Switch Theme:

DE: so now vehicles have invulnerable saves?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Huge Bone Giant





Oakland, CA -- U.S.A.


/sarcasm

In a thread asking for implications of a rule, people are. . .complaining that folks respond with rules?

Also, regarding trying to work with weekly deadlines. . .really?! These rules are not published weekly--and there are weekly [daily!] publications with very strict publishing restrictions that have nowhere near the assinine oversights. And even those can publish 'errata' in a timely manner. No need to be an apologist because of that.

On topic:
The implications really are that they will need to FAQ something that is written clearly elsewhere.
Also, I agree it seems to be making bonus points for GKs.>

"It is not the bullet with your name on it that should worry you, it's the one labeled "To whom it may concern. . ."

DQ:70S++G+++MB+I+Pwhfb06+D++A+++/aWD-R++++T(D)DM+ 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: