Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I was looking at the non-magenta parts too. Can you please quote it? I couldn't find it.

skyth wrote:I was looking at the non-magenta parts too. Can you please quote it? I couldn't find it.

Kay:
Page 54 – Steadfast
Change the first paragraph to “If a defeated unit has more
ranks than its enemy, it takes a Break test without applying the
difference in the combat result scores.” Change the fourth
paragraph to “Steadfast units don’t apply the difference in
combat result scores to Break tests.”

And since stubborn=steadfast at all times... You get the point.

Isn't the rule for stubborn that the unit is always steadfast? So any changes to steadfast change stubborn...

Okay, I thought they were seperate rules for some reason, thus my confusion. Granted, you could have said that a half-dozen posts back

I have no way of knowing what you got wrong,thats the whole point of a discussion – reaching the root of the problem and clearing it

HoverBoy wrote:Cuz it was FAQ-ed in the last version so it isn't in magenta.

Or because the actual BRB entry for stubborn simply says that the unit is always steadfast, with a page reference to steadfast

EDIT

Wow, reading fail there, didn't see the second page of back and forth ... and anyway RZ beat me by 30+ minutes

- Salvage