Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/27 21:07:34
Subject: New dark eldar codex
|
 |
Implacable Black Templar Initiate
|
will there ever be a new dark eldar codex-
probably not
do they deserve one-
probably not
but seriously does anyone know anything about a new codex?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/27 23:49:35
Subject: Re:New dark eldar codex
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
|
"Definition: 'Love' is making a shot to the knees of a target 120 kilometers away using an Aratech sniper rifle with a tri-light scope. Statement: This definition, I am told, is subject to interpretation. Obviously, love is a matter of odds. Not many meatbags could make such a shot, and fewer would derive love from it. Yet for me, love is knowing your target, putting them in your targeting reticle, and together, achieving a singular purpose, against statistically long odds." ~ HK-47 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/27 23:50:14
Subject: Re:New dark eldar codex
|
 |
Oberleutnant
|
I think its about time people started facing the fact that Dark Eldar have gone down the same road as the Squats. They kept promising updates for them before turning round and finally admitting they were not going to do anything with them anymore...
Mick
|
Digitus Impudicus!
Armies- |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/27 23:52:06
Subject: New dark eldar codex
|
 |
Foolproof Falcon Pilot
Somewhere in the unknown universe.
|
If you want to play DE, play soulstorm.
|
Manchu wrote:Agamemnon2 wrote:
Congratulations, that was the stupidest remark the entire wargaming community has managed to produce in a long, long time.
Congratulations, your dismissive and conclusory commentary has provided nothing to this discussion or the wider community on whose behalf you arrogantly presume to speak nor does it engage in any meaningful way the remark it lamely targets. But you did manage to gain experience points toward your next level of internet tough guy. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/28 00:10:48
Subject: Re:New dark eldar codex
|
 |
Humming Great Unclean One of Nurgle
Georgia,just outside Atlanta
|
Mick A wrote:I think its about time people started facing the fact that Dark Eldar have gone down the same road as the Squats. They kept promising updates for them before turning round and finally admitting they were not going to do anything with them anymore...
Mick
I honestly hope your wrong about this,as I would hate to see yet another army (and another group of players) get shafted by GW,of course,nothing GW does would honestly suprise me anymore.
|
"I'll tell you one thing that every good soldier knows! The only thing that counts in the end is power! Naked merciless force!" .-Ursus.
 I am Red/Black Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today! <small>Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.</small>I am both selfish and chaotic. I value self-gratification and control; I want to have things my way, preferably now. At best, I'm entertaining and surprising; at worst, I'm hedonistic and violent. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/28 00:26:42
Subject: Re:New dark eldar codex
|
 |
Oberleutnant
|
I hope I'm wrong to but when was the last time GW did anything to do with Dark Eldar, even in White Dwarf? It's a case of them thinking that if they aren't mentioned for long enough people will forget about them... (remember this is GW who think that the only sources of info are their own...)
Mick
|
Digitus Impudicus!
Armies- |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/28 00:41:38
Subject: New dark eldar codex
|
 |
Humming Great Unclean One of Nurgle
Georgia,just outside Atlanta
|
IIRC there was some Dark Eldar rules/info in both Apoc and planet strike (?) (not really sure),but yes your correct that GW is definatly giving DE the "cold shoulder"
It's a shame really,because DE have alot of potential to be very interesting as well as competitive.
Still GW has a record of "sqauting" other interesting armies, LaTD instantly comes to mind.
I suppose all we poor consumers can do is sit and wait while those wise folk at GW decide the fate of yet another army.
|
"I'll tell you one thing that every good soldier knows! The only thing that counts in the end is power! Naked merciless force!" .-Ursus.
 I am Red/Black Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today! <small>Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.</small>I am both selfish and chaotic. I value self-gratification and control; I want to have things my way, preferably now. At best, I'm entertaining and surprising; at worst, I'm hedonistic and violent. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/28 01:04:10
Subject: New dark eldar codex
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I wish they would get rid of Dark eldar just to put them out of their misery. As a stand alone army they make 0 sense because dark eldar only do THREE THINGS
1) Provide a carbon copy of WFB Dark Elves
2) Take slaves
3) Again provide a carbon copy of dark elves
Lets see
Space marines dont become slaves
Necrons cant be slaves
tyranids cant be slaves
orks cant be slaves (grots maybe)
Eldar are on craftworlds.. hard to raid those
Any chaos armies wouldnt be slaves
That basically leads to DE only having relevance if assaulting an imperial guard army or Inquisition with all humans
Hopefully they 100% redo their fluff so they actually make a shred of sense
|
Keeper of the DomBox
Warhammer Armies - Click to see galleries of fully painted armies
32,000, 19,000, Renegades - 10,000 , 7,500, |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/28 01:37:40
Subject: New dark eldar codex
|
 |
Sneaky Kommando
SD
|
@Kirasu: Just because the DE can't enslave a majority of the armies doesn't mean they make no sense. They can still enslave general populations. It is really hard to enslave anybody who is in a fighting force including IG, since they generally are ordered to die before surrender.
Also, slavery isn't their only thing. They just go around and cause chaos and pain to appeal Slaaneesh iirc. So they make sense in the general scheme of things. It's just they haven't been updated.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/28 03:49:40
Subject: New dark eldar codex
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Yes a lightly armored raider force whos primary purpose according to the 1 page of fluff in their codex is to collect slaves
Why the hell would a lightly armored force go up against heavy armored armies in which they could gain no slaves?
Again DE need a totally new focus or they should not even be on the battle field..
|
Keeper of the DomBox
Warhammer Armies - Click to see galleries of fully painted armies
32,000, 19,000, Renegades - 10,000 , 7,500, |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/28 04:09:41
Subject: New dark eldar codex
|
 |
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
|
Well, DE wouldn't be trying to enslave Space Marines. They'd be trying to enslave Imperial civilians.
Last WD I can think of that had them was when the Black Templars codex got released. I have it sitting around in here. Some tournament player bragged for an article over how his Dark Eldar won a GT or something, then they get beaten by Templars in a battle report.
|
Check out my Youtube channel!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/28 05:15:23
Subject: New dark eldar codex
|
 |
Sinewy Scourge
|
Brother SRM wrote:Well, DE wouldn't be trying to enslave Space Marines. They'd be trying to enslave Imperial civilians.
Last WD I can think of that had them was when the Black Templars codex got released. I have it sitting around in here. Some tournament player bragged for an article over how his Dark Eldar won a GT or something, then they get beaten by Templars in a battle report.
Enslave? Maybe not. Torture? Absolutely. There's even a story in the codex about a homunculus torturing the crap out of a captured space marine. Had him screaming pretty much immediately.
And you must notice that in any battle report with a newly released army, the newly released army always 'happens' to win. I knew a couple guys who were commissioned to write a battle report for WD. You better believe that GW arbitrates which army is to win. The outcome is known before the game starts and the players just figure out how to make it look exciting and dramatic.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/28 05:50:04
Subject: New dark eldar codex
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
|
Just one question, do Dark Eldar even have a BFG force?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/09/28 05:50:54
I Play
I am thinking of starting Freebooterz
Currently working on Rainbow Warriors Epic Scale check it out here! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/28 06:17:30
Subject: New dark eldar codex
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Dark Eldar have very little use for RealSpace, so not BFG for them.
DE are not going the way of squats. We're getting a new codex and models; hopefully right after the space pups; but at the very latest, after the one after them.
DE still do reasonably well with a good general. I have a very low loss rate with mine, for instance. Vs most people it usually ends up in a massacre; as (1) most people build anti-marine lists and I don't play marines, and (2) most people play marines and I have an anti-marine list.
I want some variety though. I basicaly just use the same list, very slightly modified for points... and it gets old. I want more options that still results in a competitive list.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/28 06:21:11
Subject: New dark eldar codex
|
 |
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
|
kuro_khan wrote:
DE are not going the way of squats. We're getting a new codex and models; hopefully right after the space pups; but at the very latest, after the one after them.
That's a negative good buddy. They're really, really far out. Phil Kelly was talking earlier today that he wished he was writing their codex. Jes Goodwin isn't done sculpting their models. I believe they're further out than Necrons. At least Nids are coming in January though.
|
Check out my Youtube channel!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/28 06:42:50
Subject: New dark eldar codex
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I just think people tend to underestimate the massive amount of work DE need to be respectable in the hobby
Not even sure how people can identify them as "their" army considering the codex has no fluff and the models are awful
DE are the only race that basically is like creating an ENTIRELY new race
Need to redo virtually every single unit 100%
Have to add pretty much 100% new fluff due to the lack of it
All new models
Barely any player base to buy said new models, said new codex or read said new fluff
I would like DE to come back but from the standpoint of a GW executive I can see virtually no reason to do DE if another race could use a codex .. or models
|
Keeper of the DomBox
Warhammer Armies - Click to see galleries of fully painted armies
32,000, 19,000, Renegades - 10,000 , 7,500, |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/28 07:05:47
Subject: New dark eldar codex
|
 |
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Thread being locked. To the OP, please read this as to why:
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/234173.page
|
|
|
 |
 |
|