Switch Theme:

Tanks firing on multiple targets  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Fresh-Faced New User





They used to do it, stupid fliers can do it, bearded grey puppies can do it, but apparently nobody in the 41st millenium remembers what side sponsons were designed for.

Seriously though. One extra target a turn. Thats all it would take to make me happy. No more fiddling with my predator to ensure he dosen't manage to block his own LOS to a target. They take it away to simplify things, then they go and play favorites. WTH?

What the heck indeed.

   
Made in us
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine




Murfreesboro, TN

Perhaps require a Ld test on the "baseline" Ld of the army? i.e., 8 for SMs, 7 for IG, etc.

As a rule of thumb, the designers do not hide "easter eggs" in the rules. If clever reading is required to unlock some sort of hidden option, then it is most likely the result of wishful thinking.

But there's no sense crying over every mistake;
You just keep on trying till you run out of cake.

Member of the "No Retreat for Calgar" Club 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





I like it! Good idea.

(But I have to admit, it takes away the coolness of the machine spirit, and why only 2 targets?)

   
Made in us
Fresh-Faced New User





You're right. Given the odds of it making print, I might as well ask for three. On the machine spirit, didn't they rob it of that ability in the new space marine dex?
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




yes they did...its in 2004 chapter approved the one they have now is so goofy its blows

We have better prices and better service
check us out
www.dropzoneonline.ecrater.com 
   
Made in us
Incorporating Wet-Blending





Houston, TX

Why not allow separate targetting for each weapon? Vehicles are assumed to have all manner of complex range and targetting equipment.

However, I also see no reason why a squad must direct all of it's fire on one target either. Apparently the sarge doesn't know how to tell the men to keep those bugs pinned while Pvt. Schmuck tries to take out that monster flying up the field. AT least allow a LD test to split fire....

-James
 
   
Made in us
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine




Murfreesboro, TN

It's that kind of stuff (along with Overwatch) that made 2nd ed. so complex and the games so long. Splitting the fire of tanks is sufficient, and simple enough.

As a rule of thumb, the designers do not hide "easter eggs" in the rules. If clever reading is required to unlock some sort of hidden option, then it is most likely the result of wishful thinking.

But there's no sense crying over every mistake;
You just keep on trying till you run out of cake.

Member of the "No Retreat for Calgar" Club 
   
Made in us
Executing Exarch





Los Angeles

Back in the second ed days, each model could fire at a different target. And whats more, each individual model was considered a seperate target. So at the begining of the shooting phase, you would go down the line saying "my bolter guy shoots your heavy bolter guy, my next bolter guy shoots the same heavy bolter guy, my next bolter guy shoots this bolter guy, my next bolter guy shoots this other bolter guy, my plasma gun shoots your squad sargent, ect. For your entire army. Then once you declaired everything, you had to go back and roll it out. It really sucked and was super slow. It did let you split fire though. So as with most things GW, they swung the pendlum the other way and made it so that nothing could split fire anymore.

While I'm mostly glad squads can't do it, I wouldn't mind seeing tanks being able to split their fire.

**** Phoenix ****

Threads should be like skirts: long enough to cover what's important but short enough to keep it interesting. 
   
Made in us
Fresh-Faced New User




Colorado Springs, CO

Keep the normal tergettign rules, but allow up to half of a squad to fire at a single other target.

Viola!

Art for the Art God, minis for his throne! 
   
Made in us
Fresh-Faced New User





I agree. Long fangs have the right idea.

I'd also love to see units able to reposition a model or two to take advantage of cover and such without botching the fire line of Mr. shmuck, the lascannon bearer, but I've been reading alot of warmachine.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Proposed Rules
Go to: