Switch Theme:

40k in 6 pages.  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in ca
Longtime Dakkanaut




Dives with Horses

So warmachine got me started on this idea.

Could you condense the rules for 40k in to 6 pages? (without being 1pt font or something stupid)

The main rules are longer than they need to be, could they be clear AND concise?

Note: I DO Know that all the rules to warmachine are more than the 6 page PDF, I have the book but the 6 page PDF can get most people through a game, especially if they are playing with someone else who knows the rules.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2007/12/11 18:20:36


Drano doesn't exactly scream "toy" to me.

engine

 
   
Made in ca
Deathwing Terminator with Assault Cannon






Yep. GW produces 2 page reference sheets for most of their games that contain all the basics. Just add 4 pages to cover USR, etc. and you'd be good.
   
Made in us
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw





St. Louis, MO

I think it would be difficult, IF possible.

It could be done in 10, though, for sure.

Heck! I'd love to see that!

Eric

Black Fiend wrote: Okay all the ChapterHouse Nazis to the right!! All the GW apologists to the far left. LETS GET READY TO RUMBLE !!!
The Green Git wrote: I'd like to cross section them and see if they have TFG rings, but that's probably illegal.
Polonius wrote: You have to love when the most clearly biased person in the room is claiming to be objective.
Greebynog wrote:Us brits have a sense of fair play and propriety that you colonial savages can only dream of.
Stelek wrote: I know you're afraid. I want you to be. Because you should be. I've got the humiliation wagon all set up for you to take a ride back to suck city.
Quote: LunaHound--- Why do people hate unpainted models? I mean is it lacking the realism to what we fantasize the plastic soldier men to be?
I just can't stand it when people have fun the wrong way. - Chongara
I do believe that the GW "moneysheep" is a dying breed, despite their bleats to the contrary. - AesSedai
You are a thief and a predator of the wargaming community, and i'll be damned if anyone says differently ever again on my watch in these forums. -MajorTom11 
   
Made in ca
Morally-Flexible Malleus Hearing Whispers






Well I kind of moved near Toronto, actually.

happypants wrote:
The main rules are longer than they need to be, could they be clear AND concise?


I don't think it would be that hard. Writing the RAW as the RAW, keeping the same rules but more like a technical manual.

Sounds very Dakka.

That's someone's cue to take up the challenge, btw

It might violate copy-right in some way.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2007/12/11 22:27:24


Dakka Articles: Eldar Tactica | In Defence of Starcannons (math) | Ork Takktika Quick Tips
taco online: WoW PvP
ur hax are nubz 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Proposed Rules
Go to: