European Court of Human Rights upholds France's full face veil ban

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Iron_Captain**

jasper76 wrote:
Iron_Captain wrote:

And maybe if you Americans hadn't been so gun-happy, you wouldn't need to defend your family in the first place.

If ifs and buts were candy and nuts, we'd all have a Merry Christmas.

I like that saying

jasper76 wrote:
Besides, I need a rifle for protection against bears, to scare off coyotes, and there have been mountain lion sightings here, too. All of which only really care about my true inherent rights as a human being, the right to be food, and the right to surrender food . The plain fact is that. in my situation, I'm much much more likely to need firearm protection from critters than from an aggressive human.

Real men don't need guns to fight off a bear. Guns are for pansies and kids.
A real man fights bears with the Rogatina, a bear spear.

And if you have the balls for it, wrestling the bear into submission is even more manly

**SilverMK2**

I like the back flipping kung fu wolf on the left.

**Kilkrazy**

He's happy because he eats lard.

**Jihadin**

Iron_Captain wrote:
jasper76 wrote:
Iron_Captain wrote:

And maybe if you Americans hadn't been so gun-happy, you wouldn't need to defend your family in the first place.

If ifs and buts were candy and nuts, we'd all have a Merry Christmas.
I like that saying

jasper76 wrote:
Besides, I need a rifle for protection against bears, to scare off coyotes, and there have been mountain lion sightings here, too. All of which only really care about my true inherent rights as a human being, the right to be food, and the right to surrender food . The plain fact is that. in my situation, I'm much much more likely to need firearm protection from critters than from an aggressive human.

Real men don't need guns to fight off a bear. Guns are for pansies and kids.
A real man fights bears with the Rogatina, a bear spear.

And if you have the balls for it, wrestling the bear into submission is even more manly

Miss something in the picture? He is forced to fight. Castle Doctrine/Stand Your Ground in full effect. His snow shoe's seems busted in left corner of pic

**VorpalBunny74**

Jihadin wrote:
Miss something in the picture? He is forced to fight. Castle Doctrine/Stand Your Ground in full effect. His snow shoe's seems busted in left corner of pic

The bear is clearly no threat - it is a postal bear, trying to deliver a message to Jayne Cobb.

The message is probably "beware, kung-fu wolves are in the area"

**trexmeyer**

Soladrin wrote:
Nothing, I agree, we should target all religions.

Target all religions for their respective stupid practices?

**Hybrid Son Of Oxayotl**

trexmeyer wrote:
Target all religions for their respective stupid practices?

Yes. Good plan. Let us start by those that have negative effects on society, though.

**AlmightyWalrus**

Hybrid Son Of Oxayotl wrote:
trexmeyer wrote:
Target all religions for their respective stupid practices?

Yes. Good plan. Let us start by those that have negative effects on society, though.

(Toungue in cheek)

That's what he said, target all religions!

**Hybrid Son Of Oxayotl**

You are right. I meant “Let us deal by those that have the most negative effects on society first”

.

**SilverMK2**

Jihadin wrote:
Iron_Captain wrote:
jasper76 wrote:
Iron_Captain wrote:

And maybe if you Americans hadn't been so gun-happy, you wouldn't need to defend your family in the first place.

If ifs and buts were candy and nuts, we'd all have a Merry Christmas.
I like that saying

jasper76 wrote:
Besides, I need a rifle for protection against bears, to scare off coyotes, and there have been mountain lion sightings here, too. All of which only really care about my true inherent rights as a human being, the right to be food, and the right to surrender food . The plain fact is that. in my situation, I'm much much more likely to need firearm protection from critters than from an aggressive human.

Real men don't need guns to fight off a bear. Guns are for pansies and kids.
A real man fights bears with the Rogatina, a bear spear.

And if you have the balls for it, wrestling the bear into submission is even more manly

Miss something in the picture? He is forced to fight. Castle Doctrine/Stand Your Ground in full effect. His snow shoe's seems busted in left corner of pic

I would imagine the snow shoes are off so he can be more nimble on his feet.

**Kilkrazy**

Those are no snow shoes, those are Death Slugs taking advantage of his distraction to get at him from behind.

**MrDwhitey**

**Jihadin**

Kilkrazy wrote:
Those are no snow shoes, those are Death Slugs taking advantage of his distraction to get at him from behind.

Movie Dreamcatcher comes to mind....I drop the spear and charge the bear baring my throat then get taking from behind by the space slugs.