Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/11/09 16:38:40
Subject: Is my opponent cheating? or 'Frekin Bloodletters
|
 |
Khorne Rhino Driver with Destroyer
|
I've been a slave to my CSM for ever and have a regular opponent who has turned to the darkside. He has begun to field a CSM army of his own now!
This is where it gets tricky. He fields a huge amount of daemons.
2 x 6bloodletters
1 x 20bloodletters
1 x Skarbrand
1 x Daemon Prince
all summoned...
Needless to say by the third turn all my units have been assaulted and are dead or in combat. Fielding Zerkers is pointless now as they are the first to get eaten (I know! Their blood too is welcome). So what should I do?
The issue lies in whether he is fielding a CSM army with Daemon Army allies or is he fielding a Daemon army with CSM allies. As there are no official ally rules he's just pasting me by playing a CSM army with summoned Daemons from the Daemons Army codex! That's 96 power weapons!!!!!!!!
Frekin' Bloodletters!
|
All praise the Omnissiah! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/11/09 16:43:29
Subject: Re:Is my opponent cheating? or 'Frekin Bloodletters
|
 |
Pete Haines
Nottingham
|
CSM armies can't take allies from the Daemon codex. Daemon armies can't take allies from the CSM codex. CSMs get their own, much less powerful lesser daemons. Tell him to take one codex or the other; there's a reason you can't use both (they'd be too good!).
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/11/09 16:44:07
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/11/09 16:44:15
Subject: Re:Is my opponent cheating? or 'Frekin Bloodletters
|
 |
Pauper with Promise
|
If he is running this as a Chaos Space Marines list along with regular marines he is cheating.
That list you left looks perfectly playable as a Daemons army though.
If you run a Chaos army yourself, have a codex, how can you not find this answer yourself?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/11/09 17:43:36
Subject: Is my opponent cheating? or 'Frekin Bloodletters
|
 |
Khorne Rhino Driver with Destroyer
|
Cheers dudes. You have echoed my own thoughts!
I should add my opponent also fields
1 x Lucious
1 x CSM unit
3 x Obli
1 x Dreadnaught
Maybe as a house rule he could take bloodletters and other daemons but at higher points cost or no summoning! Hmmmm
It does seem silly that a CSM army can't also field cult daemons...
|
All praise the Omnissiah! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/11/09 18:08:07
Subject: Is my opponent cheating? or 'Frekin Bloodletters
|
 |
Eternally-Stimulated Slaanesh Dreadnought
|
Rochronos wrote:I've been a slave to my CSM for ever and have a regular opponent who has turned to the darkside. He has begun to field a CSM army of his own now!
This is where it gets tricky. He fields a huge amount of daemons.
2 x 6bloodletters
1 x 20bloodletters
1 x Skarbrand
1 x Daemon Prince
all summoned...
Needless to say by the third turn all my units have been assaulted and are dead or in combat. Fielding Zerkers is pointless now as they are the first to get eaten (I know! Their blood too is welcome). So what should I do?
The issue lies in whether he is fielding a CSM army with Daemon Army allies or is he fielding a Daemon army with CSM allies. As there are no official ally rules he's just pasting me by playing a CSM army with summoned Daemons from the Daemons Army codex! That's 96 power weapons!!!!!!!!
Frekin' Bloodletters!
Rules As Written he's not allowed to combine armies. the simplest solution here is to just tell him he can't do that. however if you want to stay on better terms with your friend and have a more enjoyable experience I think you should just try to beat what he's throwing at you, because the army he's running is fluffy and not at all broken. when berserkers fight bloodletters its all about the charge. I think you should look to your unique characteristics as a csm player to handle his army - he's good in close combat but has hardly any shooting. a couple of csm squads running around in rhinos with flamers will make short work of all those blood letters. use your flexibility to beat him, in other words, by shooting him to pieces at range and finishing up in close combat. skarbrand is obviously the priority target for your heavy weapons since he makes the whole army go berserk and he's a really strong fighter in his own right.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/11/09 19:44:33
Subject: Is my opponent cheating? or 'Frekin Bloodletters
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
Looks more like he's running a Demon army and the OP is confusing them with CSM.
Eric
|
Black Fiend wrote: Okay all the ChapterHouse Nazis to the right!! All the GW apologists to the far left. LETS GET READY TO RUMBLE !!!
The Green Git wrote: I'd like to cross section them and see if they have TFG rings, but that's probably illegal.
Polonius wrote: You have to love when the most clearly biased person in the room is claiming to be objective.
Greebynog wrote:Us brits have a sense of fair play and propriety that you colonial savages can only dream of.
Stelek wrote: I know you're afraid. I want you to be. Because you should be. I've got the humiliation wagon all set up for you to take a ride back to suck city.
Quote: LunaHound--- Why do people hate unpainted models? I mean is it lacking the realism to what we fantasize the plastic soldier men to be?
I just can't stand it when people have fun the wrong way. - Chongara
I do believe that the GW "moneysheep" is a dying breed, despite their bleats to the contrary. - AesSedai
You are a thief and a predator of the wargaming community, and i'll be damned if anyone says differently ever again on my watch in these forums. -MajorTom11 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/11/09 19:54:59
Subject: Is my opponent cheating? or 'Frekin Bloodletters
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
MagickalMemories wrote:Looks more like he's running a Demon army and the OP is confusing them with CSM. Eric Yes but then he posted this Cheers dudes. You have echoed my own thoughts! I should add my opponent also fields 1 x Lucious 1 x CSM unit 3 x Obli 1 x Dreadnaught Maybe as a house rule he could take bloodletters and other daemons but at higher points cost or no summoning! Hmmmm It does seem silly that a CSM army can't also field cult daemons... which you cannot take with demons. OP : Id say no to the house rule. If you allow him to use both codices then he will not only continue to be playing wrong, but be kicking your ass. Tell him if he wants to keep on taking that list, then you are now allowed to take 6HQ choices as your army, and take the BEST hq from any codex you choose. Id say Abbaddon/Calgar/Mephiston/Ghazkull would be a nice start anyways. (edited so many times because Im slightly slowed lol)
|
This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2010/11/09 19:56:33
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/11/09 20:04:03
Subject: Is my opponent cheating? or 'Frekin Bloodletters
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Remember that if you or your opponent are planning on using two Force Organization Charts, then you have two take a minimum of four Troops choices, or two from each, which tends to balance for all the extra HQ and Heavy Support by sucking up points.
Furthermore remember that only Summoned Lesser Daemons and Summoned Greater Daemons can assault in the turn they arrive from reserves, while no Chaos Daemons can do so.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/11/09 20:18:42
Subject: Is my opponent cheating? or 'Frekin Bloodletters
|
 |
Eternally-Stimulated Slaanesh Dreadnought
|
I think the house rule would be ok. the combined army is good but its not broken. it makes sense in the context of the fluff and its just a game anyway.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/11/09 20:26:04
Subject: Re:Is my opponent cheating? or 'Frekin Bloodletters
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Well if you house rule it, and make sure he has to follow BOTH FOC on the armies sure its fine. Hell Ive played against someone doing something similar with a really fluffy SM army he made up.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/11/09 20:30:51
Subject: Is my opponent cheating? or 'Frekin Bloodletters
|
 |
Dispassionate Imperial Judge
|
The problem here, is I remember correctly, is that when you use the Summoning rules in the CSM codex, your daemons can charge on the turn their summoned, you also HAVE to use an Icon to summon them, and they never scatter. You'll get a huge bonus if you're using these rules, but with Codex: Daemons units. Part of the CC effectiveness of Codex Daemons is offset by the fact that they can't assault on the turn they are summoned - if your friend is summoning them just like CSM lesser daemons then he's getting a huge advantage that shouldn't be there. I'd get him to play by the bloody rules. If you DO want to take both Daemons and CSM in the army, play it as a 'mutiple detachment' game - two FOCs for two armies. But remember that the Daemon army will be using the Daemon codex rules - can't assault on the turn they arrive, always scatters and uses Deep Strike rules, half the army turns up on turn 1 etc.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2010/11/09 20:37:57
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/11/09 20:33:13
Subject: Is my opponent cheating? or 'Frekin Bloodletters
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
KingCracker wrote:
Yes but then he posted this
Cheers dudes. You have echoed my own thoughts!
I should add my opponent also fields
1 x Lucious
1 x CSM unit
3 x Obli
1 x Dreadnaught
Maybe as a house rule he could take bloodletters and other daemons but at higher points cost or no summoning! Hmmmm
It does seem silly that a CSM army can't also field cult daemons...
What?
How DARE you expect me to read past the first post!!!!
You are SOOO close to being reported!
Eric
|
Black Fiend wrote: Okay all the ChapterHouse Nazis to the right!! All the GW apologists to the far left. LETS GET READY TO RUMBLE !!!
The Green Git wrote: I'd like to cross section them and see if they have TFG rings, but that's probably illegal.
Polonius wrote: You have to love when the most clearly biased person in the room is claiming to be objective.
Greebynog wrote:Us brits have a sense of fair play and propriety that you colonial savages can only dream of.
Stelek wrote: I know you're afraid. I want you to be. Because you should be. I've got the humiliation wagon all set up for you to take a ride back to suck city.
Quote: LunaHound--- Why do people hate unpainted models? I mean is it lacking the realism to what we fantasize the plastic soldier men to be?
I just can't stand it when people have fun the wrong way. - Chongara
I do believe that the GW "moneysheep" is a dying breed, despite their bleats to the contrary. - AesSedai
You are a thief and a predator of the wargaming community, and i'll be damned if anyone says differently ever again on my watch in these forums. -MajorTom11 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/11/09 21:45:54
Subject: Re:Is my opponent cheating? or 'Frekin Bloodletters
|
 |
Waaagh! Warbiker
|
Well, just remeber Skarbrand lets you re-roll aswell!
|
"Da Mek'z tinker nd do their job
The boys 'll smash yah, so will da Nob
The Bos 'll stompa till your dead
Snikrot 'll kill ya wiff is hands behind is 'ead!"
^^^^ Ode to Snikrot, the Sneakiest, Stabbiest, Morkiest, Kommando to ever walk the face of whoever looked at him funny! Tourne W/D/L 6/0/0 Public W/D/l 24/2/8 All with my orksof course
squidhills wrote:It is for the same reason that Chaplains wear black: so that they will be inherantly more awesome than the guy in blue, and thus the purity of the Chapter is assured.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/11/09 23:06:31
Subject: Is my opponent cheating? or 'Frekin Bloodletters
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Tell him to use the summoned daemon profiles in the CSM codex. None of this hellblade nonsense!
|
There's just an acre of you fellas, isn't there? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/11/09 23:25:56
Subject: Is my opponent cheating? or 'Frekin Bloodletters
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
MagickalMemories wrote:KingCracker wrote:
Yes but then he posted this
Cheers dudes. You have echoed my own thoughts!
I should add my opponent also fields
1 x Lucious
1 x CSM unit
3 x Obli
1 x Dreadnaught
Maybe as a house rule he could take bloodletters and other daemons but at higher points cost or no summoning! Hmmmm
It does seem silly that a CSM army can't also field cult daemons...
What?
How DARE you expect me to read past the first post!!!!
You are SOOO close to being reported!
Eric
That would be the most epic reason to report someone
"BUT...... BUT........ he posted something I missed!"
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/11/16 07:52:42
Subject: Re:Is my opponent cheating? or 'Frekin Bloodletters
|
 |
Guard Heavy Weapon Crewman
California Central coast
|
He is not following the rules but if your fine with than why not. I would go with more bolters and if you hid your squads in cover they will be able to attack before the bloodletters attack.
|
TEAM ZERO COMP
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/11/16 09:09:43
Subject: Is my opponent cheating? or 'Frekin Bloodletters
|
 |
Wicked Canoptek Wraith
|
ArbitorIan wrote:The problem here, is I remember correctly, is that when you use the Summoning rules in the CSM codex, your daemons can charge on the turn their summoned, you also HAVE to use an Icon to summon them, and they never scatter. You'll get a huge bonus if you're using these rules, but with Codex: Daemons units. Part of the CC effectiveness of Codex Daemons is offset by the fact that they can't assault on the turn they are summoned - if your friend is summoning them just like CSM lesser daemons then he's getting a huge advantage that shouldn't be there. I'd get him to play by the bloody rules. If you DO want to take both Daemons and CSM in the army, play it as a 'mutiple detachment' game - two FOCs for two armies. But remember that the Daemon army will be using the Daemon codex rules - can't assault on the turn they arrive, always scatters and uses Deep Strike rules, half the army turns up on turn 1 etc. Where does it say that CSM daemons can charge on the turn they are summoned? -EDIT- Just looked through my friends codex and I just saw sorry must have missed that page
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2010/11/16 09:12:37
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/11/16 15:28:01
Subject: Re:Is my opponent cheating? or 'Frekin Bloodletters
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I'm going to agree with most of the other posters.
This is not allowed in a standard 40k game. You can't mix-and-match across multiple codexes, even if they are "allies". Would your friend be okay with you fielding IG tanks or Long Fangs in a BA army?
If you want to allow this, go right ahead. Play an apocalypse game. But, both players should be aware that they're playing apoc. You can't have 1 player fielding apoc and the other player not
|
|
|
 |
 |
|