Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I am fairly sure I know the answer on this already, but I'd figure I would ask you guys and get your opinion on it as well.

Lets say you have a squadron of two vehicles. If one of them becomes immobilized then per the rules, said vehicle is destroyed. However, lets say that both vehicles become immobilized at the same time as there seems to be no rule specifically stating that damage rules are to be rolled separately for each vehicle. Basically there are three outcomes as followed:

A) Neither vehicle can move so neither are destroyed and are both just treated as immobilized for the rest of the game.

B) As per the rules, they are both destroyed at the same time, therefore leaving no vehicles.

C) One vehicle is destroyed, and the other remains with an immobilized effect.

Let me know what you think!

The rules say:

page 64 wrote:treat all immobilised results as
destroyed (wrecked) and all stunned results as shaken.
If a squadron consists of a single vehicle when an
enemy unit fires at it, it reverts to the normal rules for
vehicle damage results.

Clearly the squadron did not consist of a single vehicle when the enemy unit fired so both vehicles are destoyed.

Edit: One may find it more logical that both would instead be immobilised though and that would make a fine house rule.

Actually, that little bit sums it up quite well, and makes my originally assumption wrong.

Thanks

I voted 1 and 1, dunno if it is RAW but it feels right.

Homer

RAW would seem to support that both are destroyed.

I also voted 1-1, but I think RAW may support both destroyed more.

I said both were destroyed because of what Webbe pointed out. I don't like it but its the rules so what can you do besides make a house rule.

I use two squads of Warwalkers, I hate that rule, and I voted they are both destroyed. Shooting is simultaneous so damage should be as well.

RAW is 2 but i voted 1 as if this ever came up i think ths is a fairer ... some hing more to talk about before a game