Switch Theme:

2K Vamps: Too soft?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in au
Grisly Guild Autopsy





I'm debating getting back into WHFB. I'm down to a choice of two armies.

Is this vamp list too soft?

430 - Lord: Level 2, Abyssal Terror, Red Fury, Dread Knight, Cadaverous Curaiss.
170 - Vamp: Level 1, Avatar of Death (GW), 2x Scrolls.
160 - Vamp: Level 1, Dread Knight, Book of Arkham.

168 - 19 Skeletons: Musician, Standard. (+Avatar)
176 - 20 Skeletons: Musician, Standard.
80 - 20 Zombies.
40 - 5 Hounds.
40 - 5 Hounds.
40 - 5 Hounds.
40 - 5 Hounds.

301 - 9 Knights: Barding, Musician, Standard, Warbanner. (+Vamp)
90 - 4 Fell Bats.

275 - 5 Wraiths: Banshee.

2000pts
6 Power, 1 Bound.
5 Dispel.

There is a thin semantic line between weird and beautiful. And that line is covered in jellyfish. 
   
Made in us
Wrack Sufferer





Bat Country

Way too soft.

Once upon a time, I told myself it's better to be smart than lucky. Every day, the world proves me wrong a little more. 
   
Made in au
Grisly Guild Autopsy





Ok.

Make it less soft?

I have no idea how to build VC. =p

There is a thin semantic line between weird and beautiful. And that line is covered in jellyfish. 
   
 
Forum Index » The Old World & Legacy Warhammer Fantasy Discussion
Go to: