| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 08:04:46
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
Desubot wrote:i mean rhino, razorbacks, storm raven denotes a kind of animal, but then drop pods, land speeder, land raider really dont.
There can also be a weather aspect to it, Whirlwind, Land Speeder Tornado, that sort of thing. Land Raider and Land Speeder were later given reasons for those names (ie. Land's Speeder, Land's Raider). This is just functionally descriptive, and as a result quite lacklustre.
Drop Pods, sure, I'll give you that one, but really they're about as mundane as Marines get.
MLaw wrote:People arguing about vehicles named after animals while I'm here waiting for stats on actual animals #gargantuansquiggoth
I can't see anyone arguing here. Discussing perhaps.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 08:15:32
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Courageous Space Marine Captain
|
H.B.M.C. wrote:There can also be a weather aspect to it, Whirlwind, Land Speeder Tornado, that sort of thing. Land Raider and Land Speeder were later given reasons for those names (ie. Land's Speeder, Land's Raider). This is just functionally descriptive, and as a result quite lacklustre.
Drop Pods, sure, I'll give you that one, but really they're about as mundane as Marines get.
Drop Pods are named after tech-priest Hieronymus Drop.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 08:18:45
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
Hehe.
I could see them doing that.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 08:21:35
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
His Master's Voice wrote:Someone down the thread guesstimated it to be 1 power point = 20 points, but that was for infantry I think.
I don't think that'll ever work out well.
Just for Space Wolves, there are quite a few units that are cross-wise in costs at power level and point costs.
For example:
Vanilla Rune Priest with default equipment = powerlevel 6 / points 84 (with his default axe, bolt pistol, etc..)
Vanilla Wolf Priest with default equipment = powerlevel 5 / points 90 (with crozium, etc..)
So the Wolf Priest is cheaper at powerlevel, the Rune Priest is cheaper in points.
It's harder with unit, due to variable equipment, but for example:
Wulfen with 1x Claws (leader has to have it) and 4x TH/ SS = powerlevel 13 / points = 300
Wolf Guard Terminators, 1x pair of Wolf Claws (to match the Wulfen equipment) and 4x TH/ SS = powerlevel 15 / points = 268
I.e. Terminators are cheaper in points, Wulfen are cheaper in power level.
Unless i am missing something obvious.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 08:23:46
Subject: Re:40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Yodhrin wrote:From the WoS transcript, re the gravtank:
Repulsor tank :
it's not a grav tank, it's nothing like a speeder.
 Goddamnit Jes, why insult our intelligence like this. It's a floating tank with big plates on the bottom that generate lift and is propelled forward by big ol' turbine engines on the back, you might as well have called it the Land Floater, it's a gravtank. Frankly I'd prefer they just retcon inconvenient fluff rather than trying to make up new, hilariously unconvincing fluff to explain how a thing that is exactly the same as another thing is in fact totes different because look, we called it "repulsor" not "grav" - we can, much as it pains us to have to, ignore fluff we don't like; ignoring that you evidently seem to think we're drooling morons is a tad harder.
In the interview Jes was saying that it is not a 'grav tank' as in the Eldar one. The tech is different. Rather than using an anti grav field like the Eldar it is pushing the ground way (hence the name)The comparison given was that if an Eldar tank flew over glass it would be untouched, while the repulsor would shatter it. He also wanted to make it clear that it would not be very manoeuvrable.
This seemed reasonable to me. Why should anti grav tech be one size fits all?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 08:36:07
Subject: Re:40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Skillful Swordmaster
The Shadowlands of Nagarythe
|
Chikout wrote: Yodhrin wrote:From the WoS transcript, re the gravtank:
Repulsor tank :
it's not a grav tank, it's nothing like a speeder.
 Goddamnit Jes, why insult our intelligence like this. It's a floating tank with big plates on the bottom that generate lift and is propelled forward by big ol' turbine engines on the back, you might as well have called it the Land Floater, it's a gravtank. Frankly I'd prefer they just retcon inconvenient fluff rather than trying to make up new, hilariously unconvincing fluff to explain how a thing that is exactly the same as another thing is in fact totes different because look, we called it "repulsor" not "grav" - we can, much as it pains us to have to, ignore fluff we don't like; ignoring that you evidently seem to think we're drooling morons is a tad harder.
In the interview Jes was saying that it is not a 'grav tank' as in the Eldar one. The tech is different. Rather than using an anti grav field like the Eldar it is pushing the ground way (hence the name)The comparison given was that if an Eldar tank flew over glass it would be untouched, while the repulsor would shatter it. He also wanted to make it clear that it would not be very manoeuvrable.
This seemed reasonable to me. Why should anti grav tech be one size fits all?
That is reasonable, but out of curiosity how does the Land Speeder's grav tech work? Does it work like the Eldar grav tech or the Repulsor grav tech?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/06/06 08:36:23
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 08:47:54
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Wonderwolf wrote: His Master's Voice wrote:Someone down the thread guesstimated it to be 1 power point = 20 points, but that was for infantry I think.
I don't think that'll ever work out well.
Just for Space Wolves, there are quite a few units that are cross-wise in costs at power level and point costs.
For example:
Vanilla Rune Priest with default equipment = powerlevel 6 / points 84 (with his default axe, bolt pistol, etc..)
Vanilla Wolf Priest with default equipment = powerlevel 5 / points 90 (with crozium, etc..)
So the Wolf Priest is cheaper at powerlevel, the Rune Priest is cheaper in points.
Now add in their options. The Wolf Priest only has options for a pistol/combi weapon and a Jump pack, so ~30 extra points. Rune priest gets the same 2 options but also can take Runic Armour, a Psychic hood and an upgraded Runic weapon as well, for potentially ~65 extra points. Power level (roughly) assumes about half of all options are taken by the model, so very ballpark that makes it:
Rune Priest approx 117 points
Wolf Priest approx 105 points
Power level 6 and 5 respectively looks correct !
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/06/06 08:48:48
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 08:52:34
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
UK
|
Sorry for slightly off-topic, but "Repulsor" does also work as an aggressive, rather punnish name; yes, it 'repulses' away from the ground, but it also (hopefully!) repulses the enemy...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 08:56:11
Subject: Re:40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
We'll find out soon enough eh.
|
Vorian wrote: Yodhrin wrote:From the WoS transcript, re the gravtank:
Repulsor tank :
it's not a grav tank, it's nothing like a speeder.
 Goddamnit Jes, why insult our intelligence like this. It's a floating tank with big plates on the bottom that generate lift and is propelled forward by big ol' turbine engines on the back, you might as well have called it the Land Floater, it's a gravtank. Frankly I'd prefer they just retcon inconvenient fluff rather than trying to make up new, hilariously unconvincing fluff to explain how a thing that is exactly the same as another thing is in fact totes different because look, we called it "repulsor" not "grav" - we can, much as it pains us to have to, ignore fluff we don't like; ignoring that you evidently seem to think we're drooling morons is a tad harder.
You're taking the line completely out of context.
He was meaning that it's not like an Eldar grav tank that zooms about the place, it's not manoeuvrable and goes about the same speed as a Landraider.
Of course it was broadcast live, so it wasn't phrased exactly perfectly if someone later wanted to be an ass and comb through something to find something to complain about.... but it was completely obvious what was meant if you watched it
>Has a go at someone for not paying attention to context before responding.
>Doesn't bother reading post they're responding to properly to see it has the source listed right at the top there.
I read the transcript, which is all people not subbing to GW's Twitch have to go on. Toddle over and snark at WoS if you think Jes said something other than what's written there.
Chikout wrote: Yodhrin wrote:From the WoS transcript, re the gravtank:
Repulsor tank :
it's not a grav tank, it's nothing like a speeder.
 Goddamnit Jes, why insult our intelligence like this. It's a floating tank with big plates on the bottom that generate lift and is propelled forward by big ol' turbine engines on the back, you might as well have called it the Land Floater, it's a gravtank. Frankly I'd prefer they just retcon inconvenient fluff rather than trying to make up new, hilariously unconvincing fluff to explain how a thing that is exactly the same as another thing is in fact totes different because look, we called it "repulsor" not "grav" - we can, much as it pains us to have to, ignore fluff we don't like; ignoring that you evidently seem to think we're drooling morons is a tad harder.
In the interview Jes was saying that it is not a 'grav tank' as in the Eldar one. The tech is different. Rather than using an anti grav field like the Eldar it is pushing the ground way (hence the name)The comparison given was that if an Eldar tank flew over glass it would be untouched, while the repulsor would shatter it. He also wanted to make it clear that it would not be very manoeuvrable.
This seemed reasonable to me. Why should anti grav tech be one size fits all?
I don't see any mention of Eldar vehicles in the transcript quote there, I see a comparison being drawn with the speeder, a SM vehicle that previously has always been fluffed as using antigrav plating, and the implication is that the new vehicle doesn't use AG plate despite borrowing several design cues from the speeder including the gribblies on the bottom there that look very much like what used to be called grav plating, hence my comment.
Regardless, whatever it's called now the prior fluff was that the Imperium could no longer reliably manufacture military level Make Thingies All Floaty Like technology which was why only SM had Land Speeders and only Land Speeders were Floaty Thingies. If they wanted to change that status quo, I'd rather they simply ignore it as they do many other older bits of fluff than tell us suddenly there's a whole other type of Make Thingies All Floaty Like tech that the Imperium can make just fine and for some reason weren't using before now.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/06/06 09:07:37
I need to acquire plastic Skavenslaves, can you help?
I have a blog now, evidently. Featuring the Alternative Mordheim Model Megalist.
"Your society's broken, so who should we blame? Should we blame the rich, powerful people who caused it? No, lets blame the people with no power and no money and those immigrants who don't even have the vote. Yea, it must be their fething fault." - Iain M Banks
-----
"The language of modern British politics is meant to sound benign. But words do not mean what they seem to mean. 'Reform' actually means 'cut' or 'end'. 'Flexibility' really means 'exploit'. 'Prudence' really means 'don't invest'. And 'efficient'? That means whatever you want it to mean, usually 'cut'. All really mean 'keep wages low for the masses, taxes low for the rich, profits high for the corporations, and accept the decline in public services and amenities this will cause'." - Robin McAlpine from Common Weal |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 09:23:59
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Oh, I was well aware you were having a go at him with only a brief summary. I also see that hadn't stopped you having a go at him about what he said despite not actually knowing what he said.
You didn't ask for a clarification about what he said, you posted that he was insulting our intelligence and other such nonsense.
like I said, what he meant was perfectly clear.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 09:41:33
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
[MOD EDIT - RULE #1 - Alpharius]
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/06/06 11:47:50
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 09:54:08
Subject: Re:40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Yodhrin wrote:
Regardless, whatever it's called now the prior fluff was that the Imperium could no longer reliably manufacture military level Make Thingies All Floaty Like technology which was why only SM had Land Speeders and only Land Speeders were Floaty Thingies. If they wanted to change that status quo, I'd rather they simply ignore it as they do many other older bits of fluff than tell us suddenly there's a whole other type of Make Thingies All Floaty Like tech that the Imperium can make just fine and for some reason weren't using before now.
Why not.
The Imperium always used Grav Tech very reliably on all their Space Ships to create artificial gravity. No 40K space ship designs appears to use centrifugal designs to get people to "walk normally". Even the dingiest Rogue Trader ship has that stuff.
Can't be that rare. Switch the polarity from "create 1 g where there is none" (i.e. "pull") to "negate 1 g where it exists" (i.e. "push") and you're good to go.
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/06/06 09:57:55
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 10:02:48
Subject: Re:40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Locked in the Tower of Amareo
|
Wonderwolf wrote:The Imperium always used Grav Tech very reliably on all their Space Ships to create artificial gravity. No 40K space ship designs appears to use centrifugal designs to get people to "walk normally". Even the dingiest Rogue Trader ship has that stuff.
Can't be that rare. Switch the polarity from "create 1 g where there is none" (i.e. "pull") to "negate 1 g where it exists" (i.e. "push") and you're good to go.
You realize we are talking about ships kilometers long with more power output than you can shake at? See obvious reason why it's not as easy as you make it claim?
|
2024 painted/bought: 109/109 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 10:07:43
Subject: Re:40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
tneva82 wrote:
You realize we are talking about ships kilometers long with more power output than you can shake at? See obvious reason why it's not as easy as you make it claim?
Sure.
But not all ships are that large (though they are still larger than a tank). Even Thunderhawks flying in space appear to have access to it. And the technology seems widespread and reliable enough that even long forgotten corridors and nobody's-been-here-in-decades bilge compartments in larger ships have it, even long after things like basic lights are gone.
Hell, for plot purposes, it's usually the last and only tech still running on ships stuck for centuries in some Space Hulk, long after their reactors went dark.
So it doesn't "look" like its terribly arcane tech for the Imperium.
Grav guns and even grav pistols seem to use the technology (admittedly for short-duration "shots") on a miniaturization smaller than a tank without much of a problem. Also, Elysian Grav-chutes? Presumably same tech? Inferior version? They are disposable, right? So they'd have to have continuous production, no?
I am not saying it's an automatic conversion, but if you remove the cultish/quasi-religious stigma of not doing things of the pre-Gathering Storm Imperium, it doesn't seem outlandish for an enterprising Magos (or even Tech Marine) to adapt that tech to different energy demands.
|
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2017/06/06 10:20:20
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 10:08:51
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
More fun to point out baseless negativity
The interview did end up costing me money though, reminded me I needed to buy the Eldar sketchbook!
As for why Grav is back? They are infusing 40k with elements of the great crusade that RG is bringing.
Secularism, hope, the clean design of the Primaris, the one type of weapon per squad, now Grav. Whatever hand waving background explanation there is behind it, that's ultimately the real reason
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/06/06 11:48:28
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 10:53:55
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Do they host those videos anywhere else? Because I might give them a browse, but i'm not paying to be advertised to.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 11:16:53
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Justyn wrote:Do they host those videos anywhere else? Because I might give them a browse, but i'm not paying to be advertised to.
Not that I know of.
Though as somebody pointed out, you can get in for free if you already have an Amazon Prime account, which might be a help for some people.
https://twitch.amazon.com/prime
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 12:07:55
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Inspiring Icon Bearer
|
One of the cooler things I'm liking so far about the new rules is that I can finally make my Blood Ravens into the specific chapter they should be thanks to the keywords system.
I can now pull Librarian Dreadnoughts without having to ally, and I can convert up a squad of Librarians using the Dark Angels terminators and the grey knight rules.
The only downside is that a two-thirds of their psychic powers only effect their respective factions, but it will still be cool and more importantly 100% legal!
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/06/06 12:08:19
One of them filthy casuals... |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 12:18:20
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
The New Miss Macross!
|
Crimson wrote: H.B.M.C. wrote:There can also be a weather aspect to it, Whirlwind, Land Speeder Tornado, that sort of thing. Land Raider and Land Speeder were later given reasons for those names (ie. Land's Speeder, Land's Raider). This is just functionally descriptive, and as a result quite lacklustre.
Drop Pods, sure, I'll give you that one, but really they're about as mundane as Marines get.
Drop Pods are named after tech-priest Hieronymus Drop.
I believe his first name was Geronimo. Automatically Appended Next Post: godswildcard wrote:One of the cooler things I'm liking so far about the new rules is that I can finally make my Blood Ravens into the specific chapter they should be thanks to the keywords system.
I can now pull Librarian Dreadnoughts without having to ally, and I can convert up a squad of Librarians using the Dark Angels terminators and the grey knight rules.
The only downside is that a two-thirds of their psychic powers only effect their respective factions, but it will still be cool and more importantly 100% legal!
Are librarian dreads now a generic space marine entry?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/06/06 12:19:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 12:36:51
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Courageous Space Marine Captain
|
No, but as you can freely mix everything with 'Imperium' faction keyword, it really doesn't matter. (Except for Ad Mech, who for some bizarre reason got to have pure Ad Mech detachment in order to be able to use canticles.)
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/06/06 12:38:11
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 12:40:38
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
Crimson wrote:
No, but as you can freely mix everything with 'Imperium' faction keyword, it really doesn't matter. (Except for Ad Mech, who for some bizarre reason got to have pure Ad Mech detachment in order to be able to use canticles.)
For a second I was going to freak out because my Ad Mech list has a Knight Warden in it. Then I remembered he is in a separate detachment.
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 12:45:55
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Courageous Space Marine Captain
|
It is actually rather annoying, considering that Ad Mech has exactly one non-special character HQ available.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 13:06:34
Subject: Re:40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Pewling Menial
|
Question: If you take the neutron laser + cognis heavy stubber upgrade on dunecrawler, can you take ANOTHER heavy stubber since the first is part of the neutron laser? So you would be firing 6 shots?
Also if you can take 2, do you pay for both or does 1 come as part of the neutron laser?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/06/06 13:11:27
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 13:10:49
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
Crimson wrote:It is actually rather annoying, considering that Ad Mech has exactly one non-special character HQ available.
Oh I agree wholeheartedly. I think the Techpriest Enginseer should have been an HQ. I wish they would go ahead and make a Skitarii Alpha Prime model and Datasheet. Tyranids get their Prime (even though there isn't a kit for it) but Skitarii don't. That is just lame.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
RoboDragon wrote:Question: If you take the neutron laser + cognis heavy stubber upgrade on dunecrawler, can you take ANOTHER heavy stubber since the first is part of the neutron laser? So you would be firing 6 shots?
Also if you can take 2, do you pay for both or does 1 come as part of the neutron laser?
Yes you can. And you have to buy both.
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/06/06 13:13:29
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 13:25:10
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
casvalremdeikun wrote: Crimson wrote:It is actually rather annoying, considering that Ad Mech has exactly one non-special character HQ available.
Oh I agree wholeheartedly. I think the Techpriest Enginseer should have been an HQ. I wish they would go ahead and make a Skitarii Alpha Prime model and Datasheet. Tyranids get their Prime (even though there isn't a kit for it) but Skitarii don't. That is just lame.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
RoboDragon wrote:Question: If you take the neutron laser + cognis heavy stubber upgrade on dunecrawler, can you take ANOTHER heavy stubber since the first is part of the neutron laser? So you would be firing 6 shots?
Also if you can take 2, do you pay for both or does 1 come as part of the neutron laser?
Yes you can. And you have to buy both.
There is a Tyranid Prime kit - distinctive body and head parts in the Warriors kit.
|
Stormonu wrote:For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules" |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 13:28:24
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
casvalremdeikun wrote: Crimson wrote:It is actually rather annoying, considering that Ad Mech has exactly one non-special character HQ available.
Oh I agree wholeheartedly. I think the Techpriest Enginseer should have been an HQ. I wish they would go ahead and make a Skitarii Alpha Prime model and Datasheet. Tyranids get their Prime (even though there isn't a kit for it) but Skitarii don't. That is just lame.
I'm okay with the Enginseer being an Elite. They're not "full" Priests. The "Knights of the Imperium" novel has the Techpriests of the Forge World looking down upon the Knight Sacristans(said to be similar to Enginseers) as "pretenders" and "rote mechanics".
I don't think we'll see a Skitarii Alpha Prime until we see a full book for the AdMech. Hopefully it would be an interesting design/loadout.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 13:28:40
Subject: Re:40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Hmm... I think there's a secutarii prime? We might get that as a cheap HQ as of fires of cyraxus.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 13:57:14
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Auspicious Aspiring Champion of Chaos
|
Crimson wrote: H.B.M.C. wrote:There can also be a weather aspect to it, Whirlwind, Land Speeder Tornado, that sort of thing. Land Raider and Land Speeder were later given reasons for those names (ie. Land's Speeder, Land's Raider). This is just functionally descriptive, and as a result quite lacklustre.
Drop Pods, sure, I'll give you that one, but really they're about as mundane as Marines get.
Drop Pods are named after tech-priest Hieronymus Drop.
Ah! Hieronymus Drop, also inventor of the Skrillex-pattern Vox. He spoke in pure dubstep.
|
2000 Khorne Bloodbound (Skullfiend Tribe- Aqshy)
1000 Tzeentch Arcanites (Pyrofane Cult - Hysh) in progress
2000 Slaves to Darkness (Ravagers)
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 13:59:36
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
JohnnyHell wrote: casvalremdeikun wrote: Crimson wrote:It is actually rather annoying, considering that Ad Mech has exactly one non-special character HQ available.
Oh I agree wholeheartedly. I think the Techpriest Enginseer should have been an HQ. I wish they would go ahead and make a Skitarii Alpha Prime model and Datasheet. Tyranids get their Prime (even though there isn't a kit for it) but Skitarii don't. That is just lame.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
RoboDragon wrote:Question: If you take the neutron laser + cognis heavy stubber upgrade on dunecrawler, can you take ANOTHER heavy stubber since the first is part of the neutron laser? So you would be firing 6 shots?
Also if you can take 2, do you pay for both or does 1 come as part of the neutron laser?
Yes you can. And you have to buy both.
There is a Tyranid Prime kit - distinctive body and head parts in the Warriors kit.
Huh, I was not aware of that.
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/06 14:04:22
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 5th June 17: WH Live "First Blood" / A few FW Datasheets (all info in OP)
|
 |
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
EnTyme wrote:Crimson wrote: H.B.M.C. wrote:There can also be a weather aspect to it, Whirlwind, Land Speeder Tornado, that sort of thing. Land Raider and Land Speeder were later given reasons for those names (ie. Land's Speeder, Land's Raider). This is just functionally descriptive, and as a result quite lacklustre.
Drop Pods, sure, I'll give you that one, but really they're about as mundane as Marines get.
Drop Pods are named after tech-priest Hieronymus Drop.
Ah! Hieronymus Drop, also inventor of the Skrillex-pattern Vox. He spoke in pure dubstep.
Noise Marines confirmed inventors of the Drop Pod.
|
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|