| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/01/15 08:00:27
Subject: Close Combat with Multiple units.
|
 |
Fate-Controlling Farseer
|
I'll start with how my group currently does CC when multiple units are involved.
A Space Marine Tac squad charged an Eldar Guardian Squad, as well as a Ranger squad, being able to make contact with both. Of the 10 Marines in that squad, 6 are within range to attack the Guardians, and the other 4 can attack the Rangers. Now the SM player would have to choose which unit will be "attacked". Do you make 12 attacks against the guardians, or 8 attacks against the Rangers. Basically, you have to pick one or the other to fight, while the rest of the unit just chills. The Eldar player gets to make full attacks with both of his units as well.
Is this wrong? I think so.
From how I read the section in the BGB about CC with Multiple units, everyone makes their attacks against whatever units they can. If you have models that can attack both units, you decide which one they'll go after. Is that how it's supposed to be resolved?
|
Full Frontal Nerdity |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/01/15 12:19:38
Subject: Re:Close Combat with Multiple units.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Yes that is wrong.
you look at each model separately. If it is in btb with a unit, it has to attack that unit. (If in btb with both, you can choose)
Other engaged models can choose between any enemy unit that it is engaged with.
All 10 marines would get to attack, you will have some control of how many attack each; but not total freedom.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/01/15 12:36:46
Subject: Close Combat with Multiple units.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Cherry Hill, NJ
|
Yes that is how it is to be resolved. Each model may choose which unit to attack.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/01/15 12:43:59
Subject: Close Combat with Multiple units.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Yeah, it is as Negativemoney stated, as far as I know, as long as you are base to base with it, or within 2" to support it-exceptions apply(ie IC's).
|
"Dakkanaut" not "Dakkaite"
Only with Minatures, does size matter...
"Only the living collect a pension"Johannes VII
"If the ork codex and 5th were developed near the same time, any possible nerf will be pre-planned."-malfred
"I'd do it but the GW Website makes my eyes hurt. "Gwar
"That would be page 7 and a half. You find it by turning your rulebook on its side and slamming your head against it..." insaniak
MeanGreenStompa - The only chatbot I ever tried talking to insisted I take a stress pill and kept referring to me as Dave, despite my protestations.
insaniak "So, by 'serious question' you actually meant something entirely different? "
Frazzled[Mod] On Rule #1- No it literally means: be polite. If we wanted less work there would be no OT section.
Chowderhead - God no. If I said Pirates Honor, I would have had to kill him whether he won or lost. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/01/15 12:59:36
Subject: Close Combat with Multiple units.
|
 |
Fate-Controlling Farseer
|
Thats what I've always thought. Thanks guys.
|
Full Frontal Nerdity |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/01/15 17:10:41
Subject: Re:Close Combat with Multiple units.
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
I'd like to add in a semi-related question that i was about to start a new thread on...
First off, let me state that I may be wrong on having read this somewhere.
I THINK I read it somewhere, but I cannot find it now.
How do you "handle" charging multiple units?
I mean, I know that your first moved model has to charge the closest model of the first unit you're charging, and that you have to maintain coherency, and that the rest of the rules for combat apply (no doubling up if you can engage a new model, etc.).
I'm looking at declaring charges.
I thought I read somewhere that you had to declare your charge and announce which was the main unit you were chargin, which was the second, and the third, etc. I can't find that anywhere, though.
The other option is that you charge into your main target, then overflow wherever you want afterwards (basically).
Am I imagining it?
If I'm not just crazy, and it is in a book or FAQ somewhere, I'd appreciate a page reference or FAQ reference.
Thanks, all.
Eric
|
Black Fiend wrote: Okay all the ChapterHouse Nazis to the right!! All the GW apologists to the far left. LETS GET READY TO RUMBLE !!!
The Green Git wrote: I'd like to cross section them and see if they have TFG rings, but that's probably illegal.
Polonius wrote: You have to love when the most clearly biased person in the room is claiming to be objective.
Greebynog wrote:Us brits have a sense of fair play and propriety that you colonial savages can only dream of.
Stelek wrote: I know you're afraid. I want you to be. Because you should be. I've got the humiliation wagon all set up for you to take a ride back to suck city.
Quote: LunaHound--- Why do people hate unpainted models? I mean is it lacking the realism to what we fantasize the plastic soldier men to be?
I just can't stand it when people have fun the wrong way. - Chongara
I do believe that the GW "moneysheep" is a dying breed, despite their bleats to the contrary. - AesSedai
You are a thief and a predator of the wargaming community, and i'll be damned if anyone says differently ever again on my watch in these forums. -MajorTom11 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|