2006 UK Grand Tournament FAQ...

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Ghaz**

Posted By Toreador 08/18/2006 10:27 AM
Ah, another RAW thing. Again we have skimmed the rule and took it as a unit may attack any unit in base to base instead of a meaning "one" and so have been playing since this edition came out that they could split attacks.

Please read page 45 of the Warhammer 40,000 4th edition rulebook under the heading Multiple Combats. You will see that we did not 'skim the rulebook' nor did we misinterpret the rules. They are exactly as we have already stated. An Independent Character can not split attacks by the wording in the rulebook.

**Oaka**

@ barontuman,

Q: Can an independent character join a unit before deployment (e.g. in a droppod)?

A: Yes

It's a doozy of a rule change. Karandras can now infiltrate with his unit. Independent Characters can now deepstrike with units. But like I mentioned, there is no way to figure out how you make a reserves roll for a unit that is composed of two separate choices on the FOC. Let alone how this affects transports (Farseer attached to a banshee squad in a falcon?).

- Oaka

**mauleed**

Karandas and the infiltrating 30 man seer council.

Go Team GW!

**Oaka**

Fortunately I don't think Karandras can be taken to the UK GT because he is one of the older special characters that needs opponent's permission, yes?

- Oaka

**Toreador**

Everyone is so willing to argue. Even what I said seemed clear to me, but was interpreted different.

Our group skimmed and assumed. Not you!

Yikes!

**DaIronGob**

Everyone is so willing to argue. Even what I said seemed clear to me, but was interpreted different.

Our group skimmed and assumed. Not you!

Yikes!

Welcome to dakkadakka, please wipe your feet.

**Toreador**

Been here for years, that is exactly the reason I don't post much

**Longshot**

At least most of the Dakka toughguys will read your post before slamming you.

**Ghaz**

Our group skimmed and assumed. Not you!

Like I said, we did not skim or assume. That is key if you are going to discuss the rules.