Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2009/05/17 21:06:57
Subject: Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Stalwart Dark Angels Space Marine
|
What's everyone's thoughts on it?
I only ask because I came across some old Bauhaus Warzone models that I really like the look of. The bases are the same size as a standard GW Mini and was thinking of including them as Storm Troopers in my Secondary Imperial Guard Army (The basis behind my guard is very rag-tag militia. I got Catachan models and painted them all different colors like they were all just street urchins and gangers banded together.)
So, yes? no? spoon?
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/17 21:39:20
Subject: Re:Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Yellin' Yoof
|
I pick spoon. Seriously though I personally don't think it matters as surely its the same type of thing as if you're opponent or you fielded scratch builds, wich are for all intents and purposes non GW models. I could be talking rubbish but I personally think as long as they look cool and don't mess with the rules its fine, but I imagine asking your opponents permission is a must.
|
750pts Win: 2 Loss: 1
1000 when I paint everything... |
|
|
|
2009/05/17 21:53:47
Subject: Re:Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Stalwart Dark Angels Space Marine
|
I found these pics online of the guys just to show you all what I mean. Here's two of'em I got off of Google Images
http://n2.nabble.com/file/n1625198/11609.jpeg
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/17 21:58:59
Subject: Re:Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Yellin' Yoof
|
They look pretty sweet, And they don't look that far removed from the Games Workshop minis, I can't see any reasonable person having a problem with you fielding those as substitutes for standard models.
|
750pts Win: 2 Loss: 1
1000 when I paint everything... |
|
|
|
2009/05/18 00:04:23
Subject: Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
Phoenix, AZ, USA
|
In a friendly game environment, I see no issues as long as "What you see is what you get." In a tournament environment, you need to check with the organizers to verify if the models are legal to use, as many GW touranments require GW and/or FW models only.
Personally, I use the play Warzone back in the 90's; I still love the Mutant Chronicles setting, and the mini's are awesome. I use my Imperials as Guard troops, just because I can (but not in tournaments), and find any excuss to field my AI-only Doomtrooper army (yet again, not in tournaments).
SJ
|
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world.”
- Ephesians 6:12
|
|
|
|
2009/05/18 00:20:54
Subject: Re:Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Stalwart Dark Angels Space Marine
|
Yeah, I had originally had a whole bunch of the plastic Imperials but gave them to a friend of mine as supplicants to his Guard Army he's starting. More or less just place holders for him. In digging them out was when I came across my old Bauhaus guys I was starting up. I can see their guns resembling maybe a lower-tech bolter so I thought it could fit decently.
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/18 03:59:41
Subject: Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Anti-Armour Swiss Guard
|
I still use my Capitol Martian troops in my SM army as scouts (with either pistol/ccw or bolter, depending on models).
As IG, I'd have no problem with them. At most of our tourneys, the TOs would have no issue with them. Some of the larger ones , might have an issue, but they're just as likely to tell GW to feth off and take their prize sponsorship with 'em (and then get PS from another distributor).
|
I'm OVER 50 (and so far over everyone's BS, too).
Old enough to know better, young enough to not give a ****.
That is not dead which can eternal lie ...
... and yet, with strange aeons, even death may die.
|
|
|
|
2009/05/18 15:05:13
Subject: Re:Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Leutnant
Hiding in a dark alley with a sharp knife!
|
I can't see any reasonable person having a problem with you fielding those as substitutes for standard models.
I agree of course. But the word "reasonable" is key here. There will always be coneheads of the "WHATDOYOUMEANYOUPLAYITONORDINARPAPER!!!11??" sort who will have a stroke over that sort of thing. Anyone that raises a fuss over that kind of thing you should not be playig with anyway...
Then of course their are the largely unenforceable "only play with our toys" rules that GW stores and tournies usually have in place. Rumor has it that I used to quitely poke a stick in the eye of GW by playing in tournies with an Enigma Miniatures space marine model hidden in my army.
edit: The old Citadel clone Enigma that GW put out of business...not the current one.
TR
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/05/18 15:08:42
Former Kommandant, KZ Dakka
"I was Oldhammer before Oldhammer was cool!"
|
|
|
|
2009/05/18 15:36:14
Subject: Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Stalwart Veteran Guard Sergeant
|
I play Praetorian IG so most people think my mini's aren't GW to begin with. And my Praetorian RR's are mostly Old Glory Zulu Lancers with GW horses and lances. I have never had a problem, including tournaments.
|
I heart SYR 8766
For all your bravado, if the US Army decided to invade, Wisconsin is it?, in force supported by a heavy bombing campaign for the month before, weeks of shelling from battleships on Lake Superior, and a full tank thrust (crushing the cows beneath the treads), I don't think that your .22 is going to make much of a difference really... Asmodai (my new hero)
At some point these sorts of decision-making skills lump you into the same camp as the Lehman Brothers, the White Star Line shipping company, and mothers who smoke during pregnancy. ---Sour Clams |
|
|
|
2009/05/18 16:07:12
Subject: Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Yellin' Yoof
San Antonio, TX
|
Warzone! Cool!
I imagine that Cybertronic troops would be usable as Space Marines. But, did they ever come out with Cybertronic models, or was that megacorp featured only in the "Seige of the Citadel" board game?
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/18 16:16:13
Subject: Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Dispassionate Imperial Judge
|
I wouldn't have a problem, as long as the army 'fits' and looks good together. I have a planned IG army made from old Void Junkers models...
It would be even better if you could convert them to GW weaponry though, as that's the important bit of the WYSIWYG rules.
And of course, you can't use them in a GW store or a tournament.
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/19 16:34:49
Subject: Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Pauper with Promise
|
Me personally, I would be fine with it, but like trench said there will always be "WHATDOYOUMEANYOUPLAYITONORDINARPAPER!!!11??" people
so, yeah i think that's a pretty cool idea
|
"You are not free whose liberty is won by the rigor of other, more honorable men. You are merely protected… Your Freedom is parasitic, you suck the honorable man dry and offer him nothing in return.” – Inquisitor Czevak
Imperial Fist- 4,500 pts
Cadian- 2,000 pts
Daemonhunters- 1,500 pts
Iron Warriors- 2,000 pts
Pre Heresy Luna Wolves- 5,000 pts |
|
|
|
2009/05/19 16:38:16
Subject: Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Plummeting Black Templar Thunderhawk Pilot
|
As long as the model used is similar in looks and style to the model it is meant to represent, and you can easily tell what it is without needing to constantly ask your opponent ... ... then yes, I'd be more than happy to allow you to play a model that wasn't GW.
Eg, using a small gundam model to represent a Tau crisis battle suit. Weapons on it looks like a plasma rifle and something else represents a missile pod for example. Its easy to know what it is and what the model represents. If you've never played Tau before then you wouldn't know the difference anyway lol
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/19 17:15:55
Subject: Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Nasty Nob
|
Ugh, generally I've only seen the two extremes. Either, one character (it is nicely painted and perfectly fits) or the ENTIRE army is non-GW. Of the 8 or so armies like this I've seen one (and only one) actually had a visual marker stating what they are. The other one were so confusing that i would dread (or dreaded) playing against them.
At our local indygt one of the guys (Luis Lopez I believe) creates an entire greenstuff army that has a smurf's theme. He is a great guy, but I have a tough time differentiating what each unit is. A+ for effort though.
|
"Just pull it out and play with it" -Big Nasty B @ Life After the Cover Save
40k: Orks
Fantasy: Empire, Beastmen, Warriors of Chaos, and Ogre Kingdoms |
|
|
|
2009/05/21 00:51:35
Subject: Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Anti-Armour Swiss Guard
|
RabbiTucker wrote:Warzone! Cool!
I imagine that Cybertronic troops would be usable as Space Marines. But, did they ever come out with Cybertronic models, or was that megacorp featured only in the "Seige of the Citadel" board game?
No, they had models for Imperial, Capital, Mishima, Bauhaus and the daemonic followers as well as Cybertronic. The Cybertronic stuff could be used as marines, I guess. I used to play as Capital, so I still have the minis (but we had a big martian themed table and terrain). Prince August still sell bags of the plastic Warzone 2.0 Imperial trenchers/Bauhaus troops for around 20 pounds (80 minis).
Even had some vehicle models (Imp had a big walker, Bauhaus had a tank)
|
I'm OVER 50 (and so far over everyone's BS, too).
Old enough to know better, young enough to not give a ****.
That is not dead which can eternal lie ...
... and yet, with strange aeons, even death may die.
|
|
|
|
2009/05/21 00:54:08
Subject: Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Ashaman wrote:Me personally, I would be fine with it, but like trench said there will always be "WHATDOYOUMEANYOUPLAYITONORDINARPAPER!!!11??" people
so, yeah i think that's a pretty cool idea
I admit I was one of those people
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
|
|
2009/05/21 11:18:18
Subject: Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Lady of the Lake
|
hellsguardian316 wrote:Eg, using a small gundam model to represent a Tau crisis battle suit. Weapons on it looks like a plasma rifle and something else represents a missile pod for example. Its easy to know what it is and what the model represents. If you've never played Tau before then you wouldn't know the difference anyway lol
The really small ones (smaller than the 1/144 that I think you're talking about) might make some interesting looking Fire Warriors.
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/23 17:37:29
Subject: Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
NON gw minis....can't play in GW store....can't do gw tournies.....might not be able to do other non-gw warhammer tournies.....
I don't like paying gobs of money for gw minis, but do because it is the game & game system I CHOSE to be part of, and don't enjoy playing against others that have an army that consists of ragtag 25mm, 28mm, and 30mm various manufactured and inconsistantly detailed minis.....
IMHO
|
|
|
|
2009/05/24 03:10:51
Subject: Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
Chicago, Illinois
|
I dont think it would be okay in a tourney but you are not playing with the right people if they wouldnt let you play with your own models.
|
If I lose it is because I had bad luck, if you win it is because you cheated. |
|
|
|
2009/05/24 03:17:43
Subject: Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
[MOD]
Madrak Ironhide
|
krazynadechukr2 wrote:NON gw minis....can't play in GW store....can't do gw tournies.....might not be able to do other non-gw warhammer tournies.....
IMHO
What GW tourneys?
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/24 03:39:33
Subject: Re:Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Leutnant
Hiding in a dark alley with a sharp knife!
|
or the ENTIRE army is non-GW. Of the 8 or so armies like this I've seen one (and only one) actually had a visual marker stating what they are. The other one were so confusing that i would dread (or dreaded) playing against them.
Then your opponent was not doing it right. I'll use a personal example here, although admittedly it's from WFB rather than 40k. I used to own a 28mm 15th century Medieval German army that I based for Warhammer Ancient Battles. It was made up of a mixture of Essex, Old Glory, Irregular, and the odd fantasy miniature. I used to play it as an Empire army and even played in a tourny at one of the FLGSs. I never once had an opponent complain. But the reason this happened was that I used troops that had a basic resemblance to what they represented (ie knights as knights, spearmen as spears, peasant Heerban as free companies, organ guns as hell blasters, etc) and I took the three minutes or so it took to declair what every unit in the army was to my opponent before the game began. Communication solves most proxy problems.
I think that only a tool would have issues with the use of non- GW figures in enviorments were they are permitted.
Speaking of such....
I admit I was one of those people
Hey, good for you!
Admitting you have a problem is the first step on the long road to recovery!
TR
|
Former Kommandant, KZ Dakka
"I was Oldhammer before Oldhammer was cool!"
|
|
|
|
2009/05/26 23:52:34
Subject: Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
n0t_u wrote:hellsguardian316 wrote:Eg, using a small gundam model to represent a Tau crisis battle suit. Weapons on it looks like a plasma rifle and something else represents a missile pod for example. Its easy to know what it is and what the model represents. If you've never played Tau before then you wouldn't know the difference anyway lol
The really small ones (smaller than the 1/144 that I think you're talking about) might make some interesting looking Fire Warriors.
I think the action figures would be about the right size for a crisis suit, although you might have problems getting the weapons consistent. Makes me wish that I had duplicates in my collection now. :(
|
|
|
|
2009/05/29 04:45:09
Subject: Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Wicked Warp Spider
The Webway Gate in California
|
Sounds good. Like the others said GW doesn't like non GW models
|
We were masters of the stars once and we shall be again
|
|
|
|
2009/05/29 11:53:28
Subject: Re:Non-GW Minis included in an Army?
|
|
Dakka Veteran
Chesapeake Beach, Maryland
|
No they do not. But I have played Fantasy with Avatars-of-War models in their stores and they have never said a word to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|