking prices over several years with the old Death Company blister packs.

$11.50 when I started. Then $12.95. Then $13.50. Then 'White Metal' came around and suddenly those 3 Death Company per blister became 2 Death Company per blister, 'cept now they were $14.95. Then $15.95 a year later. They went from being $3.80 each to $7.97 in about 5-6-ish years. That's a pretty decent increase.

Bookwrack wrote:Because EVERY new player buys the starter box with no previous exposure to any miniature game or kit ever.


I didn't.

And I reckon most 11-12 year olds getting it for their Birthday/for Christmas have the same sort of experience.

So lose the attitude pal.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 10:15:59


Post by: kastellan


H.B.M.C. wrote:
Why are you buying it in Australia when you can get it for around 40% off from lots of other places. From one Aussie to another - never buy locally. We pay +40% over what the US and UK prices are. Buying here is a complete rip-off.

And if, for some reason, you find yourself needing to buy direct from GW, buy from GWUK. You still get a 40% discount (compared to local prices) and shipping from the UK is quite good (as opposed to the US, where it's ultrastupidexpensive).


Coz the my local gaming store needs more people to buy from it to keep it open and as its the only store nearby that allows you to go in and use their tables for free I'll still probs buy from there, even if it is a crap load more expensive.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 10:25:26


Post by: Wolfstan


Unlikely GW is making a loss at this price either, so it just proves how much of a mark up there is on the stuff.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 11:28:14


Post by: aka_mythos


Ailaros wrote:
evilsponge wrote:This isn't inflation at work, just good old fashioned price gouging.

No, it's "price correction". At no point did GW claim that their across-the-board 50% price hikes were because of inflation. As for gouging, I think you've taken for granted how cheap it was for so long. Yes, I said it, GW has been keeping their prices LOW all these years, thus the increase now.

As mentioned, everything else in the world has gotten a lot more expensive over time. The price of rice has quadruped in the last 5 years, the price of gold has tripled, the price of gas has doubled. The fact that GW went for 5 years without much rise in prices and then only increased by 50% actually makes their price hike CHEAP in comparison to everything else...


A simple definition for price gouging is to raise price through monopolistic practices above their market value. GW makes up such a large portion of the tabletop wargame market, the arguement could easily be made they have a monopoly. Thus any price rise not driven by a material price increase or inflation or legal dictates by GW is gouging by definition.

While prices of food have drastically shot up, the price of other reasources have not.

Ailaros wrote:
The fact that GW went for 5 years without much rise in prices and then only increased by 50% actually makes their price hike CHEAP in comparison to everything else.
GW has increased prices almost every year.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 12:29:54


Post by: Big P


Its all about perception.

No-one here who plays the games can have a rationale perception of what a new player will think of the GW pricing.

It will come down to the individual.

Some parents will baulk at paying that price for 'toy soldiers', while others wont care.

GW will do what they have always done - charge what the market can bear. They will keep raising prices till they start losing sales at a rate that causes concern.

Until that happens, why would any business not charge as much as they can for a product?


As for the 'hobby' being expensive, what a load of rubbish. The 'GW-Hobby' (whatever that is) may be expensive but wargaming isnt. With regards to historical gaming you can enter it for a very low start up cost if you want too. Plastic figures abound these days. And yes, you can get decent figures for cheap - Perry Figures sell for £1 a figure. For the price of the WFB box set I could get a whole bunch of Perry metals! Of course I would end up spending a load more... But thats cos I suffer from 'ooooo Shiny' syndrome.


As a primarily historical gamer, I dont think its a bad price to be honest, and while some of the latest GW plastics have been awful to my eye, these plastics seem rather tasty and I may well get a set to use in my fantasy gaming.

But just cos I think its good value, dont mean a parent, with their first exposure to the game involves being thrust a £50 - £100 proce tag will feel the same...

Only time will tell what the ceiling is for GW products, and they will keep raising it till it falls in.



Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 13:30:25


Post by: Ouze


After playing the Dawn of War games, I pre-ordered the Assault on Black Reach starter set. It was the first 40k thing I ever owned, and it was $65.

I might not have gotten it were it $90. I know it's not a giant boundary, but there is an invisible line there between "inexpensive toy I can tack on to the bills this month" and "something I should save for, but never will, because I suck at saving and so will just never get it". $65 is a relatively easily digestible chunk.

To put it a different way, at $65 I'd get my stepson a starter set to see if he likes it, and at $90 I'd get him some clothes or sneakers instead.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 13:41:21


Post by: Phototoxin


"Get the tournament scene to drop the Citadel Only rule. When players start shopping at other companies for orcs and elves and Shock Troops, and get them cheaper, then GW will have to change its business practices. "

That would do it alright...


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 13:45:12


Post by: Ouze


Phototoxin wrote:"Get the tournament scene to drop the Citadel Only rule. When players start shopping at other companies for orcs and elves and Shock Troops, and get them cheaper, then GW will have to change its business practices. "

That would do it alright...


Yes, I could definitely see that idea being kicked around with great success at a board meeting. "Hey, you know what our problem is? We're making too much money. Here's what we should do - at the events that we sponsor, which already cost us money, lets let our opponents product be used in those games. Not only will the extra market though exposure share hurt us (while we directly pay for them to do so), but we'll also be forced to lower our prices (while not our costs) to compete!"



Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 13:57:11


Post by: Da Boss


depending on your location, the tournament scene might be completely independant of GW.
Some of the independant events STILL require GW only models, despite no help from GW. Weird, eh?


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 14:08:28


Post by: davetaylor


H.B.M.C. wrote:
davetaylor wrote:I think back to the GW store I ran (in Sydney, Australia) 15 years ago. We'd regularly sell 20-30 "starter sets" of 2nd Edition 40K and 4th Edition Warhammer each month. Those boxed sets were $140 each.


You think wrong.

2nd Ed 40K and... at the time... 4th Ed Warhammer (I believe... 5th was with Lizardmen/Brettonians IIRC, so it must've been 4th Ed, High Elves/Orcs), they were $100 ($99.95 probably), and were like that for quite some time. I remember getting Necromunda for the same price, and only a while after was I shocked to learn that it was now at $120 (). Plus, as I said, Aussie prices are far higher than the US and UK, so any sort of comparison you make between what was then (in Australia) and what is now (in the US) is basically moot.


H.B.M.C., thanks for cutting a tiny snippet from my post, letting me know what my memories should have been, then completely missing my point. Way to argue you on the Internet.

Now I remember why I steer clear of the Discussion sub-forums here on Dakka. Wait, let me use an orkmoticon so you know I'm just kidding

Cheers
Dave


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 14:10:22


Post by: malfred


If you're buying for two people, it's 45 dollars per kid.

Is it a lot? Yes. But really it's not terrible. I mean, some parents will make their kids pay for it themselves
or wait until their birthdays as a major purchase or reward.

Heck, the cable bill is probably more per month than those boxes.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 14:11:25


Post by: Scott-S6


Big P wrote:Perry Figures sell for £1 a figure. For the price of the WFB box set I could get a whole bunch of Perry metals!


Yep, you could get 60. Or you could get 64 plus five cavalry plus two big monsters plus two little war machines and an elf on a griffon in the IoB set.

And the historicals aren't expensive to get started in but GW is? I don't think you entirely thought that through.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 14:39:06


Post by: aka_mythos


The simple economics 101, is that supply and demand dictates, unless it is an inflexible demand, as prices rise so will demand drop. From GW perspective they are looking at this as an individual item, they will raise prices till the amount of extra money per box set they make is equal to the amount lost by drop in sales quantities. Make more for less effort.

So simply this price cuts down on the number of people who will get into the hobby. By how much, who knows?

This may be great in the short run, but the long term implications are unsustainable. The market reaction is one where as GW pushes their margin higher they make it easier for competition on a price point level to compete with them. This is why more companies are doing plastic miniatures now. They will eventually see migration to alternatives purely for that. You can't afford cocaine you buy crack.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 14:46:36


Post by: Scott-S6


The flip side is - will all the cool new stuff in the box make it seem like better value?

There is surely no argument that these minis aren't much better than the last box?


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 14:56:50


Post by: Sidstyler


Andrew1975 wrote:The production that goes into a video game is massive. With GW products you do alot of the production, you have to pay for the paint, glue and other products . You get alot of playability with a video game, especially when you consider on line play. I know people that have easily racked up hours, days, weeks playing video games. How often do most people play more than a couple games of GW products a week? Comparing a video game to GW is apples and oranges.


Exactly, and that's why I hate threads like this. People who also make this comparison are extremely biased and seem to believe that all video games are $60+ (look somewhere else besides the new release section at Wal-Mart), and they never provide more than 4-5 hours of enjoyment, tops. It's bs and way more annoying to me than the constant bitching about price gouging.

I bought the Orange Box for $30 last month (yeah I know, I'm a little behind the times), and in that time I've put way more time into Team Fortress 2 than I have Warhammer 40k since 2007. More hours spent playing a game that I've owned for about a month than a game I've been into for three fething years. Saying all video games are expensive and short is like saying all GW miniatures look like the razorgor.

Also, why does everyone keep claiming that this box has $300+ worth of miniatures in it? It doesn't. You're not buying those kits, you're buying inferior snap-together models with very limited poses. They look good for what they are, but don't lie and try to claim they are the same thing as the multi-part plastic kits. I'd say it's an okay deal for a starter set, but to try and claim that this is some kind of a steal because buying all the real models separately would cost three times as much is ridiculous.

and if the staff in GW stores are honest about the costs and potential enjoyment of getting into the hobby


LOL


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 15:00:27


Post by: inquisitor_bob


I seem to recall the 2nd Edition boxed set was $100. Don't quote me on that, it was a long time ago. Maybe that's the cost of the Basic boxed set and Dark Millenium together.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 15:26:03


Post by: agnosto


Kilkrazy wrote:
agnosto wrote:The problem with them having only one such set per new edition of rules is that they lose out on sales to people that could care less about the two armies they're trying to pawn off on us.


If you are new to the game you probably don't have a strong idea about which armies to play.

Anyway, AoBR contains two of the most popular armies. I don't know about the WHFB set.

AoBR is £55 in the UK. That doesn't seem like a terribly high price compared with high quality board games like Agricola, given you get a lot of plastic models in it.


I was thinking about the new IoB set...skaven and high elves. Though both armies might be popular (I have no idea) neither appeals at all to me whereas the AoBR set would appeal to a broad market since many people own some flavor of marine or other anyway. I like these sets in that they are a comparatively inexpensive means at acquiring grunts.

I think GW might sell more if they made army specific sets of these inexpensive, non-posable, sets for every army. This would allow an entry into the game (as they certainly do not include every model you need to make a complete, strong force). I view them as a sort of gateway drug; the dealer gives you a small free sample and then says, "Hey kid if you liked that, I've got some really good stuff over here.."

Army specific bundles would be a great way to go. Imagine if you could just buy the AOBR marines, rules, templates and such with maybe the addition of another tac squad or assault squad for the same price as the original set. I would think, my opinion here, that many people don't buy the sets because they don't want the other army and don't want to go through the trouble of finding a trade or selling the extras on e-bay (which is a separate issue as GW is just needlessly putting money in someone else's pocket). I know it would appeal to me (but maybe I'm just crazy and most people want to buy a bunch of models they don't want/need).

On the price end of things. I agree with what some posters are saying here in that they, GW, charge what we are willing to pay; there's noone to blame here but ourselves if you don't like the prices. Of course as consumers we would love to pay less for something and we'll always gripe when prices inevitably go up; however, there comes a price point for all of us beyond which we are not willing to go. You can only place so much value on your hobby, whatever it may be, before you say "Well, that's it then, no new toys for a while."v


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 15:58:36


Post by: Big P


Scott-S6 wrote:
Big P wrote:Perry Figures sell for £1 a figure. For the price of the WFB box set I could get a whole bunch of Perry metals!


Yep, you could get 60. Or you could get 64 plus five cavalry plus two big monsters plus two little war machines and an elf on a griffon in the IoB set.

And the historicals aren't expensive to get started in but GW is? I don't think you entirely thought that through.


Er... Well they aint poorly sculpted plastic figs from the Perrys are they?

I would rather have 60 figs from the Perries... More use to me.

But then most of the figures I buy are in the .55p bracket. Or a tank for £6.50...

Can no GW player take a little bit of criticism about their Overlords?


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 16:59:13


Post by: Scott-S6


I'm just pointing out that you said historicals were cheaper and then gave an example that wasn't cheaper.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 17:33:40


Post by: asmith


This was from another thread that was locked:

"I'm probably too sleepy to get this right so bear with me... I think this is interesting. I think we can actually figure out a rough estimate of how much it costs them to produce a kit from this report. 59% of their sales they get to keep the full amount and 41% are to independant sellers @ a 50% discount. so 6 kits direct for every 8 kits to independant stockists. (6*60+8*30)/14=$42.86 (average sale price) on which they make a 72% margin($30.86 margin) so actual cost to them to make a $60 kit is $12. so GW gets $48 if you buy it from them and $18 if you buy it from an independant retailer (the retailer pockets the difference) "

These are from GW's own numbers in their report. (before the recent prices rises).


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 17:35:05


Post by: Ruckdog


Scott-S6 wrote:GBP60. That's one and half xbox games. Seems pretty reasonable to me for what you get.


I think that is an excellent point...the price of the box sets, while not inconsequential, are in line with other hobbies and forms of entertainment. As such, I don't think the prices necessarily represent a hurdle to new players.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 17:35:19


Post by: asmith


This will hopefully give people an idea of what it actually costs to make this stuff.

Edit: I think compared to most other things that people buy, which are either very complicated (electronic equipment) or well finished (toys), most people will think paying these prices for what you get (unfinished, unpainted, plastic, without the means to finish them in the box) is well out of line with almost everything else they buy.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 17:37:04


Post by: The Night Stalker


Holy crap Aobr 90$ I remember getting it last year for 60$ and then it jumped to around 75$ at my FLGS, but now about 100$ that is a real put off.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 17:38:39


Post by: PanamaG


But youve already bought it and new players dont know it was 60 or 75


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 17:52:50


Post by: kinghammer


Kids buy the battle forces that are $90+ dollars. The starter set is like buying a battle force with rules.

Cheers


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 17:54:32


Post by: Scott-S6


asmith wrote:This will hopefully give people an idea of what it actually costs to make this stuff.

Edit: I think compared to most other things that people buy, which are either very complicated (electronic equipment) or well finished (toys), most people will think paying these prices for what you get (unfinished, unpainted, plastic, without the means to finish them in the box) is well out of line with almost everything else they buy.


Compare it to a good quality model kits from another manufacturer. A decent 1/35 tank is GBP30-45.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 17:57:07


Post by: asmith


I think my point went well over your head...


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 19:07:08


Post by: ShivanAngel


Meh considering lots of parents drop 300+ dollars for the latest gaming system (with no games mind you) I doubt the 100 dollar starter box will deter that many people.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 19:08:39


Post by: Scott-S6


I think it didn't, your premise was flawed. Comparing two ery different types of product does not serve to highlight anything.

Furthermore, you comment on how cheap these things are to produce, it costs more to make the IoB box set than a basic DVD player, something which is (very complicated). What relevance is the fact that it's complicated if it can be manufactured and sold more cheaply?


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 20:09:26


Post by: agnosto


Scott-S6 wrote:I think it didn't, your premise was flawed. Comparing two ery different types of product does not serve to highlight anything.

Furthermore, you comment on how cheap these things are to produce, it costs more to make the IoB box set than a basic DVD player, something which is (very complicated). What relevance is the fact that it's complicated if it can be manufactured and sold more cheaply?


Maybe, depends on the production methodology. As far as materials, small amounts of precious metals go into circuitboards and other sundry internals in electronic equipment. The last time I looked, my little plastic soldiers weren't made of aluminum, gold, silver, etc..AND a great deal of plastic which are all much more expensive than just the small amount of plastic that goes into my box of toys.

A variety of raw materials are used in the construction of DVD players and disks. Glass is used to make the laser and other diodes in the system. The primary components on the circuit board are made from silicon. Aluminum metal is used for the housing as well as a hard plastic. The base material of the disks is plastic. They are additionally coated with a silver colored layer and a thin gold layer. The surface of the disk is further coated with a hard layer of lacquer to protect it from damage.


Read more: How dvd player is made - material, production process, history, used, processing, parts, components, structure, product, industry, machine, History, Design, Raw Materials http://www.madehow.com/Volume-4/DVD-Player.html#ixzz0wKEmp08S


Why can I walk into a WalMart and buy a DVD player for $25 when a box of army men costs $50? I get your point but it was not even close to a good comparison. It would be easier just to admit that prices are inflated because the company is able to do so due to the particular market and their share of said market. A great deal has been said about how archaic even such a basic process as stock management is at GW, their manufacturing process is probably even more silly. From a business standpoint, they would be much better off just outsourcing to China or India like even small miniatures companies do (wargames factory). People may argue that such miniatures are not as detailed, etc; however, it doesn't matter how complicated something is to create (iPhones are manufactured in China), the labor is so much cheaper as well as the overall operating costs associated with production.

Come to think of it, I bet you could commision some outstanding Chinese sculptors to make your figs and just move all pre and post production to mainland China.

*here's where I rub my hands together with an evil laugh*


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 20:33:39


Post by: asmith


Scott-S6 wrote:I think it didn't, your premise was flawed. Comparing two ery different types of product does not serve to highlight anything.

Furthermore, you comment on how cheap these things are to produce, it costs more to make the IoB box set than a basic DVD player, something which is (very complicated). What relevance is the fact that it's complicated if it can be manufactured and sold more cheaply?


Here you've proven you missed the point. the IoB box set should not cost more to produce than a basic DVD player. the fact that the DVD player can be got for cheaper just illustrates even more how overpriced the GW box is. A basic DVD player has all the design aspects that a IoB box has (many injection molded parts, glossy box) plus many more components made by other processes, exotic materials etc, and it is assembled and hopefully tested. Even people who are not engineers or into manufacturing can see that one thing is a lot harder to make than the other.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 20:33:47


Post by: Andrew1975


Well its like I said, they are like the American car manufactures back in the 70's. Turning out product for a captive audience so they got lazy. Now instead of raising prices they just made crap cars. But its all due to lack of serious competition and buyer complacency.

The reason you can get a DVD player for $25 is that there is so much competition, (plus you are probably buying a crap DVD player). Competition forces companies to streamline, make production more efficient, and liquidate unnecessary departments. Competition is the only real motivating factor for a company to change its practices.

A $25 dollar DVD is probably crap. But if you get a year out of it then great. That's a year of DVD for 25 dollars its still worth it, it might last you years. On the same note you can buy cheaper miniatures if you want also. There are many good quality miniatures for far less than GW charges. Hell you could use green army men if you wanted to. (yes yes yes, not at tournaments. I know, which brings up my next point).

That is a great point though. I understand wanting people to play with painted miniatures. But I have never understood why an independent tournament would require GW miniatures. As long as they are easily identifiable, what do you care? Unless GW is sponsoring or providing the prizes the have F@@@ all to do with it. Seriously, there is no room in the 40K universe for my Warzone, bauhus, imperial guard.....they look sweet they fit the codex even the command squads are Cadian Imperial supervisors. They were far better than the Guard that GW was producing at the time.

It's crazy the Fanboyism of some people. GW can get you to be their enforcer without any benefit to you. All the have to do is raise prices and not give a cent back to anybody for anything. Its crap. Hey why don't we just give GW the monopoly.

I think I may have just seen the owner of GW








Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 21:23:56


Post by: Hulksmash


@Andrew

GW provides almost all the prize support for stores that take the tiny bit of time it takes to talk to them. For GT's it's generally around 1,100-1,300 in prize support with another couple hundred in terrain support. So no Indy GT is going to allow non-GW armies (a model here and there they don't have a problem with). RTT also get around $140ish from GW again if you spend a tiny bit of time talking to them and your a store that orders their product. So unless those non-GW companies are going to fork over prize support store owners want to make money on their tournaments so they won't allow non GW armies.

*Edit* The above is US based. I don't know how they support tournaments in other countries.

You're just as much a debby downer on GW as some people are fan boys. Best part is you don't seem to know what your talking about (especially in regards to gouging). We get it, your angry. But no one is forcing you to buy GW. No one is forcing you to play GW. Go play WM/Hordes (almost the same cost) or historicals or something else. Harping on a company that you don't support is kinda pointless. Even if they read this crap they wouldn't listen to you since your not a customer.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 22:10:22


Post by: Euzebeau


They are just way overpriced, all the new plastic stuff coming out should be cheaper but its not. It's not fair to the hobbyists. All GW care about is sales


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 22:32:46


Post by: Da Boss


Hulksmash wrote:@Andrew

GW provides almost all the prize support for stores that take the tiny bit of time it takes to talk to them. For GT's it's generally around 1,100-1,300 in prize support with another couple hundred in terrain support. So no Indy GT is going to allow non-GW armies (a model here and there they don't have a problem with). RTT also get around $140ish from GW again if you spend a tiny bit of time talking to them and your a store that orders their product. So unless those non-GW companies are going to fork over prize support store owners want to make money on their tournaments so they won't allow non GW armies.

You're just as much a debby downer on GW as some people are fan boys. Best part is you don't seem to know what your talking about (especially in regards to gouging). We get it, your angry. But no one is forcing you to buy GW. No one is forcing you to play GW. Go play WM/Hordes (almost the same cost) or historicals or something else. Harping on a company that you don't support is kinda pointless. Even if they read this crap they wouldn't listen to you since your not a customer.


Some good points in there, but one that's not so good: GW should potentially listen to him because he COULD be a customer. If they only listen to current customers, they are less likely to expand their sales.
And in Ireland at least, GW doesn't do a lot for independant tournaments. Well, the staffers are enthusiastic friendly guys, and they'll help out, but the company doesn't do much for the tournament scene. So it depends on where you go. (Ireland is probably a pretty small market to be fair- small population, low population density.)
I think GW makes the best plastics in the business, but they are outside my price range. I don't think commenting about it is a bad thing, or that you have any right to tell me or others to stop.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 23:08:33


Post by: Ailaros


aka_mythos wrote:A simple definition for price gouging is to raise price through monopolistic practices above their market value.

What? Raising above market value? Everything is worth what its purchaser will pay.

In the case of a monopoly, the monopolizer DETERMINES market value, which is why it's not possible to "gouge" based on your definition.

Da Boss wrote:I don't understand why people get so aggressive and derisive when someone says that they think something isn't good value for money.

Because that's not what's happening. The OP wasn't simply stating "this hobby is expensive", it was someone moaning and whining about how they can't afford their favorite toy. People get bothered by this once they're old enough to have had to actually sacrifice things for what they want (like time, money, and in my case for 40k, time, money, and blood), rather than throwing a tantrum when they don't get what they want.

Yeah, it's not "fair" that GW raised prices.... get over yourselves.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/11 23:18:11


Post by: mikhaila


Da Boss wrote:I don't think commenting about it is a bad thing, or that you have any right to tell me or others to stop.


Maybe not in Ireland, but in the US we actually do have a right to tell you to stop. (Not to make you stop, just to be able to tell you to.)

Just as anyone has a right to moan about something, and keep on moaning about it after asked to stop.)

Otherwise the interwebs would grind to a halt


Automatically Appended Next Post:
And back to the original topic:

Veterans moaning about the price being to high has nothing to do with getting new people into the hobby.

Day it comes out I'll be putting some of those high elfs on a hook, and casting them out into the mall to reel in a few new customers and sell them a set.

I don't even have to throw back the small ones I catch!

If I do my job right, they have fun and start into a new hobby, I make money, and the parents get the cheapest babysitting they've ever heard of, every saturday at my shop. Win/Win/Win

Put the set together today. Very, very nice models. Makes me want to do something un-natural, like paint High Elfs.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 00:04:19


Post by: Vene


Euzebeau wrote:They are just way overpriced, all the new plastic stuff coming out should be cheaper but its not. It's not fair to the hobbyists. All GW care about is sales

They're a fething business, of course they care about sales.

I'm quite happy to pay $90 for AoBR (not that I did, seriously go find a discount retailer), my gf needed basic tactical marines, the dreadnought was great, basic terminators are awesome, and it gives her a change to play around with Orks. What's not to like? Sure, the extra options from the proper boxes are good and all, but there is a place for base line units, and it sucks having to make basic troops when you have all these pretty options that you'll never use.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 02:11:36


Post by: Andrew1975


GW provides almost all the prize support for stores that take the tiny bit of time it takes to talk to them. For GT's it's generally around 1,100-1,300 in prize support with another couple hundred in terrain support. So no Indy GT is going to allow non-GW armies (a model here and there they don't have a problem with). RTT also get around $140ish from GW again if you spend a tiny bit of time talking to them and your a store that orders their product. So unless those non-GW companies are going to fork over prize support store owners want to make money on their tournaments so they won't allow non GW armies.

*Edit* The above is US based. I don't know how they support tournaments in other countries.

You're just as much a debby downer on GW as some people are fan boys. Best part is you don't seem to know what your talking about (especially in regards to gouging). We get it, your angry. But no one is forcing you to buy GW. No one is forcing you to play GW. Go play WM/Hordes (almost the same cost) or historicals or something else. Harping on a company that you don't support is kinda pointless. Even if they read this crap they wouldn't listen to you since your not a customer.


That is the sound of another Fanboy earning his wings

But see Hulksmash, I was a customer, a great customer.

Lets see
40k : 2 companies of spacemarines, landraiders, rhinos, Eldar army, Imperial Guard army, Chaos marine army
Warhammer : Dark Elves, Empire, Skaven,
Blood bowl, dungeon bowl,: Dark elf team, dwarf team, elf team, human team, skaven team, orc team,
Space marine, space marine 2nd ed, titan legions,: space marines army, chaos army, Imperial guard army, 2 full titan legions (one chaos, one loyalist) each with 4 warhounds, 3 reavers, 3 warlords and an imperator, and a knight titans army
Advanced hero quest, advanced space crusade, space hulk with all the modules
Necromunda. Don't remeber which gang, I used my tallarens.
Dark future, Whiteline Fever
I even have some of those stupid troll games, not to mention chainsaw warrior and block mania.
If it was put out by GW I owned it or played it at some point.

And you know what I bought all that while I was in high school and college. Not even at my peak of earning potential. Yeah it was good times. You could get a good army for $100 instead of $1000.

So yeah I was a good customer. So were all my friends. We played all the time. Hell we still play, but we are not buying anything new....it's too expensive. I love my old minis, but the new terminators are better than my old ones, stern guard are cool, My dark elves are so old they are all armed with hand weapons, dark elf warriors cant even have hand weapons anymore! There are a lot of miniatures my friends and I would buy if they were not way overpriced. My god if they would put out a new epic scale that was more like 2nd ed with all the new vehicles and units!!!!!!! But they would probably want $5 a piece for epic scale plastic razorback.

There are a ton of old gamers that would buy stuff, but GW has priced a most reasonable adults out of the market. And guess what GW we have kids. If you think vets wont buy the stuff for themselves......they are not going to buy it for their kids. Now that the hobby has gone from cheap entertainment to apparently a plastic crack addiction you will never see my kids buy a single product from GW. Maybe used on ebay, or a competitors stuff.

GW policy seams to be that new people buy more stuff so screw the vets. But every business knows it is cheaper to keep your old clients than get new ones. We may not buy as much stuff as the new guys right away, but we buy so much more over the long haul.

So don't tell me what to play and how to play it Fanboytastic Hluksmash. At least I have reason to be a Debbie Downer (which I really only am on GW pricing practices). What's your excuse for the bowing down to the Alter of GW? You know the more you support them the more they will just keep raising the price.


Automatically Appended Next Post:


I'm quite happy to pay $90 for AoBR (not that I did, seriously go find a discount retailer),


Contradict yourself much? Were you happier paying $60 a couple years ago. I'm sure if someone offered it to you for $30 you wouldn't buy it?

The second you say you are happy and ok with the prices, GW knows they can raise them.



Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 02:55:36


Post by: @postle


Let's face it. If the IoB box sold for 60$ then everyone would be playing Skaven or High Elves for months to come. The only people that would buy it would be players already playing the game, seeking to bolster their current armies or start new ones. At 99$ it's a terrific deal given the current price of figures*. It's essentially 2 95$ battalion boxes worth of figs plus rules, dice, etc... Entry into the hobby for two players for "less than 100$." So for the truly new player, it's really 50$, provided they can find a friend to split and enjoy it with. A steal, really.

*Arguing the overall price of the hobby in general is a completely different discussion that I'd rather not get into. There are two sides to that fight, neither interested in having their opinions changed.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 03:04:52


Post by: Le Grognard


It's essentially 2 95$ battalion boxes worth of figs . . . .

I don't know why the figs in IoB are being compared to their counterparts that are boxed separately. If they had put the 'regular' minis into this set rather than less-pieces-as-possible starter minis, then I could see the heftier tag. Would you shell out $95 for either army in the IoB on its own?


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 03:12:24


Post by: Andrew1975


Let's face it. If the IoB box sold for 60$ then everyone would be playing Skaven or High Elves for months to come. The only people that would buy it would be players already playing the game, seeking to bolster their current armies or start new ones. At 99$ it's a terrific deal given the current price of figures*. It's essentially 2 95$ battalion boxes worth of figs plus rules, dice, etc... Entry into the hobby for two players for "less than 100$." So for the truly new player, it's really 50$, provided they can find a friend to split and enjoy it with. A steal, really
.

Lets face what? By this logic a $50,000 2 bedroom house should really be $100,000. I could just find a roommate and we could both enjoy the pride of home ownership. And car companies should price cars so that people have to car pool. It's nonsense.

Besides there is only one rule book in the box.

You know what, this wouldn't be so bad if the stock was flying. But its not, so obviously they are doing something wrong. The customers are paying for that mismanagement. You can't throw money at problems. If you can't make money at $2 a miniature you can't make it at $4 or $6 if the management is lacking or your business model is flawed.

I actually think the minis in the new box are great, as good or better than even the old metal ones. I don't mind single pose with variety, look at the multi pose dark elf warriors CRAPTASTIC. Ill keep my old maurader regiments thank you. Do you really need super individual models in a packed unit? I don't need to be able to see the time on a marines wrist watch either.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 03:24:47


Post by: Vene


Andrew1975 wrote:


I'm quite happy to pay $90 for AoBR (not that I did, seriously go find a discount retailer),


Contradict yourself much? Were you happier paying $60 a couple years ago. I'm sure if someone offered it to you for $30 you wouldn't buy it?

The second you say you are happy and ok with the prices, GW knows they can raise them.


Not a contradiction, I'd be willing to pay $90 for it, but I'd be stupid if I would pay that much if I can get it for less. I honestly would be willing to pay more for it, because I know the units in it are just that good.

And what is it with gamers not understanding that GW is, first and foremost, a business? Do you think they're a charity, or maybe a non-profit? I personally love how the only thing people in this thread are looking at is material cost. I work in a factory, we care a lot more than about the material cost. Let's see, there's the equipment, the labor, the packaging, the shipping (even just from factory to warehouse), oh, and quality control (which is what I'm personally in). There's also the cost of development (good modelers and painters cost money) and administrative costs. There's the bandwidth for their website. The customer support phonelines also cost money. Oh, and the lawyers. I'm sure I'm forgetting other costs, but those boxes of plastic have to pay for it.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 03:35:25


Post by: Andrew1975


yes but I've covered that, If GW was able to cover all these costs years ago at $1-2 for metal and $.75 for plastic minis when sale were low. Surely they can cover it now at $3-4 for metal and $1.5-$2 for plastic when sales have skyrocketed and still make a hefty profit. That is a 100% increase on a plastic product with little labor involved in the production process. The fact that they are so above and beyond this...its laughable. And during a global recession no less. When the economy recovers just think of what they will believe they can get away with.

All companies have administration costs, you know what GW doesn't have. Assembly and paint departments, like most toy companies do. That GI Joe guy, believe it or not was just a piece of plastic on a sprue, there is still a lot of hand labor in those assembly processes. That $25 DVD player, has all those admin costs, even higher material costs. I'm no engineer but to design a DVD player from start to finish is probably more complex and costly than designing a few sprues of minis ...I could be wrong there.

Unfortunately I can not find a good product to compare them to. So lets take gi joes. Much more labor intensive in the production. In 20 years they have gone from $3 to $6. They are a bit bigger and are more detailed and articulate than the ones I used to buy as a kid. So 100% increase, I accept this as labor prices have skyrocketed in 20 years. Material costs have gone up for both products (plastic). There is comparatively little labor in GW products. So a 600% price increase in 20 years gets under my skin.

The production of most anything from a gi joe to a dvd player is ridiculous. So many bits and pieces

Production at GW

GW. step1 melt plastic beads, step2 inject in mold, step3 cool and eject sprue. Step 4 see step 1

Oh yeah they don't have any real competition yet, so they can charge what they want. (que mantic)

I guess I just miss when they were a small fun company, putting out things like Chaos toilets, and throwing in bags of goodies when you ordered stuff. You know it was nice not feeling like I was getting taken for a ride when I bought something. Now it just insults me.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 03:53:45


Post by: Vene


I have a hard time believing that the assembly is done by hand, not when I work at a fething factory. The only thing done by hand here is stacking the pallets (except when the robot is doing it), otherwise it's people making sure the machinery doesn't make mistakes. And it really does sound like you're mad at a company for being a company and wanting to make a profit.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 03:59:26


Post by: fullheadofhair


Andrew1975 wrote:

I guess I just miss when they were a small fun company, putting out things like Chaos toilets, and throwing in bags of goodies when you ordered stuff. You know it was nice not feeling like I was getting taken for a ride when I bought something. Now it just insults me.


Rose colored glasses? A small fun company with not enough customers - where do you think all the models they produce now come from? Previous the stuff was totally undercosted and we were getting bargins - the fact that prices have risen and people keep buying prove that. I think the price rise should have stopped around $30 per unit box (16+ models etc for fantasy) but @ $30 it seemed an OK price.

Back then the models were crap in comparison. They really were - you put some of the old metals from 15-20years again against some of the plastics of today and no-one can argue it isn't better.

Anyway - you're not being taken for a ride coz you're not buying.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 04:05:09


Post by: focusedfire


fullheadofhair wrote:
A small fun company with not enough customers - where do you think all the models they produce now come from?



China, mostly


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 04:05:13


Post by: Andrew1975


Anyway - you're not being taken for a ride coz you're not buying.


My point exactly.

A small fun company with not enough customers


Not sure where you get that. As far as I know they only started having money issues once they got bigger and started charging more. I pretty sure they were doing just fine back in the day. They had plenty of tournaments, ran games days, sold lots of miniatures and they had about 10 pretty well known games and many smaller ones. Now they have 1 game 40K, the last few editions of fantasy did not go very well for them.

Look i'm not trying to say lets have 30 marines for 18 bucks, But 10 marines for $20 isn't so bad, but 10 for $40 is insanity.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 04:13:39


Post by: Hulksmash


@Andrew

Your a very angry man about something you don't collect anymore. Also I'd like to disagree about a good army being $100. I've been buying since second edition and no army has ever cost me $100. If your talking rogue trader then maybe but that was before my time. I'm not a fanboy. Just a realist. I myself rarely purchase products from GW unless they are a) amazing and b) something my army can use to make it better. And even then my hobby is normally paid for by others (commission or tournament winnings). But I don't complain about the price because guess what? It's not something I'm willing to get worked up about. If they price me then they price me out. I'm a grown-up. I can decide when something isn't worth it to me. And I don't internet rage at people because of the price of a hobby no one is making me purchase.

I also like how you completely slide slid most of my post and simply focused on one small part. Kudos to you my friend. Enjoy your rage.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 04:16:39


Post by: Lord-Ironfist UNA


I can't stop laughing at the people saying a kid would go for a handful of plastic for $100 instead of two just released video games! Now we know who the real addicts are .

As a kid which would you pick?

Games-Workshop:
Island of Blood - $99

Alternative:
Halo 3 - $20
Gears of War 2 - $20
Left 4 Dead - $20
Bioshock - $20
Dead Rising - $20

Or go buy them pre-owned and throw in 2-3 more games. True they are older games, but the prices drop quickly shortly after the big release.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 04:36:21


Post by: eledamris


Model for model it's not a terrible deal, until you consider that the ENTIRE boxed set is chock full of the least popular troop choices in WHFB. I've never, ever put a High Elf on a griffon. Swordmasters suck in 8th ed. Poison Wind mortars aren't the best things in the world. What the hell are you going to do with 2 rat ogres? Ellyrian Reavers are borderline useless.
I don't see how these things are going to sell to veterans, and the new players who come in, if they do, will do so because some GW rep took them for a ride in explaining what a good deal the starter box was. They'll soon realize that while they might have $300 worth of miniatures, it's really $300 worth of garbage.
The only exception: the clanrats.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 04:57:59


Post by: Lord-Ironfist UNA


Don't be such a drama queen, ten Sea Guard will win you every game! At least that is what the employee told me (while making overly dramatic sound effects).


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 05:11:33


Post by: eledamris


Because they can shoot AND they have spears!!!


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 05:16:47


Post by: Andrew1975


I also like how you completely slide slid most of my post and simply focused on one small part. Kudos to you my friend. Enjoy your rage.


Kind of like you did huh with my post huh!

Hulksmash, You tell me how to play and what to play and I wasn't a good customer and you say I have the rage?

Not really angry, i've got my minis.

I'm dissapointed that the players let GW get away with it.
I'm annoyed because if I ran either of my companies this way I'd be out of business.

Some minis are better now, some are worse than they were. We could give lists but it'd just be cherry picking. In general they are better, I can admit that. But not 600% better.

Better is also a relative term, the details of sculpts are better in most cases (much worse in others). Many of the "multipose" really only work in one pose, standing strait up. I guess if i wanted to have a parade that would be great. I dont think everyone needs to be a character model though with the details, but hey a dynamic pose might be nice. They don't play any better. Your $40 squad of marines can't beat my $7 squad of marines. Most people probably can't even paint to the level required to make the new details stand out.

I think what saddens me the most is when I hear people like you, (probably a guy who loves the hobby and has given GW tones of cash, and deserves some loyalty from them) go "Yeah it's expensive but I suck it up every once in a while and buy something". Why should you have to suck it up? Why do you defend a company that makes you suck it up. They don't have to make you suck it up you know. They could just make it ........affordable. It's called better business practices.

People defend prices for only one reason. They'll be damned if they are made fools by a company dropping the prices like that. They really want to believe that these plastic men are worth what they were charged, because that is what they paid for them. You know what, to you maybe they are worth that. But that's not what they cost, and it's not what they should cost. It's not right. YOU SHOULD BE THE ONE WITH RAGE. Not me, i got my minis, or i'll get them used. When I have kids.......maybe they will get them used I don't know.

Competition is going to come along. You should support it! What you shouldn't do is bury your head in the sand and understand that the $40 in plastic that you just bought costs about $4 total to manufacture.

I have a hard time believing that the assembly is done by hand, not when I work at a fething factory. The only thing done by hand here is stacking the pallets (except when the robot is doing it), otherwise it's people making sure the machinery doesn't make mistakes. And it really does sound like you're mad at a company for being a company and wanting to make a profit.


You work in a factory where? The united states. Where labor is the most expensive in the world? Yes, You will witness very little hand assembly done there.

Where are most products made (especially the ones I was referring to)? Where labor is cheaper than machinery. Where they don't have to pay unions. Go to any major factory in China or the third world....its hand assembly.

Disclaimer

Oh please don't get me started on globalization and outsourcing of jobs, I'm not a fan of outsourcing manufacturing, but as far as I know GW products are not produced in the USA (and I'm not sure if they are still produced in England), so they might as well be produced in china to save the customer money. (sorry England...just my two cents...keep your stiff upper lip and all). However again comparative to the other products I used as an example there is very little labor involved in the cost of GW products, so move those machines back to England. (Good show chaps) Either way if these are manufactured in England or the U.S. the prices are still crazy, if they are made in china they are redonkulous





Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 05:21:14


Post by: snurl


The price for GW plastics will be coming way down, at the bankruptcy clearance sale, if they keep doing what they are doing.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 05:58:03


Post by: Lord-Ironfist UNA


Andrew1975 wrote:snip


I also feel the prices on GW miniatures are borderline outrageous, but this is DakkaDakka. People will argue that GW is great for saving them a few bucks, completely ignoring the fact the models went from metal to plastic and that it was GW who drove the metal prices that high in the first place. I think you'll find that most people who feel like you do are not on the forums. To be honest they're probably not doing anything GW.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 07:44:40


Post by: focusedfire


Andrew1975 wrote:You work in a factory where? The united states. Where labor is the most expensive in the world? Yes, You will witness very little hand assembly done there.

Where are most products made (especially the ones I was referring to)? Where labor is cheaper than machinery. Where they don't have to pay unions. Go to any major factory in China or the third world....its hand assembly.

Disclaimer

Oh please don't get me started on globalization and outsourcing of jobs, I'm not a fan of outsourcing manufacturing, but as far as I know GW products are not produced in the USA (and I'm not sure if they are still produced in England), so they might as well be produced in china to save the customer money. (sorry England...just my two cents...keep your stiff upper lip and all). However again comparative to the other products I used as an example there is very little labor involved in the cost of GW products, so move those machines back to England. (Good show chaps) Either way if these are manufactured in England or the U.S. the prices are still crazy, if they are made in china they are redonkulous



A lot of their products are are now made in china, with modern equipment(Your info on china seens to be a decade behind here), the chinese have modernized their production capabilities considerably.

I don't know if they they still produce any pieces in the Tennessee factory, they were a few years ago when they moved the facility from Baltimore.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 08:22:40


Post by: H.B.M.C.


davetaylor wrote:H.B.M.C., thanks for cutting a tiny snippet from my post, letting me know what my memories should have been, then completely missing my point. Way to argue you on the Internet.

Now I remember why I steer clear of the Discussion sub-forums here on Dakka. Wait, let me use an orkmoticon so you know I'm just kidding


Oh harden up Dave. It's the internet - it's not like it's 'serious business' or anything. And besides, quoting your entire post would have been a waste of time, as I was only responding to the error you made, not the point you were making.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 09:07:39


Post by: Wolfstan


I think you are 100% correct in that statement Andrew1975. Just because you like the product, doesn't mean you have to bend over and assume the position. The only reason they get away with it is because they can, and if their customers had any sense or willpower they would put a stop to it.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 09:23:30


Post by: Big P


Andrew1975 wrote:


People defend prices for only one reason. They'll be damned if they are made fools by a company dropping the prices like that. They really want to believe that these plastic men are worth what they were charged, because that is what they paid for them.



Amen to that. Someone just hit the nail with a hammer.

Andrew, I think we had the same GW experience.

Bet you still have your original copy of Orcs Drift and Chapter Approved...


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 13:04:43


Post by: Ouze


Lord-Ironfist UNA wrote:I can't stop laughing at the people saying a kid would go for a handful of plastic for $100 instead of two just released video games! Now we know who the real addicts are .

As a kid which would you pick?

Games-Workshop:
Island of Blood - $99

Alternative:
Halo 3 - $20
Gears of War 2 - $20
Left 4 Dead - $20
Bioshock - $20
Dead Rising - $20

Or go buy them pre-owned and throw in 2-3 more games. True they are older games, but the prices drop quickly shortly after the big release.


Although I agree with the sentiment in general, You chose poorly on specifics. Which is to say, of your "just-released" video games,

Halo 3: released Sept 2007. $27
Gears of War 2: Released November 2008. $28
Ledt 4 Dead: released November 2008. $20
Bioshock: Released August 2007. $20
Dead Rising: Released August 2006. $17

Saying "Would you buy Island of Blood for $90, or 3 games that were released 2 to 4 years ago" isn't exactly the same argument, yes?




Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 13:07:54


Post by: Chimera_Calvin


@Andrew1975.

Whilst a large amount of supplementary stuff (figure cases, I think the RoB game boards) is manufactured in China and most of the printing (Rules, WD, etc) is done in Poland, the minis are produced in Nottingham, UK.

When the US operation got big enough, they copied the factory (literally - the layout was identical) and built one in the US (can't remember where) to reduce shipping costs.


The point still stands, though, that GW are overpriced, especially when compared to some of the competition. Any arguments saying that you can't compare prices because the competition makes different games are spurious - after all, Ford makes cars, Volvo makes cars. They are different in many ways but they are still cars and worthy of comparison on price, quality and applicability to your needs.

You can do the same with wargames - it doesn't matter if they are made by PP, GW, Rackham, Mantic, Wyrd or MyMateBob (not a real company ), they still produce wargames minis and rules and should theoretically be in direct competition with each other. The reason why GW charges what it does is because as yet none of the other companies have got their 5h1t together to a level where they can challenge them on a meaningful scale.

When this happens, GW prices will fall or GW will go under - its that simple.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 13:08:54


Post by: Ouze


Sidstyler wrote:I bought the Orange Box for $30 last month (yeah I know, I'm a little behind the times)


Spoiler:
Spoiler:
The cake is a lie.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 14:38:42


Post by: agnosto


focusedfire wrote:

A lot of their products are are now made in china, with modern equipment(Your info on china seens to be a decade behind here), the chinese have modernized their production capabilities considerably.

I don't know if they they still produce any pieces in the Tennessee factory, they were a few years ago when they moved the facility from Baltimore.


QFT.

Wargames Forge charges $20 for 18 greatcoats and their miniatures are produced in China; I'm sure they're making a reasonable profit off of sales but the price is low enough that they are selling well (at least going by their online forum and facebook page) and that's even after the shipping snaffu here recently.

Mantic produces some nice figs, cheaper than GW and includes a case with each unit.

Production costs are not an issue in GWs pricing. What is an issue, as has been mentioned before, is we're paying for overhead costs unrelated to actual production and delivery. Support for competitions, the brick and mortar shops that are continually shuffled about. Foremost, we're paying for the salaries of a CEO, CFO, Legal department,etc. all of which smaller companies like WF and Mantic don't have or contract out for; believe me, they'll charge more as they grow....just like GW. None of this excuses the high prices (they'll charge what they can get) but it does result in more and more people looking elsewhere....seriously why pay GW (even discounted) for a box of 10 cadians when I can get 18 greatcoats for the same or a cheaper price?

Nobody's going out of business here. GW is not going to close shop tomorrow. FLGS owners like Mikhaila won't see their stores run dry because of GWs prices (as I'm sure Warhammer is only a percentage of his shop's earnings) and dedicated GW fans will continue to buy for their own reasons......for now. I'm sure GW realizes that as comepetition becomes more fierce, they'll have to do something different or fall by the wayside. They've had a good run but nothing's forever; even TSR (1973-1997)closed shop and sold out to Wizards of the Coast and D&D has/had a larger audience with a much stronger IP than GW (Books, movies, saturday morning cartoons, dolls and figs, video games, clothing, gaming merchandise, novels).


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Ouze wrote:

Although I agree with the sentiment in general, You chose poorly on specifics. Which is to say, of your "just-released" video games,

Halo 3: released Sept 2007. $27
Gears of War 2: Released November 2008. $28
Ledt 4 Dead: released November 2008. $20
Bioshock: Released August 2007. $20
Dead Rising: Released August 2006. $17

Saying "Would you buy Island of Blood for $90, or 3 games that were released 2 to 4 years ago" isn't exactly the same argument, yes?




Yeah but he can trade those games back and forth with his friends or go to gamestop and buy a pre-owned for less; will you loan a friend an army that you spent months putting together and painting?


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 15:26:25


Post by: aka_mythos


This hobby really suffers for GW not having a peer competitor. The table top wargaming industry is probably just over a $300M/yr industry, of which GW is about $230M/year. The rest split between a large number of much smaller companies. Rackham is a 1/10th GW size, based on revenue and when wizkidz was sold their value had sunk down to less than that and those two are the next biggest companies. By not having to compete GW can get away with what they do.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 15:27:03


Post by: kastellan


Actually, on a second look this is really good value for money. If your like me and only want one army (High Elves of course) and you swap the army you dont want with a mate for the one you do want, you end up with quite a lot of miniatures which is almost enough to start battling right away. Now compare this to the $150 us Aussies pay for battalion box sets, for an extra $10 I'll be getting a regiment of Reavers, 2 Lords on a freaking griffon, 2 mages, and the rulebook. Well worth it IMO.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 16:36:59


Post by: PinkPaw


Something no one has mentioned (that I noticed) - GW most likely raised the price so people couldn't profit too much from breaking the sets. If you price a set too cheap people make a killing breaking it up and selling it off in small pieces; not exactly what they intended by making the sets in the first place. They are meant to be a good deal, especially for a beginning hobbyist; not something to be sold in pieces on Ebay.

Besides they are a BUSINESS. And a sucessful one at that. They can never make everyone happy, especially people who are blind to how businesses are run.

I personally would like to see plastic meganobs since the current ones are crazy expensive but GW takes a gamble every time they produce a plastic model. Unlike metal ones they could actually LOSE money on the plastic models. Just because the end product is made from cheap plastic does NOT make the process inexpensive.

For example, a plastic ring costs .01 cents for the actual plastic it is made out of. That one cent does NOT include the $80,000 spent on molds, the $2 million dollar machine, the electricity to run the machine, the 5 people who check for quality control, the carboard box it comes in, the shipping to the major distribution center and then to the local store, or the sales person who sells it to the retailer. Suddenly that ring no longer costs one cent... how much that ring really "cost" is determined by how many eventually sell since those huge costs will be divided among all of the rings produced. So that ring could cost 5 cents in the end OR as much as ten dollars. If you sold the ring for 10 cents to the retailer then you are hoping you sell enough so that the ring will cost you less than 10 cents... it's a gamble.

And yet people will still complain about spending 10 cents on a "ring that cost one cent!!!". Sigh.

And last - it is a free country. Spend your money on what you feel is "worth it".


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 16:48:47


Post by: asmith


I keep posting it but it doesn't seem to sink in. On all the models GW makes they make a 72% margin on average. That means taking everything you said into account with the molds machinery and manpower to produce the goods, they are making a big margin by any standard. $12 to produce a $60 box on average. Almost any consumer good you find will be on a much smaller margin than that. For instance Walmart and most of its suppliers operates on less than 10%.

People don't complain because the plastic in the ring costs a penny. They complain because it actually cost a penny to make with all those factors you added in considered. Actually to put it better, for most other things people are used to buying, if a ring costs 10cents to purchase, it likely cost 9 cents to get it there all things considered, where GW would charge 50 cents for the same thing. Its that 5x multiplier for GW goods that in my opinion, keeps them from explosive growth. Hell knock it down to a 3x multiplier and they would more than make up the money both in short, and especially long term IMO.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 17:02:09


Post by: Andrew1975


A lot of their products are are now made in china, with modern equipment(Your info on china seens to be a decade behind here), the chinese have modernized their production capabilities considerably.


While I appreciate the input, i know a little bit about Chinese factories. My sister used to have to go to China to supervise the production of toys for a large well known toy company. I'm not saying everything is hand assembled, but there is a good amount, especially with the products I used as examples. No two Gi joe characters are the same, you cannot create assembly machinery for each different Joe. I also used to have to go to factories on the U.S. Mexico border to supervise the assembly of (get this) audio greeting cards. The sound chips, speakers, and printing were done in China, but to avoid a "Made in China" tag this company used to have the hand assembly done in sweatshops full of illegal immigrants. I didn't work for them much longer after that.

Please don't get me wrong, I don't hate GW. I think they make a great product. They fumble here and there (Minatars), but their minis are for the most part better than they were a few years ago. I think they are setting themselves up for a fall though. They have turned from a game company that had hundreds of games, to a manufacturing company that has 40K. They continue to whittle down their revenue stream buy constantly pricing their products out of the reach of entire segments of the market.

If they are having problems running the company at the prices they charge they are very inefficient. All it would take is some company like Hasbro to crunch the numbers and decide to buy them. We know what happens then, cheap prepainted crap, and a further watering down of the game until is resembles WOC crap. Do you want that? I don't want that?

Competition in the market place improves every aspect of a business. It cuts costs, increases quality, and creates greater talent in the field. It turns fat companies into Olympic athletes. The customer benefits, but so does the company. Could you imagine the juggernaut that GW could be, if they were priced properly and created "warm fuzzies" for all their customers?

Yes there will always be people that complain about the price. If you can logically defend it and keep the grumblings to a minority, that's fine. But this is not currently GWs situation. When you have professional reviewers questioning the price of your products in public, you have a major problem. When was the last time you heard a Car and Driver reporter say that car is a nice car....but its way overpriced for what it is. I see it all the time in GW reviews.

If you ask me if the new box is a value, I'd have to say No. The contents of the box are top notch (GW is getting much better at this compare 1st ed Space hulk with the current space hulk. 1st ed space hulk however worked just fine, but it was not as pretty). It's still over priced, but probably not by much. The reason it is a terrible value though is that "It has $300 dollars worth on miniatures". Compared to the rest of the GW line these are worth $300 DOLLARS! I would wonder what I was getting into at that point. It's like the drug dealer giving you the first one free. That box is not worth $300 dollars, its not worth $90, If GW was honest they would sell it for $60, if they really wanted to get their hooks in people the would sell it for $40.

Sony losses money on every PS3 they sell when they are first released. Why? To get them into the market, drive down the cost of production, beat their competition, and start selling games, peripherals and licenses which is where the real money is made.

Mantic is going to give its rules away (will they be great rules, who knows, does it build good will and interest, you bet it does). They will have multiple starter sets at reasonable prices. I think their minis look good and come in cases (brilliant marketing by the way), I don't like the elves style, but the dwarfs are actually believable. Other people say they are not GW quality, I can't confirm or deny that, I havn't seen them up close, but they look good. Good enough that I would field them to represent my ranked troops. There is a point where every mini does not have to be a masterpiece. I don't need to fiddle with and paint 300 character models just so I can field my army.

In business there is not the Big and the Little. There is the Slow (dark eldar codex is how old?) and the Fast (Mantic has put out 3 soon to be 4 armies in a matter of months and will be releasing a full game from concept to finish in what 4 months). GW Wake up.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 17:23:49


Post by: PinkPaw


I don't want to get into a lengthy argument about actual costs (since it is almost entirely speculation) - I just want to reiterate two points.

One - they don't want people to break their sets for large profit.

Two - they are a business. They will price their products according to their business model. I highly doubt they spin a wheel to determine their prices. As a consumer if you do not feel that something is worth what they are charging you can elect not to buy it. Simple as that.

I've owned and operated two businesses (one solely retail and one wholesale production and retail) and I could go on and on about mark-ups but its all boils down to GW being a very normal business.

I think my first point is the most applicable to the original post anyways.



Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 17:33:56


Post by: asmith


sigh... it's not "entirely speculation" it's from GW's financial statement.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 17:38:34


Post by: agnosto


@ PinkPaw,

If point one is true, it doesn't make a very nice introductory kit into their line for new players. I believe this is the intent but if you make it too high, you won't get as much new interest.

@ All
Several people have posted comparisons between GW and consol game systems. What they have all left out is the concept of perceived value. There is greater perceived value in the purchase of an electronic good than in a pile of plastic army men. The reason? I can use a PS3 for more than just playing games on; there's greater utility in an object that provides me with hours of game play, a Blu-Ray movie player, an internet portal, the ability to play music, etc. I can build, paint and play a game with my little plastic army men....that's it.

Scenario: Man owns a console game system, nerds out all during the week but has a GF and wants some quality time so slips in a CD with some mood music or watches a movie with her.... this means that a console system can possibly help you get laid. Now imagine if you take a woman to your house and tell ask her "Hey do you want to look at my army men for two hours and then make out?" This means your army men may have the opposite result.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 17:41:14


Post by: Andrew1975


Something no one has mentioned (that I noticed) - GW most likely raised the price so people couldn't profit too much from breaking the sets. If you price a set too cheap people make a killing breaking it up and selling it off in small pieces; not exactly what they intended by making the sets in the first place. They are meant to be a good deal, especially for a beginning hobbyist; not something to be sold in pieces on Ebay.


This is a perfect example of the worst business practices ever! Price a product so that in no way is it a deal for anyone! This is quite possibly the worst excuse ever. Why does GW care what you do with your minis once you have bought them. They have never sold the contents of any of their boxed sets separately! If you want deff copters you have no choice but to buy the box, or buy off ebay or a friend. Do you think they will be rereleasing any of those minis from the new box in the stores seperatly? Not likely.

So it's ok for GW to force you to buy a new starter box because you like the new silver helms? This.....This is your rational? WOW I never imagined GW tactics as that sinister, and you are using it as a defense. I want to know what businesses you ran so I can stay clear of those.

I accuse them of being slow and stupid......you counter with their just mean. Hey don't share your toys


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 17:46:32


Post by: PinkPaw


Um they did it in the past to their box sets (raised the price so people would stop breaking them up as much - now when you break them up you can break-even or make a little money but not a huge profit) - it has been posted about in the past on Dakka as well as other forums. Not new news - just something not mentioned on this thread.

And if the price is too high to entice new players (which GW will shortly find out once they go on sale) the only other option would be to offer less pieces and lower the price to like $60. Unless they never took a business class I'm pretty sure they considered the other option but decided that keeping the sets large enough to actually play with was a better option.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 17:56:36


Post by: Andrew1975


Um they did it in the past to their box sets (raised the price so people would stop breaking them up as much) - it has been posted about in the past on Dakka as well as other forums. Not new news - just something not mentioned on this thread.


Wouldn't that just encourage the sales and splitting of boxes? At $40 I'd keep them all, at $100 I'm pretty much forced to sell what I'm not using. Raising the prices creates the market for resales.

If GW ever actually used this rational its an excuse to raise prices, not a reason.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 18:15:39


Post by: pombe


Andrew1975 wrote:Raising the prices creates the market for resales.


Indeed!

1) Buy GW models.
2) Wait until next GW price hike.
3) Profit!


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 18:20:12


Post by: Gitzbitah


Once upon a time, that would have been a gamble. Now, it seems more certain than the stock market.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 18:30:48


Post by: heacy hitter


HA HA! nerd rage love it


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 18:33:03


Post by: Papaskittels


i remember when i bought mine..... it was only 75$


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 18:34:11


Post by: Andrew1975


Once upon a time, that would have been a gamble. Now, it seems more certain than the stock market.


GW perfects alchemy, turns plastic into Gold*. Soon you will see "Cash for GW products" stores in every mall. We'll all be millionaires.

Step one. Steal underpants

Step two. ?

Step three. Profit

*fools gold (sorry knew iit would be in the next post...so i went for it)


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 18:39:04


Post by: Scott-S6


asmith wrote:. the IoB box set should not cost more to produce than a basic DVD player.


How can you even think that IoB should be cheaper? Hundreds of millions of DVD players are made every year. How many IoB sets will be produced total? I'd be amazed if it was 1% of that (i.e. several million).

This is why DVD players are cheaper. The comparison to DVD players was to refute agnosto premise that being more complicated makes something more expensive. He has since suggested that something should be more expensive because some of it's component materials cost more per gram, also clearly incorrect. Economies of scale and cost of labour are the factors which define production costs. For most products materials are insignificant.

The only legitimate way to show that GW stuff is overpriced is to show similar items at a similar quality being sold for significantly less. The example was made of the greatcoat infantry. I'm not keen on the sculpts but they are much better value than most GW stuff. That's a useful example


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 18:40:17


Post by: Vene


agnosto wrote:Scenario: Man owns a console game system, nerds out all during the week but has a GF and wants some quality time so slips in a CD with some mood music or watches a movie with her.... this means that a console system can possibly help you get laid. Now imagine if you take a woman to your house and tell ask her "Hey do you want to look at my army men for two hours and then make out?" This means your army men may have the opposite result.

I think the latter would be more successful with my gf.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 18:40:30


Post by: heacy hitter


Andrew1975 wrote:


Step one. Steal underpants

Step two. ?

Step three. Profit




step two, beer its part of every great plan


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 18:41:29


Post by: Scott-S6


agosto wrote:
Halo 3: released Sept 2007. $27
Gears of War 2: Released November 2008. $28
Ledt 4 Dead: released November 2008. $20
Bioshock: Released August 2007. $20
Dead Rising: Released August 2006. $17
Saying "Would you buy Island of Blood for $90, or 3 games that were released 2 to 4 years ago" isn't exactly the same argument, yes?


Computer games have a very unusual pricing model. Few items are steadily reduced in price as the design ages. It would be nice to buy a new car for 50-25% of it's original purchase prices because that model came out a few years ago....


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 18:43:50


Post by: aka_mythos


asmith wrote:I keep posting it but it doesn't seem to sink in. On all the models GW makes they make a 72% margin on average. That means taking everything you said into account with the molds machinery and manpower to produce the goods, they are making a big margin by any standard. $12 to produce a $60 box on average. Almost any consumer good you find will be on a much smaller margin than that. For instance Walmart and most of its suppliers operates on less than 10%.

People don't complain because the plastic in the ring costs a penny. They complain because it actually cost a penny to make with all those factors you added in considered. Actually to put it better, for most other things people are used to buying, if a ring costs 10cents to purchase, it likely cost 9 cents to get it there all things considered, where GW would charge 50 cents for the same thing. Its that 5x multiplier for GW goods that in my opinion, keeps them from explosive growth. Hell knock it down to a 3x multiplier and they would more than make up the money both in short, and especially long term IMO.
I worked with a number of different consumer product companies, they'd come in and give us presentations about their goals. I'd say the average margin was 50%. The companies that could tend to throw money around tend to have margins above that. Like Dell had a 50% margin while Alienware was about 65%. The killer was Gillette with ridiculous mark ups 300% on its razor heads, as well as golf club companies which would sell a $10 golf club for $150+.

I'm not disagreeing with you, just think you might be over generalizing.

The thing is the price of materials that go into a GW model kit isn't much. Having designed injection molds, its probably $3-4 for a 10 man squad, maybe a little more when you add the bits, but allowing for higher end materials. I think part of the problem alot of people have is that by its nature of being a kit, it is inherently unrefined comes out of a machine and goes in a box. Its specialized but its not labor intensive. A standard two sprue, 10 man kit has only $4 (lets go high side) of material, add in $2 for packaging. Labor and other overhead, lets say doubles it since when I planned production thats was a good estimate, $12 My belief is that even before they sell it to retailers they've already marked it up beyond the margins you're talking about. If you purchase from a wholesaler GW's products are 45% off, so the wholesaler probably gets it at 50% off. Selling a "$12" kit that retails for $35 to the wholesaler/retailers for $17.50 - $22.50. So a $12 investment nets GW $5.50, $10.50, $23.00 depending on who is buying it, that is depleted by taxes, rent, debts, etc and whats left is profit. In GW's case for a revenue of $230M about $20M was profit, putting their company wide profit margin at 10%. Assuming an even distribution of other costs, depending on who they sell it to a kit makes them $1.75, $2.25, or $3.50 profit.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 18:45:40


Post by: Lord-Ironfist UNA


Halo 3: released Sept 2007. $27
Gears of War 2: Released November 2008. $28
Ledt 4 Dead: released November 2008. $20
Bioshock: Released August 2007. $20
Gears of War 1 - $5

Fix'd

I would go for the five games to be completely honest, even if they are older. Just because they are older doesn't mean they are not worth the price, especially when each one offers dozens of hours of single player and hundreds of multi player. I guess you could just go for the plastic models that are completely useless in any 8th edition game... we could just call it $300 to make a Sea Guard unit that would be remotely effective. In the end it is "such a fantastic deal" because GW jacked the prices up on the regular boxes, it is only the appearance of a good deal.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 18:48:00


Post by: Kanluwen


So rather than pissing and moaning about it here, calmly compose a letter stating your grievance and send it.

It's not that hard, but given some of the mannerisms and behaviors of people here I can understand why they'd just junk most of their mail.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 18:50:51


Post by: agnosto


Scott-S6 wrote:
Computer games have a very unusual pricing model. Few items are steadily reduced in price as the design ages. It would be nice to buy a new car for 50-25% of it's original purchase prices because that model came out a few years ago....


I guess cars in England don't depreciate as fast as they do here...
A $20,000 (USD) car that is just three years old is worth about $11,616. That's just a straight number and doesn't take into account factors like wear and tear...
http://www.carprice.com/depreciation-calculator


kanluwen wrote:
So rather than pissing and moaning about it here, calmly compose a letter stating your grievance and send it.

It's not that hard, but given some of the mannerisms and behaviors of people here I can understand why they'd just junk most of their mail.


What else is the internet for if not for "pissing and moaning"? If I can't do that then all I have left is porn and emptying my spam folder.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 19:10:52


Post by: Cane


Yea price hikes are gakky but you arguably get much more for your dollar nowadays since the quality of the starter set models have improved greatly. Its also still cheaper than or around the same price as comic book shop board games and even GW's own Space Hulk.

As for attracting new players, I think this era of GW has been the best for that mainly due to GW Video Games (upcoming titles: Space Marine, 40k MMO, probably future DOW/Warhammer Online stuff, and there's even been smaller games like Blood Bowl), GW Movies - Okay so there's really only one in the works but if that Space Marine DVD proves to be successful I can see them rehiring that studio for future projects, and better and easier to assemble models (new Leman Russ is much easier to assemble for example, comes with various weapon upgrades that can be interchangeable, and the newer models are simply much more bad ass than they used to be - now everyone can get cool looking flyers like Valks and superheavies like the Banebldae instead of only dreaming of owning an expensive Thunderhawk or FW Baneblade/Titan...).


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 19:10:54


Post by: asmith


@ mythos: I just looked up dell it has been less than 20% margin since the 90's, so I'm not sure where your number comes from. It's funny you should mention razor blades, that 300% markup is less than the 400% markup that you get buying direct from GW! Alienware is a subsidiary of dell and Gillete is owned by P&G so those numbers aren't commonly available. I still say you'll struggle to find any companies that produce consumer goods that operate at these high margin levels. the medical device industry operates at these kind of levels because of the large risk involved, but not consumer goods.

On topic most razor blade companies sell or give away the more expensive handles at a loss so they can make their money on the high margin blades. GW is selling everything at the high margin without the hook.

I'm also an engineer that designs molds. I agree with the piece part numbers you gave if you were outsourcing everything, but GW does all their manufacturing in house, so the real numbers are going to be much lower than that. PS is like $3 a pound so raw material costs are likely less than a dollar. We don't have to speculate on their production costs because they give them in the statement. 72% margin average on all their products.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
@ scott-s6: I highly doubt that any particular version of DVD player sells hundreds of millions per year. Maybe all of the hundreds of models out there combine for hundreds of millions of year, but likely we are talking approximately the same number in regards to individual units. The reason DVD players are so much cheaper is because the people who make them operate at very low margins.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 19:21:00


Post by: Alvar


You guys forgot the 2 items marked up the most EVER. Foutain sodas and popcorn!


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 19:25:58


Post by: asmith


I just looked up proctor and gamble and what do you know also 20% margin.

@ Alvar : also the reason why a lot of people don't buy popcorn and soda at the movies (or even go to the movies) anymore.

Edit: just for fun if GW operated at a 20% margin level the $100 box would instead cost $25. ((N-20)/N = .2 for the math impaired).

I'm not saying GW can afford to operate at these kind of levels, but this kind of pricing is what people are used to paying for products which cost about the same to make.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 19:35:12


Post by: agnosto


U.S. DVD HARDWARE SALES (in millions: 1997-2006) 194.362 or 21.6 per year....in the most consumerist nation in the world.

http://www.dvdinformation.com/news/press/CES010807.htm


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 19:48:44


Post by: asmith


@ agnosto: Good find, now if we divide that by the hundreds if not thousands of models of DVD players made over that time frame each individual model is going to have a more reasonable number of sales per year (in the 10's to 100's of thousands per year range) not that far from what GW produces.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
For a scary comparison Walmart would sell the same $100 box that cost $20 to make for $21.27 (6% margin I just looked up) last year. No wonder they put everyone out of business.

Edit: ^this is your $25 DVD player.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 19:55:43


Post by: agnosto


Interesting conversation here. I had a bit of time and was reading the GW FY2010 earnings statement when I ran across this:

GW wrote:Reported sales increased by 0.6% to £126.5 million for the year. However, on a constant currency basis, sales were down by 3.1% from £125.7 million to £121.8 million; progress was achieved in Northern Europe (+0.5%) and North America (+0.4%), while sales in Continental Europe (-9.3%), Australia (-2.8%) and Emerging Markets and Japan (-3.5%) were in decline."


Being pegged to the GBP is painful. The GBP is too strong for a smallish international firm IMHO.

GW wrote:Before royalty income, core business operating profit rose by £7.5 million to £13.0 million. On a constant currency basis, core business operating profit increased by £6.2 million to £11.7 million. This constant currency growth was delivered by a 4.0% improvement in our gross margin and £4.3 million reduction in overheads.


How many price raises have we seen? No wonder their gross margin has gone up. So, operating costs are going down and margin (profit per unit) is rising.... Good for them, bad for our wallets.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 20:02:44


Post by: asmith


I think that is what we have been seeing on a year over year basis since the start of the LOTR era. Constant or declining sales with constant price raising, meaning in real terms every year less and less people are buying. They think they are market saturated and are milking the diehards for all they are worth, when in reality I think they can expand their market dramatically if they priced reasonably.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 20:07:45


Post by: Stubby


I bought Team Fortress 2 a couple years ago for 20 bucks.
I have over 1000 hours of game time, Fractions of a cent for a game that is constantly updated by the developers.

Last night, i prepared a list for a blood angels army i wanted to start, 600 dollars all together, for something that i only get a few hours every week to play...

I am no economist, i know nothing about how to run a company, but as a consumer, i am looking at the value of the entertainment, why should i start that 600 dollar army when i can buy the next valve game next year? for probably 60 bucks.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 20:09:26


Post by: Andrew1975


You guys forgot the 2 items marked up the most EVER. Foutain sodas and popcorn!


Off topic but it did remind me of something. Look at the mark up GW puts on things that we can actually do good comparisons on. Lets compare shall we?

These may actually be the most marked up items EVER
Citadel tool kit $120...........Not sure probably $30 at Harbor Freight
Hobby knife $15................$1 at HF
Plastic cutters $15.............$2 at HF
hobby drill $15...................$2 at HF
Razor saw $22...................$2.99, for $7 i get one with a miter box, for $15 I get an 18 piece professional saw set
Crappy air brush $30...........$9.99 the cheapest they had, probably not as crappy as the GW one, 19.99 for the deluxe brush with control, still not a great brush, but leagues
. better than GW's (P.S. GW charges you more because you might use it as a multimelta, that would cut sales)
Super Glue $6.60................3 for $1
PVA glue $8.25..................Really? It's F@@@ing Elmer's glue! $1 anywhere on the face of the planet
Green stuff 20grams $10....$2.99 most anywhere else
Razor Wire $9.50...........$...$.50 Home depot
Work Station $40...............$10 Pat Catan's
Flock $8.25........................Old ladies buy this with their pension money at any craft store for pennies...$1

Is GW buying these things retail and then selling them? That may be why everything is so expensive....all that time melting other companies model kits for the plastic.

Next GW will be selling you dirt for $10 a pound

What amazes me is that they have the ball's to even sell these things at this markup. They are doing it with the minis too. Stop denying it. Stop making excuses for it. They are not luxury items, a baseball bat is not a luxury item. A gold plated baseball bat signed my Mickey Mantel is a luxury item. When the minis come pre painted to my specs and pre asseembled and move on their own, then i'll accept them as luxury items.

Until then they are model kits and should be priced as such.



Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 20:25:43


Post by: kaidsin


People always complain about the prices and i understand it. Specially right now. But if you look at even kids toys now days they are expensive, some transformer piece of garbage can easily be $40 for some simple plastic toy. Also i have a ps3 as many of you probably do and i get WAY more use from my models then my ps3. Prices seem daunting when you are going from nothing to apocalypse sized games. If you are collecting for some years or so your army will grow without having to spend more then $100 or so at a time. Also i think about how much time i actually spend just painting my models. I feel the prices being higher almost makes you reflect on each squad as something you should spend the time to paint masterclass convert and truly look at that one squad for how nice it is, instead of thinking troops and such as fillers in your army. I have been repainting my army and doing every model with the same care and detail as i would do my hero's (yes its taking FOREVER) but fewer models really makes an impression when they are all nicely painted and detailed. I think complaints about prices are greatly related to impatience. I WANT A 5000 point army, and i WANT it now!

These may actually be the most marked up items EVER
Citadel tool kit $120...........Not sure probably $30 at Harbor Freight
Hobby knife $15................$1 at HF
Plastic cutters $15.............$2 at HF
hobby drill $15...................$2 at HF
Razor saw $22...................$2.99, for $7 i get one with a miter box, for $15 I get an 18 piece professional saw set
Crappy air brush $30...........$9.99 the cheapest they had, probably not as crappy as the GW one, 19.99 for the deluxe brush with control, still not a great brush, but leagues
. better than GW's (P.S. GW charges you more because you might use it as a multimelta, that would cut sales)
Super Glue $6.60................3 for $1
PVA glue $8.25..................Really? It's F@@@ing Elmer's glue! $1 anywhere on the face of the planet
Green stuff 20grams $10....$2.99 most anywhere else
Razor Wire $9.50...........$...$.50 Home depot
Work Station $40...............$10 Pat Catan's
Flock $8.25........................Old ladies buy this with their pension money at any craft store for pennies...$1


Seriously though does anyone buy supplies from Gameswork shop? Even the people who work in my games workshop tell me to go to other hobby stores and pick things up for fractions of the price. Then again i know them pretty well.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 20:38:31


Post by: FoxPhoenix135


50 bucks for a used copy of Red Dead Redemption for the Xbox 360: Gaming time upwards of 150+ hours.

Hundreds of dollars (maybe thousands) in GW product sitting unused in my attic: Gaming time somewhere around 40 hours. Painting and modeling time somewhere around 200 hours.

On the plus side, I can re-sell some of my GW product.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 21:04:52


Post by: Andrew1975


People always complain about the prices and i understand it. Specially right now. But if you look at even kids toys now days they are expensive, some transformer piece of garbage can easily be $40 for some simple plastic toy


Lets have a look GI joe ultimate battle pack (target exclusive, so not a giant run)



2 Tanks (one of them motorized, Pew, Pew, Pew)
1 Flight pod
7 action figures, but for arguments sake 3 are vehicle drives so lets say 3+1 character model

Suggested price $62.99 according to list. I saw it in the stores for $55. I could buy it now new in box on ebay $50.

2 baneblades $99 a piece = $200 (I could have gone with 2 leman russ at $100, but these tanks are giant in comparison to even the baneblades, plus one is motorized)
Land Speeder= $30 (yeah could have used a jet bike $15, but the land speeder is closest in size)
3 marines= $8.25
cheapest character model I could find was marine Sargent 2 = $12.25 (yes he's metal, do you want me to use the $20 plastic marine commander)

$250.50! for unassembled, unpainted more detailed plastic sprue. It's not a perfect analogy but the difference tells the story!




Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 21:10:24


Post by: Kanluwen


And those are all just repainted variants of toys I had when i was a kid in 92.

The vehicles retailed for $15.99 each, with no figures in there.

What's your point?


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 21:10:34


Post by: agnosto


Yeah baneblades are funny they're so expensive.
Wanna compare with another niche market? RC planes.
$90 will buy me a radio control airplane.....something that flies! Can your baneblade actually shoot stuff?

http://www.nitroplanes.com/gl401-3-j3-red-rtf.html


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 21:22:30


Post by: Andrew1975


And those are all just repainted variants of toys I had when i was a kid in 92.

The vehicles retailed for $15.99 each, with no figures in there.

What's your point?


Interestingly enough they are not. They are all new molds/sculpts with additional details all redone for the 25th anniversary (yes including the vehicles, look it up if you doubt me). And hey that $17 Jain Zar .....I wonder when she was sculpted? oh yeah she cost about $5 then too. Or my favorite the $33 traitors of chaos box....well over 10 years old and probably $8 when it came out. (well it never came out that way before, but you get the drift..I hope)

Hasbro actually remade all the toys new sculpts/molds whatever. Many of the molds GW uses have been around for over 10 years.

Come correct or don't come at all! Booya!


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 21:28:17


Post by: Kanluwen


Andrew1975 wrote:
And those are all just repainted variants of toys I had when i was a kid in 92.

The vehicles retailed for $15.99 each, with no figures in there.

What's your point?


Interestingly enough they are not. They are all new molds/sculpts with additional details (yes including the vehicles, look it up if you doubt me). And hey that $17. Jain Zar .....I wonder when she was sculpted? oh yeah she cost about $5 then too.

Hasbro actually remade all the toys new sculpts/molds whatever. Many of the molds GW uses have been around for over 10 years.

Come correct or don't come at all! Booya!

Bzzzzt, wrong.

They are not new. But hey, since you want to compare "detail"...

Take a peek inside of any one of those vehicles for the "detail" inside of them. Something like 75% of the detail will be decals over flat, unpainted surfaces molded from the exact same piece of plastic as the outer hull.

The only thing that Hasbro has remade is the 'new' molds. Games Workshop does this very same thing--in fact, that's part of what their projected costs for molds are.

How much it will cost them to replace said mold once it's worn down, will the mold be something that they need to run multiples of, will it be profitable to actually reuse the mold, etc.

Don't come back until you get some game, son.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 21:30:28


Post by: agnosto


Why are you two talking like streetballers?

andrew1975 wrote:Come correct or don't come at all! Booya!


kanluwen wrote:Don't come back until you get some game, son.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 21:31:46


Post by: Andrew1975


Bzzzzt, wrong.

They are not new. But hey, since you want to compare "detail"...

Take a peek inside of any one of those vehicles for the "detail" inside of them. Something like 75% of the detail will be decals over flat, unpainted surfaces molded from the exact same piece of plastic as the outer hull.

The only thing that Hasbro has remade is the 'new' molds. Games Workshop does this very same thing--in fact, that's part of what their projected costs for molds are.

How much it will cost them to replace said mold once it's worn down, will the mold be something that they need to run multiples of, will it be profitable to actually reuse the mold, etc.

Don't come back until you get some game, son.


Nope, evey action figure is brand new and the vehicle sculpts have either been completely remade or have had new details added. Go to YOJOE.com if you need the proof

Have you looked at the inside of a Leman Russ? Bane blade? Can you fit ten marines in a rhino? Do they even have crews. Decals...I have to paint 100% of the detail on every part of a mini? Seriously? Don't cherry pick. It take an utterly worthless conversation and makes it sound stupid.

IN THE FACE.

Why are you two talking like streetballers?
Its fun!

And the quarterback is toast!


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 21:40:27


Post by: Kanluwen


Andrew1975 wrote:
Bzzzzt, wrong.

They are not new. But hey, since you want to compare "detail"...

Take a peek inside of any one of those vehicles for the "detail" inside of them. Something like 75% of the detail will be decals over flat, unpainted surfaces molded from the exact same piece of plastic as the outer hull.

The only thing that Hasbro has remade is the 'new' molds. Games Workshop does this very same thing--in fact, that's part of what their projected costs for molds are.

How much it will cost them to replace said mold once it's worn down, will the mold be something that they need to run multiples of, will it be profitable to actually reuse the mold, etc.

Don't come back until you get some game, son.


Nope, every action figure is brand new and the vehicle sculpts have either been completely remade or have had new details added. Go to YOJOE.com if you need the proof

And YoJoe.com is full of crap. My littlest brother has those 'brand new' vehicles and they're basically the exact same as the ones I had as a kid.

Have you looked at he inside of a Leman Russ? Bane blade?

Have you? The newer Leman Russ does have some minor interior detail, but it seems that you don't understand that you're comparing two wildly different things. People aren't going to see the inside of a completely finished Leman Russ or Baneblade. For that matter, most tank kits the size of a Baneblade that come with interior detail are pushing the $120 mark for one and basic interior detailing. It'll cost another $90 or so to get them up to "realistic" levels of detail.



Automatically Appended Next Post:
Andrew1975 wrote:Have you looked at the inside of a Leman Russ? Bane blade? Can you fit ten marines in a rhino? Do they even have crews. Decals...I have to paint 100% of the detail on every part of a mini? Seriously? Don't cherry pick. It makes an utterly worthless conversation and makes it sound stupid.

Says the genius comparing prepainted and poorly assembled action figures to models about half their size, but with far far far more details on them.

Man, I sure am glad you don't want an "utterly worthless conversation"....


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 21:48:40


Post by: asmith


Hope I'm not stating the obvious but details don't cost money when you are talking about cosmetic features. DVD's have many billions of features smashed into them, cost the same as if they were blank.

Size costs, assembly costs, complexity costs (how many different technologies/processes you are putting in), but part geometry in general does not cost.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 21:50:33


Post by: agnosto


shhhh asmith, don't be bringing logic into this.... we all know a mold is a mold regardless of the cosmetic features. Just smile and nod....smile and nod.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 21:50:58


Post by: Andrew1975


And YoJoe.com is full of crap. My littlest brother has those 'brand new' vehicles and they're basically the exact same as the ones I had as a kid.


People aren't going to see the inside of a completely finished Leman Russ or Baneblade. For that matter, most tank kits the size of a Baneblade that come with interior detail are pushing the $120 mark for one and basic interior detailing. It'll cost another $90 or so to get them up to "realistic" levels of detail.


Take a peek inside of any one of those vehicles for the "detail" inside of them. Something like 75% of the detail will be decals over flat, unpainted surfaces molded from the exact same piece of plastic as the outer hull.


Someone is angry because they were proven wrong. So what you are saying is the gi joe TOYS should have more detail than a MADEL KIT? They have all new details, its like comparing the new russ to the old russ. Same vehicle more details. There are no internal crew compartments on either of the Joe vehicles either. However both drivers do hold on to sticks and there are molded details in the hiss tank canopy.

This is a cost and production analysis. Again not perfect, but the glaring difference in price is well........glaring.

Off my court SUKA!


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 21:55:04


Post by: Kanluwen


Depends on what you're talking about.

It's common knowledge in armor/aircraft modeling that you're probably going to have to pay out the rear to get a 'stock' kit up to museum quality in terms of details--or you're going to be investing alot of time into bringing them up to that level with scratchbuilt parts.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Andrew1975 wrote:
And YoJoe.com is full of crap. My littlest brother has those 'brand new' vehicles and they're basically the exact same as the ones I had as a kid.


Someone is angry because they were proven wrong. They have all new details, its like comparing the new russ to the old russ. Same vehicle more details.

This is a cost and production analysis. Again not perfect, but the glaring difference in price is well........glaring.

Off my court SUKA!

You're doing a terrible job of any kind of real "cost and production analysis" then.

You're failing to remember the venues in which each item will be sold, the expected sales numbers, etc.

A "Target Exclusive GI-Joe" kit will be sold in more Target stores in one state alone than there are Games Workshop official shops worldwide.

It costs them nothing to sell for that price simply because of the sheer volume.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 22:04:43


Post by: pombe


Kanluwen wrote:A "Target Exclusive GI-Joe" kit will be sold in more Target stores in one state alone than there are Games Workshop official shops worldwide.

It costs them nothing to sell for that price simply because of the sheer volume.


But that's the main argument, isn't it?

If GW lowered their prices, they will sell more?


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 22:05:13


Post by: Andrew1975


A "Target Exclusive GI-Joe" kit will be sold in more Target stores in one state alone than there are Games Workshop official shops worldwide.


I would doubt that target sold more of these battle boxes than GW sold baneblades. I can't prove that, but i doubt it. Yes there are more Targets than their are GW stores....Games stores and hobby shops in general though.....I would doubt that too. Guess what target does sell, Games and models! Targets and Walmarts and GW will never do business with each other as the stores have a policy about profits and cost of production. GW has priced themselves out of these avenues of sale.

Its a good comparison...Go by some $6 dollar superglue then.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
But that's the main argument, isn't it?

If GW lowered their prices, they will sell more?


Thank you sir, you may move to the head of the class.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 22:07:24


Post by: Kanluwen


Except they won't, simply because they're a niche product.

Not everyone is interested in miniature wargaming, assembling or painting models. We see that all the time here with the "WILL YOU PLAY UNPAINTED MODELS? IF NOT YOU'RE A JERK!" or "WHY DOES EVERYONE PLAY LIKE A TOURNAMENT?!" styled threads.

This isn't a hard concept to grasp. It really isn't. Would everyone ride motorcycles if the prices on them went down?

What about golfing, would everyone take that up if clubs were free?

No. They really wouldn't.



Automatically Appended Next Post:
Andrew1975 wrote:
A "Target Exclusive GI-Joe" kit will be sold in more Target stores in one state alone than there are Games Workshop official shops worldwide.


I would doubt that target sold more of these battle boxes than GW sold baneblades. I can't prove that, but I doubt it. Its a good comparison...Go buy some $6 dollar superglue then.

Then you'd be an uneducated heathen. 'Exclusive' toy sets like that sell out within the first few days of their releases, from the collectors snapping up multiples for themselves and to also sell extras for exorbitant prices on Ebay. Hasbro then reissues that same set as a general release to that specific store chain and makes pure profit on impulse buys from children and their parents.

Andrew1975 wrote:
But that's the main argument, isn't it?

If GW lowered their prices, they will sell more?


Thank you sir, you may move to the head of the class.

Doesn't take much to move to the head of a class when you're sitting in kindergarten, now does it?


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 22:17:22


Post by: Eldar Own


I don't think it's the price of the actual set that'll put people off. For example if two brothers or whatever want to get inot wargaming, they get an army for £30 each and get all the rules and dice to play the game.

I think that the parents, after learning what the hobby's about, won't decline on the basis on that the starter set is expensive, but rather that the hobby is expensive overall. Or non-price realted things, such as that their kids won't have the patience to sit down and assemble or paint their minatures etc...


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 22:18:56


Post by: Andrew1975


Except they won't, simply because they're a niche product


Yeah, because Target and Walmart don't sell niche products? What planet do you live on? They don't sell products the general public won't buy. They are not going to sell a $99 dollar game that nobody but a fanatic can see any value in. Because there is no value!

They sold tones of the old MB/GW Battle Masters and heroquest sets. You had to build and paint those too. But they were a value. See my earlier post if you don't know.

They sell miniature games at these stores. They sell things that have to be assembled. But if you product does not meet a cost to goods analysis Walmart will tell you to take a hike until you cut the price to a point where it is affordable.

Then you'd be an uneducated heathen. 'Exclusive' toy sets like that sell out within the first few days of their releases, from the collectors snapping up multiples for themselves and to also sell extras for exorbitant prices on Ebay. Hasbro then reissues that same set as a general release to that specific store chain and makes pure profit on impulse buys from children and their parents.


That's your argument then show some numbers? I see an awful lot of $100 bane blades. I have not seen many of these boxes in my life. There are by far more baneblades on ebay right now than there are of these boxes.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 22:21:04


Post by: pombe


Kanluwen wrote:Except they won't, simply because they're a niche product.


Sure, there is a limit to the population size of their target demographic. But that isn't necessarily set in stone.

Kanluwen wrote:Not everyone is interested in miniature wargaming, assembling or painting models. We see that all the time here with the "WILL YOU PLAY UNPAINTED MODELS? IF NOT YOU'RE A JERK!" or "WHY DOES EVERYONE PLAY LIKE A TOURNAMENT?!" styled threads.


Why would GW care what we do with their miniatures so long as we buy them?

Kanluwen wrote:This isn't a hard concept to grasp. It really isn't. Would everyone ride motorcycles if the prices on them went down?

What about golfing, would everyone take that up if clubs were free?

No. They really wouldn't.


Actually, I disagree. While you might not see a horde of people suddenly take up motorcycling or golf if they became more affordable, you would certainly see an increase in the number of new people entering the market to try it out. Also, if the prices came down, I bet motorcycle enthusiasts would purchase more motorcycles and avid golfers would buy more golf clubs.




Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 22:22:31


Post by: agnosto


Kanluwen wrote:Except they won't, simply because they're a niche product.

Not everyone is interested in miniature wargaming, assembling or painting models. We see that all the time here with the "WILL YOU PLAY UNPAINTED MODELS? IF NOT YOU'RE A JERK!" or "WHY DOES EVERYONE PLAY LIKE A TOURNAMENT?!" styled threads.

This isn't a hard concept to grasp. It really isn't. Would everyone ride motorcycles if the prices on them went down?

What about golfing, would everyone take that up if clubs were free?

No. They really wouldn't.


Not everyone, no. Would more people get into the game? Probably; that's why historical wargaming is a larger community than GW branded games. Sticker shock can scare off a lot of people....


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 22:24:07


Post by: Kanluwen


Andrew1975 wrote:
Except they won't, simply because they're a niche product


Yeah, because Target and Walmart don't sell niche products? What planet do you live on? They don't sell products the general public won't buy. They are not going to sell a $99 dollar game that nobody but a fanatic can see any value in. Because there is no value!

They sell miniature games at these stores. They sell things that have to be assembled. But if you product does not meet a cost to goods analysis Walmart will tell you to take a hike until you cut the price to a point where it is affordable.

No, they really don't "sell miniature games" at these stores.

Unless you're counting Risk or Monopoly.
And Lego kits are expensive as hell, yet they're sold there. Do you know why?

Because it's a generic product.

You REALLY don't seem to understand what a "niche product" is.
Andrew1975 wrote:That's your argument then show some numbers? I see an awful lot of $100 bane blades. I have not seen many of these boxes in my life. There are by far more Baneblades on ebay right now than there are of these boxes.

How many of those Baneblades have been reposted more than once?
Also, I'm pretty sure you just proved my whole damned point in that "these limited edition sets tend to sell out quickly, and then be hoarded". Toy sets don't increase in value instantly, unless there's some kind of aberration such as the old Star Wars figures where they came packaged with the wrong lightsaber colors, etc.

Eldar Own wrote:I don't think it's the price of the actual set that'll put people off. For example if two brothers or whatever want to get into wargaming, they get an army for £30 each and get all the rules and dice to play the game.

I think that the parents, after learning what the hobby's about, won't decline on the basis on that the starter set is expensive, but rather that the hobby is expensive overall. Or non-price related things, such as that their kids won't have the patience to sit down and assemble or paint their miniatures etc...

But then that's a problem with the kids, not the price now isn't it?

The majority of people want instant gratification, which you sure as hell aren't going to get with any form of model kit barring some piss-poor snapfit from a sweatshop in China.

Agnosto wrote:Not everyone, no. Would more people get into the game? Probably; that's why historical wargaming is a larger community than GW branded games. Sticker shock can scare off a lot of people....

That's partly why historical gaming is a larger community than GW branded games.
"Historical gaming" covers a huge umbrella of stuff, ranging from the Greco-Roman era to modern day warfare. That kinda helps out a bit too, wouldn't you think?

It's easier to get into something like that, wherein there's a huge amount of different themes--versus the relatively limited and restricted IPs of Games Workshop.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 22:27:25


Post by: agnosto


Kanluwen wrote:
You REALLY don't seem to understand what a "niche product" is.


See my previous post with the RC plane... for $90 I can have something that flies under its own power.



Kanluwen wrote:The majority of people want instant gratification, which you sure as hell aren't going to get with any form of model kit barring some piss-poor snapfit from a sweatshop in China.


You mean like AoBR models?


This is a snap fit model, made in china; is it piss poor?



Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 22:30:09


Post by: Kanluwen


agnosto wrote:
Kanluwen wrote:
You REALLY don't seem to understand what a "niche product" is.


See my previous post with the RC plane... for $90 I can have something that flies under its own power.



Kanluwen wrote:The majority of people want instant gratification, which you sure as hell aren't going to get with any form of model kit barring some piss-poor snapfit from a sweatshop in China.


You mean like AoBR models?

True, but that RC plane isn't going to be $90 after you have to replace the batteries or a damaged propeller, get a multi-frequency controller, etc.

And the AoBR models--they're still leaps and bounds over the common GI Joe figures, now aren't they?


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Damnit Agnosto, stop adding to your posts!

And check the price on that. I'm willing to bet it will be the same price as a box of Dark Elf Black Ark Corsairs.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 22:34:15


Post by: Andrew1975


No, they really don't "sell miniature games" at these stores.


Yes yes they do. I don't know why you argue with me on these things. I don't pull random facts out of my @@@.

Battle masters (most comparable, but it was a long time ago)
Heroquest (again along time ago)

The have all the Star Wars games there. Pre paints but still Niche enough. There are more. Hell they even have magic cards and stuff like that.

Legos are expensive? Pound for pound 10 times cheaper than GW and you can keep rebuilding them and you don't have to paint them. I can go buy a giant bag of legos right now off ebay for nothing.

I'm pretty sure you just proved my whole damned point in that "these limited edition sets tend to sell out quickly, and then be hoarded". Toy sets don't increase in value instantly, unless there's some kind of aberration such as the old Star Wars figures where they came packaged with the wrong lightsaber colors, etc.


You sir are out of your mind. Again I back up my claims with numbers. I believe it is your turn.

That gundam model is so much more detailed than the black reach marines...its sick actually. It's probably a $10 kit so its not really a fair comparison. But a great example.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 22:37:48


Post by: Kanluwen


You're really not that bright, are you?

Battlemasters and Heroquest were both Citadel products, by the by. And while they have been sold there at that time--they were made to be sold in a general venue at a time when Dungeons and Dragons was incredibly popular.

What Star Wars games are we talking about? The collectible miniatures games? The ones that Wizards of the Coast(which is owned by y'know...Hasbro) created as a new way of sticking it to consumers with randomized contents?

Wizards of the Coast, as I mentioned, is owned by Hasbro. Hasbro has leverage in stocking places like Wal-Mart and Target as they provide a huge amount of the cheap toys to these places--along with ridiculously overpriced 'exclusives'. Wal-Mart and Target aren't stupid, they don't bite the hand that feeds them when it comes to small children and toys.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 22:46:08


Post by: Andrew1975


They sold tones of the old MB/GW Battle Masters and heroquest sets.


Battlemasters and Heroquest were both Citadel products, by the by. And while they have been sold there at that time--they were made to be sold in a general venue at a time when Dungeons and Dragons was incredibly popular.


I believe I covered the GW connection by saying MB/GW in the post. Yes its amazing what can be sold when you market and price something right. Games are extremely more popular now than they have ever been. Look at all the events, if there was a time that they could open the market it is now. But they want your first born for the product. During a recession, by the by...BYE BYE

But by all means keep changing your argument. Its been real fun so far. Keep sniffing the $6.50 GW glue.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 22:51:19


Post by: Kanluwen


Andrew1975 wrote:You sir are out of your mind. Again I back up my claims with numbers. I believe it is your turn.

That gundam model is so much more detailed than the black reach marines...its sick actually. It's probably a $10 kit so its not really a fair comparison. But a great example.

What numbers? All you said is "I've never seen this set, but I've seen hundreds of Baneblades." That's anecdotal evidence, not hard facts aka "numbers".

I could say, as a 'proof by the numbers' your way--The moon does not exist. I'm not seeing it right now--thus it does not exist.

Andrew1975 wrote:
They sold tons of the old MB/GW Battle Masters and heroquest sets.


Battlemasters and Heroquest were both Citadel products, by the by. And while they have been sold there at that time--they were made to be sold in a general venue at a time when Dungeons and Dragons was incredibly popular.


I believe I cover the GW connection by saying MB/GW in the post. Yes its amazing what can be sold when you market and price something right. Games are extremely more popular now than they have ever been. Look at all the events, if there was a time that they could open the market it is now. But they want your first born for the product.

Read your edit times, cupcake. Your edits came after I had already posted in response to another of your posts, and I'm not going back to reread your inane dribble of a post half the page up to check and see what crap you've added. Considering you're averaging 2 edits per post, it's seeming there's a lot of backtracking on your half.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 22:53:17


Post by: aka_mythos


Andrew1975 wrote:
Legos are expensive? Pound for pound 10 times cheaper than GW and you can keep rebuilding them and you don't have to paint them. I can go buy a giant bag of legos right now off ebay for nothing.
Devils advocate... in comparison of first hand markets a second hand market comparison is moot. Legos are less detailed and don't require artists to generate as many individual pieces. Lego's use a cheaper plastic and thus cheaper, but they themselves are still pricey.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 22:54:47


Post by: Andrew1975


Read your edit times, cupcake. Your edits came after I had already posted in response to another of your posts, and I'm not going back to reread your inane dribble of a post half the page up to check and see what crap you've added. Considering you're averaging 2 edits per post, it's seeming there's a lot of backtracking on your half.


Not on that post you jack wagon. You facts are again not facts. You need to look about two posts up when I first mentioned it. Its simple just find the quote. You say I'm not too bright. Look just get your S@@@ straight or I'm gonna have to come after you with a $30 GW saw.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Devils advocate... in comparison of first hand markets a second hand market comparison is moot. Legos are less detailed and don't require artists to generate as many individual pieces. Lego's use a cheaper plastic and thus cheaper, but they themselves are still pricey.


Hey I didn't bring that mess of an argument in here. I don't need to grasp at straws. It was just easily refuted


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 22:57:45


Post by: Kanluwen



You're as bad as Andrew.

Do you know what is actually present in those kits?

The bare minimum of components. Tamiya sells upgrade kits, crew figures, etc separately. And unlike Games Workshop--if pieces are missing you will be paying to have them replaced, and sending them your previous kit--by paying out of your own pocket, by the by.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Andrew1975 wrote:
Read your edit times, cupcake. Your edits came after I had already posted in response to another of your posts, and I'm not going back to reread your inane dribble of a post half the page up to check and see what crap you've added. Considering you're averaging 2 edits per post, it's seeming there's a lot of backtracking on your half.


Not on that post you jack wagon. You facts are again not facts. You need to look about two posts up when I first mentioned it. Its simple just find the quote. You say I'm not too bright. Look just get you S@@@ straight or I'm gonna have to come after you with a $30 GW saw.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Devils advocate... in comparison of first hand markets a second hand market comparison is moot. Legos are less detailed and don't require artists to generate as many individual pieces. Lego's use a cheaper plastic and thus cheaper, but they themselves are still pricey.


Hey I didn't bring that mess of an argument in here. I don't need to grasp at straws. It was just easily refuted

Uhoh, adult nerd rage! Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaage for me.

Your comparison is flawed, and your grasp of economics is fallible, at best.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 23:02:17


Post by: Andrew1975


You're as bad as Andrew.

Do you know what is actually present in those kits?

The bare minimum of components. Tamiya sells upgrade kits, crew figures, etc separately. And unlike Games Workshop--if pieces are missing you will be paying to have them replaced, and sending them your previous kit--by paying out of your own pocket, by the by.


Wow, it appears that you have also drank the cool aid and and come down with a case of the blind Jingoisms. But I'm sure you have the$15 GW hobby knife to help you out of your misery.

Uhoh, adult nerd rage! Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaage for me.

Your comparison is flawed, and your grasp of economics is fallible, at best.


Your comment exudes rage itself actually. It also appears to be a meaningless statement with no facts or basis in the conversation. Gotta love the interwebs? I have however proved my grasp of economics...your the one who is trying to argue that plastic should be worth gold. So unless you actually have a point or a good argument why dont you toddle off now and play with your $8 GW elmers glue.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 23:06:48


Post by: loki old fart


Kanluwen wrote:

You're as bad as Andrew.

Do you know what is actually present in those kits?

The bare minimum of components. Tamiya sells upgrade kits, crew figures, etc separately.


And Games workshop NEVER does that


http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/catalog/productDetail.jsp?catId=cat440335a&prodId=prod1290051


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 23:11:42


Post by: Klawz


Calm down everyone! The mods are coming. the mods are coming!


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 23:13:31


Post by: nels1031


This pretty much sums up my opinion of the threads original question. Its on the first page and it still fits in with the 6 page argument about pricing and business strategies as well!

GW has a worldwide network of stores. Multiple games that has been going strong for over 20 years. Books, video games, accessories and all kinds of other bs all under their IP.

They get massive web traffic for terms related to their IP.

They have legions of devoted fans.

They spend about NO money on advertising.

Are they perfect? No.

Are they idiots? No.

They are the most successful company in their vertical, ever. That says a lot.

While other game companies come and go like the turning of the tides, GW trucks on through thick and thin and continue to innovate and grow.

They have done this because they run their company like a business which upsets some people who seem to think a game company should be an NPO. They have made mistakes, but they have overcome them consistently.

So anyway, these discussions about GW's business practices are always pointless. A bunch of people with limited information and big opinions all chime in as if they were experts when none of us really know the entire story.

I am sure new people will continue to get into the hobby as they have since the 80's. Some will stay and dump thousands into the hobby like most of us. Some will go after a year and sell their crap on eBay. And through it all, people will always complain (as is their right) about prices.

Same old story and yet pretty much everyone continues to buy the stuff.


Sidenote : I'll probably end up buying about 3-5 of these boxes, 2 definitely for myself, 1 for my nephews(future GW fanboys, they love GW stores more then Toys'r us) and probably a few more, depending on my interest in expanding either army and the market demand for individual parts of the boxed set, in the time to come.



Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 23:14:28


Post by: mikhaila


Yes yes they do. I don't know why you argue with me on these things. I don't pull random facts out of my @@@.

Battle masters (most comparable, but it was a long time ago)
Heroquest (again along time ago)

The have all the Star Wars games there. Pre paints but still Niche enough. There are more. Hell they even have magic cards and stuff like that.


Battlemasters and Heroquest are boardgames that use miniatures, and both have been out of print for a long while. They were produced by GW and sold in the mass market, hopefully pulling in new players to the larger miniature games produced by GW.

To say that those stores "sell miniature games" based on out of print games is quite a stretch.

Star Wars is very much NOT niche. It's Star Wars, quite a main stream and recognized brand. Also going away, and while a miniature game, it was mostly collected by people as a toy, vs. playing it as a game.

And yes, they do sell magic cards. This applies to miniature games how?

As to the other arguement of baneblades vs GI Joes, it's not even close. Mass market toys have numbers that make my head spin when I see them. The 'Game Industry' is barely an industry, and certainly no where near the giants that the toy companies like Hasbro are.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 23:15:03


Post by: Kanluwen


Andrew1975 wrote:
You're as bad as Andrew.

Do you know what is actually present in those kits?

The bare minimum of components. Tamiya sells upgrade kits, crew figures, etc separately. And unlike Games Workshop--if pieces are missing you will be paying to have them replaced, and sending them your previous kit--by paying out of your own pocket, by the by.


Wow, it appears that you have also drank the Kool-Aid and and come down with a case of the blind Jingoisms. But I'm sure you have the$15 GW hobby knife to help you out of your misery.

Uhhuh. Really. That's amazing.

It couldn't have anything to do with having worked on scale armor models since I was 10, now could it? Nahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. I have those exact same kits that he linked, by the way. Retailed for $25 USD in 1998, and are now $50.
Andrew1975 wrote:
Uhoh, adult nerd rage! Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaage for me.

Your comparison is flawed, and your grasp of economics is fallible, at best.


Your comment exudes rage itself actually. It also appears to be a meaningless statement with no facts or basis in the conversation. Gotta love the interwebs? So unless you actually have a point or a good argument why don't you toddle off now and play with your $8 GW Elmer's glue.


I love that you think you're actually having a grown-up conversation with someone. It's adorable.
Fact: You stated that "Baneblades outsell a limited edition toy set(made up of repainted and reissued components) that you have never seen". Gee. Could that be because, as I pointed out--they sell out within their release week?

Nahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, couldn't be.

Loki Old Fart wrote:And Games workshop NEVER does that

Go look into your Rhino kit box.
Really, go do it. I'll wait.
Does it come with the pintle Storm Bolter? How about the Hunter-Killer Missile?

Huh. What do you know. It does?

My Gods. It's almost like they give you everything you need for the 'basic' kit. Tamiya doesn't do that. Their kits are laden with instances wherein you actually have to take a piece clipped off of sprue and then melt it, stretching it out to make the antenna or track pins.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 23:18:01


Post by: Eldar Own


loki old fart wrote:
Kanluwen wrote:

You're as bad as Andrew.

Do you know what is actually present in those kits?

The bare minimum of components. Tamiya sells upgrade kits, crew figures, etc separately.


And Games workshop NEVER does that


http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/catalog/productDetail.jsp?catId=cat440335a&prodId=prod1290051

True, GW does sell some upgrade kits which are overpriced, the one that spring sto my mind is the BW upgrade kit. I think it's about £8. All i want is a deff rolla!

Though most GW kits have a good amount of spare parts that you can use to convert or save money. I.e. you buy two loota/burna boy kits and make 10 lootas. All you need to do now is buy an ork boyz kit and use the 10 burnas left over from the burna/loota kits. That's £12 as opposed to £30 (i think) from the cost of two more loota/burna kits. And you still have a nob you can use in a nobz unit. And many weapons you can make things like objectives with.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Klawz wrote:Calm down everyone! The mods are coming. the mods are coming!

Yes, this is going to get locked soon.....


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 23:19:59


Post by: loki old fart


Why not take a look at the razorback?
twin auto cannon req you buy a crusader uprade kit for the landraider. but its listed as an option in the codex


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 23:20:24


Post by: Kanluwen


Eldar Own wrote:
True, GW does sell some upgrade kits which are overpriced, the one that spring sto my mind is the BW upgrade kit. I think it's about £8. All i want is a deff rolla!

Though most GW kits have a good amount of spare parts that you can use to convert or save money. I.e. you buy two loota/burna boy kits and make 10 lootas. All you need to do now is buy an ork boyz kit and use the 10 burnas left over from the burna/loota kits. That's £12 as opposed to £30 (i think) from the cost of two more loota/burna kits. And you still have a nob you can use in a nobz unit. And many weapons you can make things like objectives with.

That's true. Not denying that upgrade kits can be overpriced.

But take a look at some scale model upgrade kits sometime. 8GBP is about right for upgrades that are 'decent' quality. There's an upgrade kit out there that's used to convert a 1/35 scale HMMV into a 'Gunwagon' that is nearly $150 for what amounts to 10 parts.




Automatically Appended Next Post:
loki old fart wrote:Why not take a look at the razorback?
The twin assault cannon Razorback requires you buy a Crusader upgrade kit for the Land Raider, but its listed as an option in the codex

"Basic" variant says what?


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 23:26:24


Post by: Alpharius


Klawz wrote:Calm down everyone! The mods are coming. the mods are coming!


Speak of the devil, hear the rustle of his wings...

Anyway...

Wow!

What the heck is going on in here?

EVERYONE should probably re-read the rules of this site - there's a link in my sig.

And, EVERYONE should calm down, count to 10, think about what you want to post before you post it, probably reevaluate that and post something else, etc.

Ouch guys.

Public warning time!

Look out after this post...


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 23:26:46


Post by: Andrew1975


Battlemasters and Heroquest are boardgames that use miniatures, and both have been out of print for a long while. They were produced by GW and sold in the mass market, hopefully pulling in new players to the larger miniature games produced by GW.


I'm sorry isn't this the point, isn't this the logical progression. A hex map hardly qualifies it as a board game. Again with the cherry picking?

Look. I've already shown GW's mark up using exact products. Modeling supplies, I've show cost analysis using like products GI Joes (it's not perfect but the glaring differences in price make the point). I could go off on other detailed model manufacturers but I don't have that first hand knowledge. Please read the entire thread first.

No where has anybody given me facts similar to mine to dissuade my beliefs.

Magic cards, star wars miniatures, battle masters etc...these are the only products larger stores have carried, so i used them. They are niche and were first sold in hobby stores (whether you want to believe that or not) they however do pass the chains value test. Unfortunately the hobby does not fit the cost analysis of large chain stores, It does not pass the value test these stores apply to their products before they will bring them to market. Maybe something GW should work on. If walmart could make a buck off of these things they would....but they can't.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 23:32:37


Post by: Kanluwen


If you want to be taken seriously in conversations about the prices of miniatures --you're going to have to do some research and not jump from genre to genre. You don't compare the price of a AV-8B Harrier jump jet to a 747 passenger liner.

Those same modeling supplies you showed off that GW are selling on mark-up? They're made by a company that specializes in making modeling supplies. They sell to Privateer Press(who sell their supplies for similar prices), to Gale Force 9(again--similar prices), etc.

As Mikhaila said: Star Wars is as far away from a 'niche' as you can imagine. It's a franchise with licensing out the wazoo. That's actually something that Lucas was brilliant about, as Star Wars was one of the first successful films to really succeed with franchising. Hell--the man managed to sell boxes with paper in them(the infamous "Early Bird Special" for the original Star Wars action figures) for $30 a pop before his movie even came out.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 23:41:34


Post by: eledamris


Simply put, there is no value in the box set. I challenge anybody to win a game with a High Elf Lord on a griffon, Lothern Sea Guard, Reavers and Swordmasters. They fill the box with these things because when new players actually read the Army Book, they realize that they need to buy entirely new units to win. There's more to consider than simply the dollar value of the boxed game. I'm not complaining about the price, but the value of what's in the box. I don't think they'll sell many of these to anyone but brand new players, mostly kids, who have been douped by GW employees into thinking this is a great deal.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 23:45:56


Post by: Kanluwen


eledamris wrote:Simply put, there is no value in the box set. I challenge anybody to win a game with a High Elf Lord on a griffon, Lothern Sea Guard, Reavers and Swordmasters. They fill the box with these things because when new players actually read the Army Book, they realize that they need to buy entirely new units to win. There's more to consider than simply the dollar value of the boxed game. I'm not complaining about the price, but the value of what's in the box. I don't think they'll sell many of these to anyone but brand new players, mostly kids, who have been duped by GW employees into thinking this is a great deal.

*facepalm*

You do realize that much like Assault on Black Reach, Battle for Skull Pass, etc--this boxed set will have scenarios using those specific models as an introductory way to play, yeah?

If you're expecting to play a game with the contents of a starter box by themselves--you're delusional.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 23:48:43


Post by: Andrew1975


Those same modeling supplies you showed off that GW are selling on mark-up? They're made by a company that specializes in making modeling supplies. They sell to Privateer Press(who sell their supplies for similar prices), to Gale Force 9(again--similar prices), etc.


Really? So the super glue, pva glue, and green stuff are SPECIAL? All those tool are not special either. Its a jewler's saw and a pin vice. The only thing that GW may sell that is specific to miniatures is the sculpting tools, which you can still get much cheaper anywhere. Privateer and Gale Force 9 are out of line with their pricing too. They just follow the GW model.

The fact is that there are plenty of model/miniatures companies out there. But make a comparison and people cherry pick how they are not exactly like GW. Well no company is exactly like GW. They either make the wrong era of miniatures, or use different plastic, or are a different scale, or whatever.

Look I've stated my opinion, I've given numbers. The new box is not a value to me. Nor do I think it should it be to any of anybody else. No one should give their blind allegiance to a company that is in my opinion hosing their customers, whether its on purpose or just plain mismanagement.





Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 23:50:24


Post by: eledamris


Exactly, but there is nothing in this box that you would want to use in a larger army, which means that anyone who already plays Warhammer won't buy it to boost their armies. There is NOTHING in there, other than maybe the clanrats and the characters on foot, that is any good in a larger force. Meaning that you'll have to start all over if you want to build a decent army.

Why would anyone spend $100 just to learn the game, when the miniatures that are included are useless? Sure, you could play the starter scenarios, but after that what do you do? AOBR worked because you always need Space Marines and a Dreadnaught and Termies, and if you're Orks then you get a whole bunch of Boyz and Nobz. BFSP worked because you got a cannon, Thunderers, Warriors and Miners, and for the Gobbos you got a TON of Night Goblins. I used all of it. This one is marketing miniatures that are no good in the game. It seems like they picked the absolute worst build and decided to put it in there with the idea that it would sell more in the long run because people would have to plop down more money to build their High Elf army to actually work. I think it'll backfire though, as people generally don't buy what they don't want, and there are usually enough veteran gamers around to dissuade new ones from dropping money on something they'll regret.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 23:58:01


Post by: Kanluwen


Andrew1975 wrote:
Those same modeling supplies you showed off that GW are selling on mark-up? They're made by a company that specializes in making modeling supplies. They sell to Privateer Press(who sell their supplies for similar prices), to Gale Force 9(again--similar prices), etc.


Really? So the super glue, pva glue, and green stuff are SPECIAL? All those tool are not special either. Its a jewler's saw and a pin vice. The only thing that GW may sell that is specific to miniatures is the sculpting tools, which you can still get much cheaper anywhere. Privateer and Gale Force 9 are out of line with their pricing too. They just follow the GW model.

The fact is that there are plenty of model/miniatures companies out there. But make a comparison and people cherry pick how they are not exactly like GW. Well no company is exactly like GW. They either make the wrong era of miniatures, or use different plastic, or are a different scale, or whatever.

Look I've stated my opinion, I've given numbers. The new box is not a value to me. Nor do I think it should it be to any of anybody else. No one should give their blind allegiance to a company that is in my opinion hosing their customers, whether its on purpose or just plain mismanagement.

You've given absolutely no numbers, nor facts, nor anything besides your opinion--which is a ridiculously uninformed one that's about on par with asking my dog to explain thermodynamics to our neighbor's cat.

As for "plenty of model/miniature companies out there"...of course they don't make things like GW.
Because GW owns its own intellectual property, and they are legally not allowed to make anything protected by GW's IP. To use your ridiculous GI Joe example--Mattel cannot produce GI Joe toys. Hasbro would sue the pants off them if they did. Each company makes things specific to their own properties/licenses. Privateer Press isn't going to start making Deathwing Terminators, nor will Games Workshop start making Menoth Warjacks.

eledamris wrote:Exactly, but there is nothing in this box that you would want to use in a larger army, which means that anyone who already plays Warhammer won't buy it to boost their armies. There is NOTHING in there, other than maybe the clanrats and the characters on foot, that is any good in a larger force. Meaning that you'll have to start all over if you want to build a decent army.

Really? You mean a starter set has nothing that a previously established player would want?

Someone call Guiness! This man's discovered a freakish occurrence!

P.S:
Sea Guard are actually pretty damned good in 8th, as are Swordmasters. And the Griffon is going to be a decent selling item for bitz services and ebay sellers, simply because it's a gorgeous model that's more in line with the current High Elf line than the Eltharion model that's about 10ish years old.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/12 23:59:22


Post by: Andrew1975


I love that you think you're actually having a grown-up conversation with someone. It's adorable.
Fact: You stated that "Baneblades outsell a limited edition toy set(made up of repainted and reissued components) that you have never seen". Gee. Could that be because, as I pointed out--they sell out within their release week?

Nahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, couldn't be.


It's this tone that is going to get the tread canceled. Which is what you probably as it pokes holes in GW flimsy excuses for unessential price hikes. And how dare anyone threaten the all might GW.

Whatever.

Again i give facts and numbers....you give nothing but a guess. If you really believe that target sold more limited edition battle boxes in the limited time that they were on the shelves than GW sold baneblades in the history of the baneblade model....id like to see it. I would. I can admit when I'm wrong.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
You've given absolutely no numbers, nor facts, nor anything besides your opinion--which is a ridiculously uninformed one that's about on par with asking my dog to explain thermodynamics to our neighbor's cat.

As for "plenty of model/miniature companies out there"...of course they don't make things like GW.
Because GW owns its own intellectual property, and they are legally not allowed to make anything protected by GW's IP. To use your ridiculous GI Joe example--Mattel cannot produce GI Joe toys. Hasbro would sue the pants off them if they did. Each company makes things specific to their own properties/licenses. Privateer Press isn't going to start making Deathwing Terminators, nor will Games Workshop start making Menoth Warjacks.


These are facts and numbers

These may actually be the most marked up items EVER
Citadel tool kit $120...........Not sure probably $30 at Harbor Freight
Hobby knife $15................$1 at HF
Plastic cutters $15.............$2 at HF
hobby drill $15...................$2 at HF
Razor saw $22...................$2.99, for $7 i get one with a miter box, for $15 I get an 18 piece professional saw set
Crappy air brush $30...........$9.99 the cheapest they had, probably not as crappy as the GW one, 19.99 for the deluxe brush with control, still not a great brush, but leagues
. better than GW's (P.S. GW charges you more because you might use it as a multimelta, that would cut sales)
Super Glue $6.60................3 for $1
PVA glue $8.25..................Really? It's F@@@ing Elmer's glue! $1 anywhere on the face of the planet
Green stuff 20grams $10....$2.99 most anywhere else
Razor Wire $9.50...........$...$.50 Home depot
Work Station $40...............$10 Pat Catan's
Flock $8.25........................Old ladies buy this with their pension money at any craft store for pennies...$1

so are these

2 Tanks (one of them motorized, Pew, Pew, Pew)
1 Flight pod
7 action figures, but for arguments sake 3 are vehicle drives so lets say 3+1 character model

Suggested price $62.99 according to list. I saw it in the stores for $55. I could buy it now new in box on ebay $50.

2 baneblades $99 a piece = $200 (I could have gone with 2 leman russ at $100, but these tanks are giant in comparison to even the baneblades, plus one is motorized)
Land Speeder= $30 (yeah could have used a jet bike $15, but the land speeder is closest in size)
3 marines= $8.25
cheapest character model I could find was marine Sargent 2 = $12.25 (yes he's metal, do you want me to use the $20 plastic marine commander)

$250.50! for unassembled, unpainted more detailed plastic sprue. It's not a perfect analogy but the difference tells the story!

I've given them before, i'll give them again.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 00:03:07


Post by: Kanluwen


Andrew1975 wrote:
I love that you think you're actually having a grown-up conversation with someone. It's adorable.
Fact: You stated that "Baneblades outsell a limited edition toy set(made up of repainted and reissued components) that you have never seen". Gee. Could that be because, as I pointed out--they sell out within their release week?

Nahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, couldn't be.


It's this tone that is going to get the tread canceled. Which is what you probably as it pokes holes in GW flimsy excuses for unessential price hikes. And how dare anyone threaten the all might GW.

Whatever.

Again I give facts and numbers....you give nothing but a guess. If you really believe that target sold more limited edition battle boxes in the limited time that they were on the shelves than GW sold Baneblades in the history of the Baneblade model....id like to see it. I would. I can admit when I'm wrong.

Look at your own anecdotal evidence. Have you seen that limited edition battle box on the shelves?

No? Where did they all go? Because Hasbro doesn't recall stock and destroy it. They leave it out for sale.

Now go into a Games Workshop and look for Baneblades on shelves, or failing that see if you can get one ordered for you. I can pretty much guarantee you can get one--failing some weird instance of the employee being incompetent.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 00:09:44


Post by: Andrew1975


Look at your own anecdotal evidence. Have you seen that limited edition battle box on the shelves?

No? Where did they all go? Because Hasbro doesn't recall stock and destroy it. They leave it out for sale.

Now go into a Games Workshop and look for Baneblades on shelves, or failing that see if you can get one ordered for you. I can pretty much guarantee you can get one--failing some weird instance of the employee being incompetent.


But that's the point it was a limited run, bane blade is unlimited. It should be cheaper because of a higher production run. As opposed to a limited production run which is much more expensive to manufacturer and yet for some reason was less than 20% of the GW cost even with paint and assembly.

Notice: no smarmy remarks or stuff like that in my post, i'm not trying to get the tread closed.

sorry guys gotto go to work...Stay free, don't let GW tread on you! I'll check back later


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 00:17:11


Post by: Kanluwen


Except it's not a truly limited run. They've retaken a specific toy, and packaged it as a "limited run" with minor cosmetic alterations--then hiked the price up.

If GW started offering say, a "Baneblade Commander" box that was strictly limited run, and had a few minor alterations--you'd have a better argument. Even kits that share similar parts(Rhinos and Whirlwinds, for example) end up with dramatically different parts involved.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 00:31:28


Post by: He Who Stood


12thRonin wrote:Yeah, but those are generally complete games and not ones that require multiple hundreds of more dollars dropped on them.


oh yeha absolutely
most lego sets are easily &80-120 nowadays

and you get the same if not more use out of the warhammer sets


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 01:27:07


Post by: Mr Mystery


eledamris wrote:Simply put, there is no value in the box set. I challenge anybody to win a game with a High Elf Lord on a griffon, Lothern Sea Guard, Reavers and Swordmasters. They fill the box with these things because when new players actually read the Army Book, they realize that they need to buy entirely new units to win. There's more to consider than simply the dollar value of the boxed game. I'm not complaining about the price, but the value of what's in the box. I don't think they'll sell many of these to anyone but brand new players, mostly kids, who have been douped by GW employees into thinking this is a great deal.


Opinion....dressed as fact? SURELY NOT!

You know, someone better tell my customers that this boxed set is pish....otherwise they might, you know, come in and spend money on a product they want! OH NOEZ! Too late! Already been there and done that.

Seriously.

You think the price of IoB is expensive? Parents don't. I should know, I sell it to them. Parents LOVE this Hobby. Why do they love it? Because it gets there kid to socialise and practice reading, writing, mathematics, and of course those all important social skills. Oh, and then there is all the FREE support offered, from beginners sessions, somewhere to game, more advanced painting lessons, lots of activities, none of which are charged for.

Would you cry if I said that for every one person on a Forum who threatens to quit (and lets face it, most don't) I tend to have around 3 new people coming in? Sorry to sink your ship fella, but what you really meant was 'this boxed set has no value.....for me.' Which is fine. It's not for every one. But don't for a second pretend you are every one. You're not. If anything, and my personal experiences prove this, you are very much in a (depressingly vocal) minority.

P.S. Someone was gibbering about GW's markup? Markup might be high, but then profit margin is slightly less than 10% now after major slimlining. But of course, that's due to an inefficient business model, and since you are all clearly Captains of your own chosen industry, and not just spods sat on the Interwebs spouting off, I shall bow to your superior knowledge.

Sorry to sound off like this, but you can only read so much tripe before it's time to get the metaphorical dettol out and clean a little.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
P.S. The comparisson to GI Joe stuff....exactly what use do you get out that particular lump of plastic?

I buy a GW kit for my army, and it's going to get used week in, week out. I get to build it (yay!) paint it (not so yay for me!) and then field it, hopefully knocking seven shades out my opponent.

That is where value is to be found, NOT in the price tag, but the usage.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 01:57:32


Post by: focusedfire


I have a friend that still gets his pieces 80% off. He has been a promotor of GW since the 80's. Thing is, at 80% off GW still makes a profit.

Several markets have runaway pricing that is based upon the public having an innacurate belief as to the manufacturing process. Top on that list is jewelry. People pay top dollar for jewelry because they have an out-dated stereo-type of some swiss or german dude with a loop in his eye hand cutting the stones. Diamonds have been being precission cut by laser guided robotics since the late 70's to early 80's. Yet because the average consumer has some misguided thought as to the value they often pay a 1000% or more mark up.

A 1000% you might say, "I don't believe it". Doesn't matter what you say, the price is inflated. An example would be the basic gold wedding band. Way back when Gold was $400-ish USD to the once, a solid basic wedding band cost $400 some dollars yet only contained less than $12 dollars worth of gold when melted down. The retailer(Jewelers) were buying their basic blank rings from Asia at $12 - $24 US dollars a ring then would turn around and sell that $24 dollar ring for $250 - $400 US dollars.

What does this have to do with GW you ask? GW has cultivated the image of being a little cottage business when in fact they are a mult-national corp that uses modern production techniques and Asian labour to make their products.

Yes GW still has factories in Britain and the US but they also have plants "in china" making models.

The mark up on GWs product is well in excess of standard retail(Normally 300-400% over cost). The fact that GW is not clearing more money is either a sign of mismanagement or cooked books, imo.

Now, I play their games and have a good time doing so, but I won't delude myself into thinking that they are my friend or even giving me a good value. Why? Because their product is a non-necessity(a luxury) that has a prestige hand crafted price while being a mass produced product.

I still buy their products, because I enjoy the game. Now I will only very rarely reward GW with my cash directly. Instead I buy their products second hand, on sale, through discount wholesalers and my friend who shall remain nameless.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 02:03:18


Post by: Mr Mystery


Prove mismanagement then, factoring the cost of running the business, like I dunno, the Wagebill for all their stores (you know, the same stores that are vital, seeing as they supply the fresh blood).

And does your friend really buy at 80% off, because I calll shenanigans....that is considerably lower than other trade accounts by my understanding (which is in itself far from complete).

And what is value, I ask again? Is value something cheap you use once or never, or something of not inconsequential price that you use week in, week out, that also retains significant re-sale value once you're done with it?

P.S. Discount wholesalers...GW still makes their profit, and indeed more through such channels!


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 02:13:38


Post by: Liquidice281


GW employees get 50% off products, I highly doubt your friend gets 80% off.


So if at 80% off GW is still making a profit then....
$20 model goes to $4 for your friend.

So less than four dollars to pay for the molding, modeling, designing, packaging, and shipping.... BullSh**


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 02:20:14


Post by: Chibi Bodge-Battle


If you're expecting to play a game with the contents of a starter box by themselves--you're delusional.


Funnily enough...
I got Skull Pass as an intro to gaming other than Heroquest,
I took the expression," starter set" to mean that it was a set with which I could start.

So went through the steps with my daughter and guess what? We managed to have a game of Warhammer YAY!

It may have been small, it may not have been Tourney standards but it was a game and we had fun! It was the start of a slippery slope

Starter set suggests entry level and you can get a game of sorts.
It doesn't really matter if it doesn't quite stack up to more sophisticated games as long as the experience is enjoyable and you can get to grips with the mechanics.



Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 02:32:49


Post by: Liquidice281


Starter set suggests entry level and you can get a game of sorts.
It doesn't really matter if it doesn't quite stack up to more sophisticated games as long as the experience is enjoyable and you can get to grips with the mechanics.


After seeing the starter set play I totally agree. The set plays great, and If you go in with a friends your two armies are easily playable.

Simply put, there is no value in the box set. I challenge anybody to win a game with a High Elf Lord on a griffon, Lothern Sea Guard, Reavers and Swordmasters. They fill the box with these things because when new players actually read the Army Book, they realize that they need to buy entirely new units to win. There's more to consider than simply the dollar value of the boxed game. I'm not complaining about the price, but the value of what's in the box. I don't think they'll sell many of these to anyone but brand new players, mostly kids, who have been douped by GW employees into thinking this is a great deal.



Lol Seaguard are one of the best core choices in the game. Dual type infantry is amazing in 8th. Swordmasters are always go first, re-roll hit great weapons with 2 attacks base (yeah they suck right?), Reavers have vanguard and can be assaulting enemy warmachines in turn one ( yeah they suck also). Griffons are the only thing I agree with you, but still wouldn't be a instant game lose.



Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 02:53:52


Post by: Kanluwen


Chibi Bodge-Battle wrote:
If you're expecting to play a game with the contents of a starter box by themselves--you're delusional.


Funnily enough...
I got Skull Pass as an intro to gaming other than Heroquest,
I took the expression," starter set" to mean that it was a set with which I could start.

So went through the steps with my daughter and guess what? We managed to have a game of Warhammer YAY!

It may have been small, it may not have been Tourney standards but it was a game and we had fun! It was the start of a slippery slope

Starter set suggests entry level and you can get a game of sorts.
It doesn't really matter if it doesn't quite stack up to more sophisticated games as long as the experience is enjoyable and you can get to grips with the mechanics.


That's not the example he was giving though. He was trying to suggest it as a "starter army", 100% legal outside of the confines of that specific scenario set.

You did prove my point, however, in that it's intended to be a way for people to 'start'(egads Holmes!) their army, and get a feel for the mechanics. It comes with pretty much one of everything you'd need to get a decent grasp of the rules: Cavalry, monstrous mounts, mages, weapon teams, etc.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 03:18:41


Post by: Ouze


Andrew1975 wrote:
These are facts and numbers

These may actually be the most marked up items EVER
(snip)


I looked at Harbor Freight's at some of your items. Generally speaking, you're off by an order of magnitude, but that's not really the point I'm going with. While It's true Harbor Freight is inexpensive, there is a reason for that: the stuff HF sells is pure garbage. I work next door to one and occasionally have stopped by there for tools. I always regretted it and never go there anymore. While the tools that GWS sells are indisputably overprices, HF is not a fair comparison. A more apt comparison would be a specialty tool site like Micro-mark. MM has better quality, but the prices reflect it.

Please stop pretending, as others have, that the spray gun is an airbrush. They never claimed it was, they never describe it as such, and they never pretend it is. It's a foolish and overpriced product that hardly needs to be conflated with a better product to be ridiculed.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 05:17:14


Post by: focusedfire


Mr Mystery wrote:Prove mismanagement then, factoring the cost of running the business, like I dunno, the Wagebill for all their stores (you know, the same stores that are vital, seeing as they supply the fresh blood).

And does your friend really buy at 80% off, because I calll shenanigans....that is considerably lower than other trade accounts by my understanding (which is in itself far from complete).

And what is value, I ask again? Is value something cheap you use once or never, or something of not inconsequential price that you use week in, week out, that also retains significant re-sale value once you're done with it?

P.S. Discount wholesalers...GW still makes their profit, and indeed more through such channels!


1)A company that has a better than 400% mark up having to pass financial difficulties onto the customer.

2)Did I say Trade acount? Look at what I said again and if you are familiar with business and sales there should be a word that jumps out at you.

3)That is how you choose to interpret the word.
Merriam Websters defines Value as:
1 : a fair return or equivalent in goods, services, or money for something exchanged
2 : the monetary worth of something :market price
3 : relative worth, utility, or importance
4 : a numerical quantity that is assigned or is determined by calculation or measurement <let x take on positive values>
5 : the relative duration of a musical note
6 a : relative lightness or darkness of a color : luminosity b : the relation of one part in a picture to another with respect to lightness and darkness
7 : something (as a principle or quality) intrinsically valuable or desirable <sought material values instead of human values — W. H. Jones>

Personally I was refering to market value.

4) There is a reason why people go into retail, to make money. If GW wholesale is more profitable than thier retail, that is your proof of mis-management.


Liquidice281 wrote:GW employees get 50% off products, I highly doubt your friend gets 80% off.


So if at 80% off GW is still making a profit then....
$20 model goes to $4 for your friend.

So less than four dollars to pay for the molding, modeling, designing, packaging, and shipping.... BullSh**


1) Read my post again. There is a word in there that should explain how/why he gets his stuff cheap. If you have ever dealt with retail the word will jump out at you and you won't question the discount.

2)Shocking but true. I am constantly amused at how people just can't grasp how mass production works and I out right giggle at what people estimate packaging and design costs to be. You see, the total cost for that 20$ model is somewhere in the $2-$3 range(And that is being a little generous)

This is how the basic retail model works. From the average consumers pov you have Retail, Sale, and Clearance. For the shrewd consumer and for business owners you have Wholesale Business level 1, business level 2 and Cost. Pricing goes as follows for items considered to be of a fair value. You take all of the material, labour, packaging, utilities, equipment(including replacement) and design costs and divide by production time to get Cost.
You then double cost to get to wholsale, then you double the price again to get a 300% mark up to retail. At 300% mark-up your cost is 25% of your retail and a 75% discount you break even. If you change to a 400% mark-up cost is only 20% and at an 80% discount you break even.(This doesn't include possible tax breaks for selling below wholsale )
Now remember what I said about GW operating with over a 400% mark-up, this is how there can be a profit when discounting 80%.

Generally 300% to 400% retail Mark-ups are considered to be the norm for open market pricing.

Now back to the average consumer. Retail is the full marked price and there is a joke in the retail industry that says retail is for suckers.
Sale pricing is uually up to a 20-25% discount
Clearance usually 25-50%(Note that because of being more than a 200% mark up that 50% discount /= Wholesale
Wholesale is often 50%+ discount and cost is a 75-80% discount.

I am sure that some of you will disagree with this, thats fine. You don't have to believe me. As a matter of fact, I encourage you to not take my word. Instead go out and research for yourself, an educated buyer is a friend to all other buyers.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 08:03:12


Post by: Chibi Bodge-Battle


Elementary my dear Watson!

Beg your pardon Kanwulen
(Missed that, it was late etc)


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 09:12:59


Post by: Andrew1975


I looked at Harbor Freight's at some of your items. Generally speaking, you're off by an order of magnitude, but that's not really the point I'm going with. While It's true Harbor Freight is inexpensive, there is a reason for that: the stuff HF sells is pure garbage. I work next door to one and occasionally have stopped by there for tools. I always regretted it and never go there anymore. While the tools that GWS sells are indisputably overprices, HF is not a fair comparison. A more apt comparison would be a specialty tool site like Micro-mark. MM has better quality, but the prices reflect it.

Please stop pretending, as others have, that the spray gun is an airbrush. They never claimed it was, they never describe it as such, and they never pretend it is. It's a foolish and overpriced product that hardly needs to be conflated with a better product to be ridiculed.


Harbor freight's tools are not crap, I use their tools all the time. But I'll even forgo those. If GW has the rocks to charge $8.50 for elmers glue, $6 for superglue and $10 for 20grams of greenstuff (products that you can easily ascertain the prices for) you really think they don't have the rocks to hose their customers on minis, (products whose production cost is unlisted anywhere because it would cause a riot)? Don't tell me these are special products!

Sorry I never used the spray gun airbrush...thing, whatever it is. I've had a good airbrush for years along with an air compressor, both from harbor freight.

Prove mismanagement then, factoring the cost of running the business, like I dunno, the Wagebill for all their stores (you know, the same stores that are vital, seeing as they supply the fresh blood).


Are GW stores vital? I've never been in one, we don't have any in Cleveland, (yes start Cleveland jokes in 3.2.1).Hell I don't even knw if we have them in the state of OHIO. Ideally the GW stores should make money not cost money. Every product sold there is pure profit, no cut goes to the retailer. If the stores can't cover their own costs then they should be closed. Running stores that can't even pay for themselves, much less make a profit for the company especially if they are this vital link then sales should be huge....well that is a prime example of mismanagement.

P.S. The comparisson to GI Joe stuff....exactly what use do you get out that particular lump of plastic?

I buy a GW kit for my army, and it's going to get used week in, week out. I get to build it (yay!) paint it (not so yay for me!) and then field it, hopefully knocking seven shades out my opponent.

That is where value is to be found, NOT in the price tag, but the usage.


I know about GI Joe's, I dont have any. But I played with them a hell of alot when I was a kid. Is that really that different than what you do with your toys?

The value is in the usage, not the price?

There are many different kinds of value. Lets talk about two of them

I'm happy for you that you have a great time with your minis. The absolute value of them however is very low and that means that GW is overcharging you.

The relative value is great, but variable for all people. Not a great thing to base a business on.

example : Hey use my super glue it's $6.50,

Relatively its worth $6.50 because it is the best super glue EVER and its got a big GW on it. You are gonna use it to build GW models so this super glue provides you with years of play.

Absolutely you bought a tube of Cyanoacrylate, available at most stores 3 tubes for $1. It works as well as the $6.50 Cyanoacrylate, because it is all Cyanoacrylate.

This "you are worth it", "yes these are bugle boy jeans I am wearing" sales technique is usually used by snake oil,and used car salesmen to part customers from their hard earned cash by selling them products with little or no absolute value.

If you are happy paying the relative value for products go ahead, keep doing it. I however will pay absolute with some added on for the producers troubles.

You know, someone better tell my customers that this boxed set is pish....otherwise they might, you know, come in and spend money on a product they want! OH NOEZ! Too late! Already been there and done that.


You know at least you have a reason to stand up for GW. You sell their product! Can't really expect a unbiased opinion from you, but you are the first person I can understand defending these prices. I can respect that. This puts food on your families plate.

Except it's not a truly limited run. They've retaken a specific toy, and packaged it as a "limited run" with minor cosmetic alterations--then hiked the price up.


um no. They are new toys, as different from the old GI JOE MOLDS as the new leman russ it to the old one, What was the price hike on that fiasco? Then they actually gave the customers a break on the price for the box, not hicked it up. It's called a bulk discount, something GW customers may not be used to. Do you save money by buying the large army boxes.....NOPE. Again wrong facts from you. These were not all $15.99 a piece, in fact the motorized tank was not released separately in the 25th anniversary line, but had it it would have been more than $15.99. Please don't make up prices for the products in my examples. I know it serves your purposes, but it's not very sporting or accurate is it?


As for "plenty of model/miniature companies out there"...of course they don't make things like GW.
Because GW owns its own intellectual property, and they are legally not allowed to make anything protected by GW's IP. To use your ridiculous GI Joe example--Mattel cannot produce GI Joe toys. Hasbro would sue the pants off them if they did. Each company makes things specific to their own properties/licenses. Privateer Press isn't going to start making Deathwing Terminators, nor will Games Workshop start making Menoth Warjacks.


I actually wrote

The fact is that there are plenty of model/miniatures companies out there. But make a comparison and people cherry pick how they are not exactly like GW. Well no company is exactly like GW. They either make the wrong era of miniatures, or use different plastic, or are a different scale, or whatever.


Please use the entire quote. This has nothing to do with IP.

The point was that every time a comparison is made people cherry pick a reason why a product is different from GW products "wrong era" "different market" " Different plastic" so you can never make a comparison. By your logic here I can't compare Burger King to McDonalds because Burger King doesn't have a big mac. You can make a comparison between a warjack and a dreadnought. A model tank and a banebalade. A historical model and a sci fi model.

Just stop twisting my words and adding your own incorrect facts to this topic











Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 10:35:24


Post by: Grot 6


There is no value in those new boxed sets. thats why only noobs will be the ones pounding over them.

Its GW, you didn't expect anything less, did you?

You can do what other people are doing, look for other systems and find new games to play that 90 bucks will get you your moneys worth or get the stuff second hand.

As for GW "Snagging" new players? They'll do what they always do. Shell game them in and nickle and dime them into the game and twice as fast out, like they always do.

Best thing for the rest of us is that the secondary market will be booming.

I hate to break it to you, but the GW apologist rant is falling on deaf ears after this last go around.

I don't know any Cleaveland jokes, but GW's sales is really starting to become one.

"How much did those whopping ten guys cost again?" More then the 24 did before? Baw haw hawhaw!!!!!


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 10:41:31


Post by: Mr Mystery


Stuff sold in Company stores is pure profit is it? Now you have just proven you are talking absolute bollocks.

Why?

Two Tactical Squads are being sent out to retail store. One is going to a FLGS. At this point, the costs incurred in this process by GW is production (including all aspects, like creation to mould making) packaging and shipping. The other is going out to a store GW run. Which means this box has the added cost of you know....rent, insurance, employees, electric, council rates.

My word, you really do just go off on a self righteous crusade?


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 10:44:20


Post by: Phototoxin


See I thinkmy main 'worry' is when GW does price themselves out of business what happens then? There will be a void with no rules, who will own the IP?

They need to gather longer term customers. A system based n fleecing someone for a £200-400 army then getting rid of them isn't going to work.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 10:51:22


Post by: Mr Mystery


So you know nothing about GW policy then. Well, that's clearly an awesome place to make unquantified statements from!

The Stores are there for Recruitment primarily. They are how new people get into the Hobby. Retention? That's where clubs and groups come into it. The Shop is a central hub, and if you depend purely upon it, then that is your choice.

Support IS available for clubs that the company know about (as in GCN Registered. Legal stuff sadly!) and it's something we can only advise on.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 10:54:05


Post by: Scott-S6


agnosto wrote:
Scott-S6 wrote:
Computer games have a very unusual pricing model. Few items are steadily reduced in price as the design ages. It would be nice to buy a new car for 50-25% of it's original purchase prices because that model came out a few years ago....


I guess cars in England don't depreciate as fast as they do here...
A $20,000 (USD) car that is just three years old is worth about $11,616. That's just a straight number and doesn't take into account factors like wear and tear...
http://www.carprice.com/depreciation-calculator


We're not talking about second hand. We're talking about buying new but it's a model that's been available for a few years. For example, the Evo X was GBP36K fully loaded when it launched in 2007 - if they followed the computer game pricing model I should be able to buy one new for around GBP20K now.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
asmith wrote:@ scott-s6: I highly doubt that any particular version of DVD player sells hundreds of millions per year. Maybe all of the hundreds of models out there combine for hundreds of millions of year, but likely we are talking approximately the same number in regards to individual units. The reason DVD players are so much cheaper is because the people who make them operate at very low margins.


There are many different models but many fewer different components. Lots of the key components are produced by only a handful of companies which then sell them on. There is an enormous saving on production in these scales.


Automatically Appended Next Post:


The panther isn't a great model. The JS2 isn't bad and compares fairly well price-wise to GW. Personally, I prefer AFV club which are a bit more expensive (£35-45) but kick the crap out of GW's vehicles.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 11:04:16


Post by: Andrew1975


No look GW will be fine. The bubble will burst just like it does in any artificially inflated market. SEE HOUSING CRISIS. It will probably be burst by competition, and GW will have to defend it's market share. Which they will do just fine, they will just figure out all the practices that they are doing wrong. Like the American car manufacturers, they will trim the fat and be better for it. Prices will go down, 40K will still be there. You'll have angry customers because that $100 model they bought is now $50, but they will get over it once they see what they can now buy with the cash they still have.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 11:07:23


Post by: Scott-S6


Kanluwen wrote:That's true. Not denying that upgrade kits can be overpriced.

But take a look at some scale model upgrade kits sometime. 8GBP is about right for upgrades that are 'decent' quality. There's an upgrade kit out there that's used to convert a 1/35 scale HMMV into a 'Gunwagon' that is nearly $150 for what amounts to 10 parts.


Some of the military modelling aftermarket stuff makes ForgeWorld look cheap.
http://www.relishmodels.co.uk/pavla-models-1-48-bac-tsr-2-nose-wheel-bay-set.html
£11 for a resin nosewheel bay (that's the space the front wheel on a plane retracts into, it's a tiny little part)


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 11:18:59


Post by: Chibi Bodge-Battle


It's not a tiny little part
It is 1/48 scale on a TSR2

There is a lot of intricate casting on the inside of the walls.

13 quid sounds about right for a resin AM piece of that size.
Though I will admit that it is fairly steep for Pavla. Some of the AM stuff is pricey but the quality is very good from what I have seen.
I will also defend Relish who give a discount and excellent service in my experience.

GW prices to kits comparison is pee poor imho
What you apparently get in an AFV kit knocks spots off what you will get for the same dollar in a GW kit.

It is a sad fact though that some manufacturers of kits are trying their level best to catch up with GW's pricing policy.
(Please note I have no connection other than a customer to Relish)


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Actually I take that back Scot, it is a tad on the expensive side now I think about it as I was originally overestimating the size.

Reason I say that is also due to some of the Pavla castings I have seen are rather dodgy at times. Though this one looks a lot crisper.

It's all academic to me as I don't get such sets.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 12:00:29


Post by: Ratius


2 Tanks (one of them motorized, Pew, Pew, Pew)
1 Flight pod
7 action figures, but for arguments sake 3 are vehicle drives so lets say 3+1 character model

Suggested price $62.99 according to list. I saw it in the stores for $55. I could buy it now new in box on ebay $50.

2 baneblades $99 a piece = $200 (I could have gone with 2 leman russ at $100, but these tanks are giant in comparison to even the baneblades, plus one is motorized)
Land Speeder= $30 (yeah could have used a jet bike $15, but the land speeder is closest in size)
3 marines= $8.25
cheapest character model I could find was marine Sargent 2 = $12.25 (yes he's metal, do you want me to use the $20 plastic marine commander)

$250.50! for unassembled, unpainted more detailed plastic sprue. It's not a perfect analogy but the difference tells the story!


Post of the week mate

And to the people saying "50 quid computer game gave me hours of fun, hundreds spent on GW products in the attic/can only play once a week" thats your problem, not GWs.
No one asked you to spend that amount of money on a hobby you obviously couldnt devote the time to make the most out of.
Let me guess, getting home in the evening and booting up your Xbox is a hell of a lot easier then setting up a gmae of 40k right? Tough
Set some time aside and quit whinging. You obviously have some armies there that are playable albeit perhaps out of date, what stops you playing some FLGS games or with friends. Are you so vain or needy that you must have the most up to date model or the very latest release. Hell 1/2 my armies are 2nd edition models but they still work/are usuable and lord knows I havent converted/updated any of them.

And GW products are a luxury item btw.


Geez, how is GW going to snag new players now? @ 2010/08/13 12:26:51


Post by: Frazzled


This thread is closed for flaming. Private warnings are being issued.