Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
I'm thinking about using a McFarlane dragon for the base of an Orc Warbosses' Wyvern, is this idea if that would work out, or are the proportions/size wrong?
I'm looking at this one in particular (Berserker dragon series 3):
Just chiming in - love me some McDragons, really great stuff. Sweet to see them used in warhammer applications, though can't remember seeing a character actually mounted on one. Generally they stand and gesture whilst near a dragon ...
The one's I've seen are about the right size. Bigger than GW's maybe, but not too big IMHO. That Berzerker Dragon is 5" tall including the base, so it should be ok. Have you seen the Series 6 Ice Clan Dragon? Pretty rad.
"Don't have much use for a poop droid." - Iorek "Elusive has a bloodhound like capacity for finding hugely ugly minis." - tortoise
There might be some problems with the detail clashing IMHO. The McFarlane dragons have very fine sculpting and details that may not mesh well with the typical GW model's detail. Sorta like if you tried using Warhammer parts on Confrontation miniatures, it *might* look slightly wrong, but I guess you would have to actually try it to see if it's really noticeable.
