Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

As above. Again you are making an asumption that you cannot have two terrain types, and assumption proven wrong, and are still arguing that this somehow doesnt matter.

There is nothing stating it replaces the original terrain type, so you have no permission to replace it. You are not being asked to prove a negative, you are being required to prove a positive. Prove it states it replaces it. Prove the rules state you can only have one terrain type. Do both, or concede

Derr wrote:
I think that's disingenuous, sir. You're referring of course to the hover "type " in the bottom of page 81. If it is a Flyer, Transport that chooses to hover, the Flyer is treated like a fast skimmer. The Flyer "type" changes to hover "type". Since it is specified as both Flyer type AND Transport type, just the Flyer Type is changed, since just that part is mentioned in that box.

I don't think it's disingenuous at all, in fact, I think the fact that you need to create absurd loopholes that require the interpretation of rules not based upon their real english language meaning, but rather inferring facts because a single word happens to be present and used in an entirely different context to the one you assert it is used in really highlights just how absurd your initial argument is.

The fact that it mentions the Flyer type is insignificant because it doesn't tell you to just replace the Flyer type, it uses Flyer as an identifier because these are rules about flyers, regardless it just tells you to treat the model as a Fast Skimmer, exactly the same as Enfeeble tells you to treat terrain as difficult terrain.

If you can't reconcile your interpretation of the Enfeeble rules with those for the Flyer (Hover) rules I think there's a problem with said interpretation.