| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/21 06:52:11
Subject: A question about Ork force fields
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
According to a friend of mine, Mekboy forcefields give a 4+ cover save to any unit within 6" of the Big Mek. I know in the codex it says 5+ is the save it gives for infantry in the open,but I can't seem to find anything about it getting better than that in an FAQ on the British GW site dated 7/11/08. Just to be clear, what I am talking about here is infantry in the open, that is moving forward without going to ground that he said gets the save.
Do I need new reading glasses, a class in comprehension, or was he looking at a fan site somewhere? I haven't had much time to play more than three games or do much reading since the new rules have come out so be gentle!
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/08/21 07:14:26
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/21 07:21:22
Subject: A question about Ork force fields
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
St. George, UT
|
Its a 5+ because thats what it says in the codex. Vehicles under the protection get a 4+ because they are only mentioned as being obscured.
|
See pics of my Orks, Tau, Emperor's Children, Necrons, Space Wolves, and Dark Eldar here:

|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/21 09:48:14
Subject: A question about Ork force fields
|
 |
[DCM]
.. .-.. .-.. ..- -- .. -. .- - ..
|
Moved to YMDC
|
2026: Games Played:20/Models Bought:323/Sold:0/Painted:132
2025: Games Played:21/Models Bought:299/Sold:294/Painted:199
2024: Games Played:8/Models Bought:393/Sold:519/Painted: 207
2023: Games Played:0/Models Bought:287/Sold:0/Painted: 203
2020-2022: Games Played:42/Models Bought:1271/Sold:631/Painted:442
2012-19: Games Played:781/Models Bought: 1935/Sold:1108/Painted:704 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/22 17:37:46
Subject: A question about Ork force fields
|
 |
Long-Range Black Templar Land Speeder Pilot
Beijing,China
|
5+ for men.4+ for vehicle.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/24 17:39:43
Subject: A question about Ork force fields
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
agreed. it clearly says 5+ for infantry but obscured for vehicles.
the main book says any piece of wargear that gives the obscured rule to a vehicle gives it a 4+ cover save.
should be clear enough
NaZ
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/25 05:04:13
Subject: A question about Ork force fields
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
so lemme get this right and make sure i understand it, the ork forcefield gives people a 5+ save not a 4+?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/25 05:16:58
Subject: A question about Ork force fields
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
God I hope you are being sarcastic.....
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/25 06:34:37
Subject: A question about Ork force fields
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
th12t33n wrote:so lemme get this right and make sure i understand it, the ork forcefield gives people a 5+ save not a 4+?
No. You've got it all wrong.
See, what it does is give VEHICLES the 4+.
It gives "people" (anything Orkish with wounds) the 5+.
You had it the wrong way around if you're not trying to be right... or the right way around if you're not trying to be wrong.
Eric
|
Black Fiend wrote: Okay all the ChapterHouse Nazis to the right!! All the GW apologists to the far left. LETS GET READY TO RUMBLE !!!
The Green Git wrote: I'd like to cross section them and see if they have TFG rings, but that's probably illegal.
Polonius wrote: You have to love when the most clearly biased person in the room is claiming to be objective.
Greebynog wrote:Us brits have a sense of fair play and propriety that you colonial savages can only dream of.
Stelek wrote: I know you're afraid. I want you to be. Because you should be. I've got the humiliation wagon all set up for you to take a ride back to suck city.
Quote: LunaHound--- Why do people hate unpainted models? I mean is it lacking the realism to what we fantasize the plastic soldier men to be?
I just can't stand it when people have fun the wrong way. - Chongara
I do believe that the GW "moneysheep" is a dying breed, despite their bleats to the contrary. - AesSedai
You are a thief and a predator of the wargaming community, and i'll be damned if anyone says differently ever again on my watch in these forums. -MajorTom11 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/26 21:18:34
Subject: A question about Ork force fields
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
no my buddy has been playing it like that and i never bothered to read it because he isnt the type guy to lie about something like that, thats all. Never played any orcs besides him so i figure he knew what was crackin. sorry for the nubbyness
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|