Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I agree, I took a squad of autocannon havoks and my teammate took a squad of Missile with flakk and I think the Autocannons outperformed as a whole.

Coming from a BA codex to CSM the Havocs pricing seem to make the Autocannon the price effective option for potential air threat.

ML with flakk are just too pricey to field IMO (unless there is serious list tailoring going on). Even then I would almost take a lascannon squad over them.

 labmouse42 wrote:


PMs are, point for point, much more survivable than MEQ.

Palindrome wrote:
A reaper autocannon is simply a twin linked autocannon, it has 2 shots.

Your right. I misread it when I looked at the entry yesterday. I take that back, a CSM is better than a reaper.

for some reason though its range is reduced to 36"

they cost 25 points on a terminator, the same 25 points a loyalist can have an assault cannont or a GK can have a psycannon. for 5 points more they can have a cyclone missile launcher and keep their storm bolter. By far the worst terminator weapon.