Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

You can probably get rules squared away and playtested within a year, using standees / tokens.

I have paper circles cut out already of various base sizes for various scales. Still deciding on 20mm or 28mm.

A new image from meganerid has came in. Opinions please and take note designs are subject to change.

Alas, finally, after a while of saving and awaiting, the end is nigh. This is a WIP of the back view of a Naratian Combat Witch.

Alas, the final 2 pics of the Combat Witch and her Ground Combat Magical Apparatus.


Next up is the heavy weapons version of the GCMA and a different kind of combat witch.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
A Go Fund Me has been launched so this project can be made into reality. https://www.gofundme.com/magic-tech-concept-art-funds

Future thinking. If this is successful, how should I go about the sprues? Have the basic kit with few options for poses and eapons and have an expanded pack of more leg, arm, head and weapon options? It would seem that in doing so, not only am I cutting down on wasted number of parts but also decreasing the price but the expansion pack will mean that a customer will have to pay more to get what they want.