Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2023/03/26 01:37:33
Subject: Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Ultramarines are better than your favorite Chapter and get gak done, unlike your homebrew Chapter with obnoxious background.
|
|
|
|
2023/03/26 02:21:50
Subject: Re:Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
I started playing Ultramarines because they were blue.
|
|
|
|
|
2023/03/26 07:37:01
Subject: Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
Strg Alt wrote:FezzikDaBullgryn wrote:Aside from having a primarch, they are not even close to the most played, or most beloved of the Astartes by the player base. But they get two back to back Editions as the primary Faction. I get they are just a blank slate, but I'd like to know why they chose Ultramarines Vs Leviathan, over Blood Angels vs Leviathan, or even Space Wolves? Ultras just seem an odd choice as the primary faction.
Could it be a tie in with Space Marine 2?
Who else should be the face of 40K? Rainbow Warriors?
Not so sure about the "face of 40k" - that's kinda Space Marines as a whole - but for box covers they could do what they did back in t'day and rotate between three of the big four for them (Space Wolves often got left out of this, as they had their own special units instead).
|
2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG
My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...
Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.
Kanluwen wrote:This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.
Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...
tneva82 wrote:You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling. - No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... |
|
|
|
2023/03/26 15:07:46
Subject: Re:Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
Confessor Of Sins
|
Love the Ultramarine or hate the Ultramarines, blue is the world's favorite color. Got to have that blue army front and center for the flagship army of your flagship product
|
|
|
|
2023/03/26 15:59:17
Subject: Re:Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Bob bob-bob-bob be dang-i-dang dang be ding-i-ding ding Blue dudes
Blue dudes, blue dudes
Dip-di-dip
Blue blue blue dudes...
But seriously folks, I'm not sure I agree that Ultras are the poster boys. They're high in the rotation, sure. But while Marines are always poster children, I'd say the specific chapter changes often enough, and there are a lot of avenues to consider when determining what "Poster faction" might even mean... For example, try telling a WH+ subsrciber that Ultras and not BA are the poster faction.
|
|
|
|
2023/03/26 17:00:01
Subject: Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
Ancient Venerable Dreadnought
|
Funny thing is I've never played against ultras nor have seen anyone locally playing them in general.
I'd like to keep it that way...
|
|
|
|
2023/03/26 20:15:06
Subject: Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
FezzikDaBullgryn wrote:Aside from having a primarch, they are not even close to the most played, or most beloved of the Astartes by the player base. But they get two back to back Editions as the primary Faction. I get they are just a blank slate, but I'd like to know why they chose Ultramarines Vs Leviathan, over Blood Angels vs Leviathan, or even Space Wolves? Ultras just seem an odd choice as the primary faction.
Could it be a tie in with Space Marine 2?
I think blue is a good marketing Color, and they are bland enough that they have the broadest appeal. Since i don't play marines, i don't really care !
|
|
|
|
2023/03/26 22:22:13
Subject: Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Yes.
|
|
|
|
2023/03/27 00:29:24
Subject: Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
The Marine Standing Behind Marneus Calgar
|
I would prefer that the Ultras didn’t have so much of the spotlight that it generate random hate on the internet.
There are a number of legitimate reasons it’s them. They are the stock marine template, blue stands out and is easy to paint, and it makes sense to have a uniform stock posterboy.
But especially after 5th edition and Matt Ward’s hyperbole, the vitriol thrown at the Ultras has reached self-reinforcing meme levels, and really need to take a step back.
|
|
|
|
|
2023/03/27 08:42:48
Subject: Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
I’m far more sick of essays about someone’s random dislike of a company’s marketing, that will in no way change said marketing because of their essay. That they haven’t seen. And isn’t based on anything other than “I’m bored”.
|
Stormonu wrote:For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules" |
|
|
|
2023/03/27 09:08:54
Subject: Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Considering that kids are a big part of the target audience for new players I think it makes sense. They look like captain America robots fighting but inspections monsters. Very cool. If you e been in 40K for ages and got into the dark lore of a universe on fire the I don’t know what appeal the UMs have for you. But you are already in, and you can paint those models any colour you want
|
|
|
|
2023/03/27 09:50:46
Subject: Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
Mekboy Hammerin' Somethin'
|
Someone's got to be the poster child, why not let it be Ultramarines?
They're the "generic or vanilla" SM choice in the same way that Cadians are for AM or Goffs tend to be for Orks.
I'd rather it be UM over something like Blood Angels or Space Wolves.
|
|
|
|
2023/03/27 15:33:23
Subject: Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
Terrifying Doombull
|
Aash wrote:nou wrote:Ultramarines being posterboys has nothing to do with their lore or how easy or difficult it is to paint them. The sole reason are the roots of 40K, which started as a satire, which was reflected not only in the lore, but also in naming convention. This is how we got Obiwan Sherlock Clousseau, Mag Uruk Thrakka or Sly Marbo. And Marines that were so marine, that one could even call them Ultra Marines and to stress their flawless nature they paint themselves using ultramarine pigment. TLDR, they will forever be posterboys because of a single bad pun.
That sounds good, but doesn’t really match up with the origins of 40K. The cover art in Rogue Trader were Crimson Fists, the 2nd Ed box art was Blood Angels, and 3rd Edition launched with Black Templars. Ultramarines weren’t on the starter set until 4th edition.
Yeah, what's fun is if you really dig into their RT history (particularly from the Warhammer Siege hardcover, which had fantasy and 40k rules): they were a provisional chapter until really late (like m39 late) and considered untrustworthy. They didn't become a real Space Marine chapter until they took McCragge from the Tyranids (it wasn't their 'home world'). Some of the concepts involved in their history just plain don't exist anymore.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2023/03/27 15:34:32
Efficiency is the highest virtue. |
|
|
|
2023/03/27 16:02:21
Subject: Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Once Pedro Kantor gets up-scaled we'll get the OG poster children back... (huffs hopium)
|
|
|
|
2023/03/27 19:30:43
Subject: Re:Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
Perfect Shot Black Templar Predator Pilot
|
Whoever it was they would have to be blue as well.
|
|
|
|
|
2023/03/27 20:02:00
Subject: Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Tittliewinks22 wrote:Once Pedro Kantor gets up-scaled we'll get the OG poster children back... (huffs hopium)
I'd argue the only scale up that failed was Shrike, so Pedro being redone is more than welcome.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2023/03/27 20:02:18
|
|
|
|
2023/03/27 21:03:02
Subject: Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
Ridin' on a Snotling Pump Wagon
|
No.
[roll credits]
|
|
|
|
|
2023/03/27 23:54:29
Subject: Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
Malicious Mutant Scum
|
Just think of all the Blood Angels fanbois that thought they were going to get some serious face time LOL!
|
|
|
|
2023/03/28 11:34:08
Subject: Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
Nihilistic Necron Lord
|
EviscerationPlague wrote:Tittliewinks22 wrote:Once Pedro Kantor gets up-scaled we'll get the OG poster children back... (huffs hopium)
I'd argue the only scale up that failed was Shrike, so Pedro being redone is more than welcome.
I’d say Shrike was done better than Khan. Looking at the army box where they’re the only one on foot is kind of hilariously bad.
|
|
|
|
|
2023/03/28 11:57:12
Subject: Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
Boosting Space Marine Biker
|
H.B.M.C. wrote:Because Blood Angels have a bunch of unique units. Ultramarines do not.
Robute Guilliman
Marneus Calgar
Tiguris
Cassius
Chronus
Telion
Cato Sicarius
Tyranic War Veterans
Vitrix Guard
They also have minis for:
Chapter champion,
Chapter ancient,
Honour Guard
And unfortunately discontinued, but still awesome
Land Raider: Terminus Ultra
|
|
|
|
2023/03/28 13:47:39
Subject: Anyone sick of Ultras being the posterchildren for Astartes?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Siegfriedfr wrote:FezzikDaBullgryn wrote:Aside from having a primarch, they are not even close to the most played, or most beloved of the Astartes by the player base. But they get two back to back Editions as the primary Faction. I get they are just a blank slate, but I'd like to know why they chose Ultramarines Vs Leviathan, over Blood Angels vs Leviathan, or even Space Wolves? Ultras just seem an odd choice as the primary faction.
Could it be a tie in with Space Marine 2?
I think blue is a good marketing Color, and they are bland enough that they have the broadest appeal. Since i don't play marines, i don't really care !
That´s true about blue. You won´t offend anyone with it. Red is too aggressive and putting Space Wolf models in a starter is counterproductive as it deters Little Timmys fom buying into the hobby as they detest uncouth savages. Give them a friendly smiling smurf and they will be happy until the local cheating TFG tables them.
|
|
|
|
|