| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/01 15:54:39
Subject: Silver bullet
|
 |
Mekboy Hammerin' Somethin'
|
I was thinking about trying Ninja Tau again and thought about using a strategy used in Magic the Gathering... It is called the Silver Bullet.
The Idea was that you have a few options that would wreck the meta but thanks to its narrowness it was not very strong against much else. In order to use those options reliably you would run cards that allowed you to grab those cards from your deck and place them in your hand, so you can play them this or next turn...
Looking at the positional relay again made me think of the Silver Bullet.
What are some general threats on the battlefield and some Tau responses? Here is what I could come up with at the moment.
Problem: Landraiders (IE: Av 14)
Solution: Hammerhead w/Railguns
Problem: Swarms and Hordes
Solution: 6 man Stealth Team with targeting arrays
Problem: Transport Spam
Solution: Deathrain Team
Problem: TEQ
Solution: Helios Team
What else do you guys think?
|
Luke_Prowler wrote:Is it just me, or do Ork solutions always seems to be "More Lootas", "More Boyz" Or "More Power Klaws"?
starbomber109 wrote:Behold, the true ork player lol.
I have to admit, I miss the old Infantry battles of 4E compared to this 5E wonderland of APCs/IFVs everywhere. It's like we jumped from WWI to WWII.
ChrisCP wrote: KFFs... Either 50% more [anti-tank] than your opponent expects or 50% less [anti-tank] than you expect.
Your worlds will burn until their surface is but glass. Your destruction is for the Greater Good, and we are instruments of Its most Glorious Path.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/01 16:20:31
Subject: Re:Silver bullet
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
are you saying take one of each?
that might work, but you would have the problem of things not arriving when you need them.
i haven't seen Ninja t'au used effectively, either by me or other players, but i could see it working if you are very careful with your actions.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/01 16:24:17
Subject: Silver bullet
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
the problem is, if you tailor your list to the meta, your going to be blindsided by a list not within it. Thats why i'm building a biker marine army... the meta in my area is very mechanized. So, most people take plenty of anti-vehicle... so I decided to make a list that can counter that, with no vehicles at all.
|
After the orbital strikes, Thunderhawk bombardments, Whirlwinds, Vindicators, fusion and starfire and finally Battle Brothers with flamers had finished cleansing the world of all the enemies of Man, we built a monastery in the center of the largest, most radioactive impact crater. We named the planet "Tranquility", for it was very quiet now.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 01:33:31
Subject: Silver bullet
|
 |
Mekboy Hammerin' Somethin'
|
The idea is that every unit can deal an dis-proportionate amount of damage to the right list... the positional relay ensures that they show up...
|
Luke_Prowler wrote:Is it just me, or do Ork solutions always seems to be "More Lootas", "More Boyz" Or "More Power Klaws"?
starbomber109 wrote:Behold, the true ork player lol.
I have to admit, I miss the old Infantry battles of 4E compared to this 5E wonderland of APCs/IFVs everywhere. It's like we jumped from WWI to WWII.
ChrisCP wrote: KFFs... Either 50% more [anti-tank] than your opponent expects or 50% less [anti-tank] than you expect.
Your worlds will burn until their surface is but glass. Your destruction is for the Greater Good, and we are instruments of Its most Glorious Path.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 01:45:22
Subject: Silver bullet
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Honersstodnt wrote:the problem is, if you tailor your list to the meta, your going to be blindsided by a list not within it. Thats why i'm building a biker marine army... the meta in my area is very mechanized. So, most people take plenty of anti-vehicle... so I decided to make a list that can counter that, with no vehicles at all.
This reminds me of a battle rep I read once. A guy was taking his Orks to a local tourny that was allowing titans. He gambled that most armies wouldnt have titans, and would be geared towards blowing UP the titans. So he took a solid horde Orks force. Basically he had nothing to deal with AV14 stuff, but he would easily soak up shots, and munch through everything else.
He ended winning because he got lucky and fought no titans, so he just overwhelmed his opponents.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 01:54:17
Subject: Re:Silver bullet
|
 |
Esteemed Veteran Space Marine
|
Broadsides would be better against AV 14.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 03:37:00
Subject: Re:Silver bullet
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Inquisitor_Syphonious wrote:Broadsides would be better against AV 14. 
+1
3 BS 3 TL shots > 1 BS 4 shot Automatically Appended Next Post: Still,the "silver bullet" list has its issues. You're probably going to have trouble against any list dedicated to a single attack form, seeing as you don't have the volume to counter it. Still looks like an effective tactic, though.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/06/02 03:41:55
There's just an acre of you fellas, isn't there? |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 06:50:18
Subject: Silver bullet
|
 |
Mekboy Hammerin' Somethin'
|
Why not run both... I just like hammerhead first in a list because it has more utility....
Giving those broadsides plasmaguns and targeting arrays or a.s.s may help out quite a bit...
|
Luke_Prowler wrote:Is it just me, or do Ork solutions always seems to be "More Lootas", "More Boyz" Or "More Power Klaws"?
starbomber109 wrote:Behold, the true ork player lol.
I have to admit, I miss the old Infantry battles of 4E compared to this 5E wonderland of APCs/IFVs everywhere. It's like we jumped from WWI to WWII.
ChrisCP wrote: KFFs... Either 50% more [anti-tank] than your opponent expects or 50% less [anti-tank] than you expect.
Your worlds will burn until their surface is but glass. Your destruction is for the Greater Good, and we are instruments of Its most Glorious Path.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/02 18:52:22
Subject: Silver bullet
|
 |
Mekboy Hammerin' Somethin'
|
So trying this again... Common threats are: TMC Spam (T6 3+ save) LR Spam (AV 14) Transport Spam (AV 10-12) Horde Deepstriking MEQS (T4 3+ save) Is there anything that I am forgetting? Common Answers are... (TMC And LR) Helios (Transports and TMC) Death Rain, Broadsides, Ionheads, Seeker Missiles (Horde) Stealth Suits, Hammerheads (Deepstriking) Holding things in reserve and distance everything apart... What do you guys think?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/06/02 19:20:03
Luke_Prowler wrote:Is it just me, or do Ork solutions always seems to be "More Lootas", "More Boyz" Or "More Power Klaws"?
starbomber109 wrote:Behold, the true ork player lol.
I have to admit, I miss the old Infantry battles of 4E compared to this 5E wonderland of APCs/IFVs everywhere. It's like we jumped from WWI to WWII.
ChrisCP wrote: KFFs... Either 50% more [anti-tank] than your opponent expects or 50% less [anti-tank] than you expect.
Your worlds will burn until their surface is but glass. Your destruction is for the Greater Good, and we are instruments of Its most Glorious Path.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/03 00:28:11
Subject: Re:Silver bullet
|
 |
Morphing Obliterator
|
Isnt this what ninja tau already does? Bring in answers it needs to counter threats?
The trouble with comparing 40k to magic is that magic has a very structured resource curve. Under most circumstances you can play a single land a turn and so that limits what other spells you can play. Traditionally things that break this curve are very powerful as you can play game winners easily.
In 40k there is no resource curve. You get all of your opponents strength all at once (unless you're playing againt demons  ). In magic terms this is like you opponent playing all his threats on turn 1. Unless you can do something similar you'll lose pretty quickly. But where it really falls appart for this stratergy is that most good army builds use a lot of redundacy in their lists. One landraider is good, but two is better, because if one gets blown up you can still use tactics involving landraiders. This is why you dont see tournament winning armies with one-offs in their list.
So if your opponent is playig MCs, for example, theyre going to have more than one. If you bring in something that can kill MCs, you get one turn to do damage before the rest of the army is looking at that unit. You wont be able to do enough damage to seriously hurt your opponent. Add to this that most armies dont use a single type of unit. A 'nid playing will have MCs, hordes of gants, zoanthropes and maybe even DoM, which is very hard for you to deal with with only a single unit a turn.
|
taking up the mission
Polonius wrote:Well, seeing as I literally will die if I ever lose a game of 40k, I find your approach almost heretical. If we were to play each other in a tournament, not only would I table you, I would murder you, your family, every woman you ever loved and burn down your house. I mean, what's the point in winning if you allow people that don't take the game seriously to live? |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/03 23:17:48
Subject: Re:Silver bullet
|
 |
Mekboy Hammerin' Somethin'
|
What do you think of the following configurations for my 4 teams of suits in the same list... Commander (Fireknife): 3 Missile Pod + 3 Plasma Rifle, 3 Targeting array, 3 HW Multi tracker, 3 HW Drone Controller, 4 Shield Drones, Bonding Knife Commander (Helios): 3 Plasma Rifle + 3 Fusion Blaster, 3 Targeting array, 3 HW Multi tracker, 3 HW Drone Controller, 4 Shield Drones, Bonding Knife Crisis Suits (Deathrain): 3 Twinlinked Missile Pod, 2 Flamers, Shas've with Positional Relay, HW Drone Controller, 2 Shield Drones, Bonding Knife Crisis Suits (Fireforge): 3 Missile Pod + 3 Fusion Blaster, 3 Targeting Array, Team Leader with HW Drone Controller, 2 Shield Drones, Bonding Knife The last elite choice is occupied by a squad of 6 stealth suits with targeting arrays.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/06/03 23:19:49
Luke_Prowler wrote:Is it just me, or do Ork solutions always seems to be "More Lootas", "More Boyz" Or "More Power Klaws"?
starbomber109 wrote:Behold, the true ork player lol.
I have to admit, I miss the old Infantry battles of 4E compared to this 5E wonderland of APCs/IFVs everywhere. It's like we jumped from WWI to WWII.
ChrisCP wrote: KFFs... Either 50% more [anti-tank] than your opponent expects or 50% less [anti-tank] than you expect.
Your worlds will burn until their surface is but glass. Your destruction is for the Greater Good, and we are instruments of Its most Glorious Path.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/04 02:11:45
Subject: Silver bullet
|
 |
Annoyed Blood Angel Devastator
|
I don't think it would work as effectively as the idea in Magic, based on the idea that fishing out 1 in 60 with a tutor effect doesnt really put you on a disadvantage on the curve.
Keeping all those units in reserve and only having a small fraction of your force on the board otherwise would justend up with whatever you bring in being plowed by the full force of your opponents army.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/04 02:32:19
Subject: Silver bullet
|
 |
Mekboy Hammerin' Somethin'
|
Given the large reach of each unit (36" for missiles, 24" for plasma, 18" for burst cannons) and reliable deepstriking. Do you think I can hit my opponent from a place where either none or a small portion of his army can fire back?
Nevermind on the burstcannon as 18" is kinda short... but with a 6" JSJ you can hit them next turn...
In kill point games, the idea is to kill one more thing then they kill...
Objective games can be won by deepstriking people within contesting while only claiming one objective...
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/06/04 02:46:56
Luke_Prowler wrote:Is it just me, or do Ork solutions always seems to be "More Lootas", "More Boyz" Or "More Power Klaws"?
starbomber109 wrote:Behold, the true ork player lol.
I have to admit, I miss the old Infantry battles of 4E compared to this 5E wonderland of APCs/IFVs everywhere. It's like we jumped from WWI to WWII.
ChrisCP wrote: KFFs... Either 50% more [anti-tank] than your opponent expects or 50% less [anti-tank] than you expect.
Your worlds will burn until their surface is but glass. Your destruction is for the Greater Good, and we are instruments of Its most Glorious Path.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|