Switch Theme:

Most annoying to assemble (old metal dragon vs thunderfire cannon)  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
Which model is the most annoying to put together
1990s WFB metal dragon
Thunderfire cannon

View results
Author Message

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Made in us
Fixture of Dakka


After just finishing assembling the thunderfire cannon I cant believe GW would release a model like this.. The parts didnt fit together at all so I had to file the entire thing, cut it up and then pin it so it even stuck together.. On top of this its around 20 very heavy parts lol

(Im ignoring the techmarine part even if hes yet another multi-part metal model)

The only other model in my memory which was as frustrating as this was the old metal dragon GW produced before the current batch.. That also barely fit together and fell apart extremely easily

What is everyones opinion? which model wins most annoying? If you have something worse than either of those (I dont see how something can be WORSE than the thunderfire cannon) post it!

Keeper of the DomBox
Warhammer Armies - Click to see galleries of fully painted armies
32,000, 19,000, Renegades - 10,000 , 7,500,  
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: