Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 JohnnyHell wrote:
Seriously, that isn’t in doubt. But for all rules purposes we’re told that it counts as the same thing. How disingenuous can you be to keep pretending those words aren’t there, and aren’t clear? If an action would count as moving, and you are attempting to do that when not allowed to move, you cannot. Simple.

And how disingenuous can you be to completely ignore the fact that the action of Da Jump is stated to not be a move, nor is it treated like a move for rules purposes?

This is clear to me.

The difference is that I'm not throwing out ad hominems.

 An Actual Englishman wrote:

 JohnnyHell wrote:
Seriously, that isn’t in doubt. But for all rules purposes we’re told that it counts as the same thing. How disingenuous can you be to keep pretending those words aren’t there, and aren’t clear? If an action would count as moving, and you are attempting to do that when not allowed to move, you cannot. Simple.

And how disingenuous can you be to completely ignore the fact that the action of Da Jump is stated to not be a move, nor is it treated like a move for rules purposes?

This is clear to me.

The difference is that I'm not throwing out ad hominems.

How disingenuous is it to ignore the words "this unit counts as moved for any rules purposes."?

Can a unit be moved further on the turn it arrives as reinforcements? No. Does Da Jump mean the unit counts as moved for any rules purposes? Yes. Is the reinforcement rule a rule? Yes.

All the above is true. How can you read that and go 'Oh Da Jump is power not a move, so its fine?"

As has been stated we are going around in circles here. Until GW clarify this we will not know what RAW is.

This does seem to be very circular by now and it is apparent that there is some room for interpretation, as always check with your opponent/TO and hopefully GW will FAQ it sooner rather than later.