Switch Theme:

The Use of Themes, is my opponent being unreasonable?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




UK

 Galas wrote:
Yeah I dont think there was any evil plan to those rules, just habitual ivory tower syndrom of GW Uk based rules writters.


Honestly I think it was partly a result of a very closed shop management team. Ergo Kirby's "no consumer research" theory taken into its extreme. Ergo they basically had too many meetings around a closed team with little to no outside input to the point where the idea warped into something that was so drastically different from their actual market that it failed on almost every level (save the models). It did attract a newish market, but it was substantially smaller and turned much of the former market into a hate group. That must have really scared GW then because GW back then wasn't doing much marketing of their own. It was all local stores and word of mouth/gamers spreading things.

Wouldn't surprise me if along with a huge wakeup on customer feedback and actual consumer research; it also likely lit a fire under the "hey we really aren't doing enough actual marketing of our own." Heck GW's marketing is now on the extreme other side and running 7 days a week!

A Blog in Miniature

3D Printing, hobbying and model fun! 
   
Made in es
Brutal Black Orc




Barcelona, Spain

 Strg Alt wrote:
 lord_blackfang wrote:
I've beaten many a Settra player by asking them to pick up my dice from the floor.


I would have to wear a hoodie in order to gain some stupid buff for my night goblins. That was the way GW gave WHFB players the good, old middle finger.



I loved those rules, to be honest.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/04/15 09:46:11


 
   
Made in us
Clousseau




The first 18 months of AOS were probably the most fun I've had with AOS. The company stepped back from producing actual rules and points and let the community handle it.
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




UK

auticus wrote:
The first 18 months of AOS were probably the most fun I've had with AOS. The company stepped back from producing actual rules and points and let the community handle it.


I recall it being a general mess and mostly the community was either in denial - shock - stress or was just using the joke rules as best they could with points from the last edition of Warhammer along with some cobbling of points for Stormcast.

That said nothing stops you going back and using those rules. That's the thing, match play exists but you can totally sue the jovial joke rules if you want. Or you can make your own if you want too - of course getting a local club to accept them over the formal current rules might be harder.

A Blog in Miniature

3D Printing, hobbying and model fun! 
   
Made in us
Clousseau




My thing was more that the community could create points and rule packs and that there was traction for that to happen.

The balance was infinitely better and the game felt like it could go anywhere because it was unbeholden to "meta" and the fan points were very fast to correct any OP garbage that made its way out.

The community in 2015 / 2016 had also not fully turned over to the CCG synergy stacking spike builds yet.
   
Made in ca
Fixture of Dakka




John Prins wrote:
Davor wrote:

I read his post differently. When he said requested, I am thinking he is asking. Yeah it's one thing to say someone else how to play, but he said regular opponent so that means to me they play a few times against each other using normal rules so he is asking this one time not to. Nothing wrong in asking. Demanding, yes. If the Original Poster is demanding and not asking then yeah he is being unreasonable.


Dunno if you saw the title and first post before the mods edited them.


No I did not. I didn't know it was edited. Thank you for pointing that out.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/04/17 15:02:07


Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.

Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?

Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong".  
   
Made in us
Stubborn Temple Guard






Since the AoS app is free, and everyone has a smart phone, you have all the applicable things from your army book.

Battlescribe is also free.

You are being unreasonable by constraining your opponent through your lack of effort.

27th Member of D.O.O.M.F.A.R.T.
Resident Battletech Guru. 
   
 
Forum Index » Warhammer: Age of Sigmar
Go to: