26531
Post by: VikingScott
Your post was edited.
26531
Post by: VikingScott
Twice without something like eg: EDITED for spelling
29697
Post by: IGLannister
So let me get this straight. You asked me to clarify why I was voting for you, which I did. Then I told you it was edited in a separate post, and to go find it. Which you did. I laid out why I was voting on you, saying (roughly) that your vote was swayed rather easily by others.
Then, after I did as bid, you vote for for me to be lynched based on the fact that I neglected to edit my post, and that you didn't like my answer. Therefore, Scott, what good would it do for anyone to answer your questions?
29697
Post by: IGLannister
Allow me to further state why I'm suspicious of you Scott. You ask Syph where if fit into his plan. If I was suspicious, why? Then Drk_O votes for me. Which is cool, we've been voting for each other on and off the entire game.
However, just a few posts later you're giving me the ultimatum to answer your query or get voted for. TBH, I think you're trying to jump on to someone elses vote.
18471
Post by: Lord-Loss
We should stop the Lan Bandwagon here before it gets bigger. 
Just cause you find someone suspicous, there is no need to vote.
Fifty, I don't think thats a very good reason to want Lan lynched and it's not pro-town to wanna lynch someone cause you dislike 'em.
26761
Post by: TherVadam
OK, that's fair. I was being a little rash.
Unvote: IGLannister
29697
Post by: IGLannister
Lord Loss, for some reason every post you make is automatically ignored. Did I press a wrong button or something? What's going on here?
18471
Post by: Lord-Loss
Go to your profile and check if you added me to ignore list. You can remove me there, if you want to. 
29697
Post by: IGLannister
Thanks. Dunno why you were in there.
10906
Post by: VictorVonTzeentch
OCC: I go to a Iron Maiden concert then turn up dead, great.
DEATH POST
Ah the foolish cultists think they've ended me... They've done nothing that hasn't already been planned...
26761
Post by: TherVadam
OOC: Away for a few days.
12061
Post by: halonachos
Wow Lann,you were right. If you're innocent, hell even if you're a cultist, I vote you to get some kind of medal. No other one here has been bandwagoned as much as him, even if they were only radioflyer size bandwagons.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Lord-Loss wrote:1.Don't you have to be Pysky (spell?) guy to be possesed?
2.I'm not possesed.
3.I see the big difference in Inqusitiors game style and it makes me... suspicous.
4.Scott has actually been scum hunting since the begining of Day Two, so I don't see any votes against his currently (He did some suspicous stuff on Day One but not enough for a Vote) as being pro-town.
5.I don't know why Bishop is attacking me, he's probally jealous of my charm & wit!
6.Inqusitior@ You've claimed that Lann is possesed and Nachos is a cultist, just like that. There's no might or probally. You could only know if someone is a cultist if you were an Inqusitior and it's currently not possible to know who Styner possesed. I think, would it come up on an Inqusitiors investigation during the night phase N0t_u?. But anyway, are you admiting to be an Inqusitior?
1. Heresy! Everyone knows how to spell psyker.
2. I know, it was a good try though!
3. I've already explained this.
4. Meh, no one to scum hunt on day one, since all the suspicious stuff happened after my last view on day one.
5. I am too!
6. I don't know who is possessed, just a 100% accurate guess! (Just kidding. ) I am just reading through the patters as to who is a cultist and why.
IGLannister wrote:Dude, to be perfectly honest, i don't care how old your friend is, no one will hook up with me to play ):
Tell your broseph to gimme a call, dude, I'll gladly convince him to Go Guard.
Furthermore, can everyone who STILL thinks I'm a heretic please stand up? And by that I mean announce it, so I can know whose faces to rub it in when They finally realize I'm just a humble serf.
HERESY! 
Paul Atreides wrote:Inquisitor_Syphonious, I am not surprised that you suspect me.
In your seat, I would probably suspect me too.
I know I have nothing but my word of honour, but I will still say, for what it's worth,that my actions were based on noobplay and gut feeling. But my stupidity cost the town greatly, and I could full well understand if you would like to see lynched.
Nope, still think you're too suspicious to not be a cultist.
Lord-Loss wrote:Uh....Uh?
What did you do again Paul? 
Same thing as TherVadam (and a 'lil by IG)...
I am 99.9999996% sure on my conclusions, c'mon! They all just... just... look!
 
12061
Post by: halonachos
In response to LL's post, you can be a cultist or a psyker to get possessed IIRC.
In all reality, I don't think syphonius is the inquisitor. though, I think he's the psyker or maybe a cultist. I see his attacks on me and the others as a blatant attempt to use the suspicions of day 1 to coerce us to believe that he is the inquisitor.
His actions so far seem different from before (which he said is due to this being day two), but I don't believe that to be true. The math points to the heretics being almost the majority(if my guess on the roles is correct) so if he lists 4 or 5 guys there's a chance one of them will be a heretic. If one of them is voted and turns cultist then it will seem as if he's the inquisitor.
The fact that the anti-town most likely have the majority means that the inquisitor will not reveal themselves if they are smart.
He's possessed, I'm completely sure of it. Whether or not he's pro-town is unknown. I will not put my vote towards him until the demon in him is banished because of my thinking of the scenario.
Syphonius is possessed and declares himself inquisitor and chooses the top 4 suspicious townies. Everyone votes the townie out and during the night phase, another townie is killed. While the town wants to get rid of syphonius, they don't have the votes and then are guaranteed a loss as 4 cultists remain and only 4 townies remain. There are still two players on the demon team(if the real inquisitor has failed to banish stynier) and this leaves the rogue psyker(whom I believe will not be possessed in interest of the demons wanting as many anti-town alive as possible).
Day 2 will end with 7 anti-town and 4 pro-town. The cultists quickly vote out one townie and night kill another player, end of game.
Don't vote syphonius, let the inquisitor banish stynier from him.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
halonachos wrote:In response to LL's post, you can be a cultist or a psyker to get possessed IIRC.
In all reality, I don't think syphonius is the inquisitor. though, I think he's the psyker or maybe a cultist. I see his attacks on me and the others as a blatant attempt to use the suspicions of day 1 to coerce us to believe that he is the inquisitor.
His actions so far seem different from before (which he said is due to this being day two), but I don't believe that to be true. The math points to the heretics being almost the majority(if my guess on the roles is correct) so if he lists 4 or 5 guys there's a chance one of them will be a heretic. If one of them is voted and turns cultist then it will seem as if he's the inquisitor.
The fact that the anti-town most likely have the majority means that the inquisitor will not reveal themselves if they are smart.
He's possessed, I'm completely sure of it. Whether or not he's pro-town is unknown. I will not put my vote towards him until the demon in him is banished because of my thinking of the scenario.
Syphonius is possessed and declares himself inquisitor and chooses the top 4 suspicious townies. Everyone votes the townie out and during the night phase, another townie is killed. While the town wants to get rid of syphonius, they don't have the votes and then are guaranteed a loss as 4 cultists remain and only 4 townies remain. There are still two players on the demon team(if the real inquisitor has failed to banish stynier) and this leaves the rogue psyker(whom I believe will not be possessed in interest of the demons wanting as many anti-town alive as possible).
Day 2 will end with 7 anti-town and 4 pro-town. The cultists quickly vote out one townie and night kill another player, end of game.
Don't vote syphonius, let the inquisitor banish stynier from him.
Why do you think I am possessed?
/shrugs
Cultist.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
How often do the townies win these?
Cultist.
EDIT-Spelling...
10906
Post by: VictorVonTzeentch
OOC I was gone a day, watching for the other ones.
13705
Post by: the_ferrett
This is all very.... loud, isn't it? I find your actions.... Garish Mr nachoes. I don't think you understand the odds of.... luck. Time to vote town and vote you off Nachoes.
26531
Post by: VikingScott
IGLannister wrote:So let me get this straight. You asked me to clarify why I was voting for you, which I did. Then I told you it was edited in a separate post, and to go find it. Which you did. I laid out why I was voting on you, saying (roughly) that your vote was swayed rather easily by others.
Then, after I did as bid, you vote for for me to be lynched based on the fact that I neglected to edit my post, and that you didn't like my answer. Therefore, Scott, what good would it do for anyone to answer your questions?
The point is that you edited your post without giving a reason which is against the rules.
Then I told you it was edited in a seperate post
Key word here is edited.
and that you didn't like my answer.
Your answer was that you retracted your staement about me not inputting and claim that I just follow people. I didn''t say that I didn't like it but you assume that as I'm voting for you.
I can't even remember the question but your answer and you still voting for me doesn't match up.
However, just a few posts later you're giving me the ultimatum to answer your query or get voted for. TBH, I think you're trying to jump on to someone elses vote.
The ultimatum was because you were online and it was possible for you to type a quick reply. You even had several post before actually acknowledging my post.
12061
Post by: halonachos
the_ferrett wrote:This is all very.... loud, isn't it? I find your actions.... Garish Mr nachoes. I don't think you understand the odds of.... luck. Time to vote town and vote you off Nachoes.
A little testy eh Mr. Ferrett?
I will answer syphonius first. He is either possessed or he's a cultist hiding behind large targets. "Halonachos is suspicious" is a relatively safe way to cast a vote as I was one of the top suspects in the beginning of the game.
I also see ferrett defending him which means that ferrett may also be a demon trying to tow the party line. I rubbed him the wrong way by guessing that Syphonius was possessed, the way ferrett quickly pounced on voting me off almost proves my suspicions.
The possibilities I can see is that Stynier is trying to get Syphonius killed and Syphonius is a pro-town psyker. Stynier is trying to make it seem like Syphonius is the inquisitor. Syphonius was a cultist and should be killed anyways.
Like I said, the rapid defense of the new syphonius by ferrett makes me think that ferrett is also a demon and that syphonius is possessed. Ferrett and syphonius were distant during day one, but this new found alliance is a little fishy in my opinion.
The only issue I have is what do we do with them. If we lynch ferrett then he can possess another player and hunt begins anew, if we lynch syphonius we release stynier to possess another player( Is that how it works Not_U?. All in all I am favoring a no lynch at the moment so the inquisitor can banish ferrett or stynier from syphonius during the night.
Vote: No Lynch
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
halonachos wrote:the_ferrett wrote:This is all very.... loud, isn't it? I find your actions.... Garish Mr nachoes. I don't think you understand the odds of.... luck. Time to vote town and vote you off Nachoes.
A little testy eh Mr. Ferrett?
I will answer syphonius first. He is either possessed or he's a cultist hiding behind large targets. "Halonachos is suspicious" is a relatively safe way to cast a vote as I was one of the top suspects in the beginning of the game.
I also see ferrett defending him which means that ferrett may also be a demon trying to tow the party line. I rubbed him the wrong way by guessing that Syphonius was possessed, the way ferrett quickly pounced on voting me off almost proves my suspicions.
The possibilities I can see is that Stynier is trying to get Syphonius killed and Syphonius is a pro-town psyker. Stynier is trying to make it seem like Syphonius is the inquisitor. Syphonius was a cultist and should be killed anyways.
Like I said, the rapid defense of the new syphonius by ferrett makes me think that ferrett is also a demon and that syphonius is possessed. Ferrett and syphonius were distant during day one, but this new found alliance is a little fishy in my opinion.
The only issue I have is what do we do with them. If we lynch ferrett then he can possess another player and hunt begins anew, if we lynch syphonius we release stynier to possess another player( Is that how it works Not_U?. All in all I am favoring a no lynch at the moment so the inquisitor can banish ferrett or stynier from syphonius during the night.
Vote: No Lynch
Silly silly halonachos.
No lynch to try to play innocent? Very big mistake...
Anyone else see that as a sham?
Hiding behind targets? Nope, I pretty much painted one on my face, while you didn't make the biggest mistake, your friends did, and you still made some slight errors.
Such as:
*Takes position*
*Offends someone*
*Takes another postition*
Rinse wash and repeat.
Ferrett wasn't rushing to my aid, he simply y'know, can piece together that you and your trifecta are cultists. He sees that my posts make sense.
Me and Ferrett talked on vassal! (Not about the game)
Now to the obligatory:
Heretical!
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Disclaimer:
I am not possessed.
Anyhoo:
Why would Stynier pick me to be possessed?
Even if he did pick to possess me, why would I take such an offensive all of a sudden?
18471
Post by: Lord-Loss
Voting No Lynch is not pro town. Please take it off before I pressure vote you.
It's not good for the town.
I don't like the way Ferrett plays, he isn't scum hunting or contributing. He's just speaking in riddles and voting without giving a reason. I'd support a end of Day Two Ferrett Lynch.
12061
Post by: halonachos
Why would stynier choose to possess you, hmmm.
1) You had little or no ties to people in this game.
2) While you were vocal, you weren't as vocal.
3) LL and Bishop would be obvious choices for stynier to possess and would be eyed with suspicion because of that fact.
4) Vadem, Fifty, and Paul didnt say too much and gave little character to base an opinion off of. Fifty and Paul especially, their lack of talking is way off of styniers style and they have continued the same style.
5)I would say that Drk_O and I both have unique styles when it comes to posting so it would be hard for stynier to replicate.
6) Ferrett talked too little and his recent quick defense of you showed that there is a connection of some sort between you two in the game.
7) LL, Bishop, and I talked way too much. This makes us safe in terms of night kills or possession.
8) Stynier talked in an amount similar to you and was night-killed. I think that the anti-town are aiming for those in the middle of the chat-meter. People who talk too much have many enemies and a night kill of one of them will expose the cultists, a possession of someone who talked too much makes it difficult for the possesser to mimic their actions. Night killing people who rarely talk implicates those who talk too much and those who don't talk may be obvious choices for possession because it's too easy to mimic.
Perhaps you are the demon and ferrett was possessed?
And yes you ARE hiding behind targets.
Inquisitor_Syphonius wrote:Inquisitor_Syphonious' supect list:
Halonachos
Paul Atredies
TherVadam
IGLannister
Lord-Loss
Congratulations, you suspect 3 of the most talkative people( IG, LL, and I), the new guy, and someone who has not talked but 3 or 4 times. Why don't you just throw bishop up on that list as well.
Not only that, but I never saw you even chance putting ferrett into the spotlight, not even during this second day of trial. He fits your suspect list fairly well and has managed to slip past your suspicions, oh wait...
I think I know who you suspect, anybody who voted for GND. He popped negative for corruption and that makes it blatantly obvious that anybody who voted for him or supported me are cultists.
Those choices are incredbily obvious and incredibly safe, too safe for anyone with the town in mind. Like another person said: the chances are that during day one we will lynch a townie, yet it seems that you are using the day one results to form the basis of your vote. What I am getting though is that you are now promoting the wholesale slaughter of anybody who voted against GND.
As to why you would take a sudden offensive is simple. You are the pro-town psyker and syphonius wants you offed so he's going to make you as big a target as possible.
12061
Post by: halonachos
LL, the only reason I have a "no lynch" vote is because I don't have a ready idea of who is a cultist now and I am sure as hell not going to lynch suspected demons and let them possess someone else just to go on another chase.
26531
Post by: VikingScott
halonachos wrote:
Those choices are incredbily obvious and incredibly safe, too safe for anyone with the town in mind. Like another person said: the chances are that during day one we will lynch a townie, yet it seems that you are using the day one results to form the basis of your vote. What I am getting though is that you are now promoting the wholesale slaughter of anybody who voted against GND.
I would like to say that i reached a similar conclusion but only posted that I wasn't going to blindly follow Inq_Syph.
And then ask him how he was so sure.
(If I actually didn't ask this then I am asking it now )
12061
Post by: halonachos
So sure about which though, suspicion of GND(you did ask about that as did I) or his conclusion about me?
26531
Post by: VikingScott
I meant conclusion about his list of heretics.
It sounds plausible but i don't think its as black and white as he thinks.
12061
Post by: halonachos
I think Stynier is just trying to get him killed or Syphonius is trying to get himself killed. My votes for the demon team stand at syphonius and Ferrett.
My cultist votes will remain anonymous as I want to see how this goes.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
halonachos wrote:Why would stynier choose to possess you, hmmm.
1) You had little or no ties to people in this game.
2) While you were vocal, you weren't as vocal.
3) LL and Bishop would be obvious choices for stynier to possess and would be eyed with suspicion because of that fact.
4) Vadem, Fifty, and Paul didnt say too much and gave little character to base an opinion off of. Fifty and Paul especially, their lack of talking is way off of styniers style and they have continued the same style.
5)I would say that Drk_O and I both have unique styles when it comes to posting so it would be hard for stynier to replicate.
6) Ferrett talked too little and his recent quick defense of you showed that there is a connection of some sort between you two in the game.
7) LL, Bishop, and I talked way too much. This makes us safe in terms of night kills or possession.
8) Stynier talked in an amount similar to you and was night-killed. I think that the anti-town are aiming for those in the middle of the chat-meter. People who talk too much have many enemies and a night kill of one of them will expose the cultists, a possession of someone who talked too much makes it difficult for the possesser to mimic their actions. Night killing people who rarely talk implicates those who talk too much and those who don't talk may be obvious choices for possession because it's too easy to mimic.
Perhaps you are the demon and ferrett was possessed?
And yes you ARE hiding behind targets.
Inquisitor_Syphonius wrote:Inquisitor_Syphonious' supect list:
Halonachos
Paul Atredies
TherVadam
IGLannister
Lord-Loss
1. Congratulations, you suspect 3 of the most talkative people( IG, LL, and I), the new guy, and someone who has not talked but 3 or 4 times. Why don't you just throw bishop up on that list as well.
2. Not only that, but I never saw you even chance putting ferrett into the spotlight, not even during this second day of trial. He fits your suspect list fairly well and has managed to slip past your suspicions, oh wait...
3. I think I know who you suspect, anybody who voted for GND. He popped negative for corruption and that makes it blatantly obvious that anybody who voted for him or supported me are cultists.
4. Those choices are incredbily obvious and incredibly safe, too safe for anyone with the town in mind. Like another person said: the chances are that during day one we will lynch a townie, yet it seems that you are using the day one results to form the basis of your vote. What I am getting though is that you are now promoting the wholesale slaughter of anybody who voted against GND.
5. As to why you would take a sudden offensive is simple. You are the pro-town psyker and syphonius wants you offed so he's going to make you as big a target as possible.
1) No one does but you and your cultists.
2) Just because I don't blabber up a storm doesn't mean I am not vocal! As I have explained many times before this, the first day is sillyness, second day is getting your hands dirty.
3) Bwahaha! Why would they be obvious now?
4) So as you put it, they would be perfect candidates, since they're not obvious.
4a) Your points 3 and 4 contradict each other.
5) I don't think that is how possession works, I may be mistaken though. So don't quote me on it!
6) No. I re-iterate, he read it, and saw that you and your gang are cultists.
7) I agree that you're talkative!
8) You seem to know alot about cultists eh? I have been talking alot too, don't know what thread you've been reading.
Or, neither of us are daemons? /shrug
Who? Accusing the lead heretic is not very conductive for well-being...
1. Talkative doesn't mean helpful. At all. (ie: halonachos) BishopGore has nothing to be suspicious of.
2. Why. Why does he fit in my list of suspects?
3. Nope, I suspect the people that protected you while voting for GND. Hell, just the people that protected you, since you seem to be getting in alot of trouble.
4. I like the wholesale slaughter of heretics. 
5. Are you talking to me? I thought you said I was possessed, then it was daemon, now I am a psyker? I know I was on the sign-up sheet twice, but c'mon!
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
You're so zealous about declaring me a possessed-pskyer-daemon...
Stynier is probably laughing mad off of his chair right about now...
12061
Post by: halonachos
Your list then composes of 5 heretics, you're missing one if you are indeed correct in your accusations.
Only psykers and cultists can be possessed. There are two psykers in this game(one good, one bad) and about 4 cultists IMO. It would be most beneficial for the now dead demon stynier to attack the pro-town psyker to push the odds in the anti-town's favor.
The reason I think you are more active is because of the fact that stynier( a demon) was night killed, forcing the demons into a power play. As this is day two, there are more targets to get behind and more reason to become more active(you used the "getting your hands dirty" euphamism I believe). Stynier would possess you because of your posting regularity, not too often and not too rarely, but just right.
Also Syphonius, your logic has upset me. I see no connection between me, paul, vadem, and LL. I also don't see how I wasn't "rubbing people the wrong way". I grilled several people later on during day one and was most suspicious because I rubbed a lot of people on day one.
Also, didn't Drk also say that I was preferred to GND? So why isn't he on your list.
As to your point 5, I think you are the pro-town psyker. However, once you are possessed you are on the demon team so right now you are anti-town.
12061
Post by: halonachos
Who do you think is the pro-town psyker then if it is not you?
26531
Post by: VikingScott
@Halonachos.
Stynier would only be able to guess at who the pro-town pysker is. If he got it wrong he would be banished (at least thats the impression i got from the rules)
18471
Post by: Lord-Loss
Inqu, just want to know: What have I done suspicous?
Nachos, how do you know how many pyskers are in the game?
12061
Post by: halonachos
I know this becuase I am the inquisitor.
Just kidding, its because I remember the sign up role list.
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/295599.page
12061
Post by: halonachos
Although I think the only difference is that he removed demon night kills.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Lord-Loss wrote:I'm afraid it has come down to 'lynch the least useful' now. We don't have much time left. The possibility of anyone revealing there scum and the town being able to decde and get a mjajority in these five (maybe four noe?) hours isn't likely.
VikingScott, you could follow others leads. Asking questions, challenging peoples unlogical arguments with logic etc.
I don't think it's good to lynch Halo. Could Scott and Inqusitior (You voted for him cause Drk said he didn't find him suspicous? Sometyhing like tha. Well if you did could you unvote to put GND and Halo on 2-2 so stuff can happen. Note: I havn't slept properly in three days. Cut me a break. :p
That's why I am suspicious-ish.
As a quick glance at the list can reveal, I got nothing on ya. 
12061
Post by: halonachos
Yet you said that you were 99.99% sure. Interesting.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
First I am possessed, then I am a cultist, then I am a demon, then I am a psyker, sheesh.
Anyhoo:
I believe BishopGore is the pro town pskyer.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
halonachos wrote:Yet you said that you were 99.99% sure. Interesting.
Look at the list!!!!!111!/one!!!!
18471
Post by: Lord-Loss
I guess it would be ok to say "I believe BishopGore is pro-town" but being a pro-town psyker wouldn't change your playstyle at all (I don't think so, as they're normal players who can be possesed) so you would not know that he is a pysker. Only a Inqusitior who ivestigated him would and I don't think a Inqusitior should reveal himself at this day phase, unless we know we got two Inqusitiors and both variations (The one where you can be protected from deamons and the one where you can be protected from cultists).
In that case we could have an invincible Inqusitior.
12061
Post by: halonachos
Inquisitor_Syphonious wrote:First I am possessed, then I am a cultist, then I am a demon, then I am a psyker, sheesh.
Anyhoo:
I believe BishopGore is the pro town pskyer.
Trap.
In previous posts you said that stynier was voting anti-town. This means that IG would be pro-town as stynier voted for him. We all know now that stynier was a demon, but wait, only psykers and cultists can be possessed by demons. You suspected IG of being possessed indicating that he was either a cultist or a psyker, but you think that bishop is the pro-town psyker. Your logic is failing you right now, and how does it feel to be under the lamp and exposed for what you are?
To make it short, with your logic you indicate anyone that stynier votes for as being pro-town, Stynier voted against IG and was also against me. This inidcates the fact that IG and I are indeed pro-town(according to your logic), yet you believe IG to be possessed. This would make IG a psyker(the only pro-town role that can be possessed), but you say that you think bishop is the pro-town psyker. So how can IG be pro-town and possessed without being the psyker? Simple, he can't. You slipped up, plain and simple.
So, Syphonius, or should I say Stynier, when should we schedule your banishment?
18471
Post by: Lord-Loss
That was a confusing post Nachos.
Just wonderin', can Inqusitiors be possesed? If so I hope the Demons don't get lucky... bad ass evil Inqusitiors runing around isn't good!
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Lord-Loss wrote:I guess it would be ok to say "I believe BishopGore is pro-town" but being a pro-town psyker wouldn't change your playstyle at all (I don't think so, as they're normal players who can be possesed) so you would not know that he is a pysker. Only a Inqusitior who ivestigated him would and I don't think a Inqusitior should reveal himself at this day phase, unless we know we got two Inqusitiors and both variations (The one where you can be protected from deamons and the one where you can be protected from cultists).
In that case we could have an invincible Inqusitior.
He asked me a question, so I answered, if I had to take a guess, I would guess at that.
halonachos wrote:Inquisitor_Syphonious wrote:First I am possessed, then I am a cultist, then I am a demon, then I am a psyker, sheesh.
Anyhoo:
I believe BishopGore is the pro town pskyer.
Trap.
In previous posts you said that stynier was voting anti-town. This means that IG would be pro-town as stynier voted for him. We all know now that stynier was a demon, but wait, only psykers and cultists can be possessed by demons. You suspected IG of being possessed indicating that he was either a cultist or a psyker, but you think that bishop is the pro-town psyker. Your logic is failing you right now, and how does it feel to be under the lamp and exposed for what you are?
To make it short, with your logic you indicate anyone that stynier votes for as being pro-town, Stynier voted against IG and was also against me. This inidcates the fact that IG and I are indeed pro-town(according to your logic), yet you believe IG to be possessed. This would make IG a psyker(the only pro-town role that can be possessed), but you say that you think bishop is the pro-town psyker. So how can IG be pro-town and possessed without being the psyker? Simple, he can't. You slipped up, plain and simple.
So, Syphonius, or should I say Stynier, when should we schedule your banishment?
Do not put words in my mouth.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Actually, more importatly, what does me thinking BishopGore is correlate to any of that?
/scratches-head-and-goes-back-quite-a-few-pages
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Him being opposed to you?
He was voting for IG, and warning you, for being off-topic.
's at halo.
12061
Post by: halonachos
No, I grilled him in earlier posts you know and he didn't like it. Of course, you should remember that stynier.
As to your thinking about bishop having correlation, there is no logic in it. If IG is innocent possessed he would have to be the psyker in your theory, yet you think that bishop is the psyker. Meaning that you really have no theory and just want to get rid of the top 3 supects from the first day. Are you purposefully not getting that to cover it up while not trying to defend yourself to make you seem any more suspicious, or do you just not get it?
12061
Post by: halonachos
^ No logic in your theory that is, referring to "As to your thinking about bishop having correlation, there is no logic in it.".
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
bishop having a relation to what now?
You're really trying to sell that BrotherStynier-Inquisitor_Syphonious pitch eh? Going to sell merchandise next?
What does any of that jumble of thoughts mean? Enter key is useful for seperating thoughts...
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
IG is innocent now? When did I say that?
12061
Post by: halonachos
Inquisitor_Syphonious wrote:IGLannister? He is in my theory.
@IGL...
BrotherStynier was logical, though he wasn't scum hunting.
He was really just pretending to scum hunt.
He was voting for people that he knew were citizens (AFAIK)
He was flying under the radar, waiting to night-kill.
You should know, since he possessed you.
This is your very own post, indicating that Stynier was voting for people he knew to be citizens. Now, would he vote for IG if he was a cultist? Even if it was just because of being OT, that single vote endangered him and may cause the lynching of IG during this day phase. So no, that is not an adequate defense of why it is possible that IG is not innocent in your "theory".
12061
Post by: halonachos
Saying that he wasn't scum hunting and then beginning to scum hunt yourself, trying to create a gap between similarities you and stynier may have had.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Well:
The big capital AFAIK is the most doubt i've shown short of lord-loss' postion.
Also, BrotherStynier could very well have been pissed at the fact that he went off-topic.
*Gee, this guy is annoying, baddies always win anyway, let me 'urb stomp 'im!*
12061
Post by: halonachos
So why are you so shaky in your accusations?
12061
Post by: halonachos
I also pointed out the fact that stynier's anti-OT vote would be too risky if IG was a cultist, look at who else jumped on during that day phase and during this day phase. That on top of the fact that IG already had a tie with GND when Stynier decided to do that leads further proof to not only your incorrect logic and theory, but if you are correct the innocence of IG.
You either believe your theory or you don't and if you don't even believe your theory, why should we?
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Shaky accusations?
Didn't realize he voted for IGL at that time.
What I do know is that:
His vote for IGL was purely out of IGL going off-topic.
12061
Post by: halonachos
How would you know that it was purely because of the OT? You're not stynier, oh wait, you are so I guess you would know.
Also, how can you not realize that IG had a tie with GND? The vote count was done and posted right before that vote.
Yes, your shaky accusations. You say someone's possessed, but declare their innocence while indicating that they cannot be innocent.
I feel like a chef right now doing some nice barbecue.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
That's funny.
I never declared IG innocent.
Once you get that through, we can continue with the topic at hand.
halonachos wrote:
I am a cultistsss!!!
Sure, you never said that, though it would make my job alot easier.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
halonachos wrote:How would you know that it was purely because of the OT? You're not stynier, oh wait, you are so I guess you would know.
Also, how can you not realize that IG had a tie with GND? The vote count was done and posted right before that vote.
Yes, your shaky accusations. You say someone's possessed, but declare their innocence while indicating that they cannot be innocent.
I feel like a chef right now doing some nice barbecue.
More grief:
2 line. Page & post number. Can I has it?
Drk_O would fit in nice and cozy with you heretics looking a few pages back... Probably nothing, though, always some brain food for you other townies. (ie: not halonachos! )
12061
Post by: halonachos
Fine, I am a cultistsss!!! that's like a quadruple plural so that means I am every single member of team cultist. Lynch me and you instantly win the game.
Yes inquisitor, you never said IG was innocent but implied it with your "theory". So your theory is bunk, you never had a theory, you just wanted to hide behind target numero uno, me.
12061
Post by: halonachos
Drk_O, paul, me, IG, LL, Bishop, Scott, etc. We all either defended me or allowed GND to be lynched so why aren't you going after them?
Oh, because my shadow hides you better.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
halonachos wrote:Fine, I am a cultistsss!!! that's like a quadruple plural so that means I am every single member of team cultist. Lynch me and you instantly win the game.
Yes inquisitor, you never said IG was innocent but implied it with your "theory". So your theory is bunk, you never had a theory, you just wanted to hide behind target numero uno, me.
halonachos wrote:Drk_O, paul, me, IG, LL, Bishop, Scott, etc. We all either defended me or allowed GND to be lynched so why aren't you going after them?
Oh, because my shadow hides you better.
Look at you up on your high horse...
((Provides good shadow? xD))
Drk_O's okey-dokey in my book, as is Scott.
No. My theory is not bunk. Scott, and Ferrett seem to understand it. I forgot Stynier voted for IGL, so, my theory isn't bunk, yet again. Stynier voted for IGL, since you two were going horribly off-topic.
29697
Post by: IGLannister
Sorry I was away. Interview. Have we decided on anyone besides me yet?
18471
Post by: Lord-Loss
Inqu, you seem to ignore anything suspicous about Scott. Some of which was aimed at you.
Does him agreeing with you mean that you're ignoring this?
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
I guess it all depends on when it happened.
Day one hating on me;
No problem.
Day two before I put up my theory;
No problem.
After I put up my theory;
Heresy!
I'll go search for the offending posts.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Meh just read them.
One was "...fabrication by cultists..."
I will admit, it was the first big post of day two.
"...How do you know Lann is possessed?..."
Which I had no way of knowing, it was a *gasps* joke.
I still think the ""psyky (sp?)"" is a 'lil suspicious from you.
18471
Post by: Lord-Loss
You shouldn't discard things just cause it's in Day One.
You seem to think that Day One means nothing. It means alot. What happens in Day One affects the entire game, it's what fuels Day Two and it's very important.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
I know, my whole theory was based on day one.
A cultist wrote:Fine, I am a cultistsss!!! that's like a quadruple plural so that means I am every single member of team cultist. Lynch me and you instantly win the game
He said it, get voting!
EDIT- Forgot to put my part in!
29697
Post by: IGLannister
It's a violation of the rules to edit your post and not say why it was edited...
29697
Post by: IGLannister
Dammit he did say why. Statement retracted.
13705
Post by: the_ferrett
Lord: Was hoping I wouldn't need to explain my absense and lack of voting A) a second time and B) at all.
A) I stated back in day 1 that I found day 1 voting a pointless excerise that must be done that I find distasteful (see - oh look a shadow KILL)
B) Currently just had the last exam for a semester I can't afford to fail. While yes I had the time to write up a few tactica, I didn't have the willpower to post here more and stress myself out with mindless accusations.
That's for my silence.
Why am I cryptic? Because I always am, so many past games have shown that nomatter how basic I try to state my language, my need to state the entire truth as I know it leads to a language that borderlines on the absurd.
As for why am I voting Nachoes? Cause of silly things like the top of this page.
12061
Post by: halonachos
Ferrett, I'm sorry if the only way to get anything different out of syphonius is to act unorthodox. I tried using straight logic with him and he pretty much just ignores it.
I also think that my last two pages worth of grilling may of had gotten something from him or are you forgetting about those?
From what I've done I gather that syphonius is most likely one of the possessed or at least on team demon and is attacking the townies that were the most suspicious during day one. You come along and say ou vote for me for "silly lthings like the top of this page" and seem to forget that I have been wearing a nice little chefs hat for a couple of pages.
So, ferrett, if I am listing my suspicions of Syphonius and you cast a vote for me with the only logic behind it being "silly things like the top of this page" you're just voting for me because I put Syphonius in the spotlight.
13705
Post by: the_ferrett
Cept don't the daemons have to beat both the cultists and the Townies to win? And you've just admitted you look most cultist like, daemon hunting or no.
12061
Post by: halonachos
Nope, demons win if the cultists win. Its just that even if all of the cultists are lynched, the remaining demons must be banished before the pro-town can win. Demons and cultists are on the same team, but demons know whos a cultist and who isn't. In theory, the demons should be trying to point out who is town to the cultists while managing to avoid being lynched by cultists.
As we saw with stynier, demons can be night-killed by cultists, but them being night-killed just means that they can possess another player. Those players being cultists and psykers, with there being 4 or so cultists, 1 rogue psyker, and 1 pro-town psyker I think that stynier possessed the pro-town psyker in order to give his team an advantage.
Which also goes into my points about Syphonius's failed logic. If he thinks that Stynier was voting against pro-town targets then IG would be pro-town. He also indicated IG as being the one possessed, and also indicated bishop as being the pro-town psyker. All in all, this is impossible unless he believes one of these statements to be untrue.
He considers the one about stynier voting against town to be untrue, yet why would a demon risk voting out a cultist if doing so would hurt his own chances of success?
12061
Post by: halonachos
Syphonius indicated that Stynier voted for IG because IG went OT, but like I said the votes were tied and doing so would sentence IG to death as others began voting for him as well. If IG died and was a cultist then Stynier would lose a potential possession victim and would hurt team anti-town in voting. So, I believe that IG is innocent because of the fact that Stynier was a demon and tried to get IG out using OT as a shield.
18471
Post by: Lord-Loss
I'm going to get mighty suspicous of Nachos if he doesn't stop saying 'grilling'. It's making me hungry!
12061
Post by: halonachos
Well yeah, you can't grill nachos though so I should be safe. However, bishop was grilling nachos so he's lucky thi isn't the RVS anymore.
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
pardon nachos, one little question. You do know the rules say the daemon can only possess someone once, after which they are killed like any cultists? Or was that rule removed?
I'm asking because you mentioned earlier wishing to refrain from killing symph until stynier is bannished from him.
Hold on, i'll quote the rules. BRB
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
Ah, here we are:
Possession works like this, after a Daemon player dies they have the option to try to latch onto someone's mind before they fall back into the warp. A Daemon can attempt to possess someone once they are dead, they can only possess one person. They also have to PM me who they wish to possess, I will then PM the person they possess if it goes through. Once a possession is successful, the two may communicate freely via PM throughout the game.
The Daemon players will know who the cultists are, but not the other way around. If the Daemon tries to possess a person who is unable to be possessed, then it fails and they leave the game as normal. If the player they possess is on the innocent side, they join the chaos side until the Daemon is removed. If the person the Daemon is possessing is killed the Daemon leaves the game, as they may only attempt to possess someone once.
12061
Post by: halonachos
Okay then Paul.
unvote: No lynch
Not sure what Syphonius is, but the ratio of possessable pro-town to possessable anti town favors the anti-town.
So Syphonius should be a rogue psyker or cultist in terms of probability.
26531
Post by: VikingScott
@Anyone who says I agree with Inq_syph.
I am not agreeing. If I agreed with his accusations I would have voted according to them. I have not.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
VikingScott wrote:@Anyone who says I agree with Inq_syph.
I am not agreeing. If I agreed with his accusations I would have voted according to them. I have not.
halonachos wrote:Okay then Paul.
unvote: No lynch
Not sure what Syphonius is, but the ratio of possessable pro-town to possessable anti town favors the anti-town.
So Syphonius should be a rogue psyker or cultist in terms of probability.
So... now I am a rogue psyker? Why? One million times why?
"Becuase Stynier possessed me?"
Wrong, you yourself said that there were two other people with his voting style, you then stated that it would be illogical for him to possess him, since it would be "obvious"...
You proceeded to accuse me of being possessed, for I was not like his voting style.
You then rambled off a list of people not like his voting style, and said it would be illogical for them to be possessed by him.
*psst, look at the above two lines*
halonachos wrote:Syphonius indicated that Stynier voted for IG because IG went OT, but like I said the votes were tied and doing so would sentence IG to death as others began voting for him as well. If IG died and was a cultist then Stynier would lose a potential possession victim and would hurt team anti-town in voting. So, I believe that IG is innocent because of the fact that Stynier was a demon and tried to get IG out using OT as a shield.
Or... He didn't want the game to be an off-topic jumbled mess, as you said, it would have killed him, though he had plenty of time left, so he simply could have scared him, without putting him in any real danger...
halonachos wrote:Nope, demons win if the cultists win. Its just that even if all of the cultists are lynched, the remaining demons must be banished before the pro-town can win. Demons and cultists are on the same team, but demons know whos a cultist and who isn't. In theory, the demons should be trying to point out who is town to the cultists while managing to avoid being lynched by cultists.
As we saw with stynier, demons can be night-killed by cultists, but them being night-killed just means that they can possess another player. Those players being cultists and psykers, with there being 4 or so cultists, 1 rogue psyker, and 1 pro-town psyker I think that stynier possessed the pro-town psyker in order to give his team an advantage.
Which also goes into my points about Syphonius's failed logic. If he thinks that Stynier was voting against pro-town targets then IG would be pro-town. He also indicated IG as being the one possessed, and also indicated bishop as being the pro-town psyker. All in all, this is impossible unless he believes one of these statements to be untrue.
He considers the one about stynier voting against town to be untrue, yet why would a demon risk voting out a cultist if doing so would hurt his own chances of success?
Not failed logic, see above quote.
You honestly think you're grilling me?
*Takes a long drag from a bubble pipe*
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
^^^^ As to the top quote, 'tis a shame... ^^^^
12061
Post by: halonachos
Syphonius are you aware of the story of Goldilocks?
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Your "hole" in my logic is complete rubbish.
BrotherStynier knew he had enough time to unvote IGLannister, and he also knew that voting for Lann would scare him straight.
12061
Post by: halonachos
So, are you defending Stynier's vote post mortem?
But yes, Goldilocks, this may seem trivial and childish but I think it works.
Bishop, LL, Drk, and I were incredibly talkative and even though Bishop and LL played similarly they were "too hot". A person who talks a lot is often targeted by town as hiding something so why would he go there?
Paul, Fifty, scarper, and Vadem played too little and hardly talked, making them "too cold".
IG, Ferrett, scott, and yourself talked often but not too much and used logic in your postings. You guys managed to be "just right". As to why I don't suspect IG is because of the voting, Stynier was just trying to fit in with the town by removing someone who was OT. Now, there may have been a day in between Stynier's vote and the deadline, but in that time many people had made up their minds, or had voted for him and may not revisit the vote until after the end of day one.
As to why I don't have suspicion on ferrett, I do, but I don't believe him to be possessed. Your mood swing is what made me think that you were now stynier's puppet. Ferrett has yet to change his posting style and scott is still acting like scott. Scott hasn't said too much, but that is probably because he is afraid to push anyone's buttons and wants to act as pro-town as possible.
26531
Post by: VikingScott
I am pro-town so I'm not acting I'm being
12061
Post by: halonachos
Would you act like a heretic if you were pro-town? The answer is probably no, so you're acting pro-town. The way you flip on your votes is almost not pro-town, but as I said: Indecision is the key to flexibility.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Teehee, find the logic in my posts, my vote for Drk_O was completely illogical, everything I said day one practically was.
As some others and I believe, day one is a gimmick.
Your rating on my posts is horribly skewed to make me look guilty.
As others have stated:
The possessed would not show a huge mood swing.
If I have to explain my change in attitude one more time so help me emperor...
26531
Post by: VikingScott
So Halo... are you calling me a bad townie or a bad cultist?
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
I would like to hear the rest of the town's opinions on halo.
13705
Post by: the_ferrett
I told you my opinion. Whether or not you're intelligent enough to read it is your own question.
12061
Post by: halonachos
Easy, half of town thinks I'm guilty, the other half say they need me.
18471
Post by: Lord-Loss
I don't think we need you.
Just rather keep a scum hunting good player around into the town is sure that he's scum. 
24360
Post by: BishopGore
Hey all.
In total agreement with Fifty that this game just isn't fun yet. I'm really glad that the new players have jumped in and are enjoying themselves, but it's too noisy and too much of a headache to keep any semblance of order in my mind, so I'm going to be a floater for a while, keep checking in but mostly checked out.
Amusingly, Inquisitor_Syphonius was exactly right when he said I'm a pro-town psyker. That should give everyone something to think about. I wasn't possessed by Stynier, but I do expect to be possessed next time a daemon dies, so if I start acting a little different you can all make sure a daemon dies for sure. Or I can be a safety kill the next day, just to be sure. The bluffs and double bluffs that surround that exchange should be amusing at least.
Unvote: Lord-Loss
When Lord-Loss and Halo turn out to be cultists I can at least know I was right, even if they are the last guys standing
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
the_ferrett wrote:I told you my opinion. Whether or not you're intelligent enough to read it is your own question.
Wow... you know, I could have meant the other 6-7 players?
BishopGore wrote:Hey all.
In total agreement with Fifty that this game just isn't fun yet. I'm really glad that the new players have jumped in and are enjoying themselves, but it's too noisy and too much of a headache to keep any semblance of order in my mind, so I'm going to be a floater for a while, keep checking in but mostly checked out.
Amusingly, Inquisitor_Syphonius was exactly right when he said I'm a pro-town psyker. That should give everyone something to think about. I wasn't possessed by Stynier, but I do expect to be possessed next time a daemon dies, so if I start acting a little different you can all make sure a daemon dies for sure. Or I can be a safety kill the next day, just to be sure. The bluffs and double bluffs that surround that exchange should be amusing at least.
Unvote: Lord-Loss
When Lord-Loss and Halo turn out to be cultists I can at least know I was right, even if they are the last guys standing
Either two things, Stynier is trying to get you killed, or you're trying to get me killed.
Hell, you might be telling the truth.
Sorry it was less than fun for you, I will admit I have been talking quite too much, mostly on account of halonachos accusing me in every fething post.
12061
Post by: halonachos
Well, when you start with an accusation that is out of the norm so far of course I will accuse you. Everybody else said they suspected someone, you yelled that I was a cultist.
I don't think anyone in their right mind would announce who they were though. I think that almost anyone can agree on that. This whole demon element is putting me off and I was on at first, after all, I didn't vote for GND because he really didn't do anything.
I mean seriously, who can explain why they voted for GND besides "I would've rather had Halo remain", that's almost complete bull and I don't like it.
And to bishop, sorry, but you haven't been on and neither has Drk so I had to do your jobs.
12061
Post by: halonachos
Also LL, I could understand your post until you became incoherent with the "into the town" part.
18471
Post by: Lord-Loss
Come on guys we need to get more people posting, it's only Inqu, me, Bishop and Halo doing anything now.
Can we please start discussion up again?
12061
Post by: halonachos
I guess we have to wait.
12061
Post by: halonachos
Either that or everyone is too afraid to talk and gain suspicion. I'm going to do something about that somehow.
18471
Post by: Lord-Loss
Maybe the active users should put some pressure votes on the less-talkative players?
26531
Post by: VikingScott
I am still here but i don't feel that I have anything useful to add at this time.
13705
Post by: the_ferrett
OOC: Due to personal issues I have to withdraw from this game. My apologies.
26531
Post by: VikingScott
Fair enough.
But whoa, a triple post!
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
halonachos wrote:Either that or everyone is too afraid to talk and gain suspicion. I'm going to do something about that somehow.
EVERYTHING that anyone does is suspicious to you eh?
If we put pressure votes on the less talkative players, then we're letting halonachos go free.
17718
Post by: Drk_Oblitr8r
Sorry I haven't been as active lately, I've been playing Maple Story, and haven't been able to get on til late, so I'm not going to say much for a little while.
I'm pretty solid on my vote for Lanny, so I'll stick to it for now.
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
I wish I had more to contribute with, But at this point I only have a few half formed theories that most of you have probably already formed yourselves.
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
That and halo is right. I am a coward too.
12061
Post by: halonachos
Inquisitor_Syphonious wrote:halonachos wrote:Either that or everyone is too afraid to talk and gain suspicion. I'm going to do something about that somehow.
EVERYTHING that anyone does is suspicious to you eh?
If we put pressure votes on the less talkative players, then we're letting halonachos go free.
You're still not making any sense, and yes everything everyone else does is suspicious to me. I don't know who's who and theres a heaping amount of baddies left to get rid of.
And no we're not letting me go free, we're looking at others. Right now I'm the only one who has had a target on their back while those who didn't talk were able to get away scott-free. Look at it this way, there's one halonachos(who has been talking) and several who have not been talking, several who we haven't really gotten to know.
VOTE: BISHOPGORE
12061
Post by: halonachos
Sorry to hear about that Ferrett, good luck with those reasons.
26761
Post by: TherVadam
Hi Guys, back. I went to go see the Chinese pres when he visited Canada, and then hung out in Ottawa until today. Just came back from 8 and a half hours of water park, so I'm going to wait until morning so I can coherently form thoughts.
Ferrett, sorry to hear that. Good luck.
18471
Post by: Lord-Loss
Paul, lets hear those theories.
Scott why don't you tell you how you feel about every single member of the town? All of us.
12061
Post by: halonachos
I also want to hear about what you think about town as well LL. I know how you feel about me, but what about the others?
You tell me, I'll tell you.
18471
Post by: Lord-Loss
Halo: I'm not sure about this guy, i'm watching him. He did some suspicous stuff in Day 1 but he's been good in Day 2.
Bishop: I'm suspicous of him admiting to being a pro town pkyser, is he not a pkyser and he's trying to trick demons? Or is he a demon being crafty...
Inq: A very aggresive playstyle in Day 2. I dunno what to think about him, he's acting aggresive but not suspicous.
Scott: Seems fairly pro-town. He started scum hunting in Day 2 after a little push in Day 1. I see his early mistakes in Day 1 as rookie mistakes.
Fifty: Suspicous, he doesn't talk much.
Sorry If I've forgotten people but those are the most talkative people or people I just remember.
Vote: Fifty
This is a pressure vote to try and get Fifty to talk more, if he doesn't I'd like other people to join me.
26531
Post by: VikingScott
My thoughts on town.
If you really want to hear it then so you shall.
(How many players are there again?  )
Current ones that I can remember:
LL: Not sure If you are town or not but I think you are closer to being town than anti-town.
Halo: Mostl likely town I think. But maybe all the chatter is a cover up?
BishopGore: Not sure what to make of the declaration of being Pro-town psyker. But being honest I thik he has just committed suicide. If he doesn't die in the night-phase then it is likely that the cultist don't believe him or that he is a cultist himself. In short its a bit of a pickle.
Inq: Not sure but I'm inclined to think town.
Chances are that one (or more) of the above are cultists. And I only chose to do these four as they are the most talkative.
26531
Post by: VikingScott
Oh and on the 5th of July to the 14/15th of July I am out of the country ok?
Sorry.
Felt I should warn you guys in advance.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
If I get night killed, lynch halo for me?
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
Lord-Loss wrote:Paul, lets hear those theories.
They are all just hypothesii really(Is that the correct way of saying it? ). These are the most important thoughts of mine at this point. Symph has more or less made up his mind about mine, halos, and IG's guilt. I am not entirely sure about him, maybe he is just rabid townie overconfident in his deductive abilities, Jumping on an obvious culprit. One argument supporting this theory is, obviously, that he has more or less no backup. If he was a baddie, maybe he'd have a couple of people agreeing with him? Now there is always the possibility they are bidding their time for a late day bandwagon, of course. Alternatively, He could be a cultist, trying to hide behind the larger target of Halo. I think the chief argument for this theory is this sudden swing in behaviour, which could mean he is possessed (Yes I know Symph, that you have explained this to be your 'serious face'). Alternatively alternatively, He could be absolutely right. Halo could be a cultist. IG could be one. I'd be an idiot if I claimed I couldn't be. But there are several possibilities here.I could be a cultist trying to throw halo and IG in a bad light by 'accidentaly' slipping up. Or Halo could be guilty and I just an idiot. I'll throw in a random thought here: EDIT: this random thought of mine proved to be certainly wrong. Sorry for any inconvenience. Then there's Halo's trap about the flaw in symphonius logic. Symph dismissed it, I don't know if you have, but I sure haven't. And besides, their exchanges up to this point can be broken down into Halo attempting to use logic and Symph calling him cultist. I am leaning towards symph at this point, but I am unsure. Bandwagoning on GND was obviously a mistake. I wonder if choose the wrong side in that matter. What would have happened if IG had been lynched? Or Halo? Most of all, I am baffled, and to some extent insulted, that noone wanted to lynch me. The attentionwhore in me wonders what separeted me from GND. I didn't contribute more, that's one thing for sure. That's just of the top of my head. Sorry if I bored you with reading this, LL.
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
Mistake post. For a minute there I thought my rant had disappeared.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
We ALL know that Karon had a role, be it heretical or puritan.
Someone understands the serious face!
If no one votes for halonachos, then i'll lynch ya. ;p
My logic is flawed, let me run this off to you guys one last time, nice and simple:
IGLannister was going radically off-topic.
I claimed that people BrotherStynier was voting for were citizens. (Big AFAIK after it, one of my most uncertain statements)
BrotherStynier voted for IGLannister, which came up to me after I posted the above.
BrotherStynier knew that while he would tip the balance to kill IGLannister, he had more than enough time to take the vote back, and vote for someone else, saving IGLannister.
BrotherStynier was night killed.
New theory time on IGLannister, he might have nightkilled BrotherStynier, IGL was certainly opposed to BrotherStynier at this point, no one else was aside from Lord-Loss (Or bishop gore?)
This seems to fit in exactly with my theory of IGLannister being a cultist, while BrotherStynier WAS a daemon.
More evidence on the big ol' pile.
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
He did? How embarrasing, I missed that. My bad.
Mr. Symphonius, I find your overuse of the taunting orkmoticon distasteful and suspicous, Almost as if you were mocking me for something we don't know.
But Thanks for filling in with your side of that argument, I guess that makes That point a tie between you and nachoes?
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
Oky, went back and doublechecked.
Yes, Karon had a role and it was redistributed, so we can be sure that all the cultists are still there, and that makes that little side note of mine on Halo completely redundant. Thanks for pointing that out symphonius.
29697
Post by: IGLannister
Alright I'm back. Minor Internet issues. Sorry for the delay.
24360
Post by: BishopGore
I suspect Paul, because he has powers to see the future and he is using them to attack only one person. Or else the future is clouded by the Spacers Guild...
I actually suspect Lord-Loss and Halo. But now Halo is voting for me, so I guess I must be wrong about that. A cultist would never vote for me. Or would they?
Good luck with that pressure vote Halo.
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
I can't help that, it's an addiction, I'm a victim!
26761
Post by: TherVadam
So confused... *Shakes head*
12061
Post by: halonachos
BishopGore wrote:I suspect Paul, because he has powers to see the future and he is using them to attack only one person. Or else the future is clouded by the Spacers Guild...
I actually suspect Lord-Loss and Halo. But now Halo is voting for me, so I guess I must be wrong about that. A cultist would never vote for me. Or would they?
Good luck with that pressure vote Halo.
It's not a pressure vote, I swear. I'm not trying to put any pressure on you or anything you know. You are lowest on my list of possible evil people and highest on my possible role townie list. I just want you to talk more like you did during day phase one.
That night kill for stynier is suspicious though. However, there are a couple of ways that could've worked out.
24360
Post by: BishopGore
If you want me to talk more then it is a pressure vote. However I'm posting and that somehow means it worked. The peer pressure got to me.
We're so far in and I'm very confused. There's a lot of people that don't fit right, but the sheer number of bad guys in the town has me reeling a bit, a third of the people out there are evil, that's a massive amount of them. They don't need to work together as a group, they can work in cells and have conflicts between them because they have the numbers to sway votes very quickly in their favour.
This has all already been said, so this is a bit of a none post.
In other news: I am a cat. Meow.
29697
Post by: IGLannister
See this Paul? This is MY Gom Jabar...
In related news, I'm lost too. I really don't know who to suspect at this point. I still have a mild suspicion of Scott, and maybe Symph. But in all honesty, I'm unsure of what to do.
Also, I'm a cat too. An orange cat. With white feet.
29697
Post by: IGLannister
Might be due to my not being on for a few days, or it may be the PTSD resulting from all the grilling. Either way I'm lost.
29697
Post by: IGLannister
Silence, daemon!
29697
Post by: IGLannister
1234 posts. Sweet.
26531
Post by: VikingScott
How many people are there thats supposed to be playing/talking etc?
18471
Post by: Lord-Loss
More then there is talking. It ticks me off, people should talk more even if they've got nothing to say.
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
Say, are people allowed to communicate with each other via PMs about the game or are we strictly limited to this thread?
26761
Post by: TherVadam
No, I believe we're limited to this thread, it sucks, doesn't it?
Anyway, do you want us to talk even if we have nothing to say? Because then wouldn't we just clutter the conversation?
24360
Post by: BishopGore
We're on 25 pages and we're barely into Day 2. This conversation is so bloated and gassy it would explode if you lit a match under it.
I was also wondering why everyone kept called you symph. But I didn't really care that much.
Soon they'll be calling me Bimshop. Lormd-Loss. Hamlonachos.
Does this count as off topic? Maybe I should put something in that's on topic.
VikingScott has remained talkative and sensible, whilst I thought he would be another Shas'O. Glad he's not.
26531
Post by: VikingScott
Wasn't Arheiner supposed to be playing this too?
And BishopGore I've noticed your playstyle has differed from the other two games that i read with you in. Is that down to the amount of players or something else?
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Arheiner hasn't talked much in the first day either, hope he doesn't have a role...
BishopGore probably thinks we're all ruining the game, on account of the all the posts, that have little meaning.
26531
Post by: VikingScott
Not_U
Can you put up a list of all the players please so we know who is posting and who isn't
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
^^ Perhaps a list with names of players that haven't posted in two days in red? ^^
12061
Post by: halonachos
That I think we can agree on.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Nope, now we have to make it dark blue. Can't be agreeing with halonachos can I?
29697
Post by: IGLannister
Actually I prefer mauve. But that's me.
12061
Post by: halonachos
Inquisitor_Syphonious wrote:Nope, now we have to make it dark blue. Can't be agreeing with halonachos can I?
I'm sure paul has my back on this one.
18471
Post by: Lord-Loss
I'm not sure about Bimshopgore, he seems to be posting more but not scum hunting.
Discussion has grinded to a halt..
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
EDIT: stupid new page bug gets me again. Sorry.
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
I wonder what bishop was trying to achieve with his claim to be the psyker. Maybe he is a townie trying to lure a daemon to possess him and fail.
But on the other hand, I can't shake the feeling this is some other form of bluff. He could already be possessed. What better way to cast doubts all over us?
BishopGore wrote:
(...)
Amusingly, Inquisitor_Syphonius was exactly right when he said I'm a pro-town psyker. That should give everyone something to think about. I wasn't possessed by Stynier, but I do expect to be possessed next time a daemon dies, so if I start acting a little different you can all make sure a daemon dies for sure. Or I can be a safety kill the next day, just to be sure. The bluffs and double bluffs that surround that exchange should be amusing at least.
(...)
Maybe this is the sound of Stynier taunting us? But this isn't likely. How would stynier know who to possess? and if he did, why would he risk trying to hit the spook?
Oh, and about the colour thing; I think we should use the snoozy ork for people who haven't spoken in two (real) days, and the  skull for those who haven't raised their voice this dayphase.
17718
Post by: Drk_Oblitr8r
Stynier is gone man, he's long gone...
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
He was the daemon, he could be anywhere now.
14070
Post by: SagesStone
Internet issues kept me from Dakka for a while >_>
Also Ferret quit as he probably mentioned to you all at some point, he was the second Daemon.
To the earlier question about possession, you are only able to be possessed if you have it listed in your abilities. Also the numbers I posted back in the sign up thread aren't the same as here, that would ruin the fun in a way
Current Votes
VikingScott -1
Scarper -0
Lord-Loss -0
Drk_0blitr8r -0
Inquisitor_Syphonious -0
Paul Atreides -0
BishopGore -1
Arheiner -0
Fifty -1
Halonachos -1
IGLannister -2
TherVadam -0
No Lynch -0
With 12 alive now 7 is required to lynch, which at the moment would be Lan.
It's Wednesday leaving one week until this Day Phase ends.
Vote Log
Syph (Vote Halo)
Bishop (Vote LL)
Drk_O (Vote Lan)
Lan (Drk_O)
Lan (Unvote Drk_O)
Lan (Vote Scott)
Scott (Vote Lan)
Vadem (Vote Lan)
Vadem (Unvote Lan)
Halo (No Lynch)
Halo (Unvote No Lynch)
Bishop (Unvote LL)
Halo (Vote Bishop)
LL (Vote 50)
Thinking of making a script to count the votes for me
26531
Post by: VikingScott
@Not_U: On monday I leave for a trip thats 8/9 days.
26761
Post by: TherVadam
Yay! One more demon gone!
26531
Post by: VikingScott
Not really. Probably someone is going to be assigned that role.
14070
Post by: SagesStone
Nope it's gone.
26531
Post by: VikingScott
I stand corrected.
24360
Post by: BishopGore
VikingScott wrote:And BishopGore I've noticed your playstyle has differed from the other two games that i read with you in. Is that down to the amount of players or something else?
It's solar storms. My brain is running at different polarities
Lord-Loss wrote:I'm not sure about Bimshopgore, he seems to be posting more but not scum hunting.
Does three posts in a week count as a lot? Back in my day that wasn't a lot. Sad the way things go, eh.
Sorry LmL, I don't see what there is to hunt. I'm going to sit and wait while everyone else decides who to lynch and then bandwagon at the last moment. It's part of a new 'plan' I have. It's very sneaky. Like a cat. Meow.
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
Praise the emperor! With team loyal two guys short I was fearing we could already have lost, but this should even out the playing field.
This could very easily lead us to his mates, too. What connections can we draw from the_ferret?
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Paul Atreides wrote:Praise the emperor! With team loyal two guys short I was fearing we could already have lost, but this should even out the playing field.
This could very easily lead us to his mates, too. What connections can we draw from the_ferret?
Honestly, the amount you put in to *convince* us that you're imperial is sickening.
The_Ferret left.
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
If you find the odd 40k platitude thrown in here and there I'll stop. Perhaps you'd care to share with me how I could possibly *convince* you of my innocence?
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Alright, you might certainly not convince others.
Though if you directly helped in the lynching of halonachos... I would percieve you as innocent.
That is simply me. I hear the cries of "how do we know you aren't just a cultist/daemon/psyker trying to kill halonachos"...
That is simply, the only way I can see you being percieved as innocent. Again, one more time, that is simply MY opportunity.
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
Glad to hear that. I see that your mind isn't changed by recent turn of events.
As I am sure you can remember, The_ferrett voiced suspicion of halo and IG during dayphase one, either he was trying to gain our trust by offering us two cultists in this way, or he was simply trying to get a few innocents lynched.
The more I think about it however, this is probably a point speaking for your case. If the_ferrett was trying to get a civilian killed first, he would be hard pressed to gain our trust later on. THe alternative is more logical.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Page number.
The sparse posts by the_ferret in the first few pages aren't very in depth.
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
Page twelve to thirteen. When pressed to point out who he would lynch if he had to, this is his response
the_ferrett, page 13 wrote:Lan due to the votes hopping. Either he and Nachoes are very indecisive or they'e playing silly buggers. Either way it raises my hackles. Heretic behaviour, maybe not. Offputting - yep!
I skimmed through the whole thread yesterday. Now I'lladmit that this is a veeeery weak lead by itself. There was one more quote from ferrett on this very subject, but I couldn't find it now. I'll try again.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
This would be my bet:
Ferrett was pressed to pick someone he would lynch, you two looking like the most obvious suspects.
So, he had to pick someone... if he voted for another, he may be pushed more on it.
He may have just been trying to fade into the background...?
Disclaimer-
Don't take any insults I send your way (anyone) personally, I simply have to discredit you in any way possible as a cultist.
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
ahum, how does Lann and halo become you two when you refer to me?
Well, your theory sounds just as plausible as mine.
And regarding your disclaimer... Yeah, I'll keep that in mind.
10667
Post by: Fifty
Well, this is the first time I have looked at the game and not felt everyone was bitching and sniping at each other. Even if progress is slow, at least it is better than people being arses.
I don't suppose this will lift the pressure vote on me, but I genuinely have little to say about this game. I don't get the feeling Lord Loss is town, so that leaves Cult or Daemon, but I am not sure which. However, I am suspicious enough to not follow his voting patterns, but not suspicious enough to vote for him...
Other than that, I think I am leaning towards supporting Bishop Gore. I could not even tell you why, as I do not know myself. However, even if that is wrong, I have found in the past that bad votes are still better than no votes.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Paul Atreides wrote:ahum, how does Lann and halo become you two when you refer to me?
Nice catch, it's 2 AM in these parts.
17718
Post by: Drk_Oblitr8r
I'm testing something, so I'm not going to change my vote.
So in otherwords, I'm not really adding much atm.
18471
Post by: Lord-Loss
How long into the Day Phase ends N0t_u?
14070
Post by: SagesStone
6 days.
26531
Post by: VikingScott
Yeah I'll be afk then.
24360
Post by: BishopGore
Fifty wrote:Other than that, I think I am leaning towards supporting Bishop Gore. I could not even tell you why, as I do not know myself. However, even if that is wrong, I have found in the past that bad votes are still better than no votes.
Supporting my ideas, or supporting a lynch on me?
12061
Post by: halonachos
I took a break yesterday and am eating out tonight so nothing from me anytime soon. Sorry.
24360
Post by: BishopGore
I'd like to apologise to anyone who's been upset by things I've said over the past week. Syph sent me a nice PM asking how I thought he should play the game to make things more fun for everyone and I felt bad for some of the things I've said.
At the end of the day I haven't adapted to the different situation in this game compared to others I've played. I want the game to be the same as one I enjoyed previously, and no two games will be the same. This is my issue, not yours, and if I've made anyone uncomfortable or worried about their playstyle, I am sorry.
Bear in mind that despite my high handedness and snooty demeanour, this is only my 3rd game, I'm not an old hand or a genius, I'm still a newbie, just one with a high opinion of himself sometimes.
So, leaving all that aside, I'm going to shake myself and come back into this game with a new mind frame and try to enjoy it for what it is, a forum based game where people talk and have opinions of each other, which are usually completely wrong.
You're all awesome, and I am glad to be playing with you
Now let's lynch LL
18471
Post by: Lord-Loss
You can't lynch me.
What evidence do you got Bim? Nothing apart from some mobojumbo about play style.
I've done nothing really suspicous, i've been a good well behavioured towny.
26761
Post by: TherVadam
People were angry at BishopGore? Hm.... I'm really off these days.
24360
Post by: BishopGore
Lord-Loss wrote:You can't lynch me.
What evidence do you got Bim? Nothing apart from some mobojumbo about play style.
I've done nothing really suspicous, i've been a good well behavioured towny.
Exactly! The perfect cover for evil!
And I wasn't being serious. I'm pretty sure you're evil, but meh.
24360
Post by: BishopGore
TherVadam wrote:People were angry at BishopGore? Hm.... I'm really off these days.
I'm not sure if anyone was affected by my attitude recently, but I want to make sure if they were, they realise it's me, not them.
If nobody cared then my post doesn't really matter.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
I am certainly not angry at BimshopGore
18471
Post by: Lord-Loss
This is slowing down, who are the town ok with lynching... I was good with Ferrett but he's gone..
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Any of my listed suspects.
Halonachos
Paul
IGLannister
TherVadam
Throw in Drk_O for good measure.
I have already stated the reasons time and time again, so, no need for that.
26531
Post by: VikingScott
I'm still voting for Lann.
29697
Post by: IGLannister
Im still voting for Scott.
17718
Post by: Drk_Oblitr8r
I'm still voting for that vile Drk_O guy.
10906
Post by: VictorVonTzeentch
I'm voting for me...
10906
Post by: VictorVonTzeentch
and you... You know who you are.
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
Aaah! Zombie!
On a serious note, I am not sure if we will even be able to agree to the extent needed to get a majority lynch, so we'll probably have to wait for the end of the dayphase again.
Or is there anyone here suspected enough by the whole town for that to be a realistic possibility?
26531
Post by: VikingScott
At everyone. I am away for 9 days starting tomorrow. I will not be online over that peroid.
I am out of the country on a long trip.
29697
Post by: IGLannister
Probably sowing heresy overseas. Lynch him, says I!
26761
Post by: TherVadam
Alright, in an attempt to vindicate myself, Inquisitor, who do you suspect the most out of those?
26531
Post by: VikingScott
I've been telling you all that I'd be away for ages. Its on the sign-up thread too i think.
24360
Post by: BishopGore
VikingScott wrote:I've been telling you all that I'd be away for ages. Its on the sign-up thread too i think.
No worries Scott, leave your vote at the door and hopefully you'll be alive when you get back. I don't think any of us will be nasty enough to kill you while you're gone, but I can't speak for the cultists. They're evil, yaknow.
I'm still working on my plan. It's still quite sneaky. This weapon's grade plutonium? No, it doesn't involve that.
12061
Post by: halonachos
TherVadam wrote:Alright, in an attempt to vindicate myself, Inquisitor, who do you suspect the most out of those?
Me. I think you've missed the beginning of the second day phase.
@ Bishop, I enjoy your "snooty" playstyle. It gives the game more personality as people develope characters in my opinion. We have a couple of paranoid fella's a couple of "gumshoes" and then we also have the guilty playing innocent *cough*Syphonius*cough*.
Also, why do you suspect me all of a sudden dude, I thought we were buds.
17718
Post by: Drk_Oblitr8r
GET OUT OF MY HEAD!!!!
I mean... Hi...
26761
Post by: TherVadam
I don't suspect you (were you talking to me?), and what's a gumshoe (am I one of those?), but I think those people suggested by Syphonius need to distance themselves to prove their innocence.
Drk: Lol
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
Distance themselves from who? Each other?
24360
Post by: BishopGore
*hands Halo a brush* Now get up my chimney and clean it out, boy! I'll have no shirking or tiddyfizzling while you're up my smoke hole!
I can 'snoot' with the best of them.
A gumshoe is a private detective, someone who looks for clues and sees hints all around. Watch 'Who Framed Roger Rabbit?' for more details.
The timer is running.
26761
Post by: TherVadam
Paul Atreides: Well, yeah. Unless you haven't noticed, you and I (and IGLannister and Halonachos) were the four people implicated in 1 out of the 2(1?) crusades so far this game, and although I'm not exactly going to vouch for its efficacy and truthfulness, it certainly has been a major impact so far, so we should distance ourselves from each other.
12061
Post by: halonachos
I would just like to let the group recognize that I did not vote for GND the way most of you guys did. There was little reason to lynch him yet a lot of you fellas just jumped on top of him for some reason I still do not get.
Some of you have said that it was because I was the more pro-town of the two. I still don't get that.
12061
Post by: halonachos
I would just like to let the group recognize that I did not vote for GND the way most of you guys did. There was little reason to lynch him yet a lot of you fellas just jumped on top of him for some reason I still do not get.
Some of you have said that it was because I was the more pro-town of the two. I still don't get that.
26761
Post by: TherVadam
Well, if I really must explain my actions again, this is how it goes.
In Dayphase 1, there was a lot of confusion (as has been said again and again), but we agreed that we needed a lynch. Then, everyone started to vote for IGLannister at first because of being off-topic for a few posts, and then.... vote-hopping, was that it? I dunno, and in hindsight maybe he was pretty bad, but I didn't think so then. So, I took upon myself a goal, to save IGLannister, and for that I needed to get someone different lynched, so I picked GND, so as to disassociate myself from him, as I was grouped together with him by Drk_O (although, in hindsight, it probably does look very bad that I tried so hard to lynch someone who flipped town  ), and from that point on, I drove to lynch GND, and honestly I don't entirely understand why other people voted for him either. The only reason why I wouldn't have been voting for Halonachos, is that he's actually posting.
29697
Post by: IGLannister
For the record, I didn't vote GND either.
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
Towards the end of dayphase 1, everyone started throwing around votes on either halo, IG or GND. I made the (maybe not so well thought out) decision at the time to lynch GND, since he had contributed less to the talking then the other 'candidates'.
What's the vote count right now anyway? We haven't seen one in like six pages. Has noone switched votes in all this time?
There were what, 4 or 5 votes to GND, Who, (except for TherVadam and me) were they? I'm going back to check.
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
Huh, it was Drk_O, a bit earlier than the others.
12061
Post by: halonachos
So Drk_O instigated a vote against a loyal citizen? If he was first then I can't really say too much about that as it was the first day phase.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
I'm back from my... "vacation" from dakka.
halonachos wrote:I would just like to let the group recognize that I did not vote for GND the way most of you guys did. There was little reason to lynch him yet a lot of you fellas just jumped on top of him for some reason I still do not get.
Some of you have said that it was because I was the more pro-town of the two. I still don't get that.
Doesn't prove anything, because they did it to protect you, because, well, you're all cultists.
TherVadam wrote:Well, if I really must explain my actions again, this is how it goes.
In Dayphase 1, there was a lot of confusion (as has been said again and again), but we agreed that we needed a lynch. Then, everyone started to vote for IGLannister at first because of being off-topic for a few posts, and then.... vote-hopping, was that it? I dunno, and in hindsight maybe he was pretty bad, but I didn't think so then. So, I took upon myself a goal, to save IGLannister, and for that I needed to get someone different lynched, so I picked GND, so as to disassociate myself from him, as I was grouped together with him by Drk_O (although, in hindsight, it probably does look very bad that I tried so hard to lynch someone who flipped town ), and from that point on, I drove to lynch GND, and honestly I don't entirely understand why other people voted for him either. The only reason why I wouldn't have been voting for Halonachos, is that he's actually posting.
It was because you all vote hopped to ginger nid dude, after halonachos was in danger.
IGLannister wrote:For the record, I didn't vote GND either.
You got other reasons for suspicion though. You're the only one that I think would have night killed brother stynier.
Paul Atreides wrote:Towards the end of dayphase 1, everyone started throwing around votes on either halo, IG or GND. I made the (maybe not so well thought out) decision at the time to lynch GND, since he had contributed less to the talking then the other 'candidates'.
What's the vote count right now anyway? We haven't seen one in like six pages. Has noone switched votes in all this time?
There were what, 4 or 5 votes to GND, Who, (except for TherVadam and me) were they? I'm going back to check.
I suspect most of them being culists.
Paul Atreides wrote:Huh, it was Drk_O, a bit earlier than the others.
That was before halo was in any danger of lynching.
halonachos wrote:So Drk_O instigated a vote against a loyal citizen? If he was first then I can't really say too much about that as it was the first day phase.
An RVS is just that.
14070
Post by: SagesStone
Two hours left for this Day Phase.
Current Votes
VikingScott -1
Scarper -0
Lord-Loss -0
Drk_0blitr8r -0
Inquisitor_Syphonious -0
Paul Atreides -0
BishopGore -1
Arheiner -0
Fifty -1
Halonachos -1
IGLannister -2
TherVadam -0
No Lynch -0
With 12 alive now 7 is required to lynch, which at the moment would be Lan.
Vote Log
Syph (Vote Halo)
Bishop (Vote LL)
Drk_O (Vote Lan)
Lan (Drk_O)
Lan (Unvote Drk_O)
Lan (Vote Scott)
Scott (Vote Lan)
Vadem (Vote Lan)
Vadem (Unvote Lan)
Halo (No Lynch)
Halo (Unvote No Lynch)
Bishop (Unvote LL)
Halo (Vote Bishop)
LL (Vote 50)
NEW
17718
Post by: Drk_Oblitr8r
VOTE: TUMBLE WEED
THAT IS BY FAR THE MOST DAEMONIC THING IN THE GAME THUS FAR!!!
14070
Post by: SagesStone
As usual the squabling continued, before long they reached a stalemate. Then you all just sat around waiting for the stalemate to break. After a while you realised that something had to be done before the enemy killed more of you. Scott and Drk_O looked at each other, tired of waiting they leapt into action. Scott grabbed Lan and then Drk_O quickly ran up and stabbed him in the chest. Shocked you were all ready to jump on the two and claim justice, but you all stopped when you heard Lan's faint laugh.
"H-how did you know?" asked Lan. "We didn't" replied Drk_O. Lan laughed for a little while longer before death overcame him. The rest of you looked confused until Drk_O searched Lan to reveal several Chaotic Tatoos and a book full of Imperial Prayers, words crossed out and replaced in a way that mocked everything the Emperor represented.
"That was lucky" laughed Drk_O. Scott looked at him in disbelief. "You mean you weren't entirely sure?" he asked. "Nope" replied Drk_O.
Lan, or Lanny as he liked to be called, was a Cultist
Night phase begins, guys with abilities send them in
17718
Post by: Drk_Oblitr8r
You didn't count my vote for the tumble weed...
14070
Post by: SagesStone
So you wanted a 5 way tie?
17718
Post by: Drk_Oblitr8r
I just want the tumble weed to die a violent death
17718
Post by: Drk_Oblitr8r
Paul Atreides wrote:Page twelve to thirteen. When pressed to point out who he would lynch if he had to, this is his response
the_ferrett, page 13 wrote:Lan due to the votes hopping. Either he and Nachoes are very indecisive or they'e playing silly buggers. Either way it raises my hackles. Heretic behaviour, maybe not. Offputting - yep!
I skimmed through the whole thread yesterday. Now I'lladmit that this is a veeeery weak lead by itself. There was one more quote from ferrett on this very subject, but I couldn't find it now. I'll try again.
Drk_Oblitr8r wrote:I'm testing something, so I'm not going to change my vote.
So in otherwords, I'm not really adding much atm.
Ohh and incase I get nightkilled, I'm just going to quote these posts. I'm testing something by doing so, I'll explain it if I don't die.
14070
Post by: SagesStone
Drk_O then turned his attention to the tumbleweed that had become the center of attention over the last few days. Jealousy overcame him and he leapt at the weed. The Tumbleweed flew into the air, dodging Drk_O's insanity and returned to the ground. Drk_O chased it around before he finally cournered it and set it on fire.
The Tumbleweed cried manly tears for it would not see it's Tumbleweedwife or his Tumbleweedson, TumbleSteve, grow up and become a doctor like he had always dreamed of. He accepted his death, the Tumbleweed was a bigger man, even though he had been set on fire he held no grudge. He would simply die. He pittied Drk_O for he had to live with the guilt. The Tumbleweed slowly burnt away remembering the good times it had had in life.
TumbleJoe was a Tumbleweed
26761
Post by: TherVadam
So, the day is over?
14070
Post by: SagesStone
Yep ended back up there at Lan's death.
29697
Post by: IGLannister
Well, at least I got Stynier.
And for the record, upon death I voided my bowels on Scott. Or at least in his general direction.
The Holy Romo is God, not your pathetic corpse you Imperial lapdogs.
Bleh...
*Voids on Scott*
18471
Post by: Lord-Loss
I'm going to have to withdraw from the game.
Relative died and I have to go down to England for the funeral next week. Don't really have time for much Dakka sorry.
29697
Post by: IGLannister
Bummer dude. My condolences.
24360
Post by: BishopGore
Lord-Loss wrote:I'm going to have to withdraw from the game.
Relative died and I have to go down to England for the funeral next week. Don't really have time for much Dakka sorry.
Condolences mate. Hope the trip down is easy. We'll see you when you get back.
12061
Post by: halonachos
Sorry to hear about that LL, its always a bad time when that sort of thing happens.
26761
Post by: TherVadam
I'm so sorry.
14070
Post by: SagesStone
Surprisingly you manage to sleep well for once, nothing happened during the night. At least to your knowledge. Dispite the night being eerily calm and quiet you awake to a gruesome sight. Over the top of the door is Bishop hanging from the ceiling by his intestines and nailed to the wall. His eyes missing and instead replaced with two flashlight, turned one to appear as if his eyes were glowing. Chaotic emblems are carved into his face, a face which has been twisted into a creepy smile. On the ground below him was another corpse, you recognize the now disfigured face of Lord-Loss. Mutilated in the same manner as Bishop.
However one of his hands is in the pocket of his jacket. One of you reaches inside, everyone assuming that with his last strength he did this to give you all a message. Inside the pocket you find a sheet of paper with orders issued to Lord-Loss; fancy paper.
Although half of it is missing it mentions Bishop in it and advises Lord-Loss to be careful of him as he shows possible signs of having psychic abilities which may lead to Daemonic possession. It continues by mentioning the events of the world. Shocked at the news the letter has delivered you realise something.
Bishop was a Psyker
Lord-Loss was an Inquisitor of the Ordo Malleus
Daypahse Three Start
Current Votes
VikingScott -0
Scarper -0
Drk_0blitr8r -0
Inquisitor_Syphonious -0
Paul Atreides -0
Arheiner -0
Fifty -0
Halonachos -0
TherVadam -0
No Lynch -0
With 9 left alive, 5 are required to lynch.
The dayphase has two weeks from now ending on the 24th
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
This was a very awkward nightphase for me; I thought there was still a couple of days left to vote when it begun. But maybe it's a good thing I didn't vote, then it might have resulted in a tie.
So, lord-loss was an inquisitor and bishop really was the psyker. Were does that leave us? And sorry if I am being daft, but how could they kill two townies this night?
Thanks to Drk_O and scott, who nailed a cultist while most of us shuffled our feet. Does anyone disagree with me that this more or less clears them of all suspicion seeing as they could easily have withdrawn their votes at any time if they had kown they were threatening one of their own?
And Syphonius, it seems you were at least partially right all along. I am sorry I doubted you.
14070
Post by: SagesStone
LL decided to quit the game for the sad reason he gave above.
17718
Post by: Drk_Oblitr8r
On the contrary Paul, Daemons know who the cultists are.
I however, decided to try out something from the quote you got off the_ferrett, who was a daemon.
Vote: Halonachos
When I quoted the quotes before, I was trying to see if I could bluff out the cultists. However, I expected them to expect that, so I was going to not vote for Halo. HOWEVER, I expected them to expect that I would expect that!
Actually, I'm alive, which means Halo is a cultist. My death would have implicated Halo, so I am alive. Although, I might be alive, because the Cultist want Halo implicated by my logic.
I figure there's only one way to be sure for sure.
24360
Post by: BishopGore
Death post:
My plan... worked... perffffff *bleh*
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
Lord-loss, yes, I would have said something kind too, but I couldn't find the words. I'd share his pain if I could.
Lord-loss and bishop, you will be missed, and avenged, not necessarily in that order!
I believe your theory has merit Drk_O, and the greatest chance of positive results.
Vote: Halonachoes
12061
Post by: halonachos
Drk_O you do realise that we had never had words with each other right?
Anywho, Paul you seem a little too eager to please people who vote. Looking at the GND vote, there really was no reason for you to follow that group in their vote, while you did get my back I can't question why still. With Drk's vote with little premise behind it you jumped right in and followed.
Vote: Paul Atreides
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
halonachos wrote:Drk_O you do realise that we had never had words with each other right?
Anywho, Paul you seem a little too eager to please people who vote. Looking at the GND vote, there really was no reason for you to follow that group in their vote, while you did get my back I can't question why still. With Drk's vote with little premise behind it you jumped right in and followed.
Vote: Paul Atreides
Desperate eh?
VOTE: Halonachos
Paul is still on my list...
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
I do not in anyway see your vote as unreasonable, halonachos.
But, for the record, I have been swinging back and forth between siding with syph or you for most of day two. With IG proven guilty, this lends strength to his case, and I would have voted for you in regardless of what anyone else said. But Drk_O has presented another good argument against you. I don't hitch on to other peoples votes, I hitch on to others ideas. There are several arguments against you, some of them quite insignificant by themselves, but all together they build a strong case against you.
But, I think of myself as being quite flexible. You are free to convince me of your innocence in anyway you see fit.
(Hmm, the only votes cast today are either against you or me. I wonder if we will be the prime targets for the next lynch. This game just got interesting.)
EDIT: I was ninja'd by syph, and wanted to specifically adress halo.
12061
Post by: halonachos
Well, Paul, if IG being a cultist lends strength to syphonius's argument then you are a cultist.
I wasn't using syphonius's list or reasoning at all in deciding my vote. I used my own reasoning because seeing as though I am no cultist and he deemed me to be so I am going to ignore most of his ideas.
I still have yet to see any clear arguments against me, just a bunch of people who really don't like me for some reason.
As to IG being a cultist it seemed logical, he did bandwagon and he didn't really do any legwork. Unfortunately we lost two major roles in this day so we have a tough job ahead of us.
So we have 9 players. About 3 cultists left and 1 rogue psyker left along with 1 demon if my estimates were true. That's majority so ouch, we need to be careful in who we choose.
Seeing as though you(paul) played similarly to IG I can further feel that you are the cultist. And by playing similarly I mean bandwagoning and having little explanation for it.
Also, viking and Drk voting for a cultist doesn't necessarily prove their innocence. We should still have one demon left alive, a demon who knows cultists and doesn't need them to win. Although all it takes is one simple cultist to be kicked out before someone may begin to trust them, once that trust is established they lead the group to kill another townie to give them anti-town majority. All they do then is agree with the remaining cultists and voila, cultist victory.
Although the day has come to this, the day halonachos finally is no longer needed because some demon has led the town against a cultist and tricked them all.
So yes Paul, your reasoning using syphonius's example is not very good. Because he implicated IG(whom I also implicated in Day One), vadem, you, and I that means that syphonius has picked out every single cultist right? Agreeing with syphonius only proves your guilt, not mine. Sorry syphonius, I don't agree with you and I know that must be very hard for you.
And Drk, explain your reasoning. I never argued against you and vice-versa, so how does you not getting night-killed prove my guilt?
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
halonachos wrote:Well, Paul, if IG being a cultist lends strength to syphonius's argument then you are a cultist.
I wasn't using syphonius's list or reasoning at all in deciding my vote. I used my own reasoning because seeing as though I am no cultist and he deemed me to be so I am going to ignore most of his ideas.
I still have yet to see any clear arguments against me, just a bunch of people who really don't like me for some reason.
As to IG being a cultist it seemed logical, he did bandwagon and he didn't really do any legwork. Unfortunately we lost two major roles in this day so we have a tough job ahead of us.
So we have 9 players. About 3 cultists left and 1 rogue psyker left along with 1 demon if my estimates were true. That's majority so ouch, we need to be careful in who we choose.
Seeing as though you(paul) played similarly to IG I can further feel that you are the cultist. And by playing similarly I mean bandwagoning and having little explanation for it.
Also, viking and Drk voting for a cultist doesn't necessarily prove their innocence. We should still have one demon left alive, a demon who knows cultists and doesn't need them to win. Although all it takes is one simple cultist to be kicked out before someone may begin to trust them, once that trust is established they lead the group to kill another townie to give them anti-town majority. All they do then is agree with the remaining cultists and voila, cultist victory.
Although the day has come to this, the day halonachos finally is no longer needed because some demon has led the town against a cultist and tricked them all.
So yes Paul, your reasoning using syphonius's example is not very good. Because he implicated IG(whom I also implicated in Day One), vadem, you, and I that means that syphonius has picked out every single cultist right? Agreeing with syphonius only proves your guilt, not mine. Sorry syphonius, I don't agree with you and I know that must be very hard for you.
And Drk, explain your reasoning. I never argued against you and vice-versa, so how does you not getting night-killed prove my guilt?
All the demons are gone...
Ferret quit, and Stynier was removed from Bishop right?
My argument against you is clear...? (So help me emperor if you try to bring up the "hole in my logic" again... )
Just because you say you're a townie doesn't mean you are!
See that part in red? I am on to you Paul and halo. If it is not true paul, oh well, you can see why I need to follow this. He basically told us his plan as far as I reckon.
Drk_Oblitr8r wrote:On the contrary Paul, Daemons know who the cultists are.
I however, decided to try out something from the quote you got off the_ferrett, who was a daemon.
Vote: Halonachos
When I quoted the quotes before, I was trying to see if I could bluff out the cultists. However, I expected them to expect that, so I was going to not vote for Halo. HOWEVER, I expected them to expect that I would expect that!
Actually, I'm alive, which means Halo is a cultist. My death would have implicated Halo, so I am alive. Although, I might be alive, because the Cultist want Halo implicated by my logic.
I figure there's only one way to be sure for sure.
I see what you did there...
Not really, I get the concept, I just don't see why it would lead you to halo. (I need some more evidence [not really ])
Put halo when I meant paul!
12061
Post by: halonachos
Put halo when you meant paul?
Oh, we did get rid of the demons? I remember someone saying that stynier was gone last day phase, but I didn't get that. Also, ferrett was a demon? If so didn't the role get reassigned?
Also, how do we know that bishop was possessed? If he was he surely wouldn't of been night killed if the cultists thought he was would they?
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Screw up in the post, had to edit.
Umm... pretty sure not_u confirmed that ferret's role was outta here.
They can't communicate, and it wouldn't be the first screw up towards Stynier.
Hrmm... Bishop was an easy night kill, obvious one, so it is hard to track. I think... Lemme do some scrounging.
Perhaps the rogue psyker is being possessed? *looks at halo*
12061
Post by: halonachos
I'm not a rogue psyker, I'm an inquisitor.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
And let me guess, either paul or me is a cultist? Yeah. Right.
12061
Post by: halonachos
No, you are a zebra.
My suspicion towards you has waned. Once ferrett was proven innocent it shot down my theory about you two being in cahoots. I'm pretty sure he wouldn't side with you if you were also a cultist or a demon because that would kill the team. If he was proven to be so and he palled along with you.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
I still find it funny that you think any of us are going to believe that YOU are the inquisitor...
So, halo, what do you think of us all? You obviously don't have to answer, though you're pretty much bent over either way...
12061
Post by: halonachos
Yep, might as well.
I think Paul is a cultist, with that much I can agree with your list.
Vadem is iffy, but he missed the vote as well so I can't really tell.
Fifty has yet to post anything as has scarper I believe. In fact, I think we're at the majority of votes for those who actually play at the moment.
Drk is kind of iffy to me, but it wouldnt surprise me if he was a heathen.
I can say this though. Paul + Drk + you=3 people. I think that is the amount of cultists left in the game and I had suspicions of Drk and you before. Paul not so much until now.
Why is it that all of a sudden a person who advocated my survival(paul) and a person who never attempted to question me(Drk) are all of a sudden following the wishes of the one person I was so sure of being a cultist in the last day phase? Drk used "quotes" that I have yet to see and the fact that we never argued is odd, paul who, like I said, believed that I was valuable to the pro-town group now wants me dead, and you who never really had any clear reasoning behind your initial declaration of me being a cultist.
What I can say is that it seems to me that during the second day you attacked one way while Drk and Paul had totally different ideas. The second day phase ended and IG was lynched proving to be a heretic, sad news indeed for I had trusted him. Yet I look at those who tried to disassociate themselves from IG and the list comes up as Drk and you syphonius. However, it could be that your plan was to sacrifice IG for the greater good as he had put himself in hot water at the start of the game and was more of a liability than an ally.
During the night phase bishop was lynched, bishop who had probed you and IG for information. You guys knew bishop was a threat and nixed him. This made you guys look innocent in my own opinionand made me and anybody else bishop had favored as being guilty.
Then Drk comes out with some foolish explanation of why his mortality is an explanation of my guilt and soon Paul follows suit using Drk's new explanation as a sole reason. You really were no surprise, your second day had started with your attack and your list.
Successfully adding IG(one of your own) to that list and adding three you knew were not cultists to the list meant that at the sacrifice of one of your companions would mean the death of 3 non-cultists(IG during day, bishop at night, halo during day, vadem/scott/fifty/scarper during the night).
This would leave 6 players, but some of them don't post or vote regularly(depending if you get scarper, fifty, or arheiner) if at all. Majority would be 4 and you would have 3 already, if scott was taken out during the night phase then the remaining 3(all being infrequent) would be easily voted out and a further night kill would ensure cultist victory as it would be 3 cultists to two people who don't even post.
12061
Post by: halonachos
I may be reading too many Tom Clancy novels or just paranoid or a huge fan of conspiracies, but I think I nailed it. Unfortunately the best we could get is a tie if viking and vadem decided to agree with me.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
halonachos wrote:I may be reading too many Tom Clancy novels or just paranoid or a huge fan of conspiracies, but I think I nailed it. Unfortunately the best we could get is a tie if viking and vadem decided to agree with me.
halonachos wrote:Yep, might as well.
I think Paul is a cultist, with that much I can agree with your list.
Vadem is iffy, but he missed the vote as well so I can't really tell.
Fifty has yet to post anything as has scarper I believe. In fact, I think we're at the majority of votes for those who actually play at the moment.
Drk is kind of iffy to me, but it wouldnt surprise me if he was a heathen.
I can say this though. Paul + Drk + you=3 people. I think that is the amount of cultists left in the game and I had suspicions of Drk and you before. Paul not so much until now.
----------------------------------------------Why is it that all of a sudden a person who advocated my survival(paul) and a person who never attempted to question me(Drk) are all of a sudden following the wishes of the one person I was so sure of being a cultist in the last day phase? Drk used "quotes" that I have yet to see and the fact that we never argued is odd, paul who, like I said, believed that I was valuable to the pro-town group now wants me dead, and you who never really had any clear reasoning behind your initial declaration of me being a cultist.
What I can say is that it seems to me that during the second day you attacked one way while Drk and Paul had totally different ideas. The second day phase ended and IG was lynched proving to be a heretic, sad news indeed for I had trusted him. Yet I look at those who tried to disassociate themselves from IG and the list comes up as Drk and you syphonius. However, it could be that your plan was to sacrifice IG for the greater good as he had put himself in hot water at the start of the game and was more of a liability than an ally.
----------------------------------------------During the night phase bishop was lynched, bishop who had probed you and IG for information. You guys knew bishop was a threat and nixed him. This made you guys look innocent in my own opinionand made me and anybody else bishop had favored as being guilty.
Then Drk comes out with some foolish explanation of why his mortality is an explanation of my guilt and soon Paul follows suit using Drk's new explanation as a sole reason. You really were no surprise, your second day had started with your attack and your list.
----------------------------------------------Successfully adding IG(one of your own) to that list and adding three you knew were not cultists to the list meant that at the sacrifice of one of your companions would mean the death of 3 non-cultists(IG during day, bishop at night, halo during day, vadem/scott/fifty/scarper during the night).
This would leave 6 players, but some of them don't post or vote regularly(depending if you get scarper, fifty, or arheiner) if at all. Majority would be 4 and you would have 3 already, if scott was taken out during the night phase then the remaining 3(all being infrequent) would be easily voted out and a further night kill would ensure cultist victory as it would be 3 cultists to two people who don't even post.
Well, for starters, we should PM the non-posters...
Down to business:
-----------------------------------------------1) Because my theory makes 110% more sense is the first thing that comes to mind. I still think paul is trying to avoid my justice by getting on my good side (which I don't have, two inquisitors dead in a chapel)...
-----------------------------------------------2) I really don't get this, could I get a quote?
-----------------------------------------------3) I "added" him to my list? When was this? He was on it early on... Of course now it is coming from your mouth now that everyone knows he is a cultist... I was on him and you from day one.
Methinks you killed Bishopgore, since he routed IGLannister up (as you claim) and you saw him as not only a threat, but also an easy kill.
17718
Post by: Drk_Oblitr8r
halonachos wrote:Drk is kind of iffy to me
Jeez, I'll remember to wear some deoderant!
I can say this though. Paul + Drk + you=3 people. I think that is the amount of cultists left in the game and I had suspicions of Drk and you before. Paul not so much until now.
How do you know there are 3 cultists left?
Why is it that all of a sudden a person who advocated my survival(paul) and 1a person who never attempted to question me(Drk) are all of a sudden following the wishes of the one person I was so sure of being a cultist in the last day phase? 2Drk used "quotes" that I have yet to see and the fact that we never argued is odd, paul who, like I said, believed that I was valuable to the pro-town group now wants me dead, and you who never really had any clear reasoning behind your initial declaration of me being a cultist.
1I haven't had need to. Until the end of the last dayphase, I don't think I would have until later in the game.
2You haven't? I've quoted them twice or so. Check last page, my quote from the_ferrett is the one I'm using to implicate you. It's not cristal clear
halonachos wrote:I'm not a rogue psyker, I'm an inquisitor.
Prove it, who did you investigate?
14070
Post by: SagesStone
For those thinking Stynier is gone, maybe he is
Maybe I'll wait until the end of the game to point out who was possessed.
Also this was nearly almost the shortest day phase ever.
Current Votes
VikingScott -0
Scarper -0
Drk_0blitr8r -0
Inquisitor_Syphonious -0
Paul Atreides -1
Arheiner -0
Fifty -0
Halonachos -3
TherVadam -0
No Lynch -0
With 9 left alive, 5 are required to lynch. Currently Halo would die.
The dayphase has 13days from now ending on the 24th.
Vote log
Drk_O (Vote Halo)
Paul (Vote Halo)
Halo (Vote Paul)
Syph (Vote Halo)
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Drk_Oblitr8r wrote:
How do you know there are 3 cultists left?
Methinks Paul and TherVadam exist... so... those are his buddies... One way he came to the conclusion, this is nothing though, since he can just say that he thought X existed at the beginning of the game.
Has the town ever won one of these? I know that you, not_u, and thor665 are veterans with this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
not_u, what are we going to do about Scarper and Fifty, Arheiner, and TherVadam, they aren't exactly posting... (and if they all left, halo would be lynched! )
PM's can be sent to them just so they post something, vote something. Dead weight impeding my investigations!
17718
Post by: Drk_Oblitr8r
Yes, once in the Genestealer game I hosted, and only because they all gave up because I'm a horrible GM
26761
Post by: TherVadam
OK, you know what? I'm tired of people implicating me. I'm giving up (temporarily) on the good of town, because I really believe you're trying to help, Syphonius, but I'm angry, ok? I don't want or expect this to end up in a lynch, but for the moment, this is the only thing that will appease me.
Rage-Vote: Inquisitor_Syphonius
And I expect that nobody except perhaps Halonachos, or Paul Atreides will vote with me, and I don't think they will (maybe Halo, but I would prefer he didn't, because that would associate us, again ). Barring them, I would be angry if anybody bandwagoned with me, because it's a ridiculous anti-town vote, and I will be the first to say that.
26761
Post by: TherVadam
Now, for the more coherent post about the people not hounding me.
Paul: I can't tell if he's brilliant, or if he's suicidal. He's essentially bandwagoning with the person who is trying to kill him, so that he can delay his own death? Maybe he is a cultist. I need to check, but I had the impression that Paul was angry about Syphonius accusing him last day phase (but don't quote me on this), but today, now that the pro-town psyker is dead (who could previously protect Syphonius from night-kills), Paul only needs to survive one more dayphase to kill Syphonius.
Drk_O: Can you please explain wth you're talking about?
Edited: Was wrong about what the psyker does. Will post again soon with new theory.
Edit 2: Did Strike-Out wrong.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
At least you didn't attempt to call it a "pressure vote"...
26761
Post by: TherVadam
Lol. Anyway, I'ma wait a little bit for both inspiration and Not_U, but right now, I can say that Paul is not in anyway associated with me. I say this not to anger him, or create enemies, but we are simply not associated.
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
Hey, Vadam, you ruled out the possibility of brilliantly suicidal! But I digress. I have played this game like a moron in more ways than one.
Aren't we a fine gang, loose at each other like rabid dogs. I miss bishop and lord.
Halo, I too was dismayed when IG flipped heretic. I too had hoped he was loyal.
As you and Drk_O both said earlier, His death does not automatically clear his lynchers. One of them could be daemons. I however doubt this. The_ferret's role wasn't reused, and that leaves stynier (who has, note, already lost two of his potential possesses (How do you spell that?) in IG and Bishop. Do you think we might be dealing with three daemons? Not implying that you said that, merely curious.
Where are we really at this point? We have lost 5 loyalists, 2 from the game, and 3 baddies, 2 from the game. We are one inquisitor short, and we are all either deathly silent or snarling at each other.
Let us Assume for a moment there are three cultists left, one very possibly possessed by stynier. (I like your conspiracy hypothesis of me, syph and Drk_O as the cultists, but I must regretfully inform you that you're wrong. I am not a cultist, and my brother thinks I should write that repeatedly in caps-lock.) This leaves us with 6 loyalists and three baddies, and a 'margin of error' of one failure. you just gotta love the odds.
Shall we go through the alternatives?
Me: Bandwagoned on GND (although I will still say that decision was my own, no matter how wrong it later turned out to be). Defended IG (the shame of it). Didn't vote during dayphase 2 (this was a stupid mistake).
Scarper: Does anyone have anything to say on this subject?Does anyone have any suspicions on this subject?
Arheiner: (sorry if I spelt it wrong) Same as above.
TherVadam: I have yet to see what is so suspicious about him really. He jumped on the GND train sooner than me so that argument is weaker than against me.
VikingScott: What with him lynching IG this leaves the argument that he might be a daemon. Have we any strong leads to such a possibility?
Drk_O: Besides being his own unique self, only other lead the same as above. IF one of them is a daemon, who of them do you think it is?
Oops out of time! Halonachos and Syphonius, please fill in yourselves on this list, I have to go eat now, sorry!
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
Halo and syphonius, you both think I am a cultist. It's nice to see you agreeing to something. This way you'll both look stupid when I die, a great way to bond if ever there was one. Intriguing that you should claim to be the inquisitor Halo, I had a weak suspicion that you were implying that just that during dayphase 1 when you said that Lord-loss, Bishop or Drk_O probably were the inquisitors. Reading between the lines, ya know. But I am sorry, no matter how many times you decided not to read what Drk_O said, His argument does exist and the_ferret, Syph and probably others too have grouped you with IG, And look were he is now. Not saying this is concrete solid, nothing is after all.
Syphonius really just made himself lazy with his choice of target, the most safe and comfortable bunch of scapegoats you could possibly imagine. It really bothers me however how he insists on the infallability of his theory. Hey, Syph! the only ones supplied with the player roles are the cultists!
Then there's fifty of course. Now this is just a random thought, and not something I would lynch someone over ever, but how many see the connections in behavior between him and the_ferret?
I think I'm done rambling, and I am sure you all have lots of things to add to this list. I'll leave you to it.
17718
Post by: Drk_Oblitr8r
TherVadam wrote:Drk_O: Can you please explain wth you're talking about?
the_ferrett was a daemon, he was unsure whether to vote for Lanny or Haloz(I'm resisting the urge to call him Hally ). Daemons don't need cultsits, they need psykers. Daemons KNOW who the cultists are. To seem like a kewl town gai, you need to kill bad guys. Cultists ARE bad guys.
I propose that the_ferrett was trying to seem like the aformentioned kewl town gai, and couldn't decide between the two cultists with the most attention at that time. I tested this theory yesterday, by voting for Lanny, and it worked. So, with this in mind, I figure Halo has a 80% chance of being a cultist at this time.
12061
Post by: halonachos
You see here's the thing, I can't really prove my inquisitorialness. I was trying to hide that fact since the beginning and tried "advising" the inquisitors to do the same and to tell the truth I only have 1 solid know for the cultists, one was syphonius and the other person I investigated was bishop. I do suspect you though Paul. As to your innocence I don't know, if I live through today and you do as well then I will have to investigate you.
I had a strong belief that LL was a good inquisitor so I attacked him and he attacked me, we tried to distance ourselves and it worked somewhat. Unfortunately I used my investigation and didn't shield bishop which is now a mistake that I must live with.
Drk: Didn't I point out the fact that ferrett was evil? Didn't I say that he was working with syphonius? Look at my claims of ferrett being evil and that syphonius is his ally. While stynier may still be around we don't have two demons on the field of play.
You unfortunately are also using quotes from a known demon as your evidence. You see syphonius has been using the "if I get night-killed lynch halon for me" as a nice cover. Syphonius obviously couldn't be night killed as he was a cultist so anytime a night kill was performed and he lived it "proved" his innocence due to his reasoning, and some fell for it.
The reason I am alive is because one, I have the night kill shield and two, if I went then syphonius would pop positive for guilt. Especially during the second night after I convicted him, but couldn't get the rest of you to believe me. When ferrett moved to protect him, I acknowledged Ferrett's guilt as well. I was so sure of him being a demon, but as he had to quit I didn't get to look at his role to confirm it, but not_u confirmed it for me.
I trusted IG so I didn't look at him and missed the mark on that one.
I do have to revise my math though. There should be 1 demon possessed player, no demons, and 3 cultists. The reason I think that there were only two demons is actually from not what anyone said, but what not_u said.
I only know 1 cultist and 1 townie, I suspect you(paul), vadem, and Drk.
Bishop's death was from a result of myself trying to distance myself from those who I thought to be pro-town. For the longest time I thought LL and bishop to be pro-town roles along with maybe Drk. So I tried my best to distance myself from all of them. Unfortunately, a night kill for any of them would of implicated my death, but I was sure that they had hid themselves well enough and the fact that no one believed anything I said would also help conceal them. For the most part it did, my belief that they were pro-town was correct, it's too bad LL had to leave and that bishop was night killed.
@ Paul:
You guys are calling me guilty built on the argument developed by a demon, you do know that right? This also makes me think that you and Drk could potentially be cultists.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Drk_Oblitr8r wrote:TherVadam wrote:Drk_O: Can you please explain wth you're talking about?
the_ferrett was a daemon, he was unsure whether to vote for Lanny or Haloz(I'm resisting the urge to call him Hally ). Daemons don't need cultsits, they need psykers. Daemons KNOW who the cultists are. To seem like a kewl town gai, you need to kill bad guys. Cultists ARE bad guys.
I propose that the_ferrett was trying to seem like the aformentioned kewl town gai, and couldn't decide between the two cultists with the most attention at that time. I tested this theory yesterday, by voting for Lanny, and it worked. So, with this in mind, I figure Halo has a 80% chance of being a cultist at this time.
That's funny, I am literally 100% sure that he is a cultist, and that he is 100% not an inquisitor.
Ok, everyone, assign roles to people, that you think what they are, not including yourself, since that would be a waste of this... reasons aren't really necessary.
Drk_O-Townie
Halo-Cultist
Paul-Cultist
TherVadam-Cultist
Scarper-Cultist
Arheiner-Townie (spelling? In all fairness, you haven't posted in a while! )
VikingScott-Townie
Fifty-Townie
Why do you think that there are three cultists halo? Slip of the tongue? Let the cat out of the bag?
...Or did I miss not_u announce it?
Alright, everyone go back and think long and hard, who do you think is the inquisitor? Read through the posts, who made a nice cover-up, who made radical theories, and backed them up?
Just got back from the NJ iron maiden concert, yay!
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
To add to that-
Halonachos, we can easily agree that you were the least decisive, something that the inquisitor would be eh?
No. Something the inquisitor is. Perhaps subtly, though they would be very decisive, not sure to never rub people the wrong way like you.
12061
Post by: halonachos
I think that there are 3 cultists because;
1) My original estimate was 4 and IG was one of them. Seeing as though IG is gone, that makes 3.
2) My original estimate of 4 comes from my thoughts that there would be 1 rogue psyker, 2 demons, and 4 cultists(each one is doubled).
3) I know that there were 2 demons because of not-u's wording about the second demon being gone. If there was more than two he would've said another.
4) Also, the rogue psyker can be possessed by up to two demons meaning that there was no less than 2 demons at the beginning.
If I recall correctly, I along with LL and Bishop had more radical theories along with back up. We were the more pro-town unlike your theories which were only proven thanks to the sacrifice of your team mate IG. My theories had a lot of merit and I successfully identified one demon and tried to save one innocent. You on the the other hand have killed one innocent and sacrificed one cultist to kill two more townies.
If I may quote Paul from before:
paul wrote:Then there's Halo's trap about the flaw in symphonius logic. Symph dismissed it, I don't know if you have, but I sure haven't. And besides, their exchanges up to this point can be broken down into Halo attempting to use logic and Symph calling him cultist.
and then there's you
syphonius wrote:Though if you directly helped in the lynching of halonachos... I would percieve you as innocent.
Yes, you do mention later what I am about to say. You played as a townie to convince the others against actual townies and just because you mentioned this tactic doesn't mean you wouldn't use it. What better way to cover up what you are doing now by actively saying that it is a foolish tactic and make us think you wouldn't use it. You want me out so badly its not even funny.
Drk: Cultist/bad townie
Inq: Cultist
Paul: Cultist
scott:townie
vadem: cultist/bad townie
No talkers: townies.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
halonachos wrote:I think that there are 3 cultists because;
1) My original estimate was 4 and IG was one of them. Seeing as though IG is gone, that makes 3.
2) My original estimate of 4 comes from my thoughts that there would be 1 rogue psyker, 2 demons, and 4 cultists(each one is doubled).
3) I know that there were 2 demons because of not-u's wording about the second demon being gone. If there was more than two he would've said another.
4) Also, the rogue psyker can be possessed by up to two demons meaning that there was no less than 2 demons at the beginning.
If I recall correctly, I along with LL and Bishop had more radical theories along with back up. We were the more pro-town unlike your theories which were only proven thanks to the sacrifice of your team mate IG. My theories had a lot of merit and I successfully identified one demon and tried to save one innocent. You on the the other hand have killed one innocent and sacrificed one cultist to kill two more townies.
OK. You said that mine were only backed up by the sacrifice of my teamate... so my PRO-TOWN theories were proven thanks to the death of my teamate... the CULTIST?...
That last line, names, want, now. And evidence. You and LL were on the same page now? last post you said you were acting at ends... stop associating with people after their death and only then, it is not beneficial...
If I may quote Paul from before:
paul wrote:Then there's Halo's trap about the flaw in symphonius logic. Symph dismissed it, I don't know if you have, but I sure haven't. And besides, their exchanges up to this point can be broken down into Halo attempting to use logic and Symph calling him cultist.
How many times do I need to explain this? Seriously:
BrotherStynier didn't like IGLannister going off-topic, he thought it was detracting from the game.
He votes for him, QUITE CLEARLY SEEING THERE WAS ENOUGH TIME TO YO-YO THE VOTE THE OTHER WAY. Yet he scared Lanny straight, and finished his off-topic shenanigans.
and then there's you
syphonius wrote:Though if you directly helped in the lynching of halonachos... I would percieve you as innocent.
Don't take that out of context, that is so horribly out of context it isn't funny.
Yes, you do mention later what I am about to say. You played as a townie to convince the others against actual townies and just because you mentioned this tactic doesn't mean you wouldn't use it. What better way to cover up what you are doing now by actively saying that it is a foolish tactic and make us think you wouldn't use it. You want me out so badly its not even funny.
Err... why? I was on you before you even SLIGHTLY hinted at suspicion at me, after I cast the vote on you, you got defensive in a heart beat, clawing your way out of it.
Drk: Cultist/bad townie
Inq: Cultist
Paul: Cultist
scott:townie
vadem: cultist/bad townie
No talkers: townies.
I probably screwed up on the quotes somewhere, though I see it as you copy & pasting this, then putting me as a cultist, and trying to seperate yourself from them. The main conspirators anyway... Drk_O is also on to you like white on rice...
12061
Post by: halonachos
1)You have no proof that you were on me before you voted for me.
2)Syphonius, your logic is incredibly lacking in the thought department(although thiscould be a ploy). If you were able to convince people to kill IG you would lose 1 cultist team mate, during the night phase you would kill 1 townie(which happened). During the next day phase you would use your last lynch vote to convince the town that you are correct in your theory and "accidentally" kill another townie followed by the night kill of another townie. Thus you would've effectively eliminated 3 townies for the price of one cultist.
3)You would have 3 cultists left with 1 rogue psyker giving 4 total anti-town. This would mean that you would have majority and win the game. Seeing as though this is the third day phase and victory is so near, why wouldn't you go for it?
4) I wasn't saying that LL was on the same page as me, the inquisitors don't know each other and neither does the psyker. All of three of us acted similarly though, we distanced ourselves for each other unknowingly by voting for one another and we also attempted to grill other players in a pro-town manner unlike Drk's "traps" which have never worked nor been truly revealed.
5) All demons act differently and if Stynier was just voting against IG because he was OT and not because he was a cultist then you really have no theory about the demon voting. You just know that Stynier voted against IG because he really hates OT and that's all. You tried to get some weird logic about him only voting for cultists and used that to describe all demons in the game. You then use that same logic to try to get me lynched.
12061
Post by: halonachos
Also, how many are there left for me to accuse?
I think you went ahead in time and copy and pasted my list only putting my name in place of yours.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
halonachos wrote:1)You have no proof that you were on me before you voted for me.
2)Syphonius, your logic is incredibly lacking in the thought department(although thiscould be a ploy). If you were able to convince people to kill IG you would lose 1 cultist team mate, during the night phase you would kill 1 townie(which happened). During the next day phase you would use your last lynch vote to convince the town that you are correct in your theory and "accidentally" kill another townie followed by the night kill of another townie. Thus you would've effectively eliminated 3 townies for the price of one cultist.
3)You would have 3 cultists left with 1 rogue psyker giving 4 total anti-town. This would mean that you would have majority and win the game. Seeing as though this is the third day phase and victory is so near, why wouldn't you go for it?
4) I wasn't saying that LL was on the same page as me, the inquisitors don't know each other and neither does the psyker. All of three of us acted similarly though, we distanced ourselves for each other unknowingly by voting for one another and we also attempted to grill other players in a pro-town manner unlike Drk's "traps" which have never worked nor been truly revealed.
5) All demons act differently and if Stynier was just voting against IG because he was OT and not because he was a cultist then you really have no theory about the demon voting. You just know that Stynier voted against IG because he really hates OT and that's all. You tried to get some weird logic about him only voting for cultists and used that to describe all demons in the game. You then use that same logic to try to get me lynched.
1) Not what I said. At all. I said I was on YOU... before you were on ME.
2) What does that have to do with anything? That has no backing other than "you're a cultist" ANY OF THE MANY that voted for IGLannister are in the same boat there...
You're acting like I was on the same team as IGLannister. As day one winded down, I assosciated with NONE of my suspected cultists. You, and the heretic parade, did the smoochy and basically cemented your association. Stop trying to dodge around it by declaring a "flaw in my logic" and explain yourself once.
3) Ok, so why am I a cultist, so help me emperor if you bring up that "flaw in my logic" one more time...
4) When did I imply that you did in my post? You're not the inquisitor by the way. I am. No wait... Drk_O is!... No wait VikingScott is!
5) Ok, never said I did, whoopdy-doo! I never used THAT to get you lynched, there was a pile of evidence right next door...
"Weird logic about him only voting for cultist and used that to descrive all demons in the game. You then use that same logic to try to get me lynched" What in emperor's name are you saying this time?
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
halonachos wrote:Also, how many are there left for me to accuse?
I think you went ahead in time and copy and pasted my list only putting my name in place of yours.
Which means I am a rogue pskyer! '
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
17718
Post by: Drk_Oblitr8r
halonachos wrote:I only know 1 cultist and 1 townie, I suspect you(paul), vadem, and Drk.
Doood, WHO AND WHEN DID YOU INVESTIGATE!!! JUST SAY IT!!! Like this. "Day One, I investigated TumbleweedJoe and he turned out to be a Tumbleweed" [EDIT: Fixed the message]
26761
Post by: TherVadam
Ok, well I think I'm going to avoid the Syphonius, Halonachos debate. I will agree with one when one of them kills the other. We're far enough now that killing your teammate seems kind of stupid.
Drk_O: I understood that one, I didn't understand the whole "Halonachos is a cultist because I expected him to expect me expecting his expectations" ... Although, I think that you are pro-town, maybe.... the other Inquisitor?
Paul_Atreides: See, this part is difficult, because I'm still considering most people innocent for the most part, like you. You've made some mistakes, but I think they were honest mistakes, and so I think you're a regular townie.
Which would make one cultist among the quiet people, which might explain why Not_U is hesitating to kill them off, and 1 cultist among Halonachos and Syphonius.
17718
Post by: Drk_Oblitr8r
TherVadem, I was bluffing that I was bluffing, and they fell for it because they called my bluff that I was bluffing.
Basically, I tried to run someone over, but I knew they'd jump out of the way and land on the landmine I had placed earlier.
26761
Post by: TherVadam
OK........
26761
Post by: TherVadam
OK........
This game makes me feel really stupid sometimes.
17718
Post by: Drk_Oblitr8r
You'll get used to it
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
I like your thoughts Ther, quite a lot.
I think we should be on the look out for any of the nontalkers who survives much longer. if it boils down to a couple of the talkers and say, scarper, that could very well be a sign that he would be the last one of the cultists. I am saying this because I think the cultists are probably going to pick of targets that you can't trace to anyone else, thus keeping us in the dark. Alternatively, if the cultists are among the talkers, they could kill of one of us, and put themselves in majority among the ones present, and win prematurely.
I am considering withdrawing my vote, for now. This is obviously not a time when we want to fail due to rashness.
26761
Post by: TherVadam
Cool beans.
Voting is difficult now, because not voting feels like a waste of a dayphase, and then the cultists can act during the night, but we also can't take the risk of killing off an ally now. I think you're right, and we can't be rash, but we cannot be inactive either.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Paul Atreides wrote:I like your thoughts Ther, quite a lot.
Well, this post to me, means nothing, since, if it makes you innocent, then of course you're going to be behind it. Once again, just me. (Here comes halonachos!!!)
----------
The fact that you guys are "existing" with my theories (conspirators in said theory) is a little bad to me... I would outright deny it, like halonachos did, though I would try to do it a bit more skillfully.
Also, halonachos, please don't take things out of context like that, it will just make me have to go back and look for it.
Alright, and who believes that halonachos can even possibly be an inquisitor?
He would have hounded a suspect unrelentlessly after day one. He would have shielded BishopGore... er should have.
I really don't think this latest bluff is going to work.
So, that (to me) is more evidence on the pile, since he is bluffing about his role.
10667
Post by: Fifty
Sorry, but I have been unable to summon any enthusiasm for this game. With Lanny gone, I may be able to, but I can't promise that. If you would rather DM-Kill me, that would be fine by me.
26761
Post by: TherVadam
I'm sorry to say it, but with the screaming you and halo are doing, I'd rather just not get into your argument. I think he's done enough arguing for the 3 of us. If we really were that threatened, we'd probably just try and get all of our votes together, and with only 5 people still here (until Scott gets back), we could probably get you lynched, or at least get a 50/50.
Meanwhile, Halonachos seems to be going down the same path as IGLannister with more and more suspicious activity, although I do think that it would have been a stretch to shield BishopGore. Halo has always been kind of an instigator it seems, and BishopGore seemed to be killed out of the blue.
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
I'm sad to hear that fifty. We need you to provide a more unbiased view on this whole mess. And besides, if you are loyal and quit, we have automatically lost(if there really are 3 cultists and 1 rogue psyker)!
Syphonius, I will enjoy taunting your overconfidence in your deductive abilities in my deathpost.
There is always the slim chance Halo COULD be the inquisitor. But so could you, so could Drk_O, so could I. Did Lord-loss unrelentlessly chase his suspect? Did he have one? There is no such thing as 100% certainty in this game after all.
EDITED by mistake, embarrasingly enough.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Oh yes there is 100% certainty. *snickers*
Lord-Loss only could have investigated to find demons.
He may not have found who he was looking for.
And simply been useless...
Much easier to find cultists though.
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
Fair point about lord-loss, but I still don't agree there is such a thing as certainty here. Take for instance your theories. Are you a hundred percent sure of my guilt? Of TherVadam's? Of Halo's? You can't be. You just slapped together a suspect list of the most comfortable targets, and you haven't changed it since. I said it before and I'll say it again, only cultists get the player roles. There is no way you can ever be 'sure', if you are on the good side, that is.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
How about inquisitor or psyker? There are good side roles too y'know...
There is one inquisitor left...
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
That is just a point more to my argument. Noone in any of these games, by their very nature, will ever be fully sure of what exactly is going on (perhaps the only people who do are lategame inquisitors). You can have whatever mind-spankingly brilliant plan you want, but there is always a chance you are dead wrong.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
About some of it? Sure.
Though you, IGLannister, and halonachos are cultists.
Trust me, im a cop.
10392
Post by: Paul Atreides
I persume you are some sort of super inquisitor then, capable of investigating four people every nightphase?
Well it's good you at least have confidence in yourself I guess, no matter how malplaced.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Not what happened though look at it this way.
Say I am the inquisitor.
I investigate you.
Then, I investigate Ther.
Then IGLannister dies, and we find out he is a cultist.
Halonachos declares himself he is an inquisitor, so I know he is lying, and a cultist.
12061
Post by: halonachos
I declare myself an inquisitor and am therefor a cultist huh?
Here's the thing, the game is down to this point that any side has an equal chance of winning. If a cultist is taken out then one of the few remaining townies will be night killed, as it is now day 3 they may be more prone to take risks with their night kills seeing as though both of them have been safe.
Everyone who died via nightkill were very safe targets, stynier was one and bishop was another( although Drk thinks differently for some reason). You see, I think bishop was taken out because if they attempted to night kill me, it would've failed and looked bad on their parts. If vadem was night killed, it would make inquisitor look guilty and if inquisitor or Drk were night killed it would make me look guilty. However, this could also be a bluff or a double bluff or a triple bluff, or even a quadruple stuffed oreo, it doesn't help at all.
Drk, I did tell you who I investigated earlier, but I didn't say when.
Bishop Day one: Proved to be on my side yay!
Inquisitor Day two: Proved to be cultist boo!
I didn't have too much suspicion of Inquisitor until day two when he tried to declare me as a cultist immediately after the night phase. I had too look at his role and found my answer, he was quite the smart little cultist me thinks.
Also, inquisitor you did say that I was saying that LL and I were on the same page. If you want me to quote you I can and will, I guess its easy to forget when you're too busy lying.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
halonachos wrote:I declare myself an inquisitor and am therefor a cultist huh?
Here's the thing, the game is down to this point that any side has an equal chance of winning. If a cultist is taken out then one of the few remaining townies will be night killed, as it is now day 3 they may be more prone to take risks with their night kills seeing as though both of them have been safe.
Everyone who died via nightkill were very safe targets, stynier was one and bishop was another( although Drk thinks differently for some reason). You see, I think bishop was taken out because if they attempted to night kill me, it would've failed and looked bad on their parts. If vadem was night killed, it would make inquisitor look guilty and if inquisitor or Drk were night killed it would make me look guilty. However, this could also be a bluff or a double bluff or a triple bluff, or even a quadruple stuffed oreo, it doesn't help at all.
Drk, I did tell you who I investigated earlier, but I didn't say when.
Bishop Day one: Proved to be on my side yay!
Inquisitor Day two: Proved to be cultist boo!
I didn't have too much suspicion of Inquisitor until day two when he tried to declare me as a cultist immediately after the night phase. I had too look at his role and found my answer, he was quite the smart little cultist me thinks.
Also, inquisitor you did say that I was saying that LL and I were on the same page. If you want me to quote you I can and will, I guess its easy to forget when you're too busy lying.
Dear halonachos, first line of your quote~
Read carefully.
Look, now let me say that I am the inquisitor, and throw it to go my way:
Day one: Laid low, and used investigate on you.
That's why I made that sudden turn, covering it up as despising the RVS...
Day two: Investigate on BishopGore to see if he really was the psyker, I saw that he was really a psyker, though he seemed to not really be enjoying the game, and that I thought it would be suicide to night kill him.
Look! I can bluff too. The fact is, that, anyone can say that they're the inquisitor. You're story is thinner than flak armor.
Stynier wasn't really safe... as much as demon. Don't know why he was safe...
Can I see said quote?
17718
Post by: Drk_Oblitr8r
Ohh, ok. I'm fine with my current position in the game.
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
Oh lord it is killing me, I put "you're story is thinner than flak armor"...
I really do think it is me that is making this game unfun for more than one person, I would really like to believe otherwise... but I don't know.
I'll probably be quiet unitl halo gets lynched, then just silently cast my vote and what not.
12061
Post by: halonachos
Why would it be suicide to night kill bishop though? A cultist wouldn't know, a rogue psyker may be able to learn that it was his role as well.
Stynier was a safe night kill because it truly didn't implicate anyone. So many people were around that double/triple/quadruple bluffs could've been abound. Same with bishop, although Paul/vadem/viking/scott/you would've been equally safe. Like I said, too many bluffs possible. Unfortunately the way I see it is that you inquisitor are the cultist, my investigation proved it to be so, and the save attempt by The Ferrett proves it.
After the night kill of stynier, it would've been wise for the Ferrett to ally himself with the cultists to avoid the chance of being night killed so he buddied up with you and your feeble attempt to impersonate the inquisitor by announcing that the most suspicious player in the game was a cultist. For me that was too safe so I began to suspect you and then investigated you after that.
Bishop talked way too much so I looked into him and saw his psykerness so I avoided any confrontation with him during the second day phase.
The quote:
IS wrote:That last line, names, want, now. And evidence. You and LL were on the same page now? last post you said you were acting at ends... stop associating with people after their death and only then, it is not beneficial...
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
halonachos wrote:Why would it be suicide to night kill bishop though? A cultist wouldn't know, a rogue psyker may be able to learn that it was his role as well.
He announced it though.
Stynier was a safe night kill because it truly didn't implicate anyone. So many people were around that double/triple/quadruple bluffs could've been abound. Same with bishop, although Paul/vadem/viking/scott/you would've been equally safe. Like I said, too many bluffs possible. Unfortunately the way I see it is that you inquisitor are the cultist, my investigation proved it to be so, and the save attempt by The Ferrett proves it.
Though looking back, it was obvious that IGLannister was the only one with a reason to nightkill brother stynier.
That last line is silly, since I am the inquisitor and I investigated you, now your argument is invalid? (Yes, I intend to do this everytime you presume me dumb enough to believe you an inquisitor )
After the night kill of stynier, it would've been wise for the Ferrett to ally himself with the cultists to avoid the chance of being night killed so he buddied up with you and your feeble attempt to impersonate the inquisitor by announcing that the most suspicious player in the game was a cultist. For me that was too safe so I began to suspect you and then investigated you after that.
Hmm. I see where you're coming from. First line of this quote... what? I made a(n) (feeble) attempt to impersonate the inquisitor? You were the most suspicious player, he was going along because he didn't want to get lynched, or be on anyone's suspect list. He knew that he wasn't on the list for night kill, since he was backing me up, thinking I would be night killed.
Bishop talked way too much so I looked into him and saw his psykerness so I avoided any confrontation with him during the second day phase.
What?
The quote:
IS wrote:That last line, names, want, now. And evidence. You and LL were on the same page now? last post you said you were acting at ends... stop associating with people after their death and only then, it is not beneficial...
Errm... see that question mark...?
12061
Post by: halonachos
Yes I see the question mark, but you still made the assumption that I was intending to say that LL and I knew what was going on the entire time.
And yes, bishop talked a lot when he could, grilling everyone which either meant he was loyal or covering something up. I looked into it, saw that he was a psyker and didn't talk to him directly besides trying to get him to talk more. Unfortunately he "blew" his cover by announcing his psykerness to the group.
His death didn't really prove anything.
Bishop died so now the entire group listed by syphonius is correct? I really want to see that logic, and I really want to see Drk's logic and I really, really want to see Paul explain Drk's logic behind that.
Also, why would Ferrett think you would be night killed, he knew the cultists after all?
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
halonachos wrote:Yes I see the question mark, but you still made the assumption that I was intending to say that LL and I knew what was going on the entire time.
And yes, bishop talked a lot when he could, grilling everyone which either meant he was loyal or covering something up. I looked into it, saw that he was a psyker and didn't talk to him directly besides trying to get him to talk more. Unfortunately he "blew" his cover by announcing his psykerness to the group.
His death didn't really prove anything.
Bishop died so now the entire group listed by syphonius is correct? I really want to see that logic, and I really want to see Drk's logic and I really, really want to see Paul explain Drk's logic behind that.
Also, why would Ferrett think you would be night killed, he knew the cultists after all?
Demons know cultists, not vice versa. You should know this.
He may have not thought that I was going to be night killed, though he wasn't in any threat from being night killed.
12061
Post by: halonachos
I did know that, ferrett was a demon so he knew you were a cultist.
He knew you wouldn't be night killed and didn't want to be night killed himself. In fact, if he was night killed and popped demon as he would have, you wouldn't be able to say that I was a cultist who night killed ferrett, so he made himself a less attractive target for you by becoming your friend. Even cultists need friends you know.
29697
Post by: IGLannister
It's nice here in the warp...
21968
Post by: Inquisitor_Syphonious
halonachos wrote:1. I did know that, ferrett was a demon so he knew you were a cultist.
2. He knew you wouldn't be night killed and didn't want to be night killed himself. 3. In fact, if he was night killed and popped demon as he would have, you wouldn't be able to say that I was a cultist who night killed ferrett, so he made himself a less attractive target for you by becoming your friend. 4. Even cultists need friends you know.
1. Why do you mention this exactly? What makes you think this?
2. Then... he wanted to blend in... be neutral to everyone. Faceless nobody.
3. Umm... or he didn't want to become to close to you, since he knew I was on to you, and he wanted to look as pro-town as possible.
4. You would know.
@IGLannister
*Spits*
29697
Post by: IGLannister
Dude, I'm in the WARP. You're gonna have to try harder than that.
And GL everyone. Have a good game.
26531
Post by: VikingScott
Just got back today.
read througth all new messages but haven't really absorbed it.
Paul looks suspicious to me but not enough for a vote.
And another hole in the Halo is an Inquisitor is that he claims to be shielding himself thats why he is alive (there is a qoute but come on, 8 days traveling! Give me a break!), If you successfully shielded yourself then o-one would have been night-killed. Every night phase people have been killed.
Not going to vote yet.
26761
Post by: TherVadam
Yay Scott's back!
|
|
