Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2021/08/01 19:03:15
Subject: Re:What should 40k's tone be?
|
|
Dakka Veteran
|
AnomanderRake wrote:Vatsetis wrote:Lets take a real world regime that is near Fascism and Catholic rigorism... both of which are heavy inspiration for the IOM... Franco´s Spain.
Those this mean that the IOM is a sci-fi space version of Franco´s Spain? ... not at all.
Satirical fiction and political science are not the same medium.
The tone of 40K should be as satirical as possible... obviously you cant remain as edgy as in the 80´s, but dont pretend either that the 40K setting is something that can be taken with a full straight face.
I'm glad to see a common shorthand for "brutal totalitarian regime that habitually commits war crimes and treats its people as expendable resources" has prompted so much discussion on whether the specific term "fascism" is technically accurate.
The term fascism in it self is very problematic both in academic and common live use. This has always been the case but it is even more problematic today.
Which shouldnt surprise anyone since in many parts of the world today we have very storng extreme right wing political movements that at least share some of the most prominent elements of classical fascism (even doe they dont self describe as fascist nor are a carbon copy of the 30´s fascist regimes).
|
|
|
|
2021/08/01 19:03:57
Subject: Re:What should 40k's tone be?
|
|
Splattered With Acrylic Paint
|
How do I turn off emails for this specific thread?
|
There is only the Emperor, and he is our shield and protector. |
|
|
|
2021/08/01 19:09:02
Subject: What should 40k's tone be?
|
|
Calculating Commissar
pontiac, michigan; usa
|
Nobody is saying the Imperium is 100% good. In fact all sides are bad. It is a grim dark setting after all. Most of the aliens are racists or evil too. Don't necrons view things that way and previously they were soulless robots. Eldar view other species as lesser and sacrifice millions or billions to save a handful of their own. Dark eldar torture others to extend their life and have husks for souls. Nids are just hungry. Tau have a lot more subtlety with their mind control, brainwashing and castration of some citizens. Chaos is basically selling your soul for power and is in many ways self destructive and does a lot of awful stuff.
Oh and orks just have fun fighting and killing everything.
Everything in the universe of 40k is bad or violent or just about.
-----
@matoro99: did you see my suggestion earlier a post or two ago?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2021/08/01 19:10:50
Join skavenblight today!
http://the-under-empire.proboards.com/ (my skaven forum) |
|
|
|
2021/08/01 20:01:50
Subject: What should 40k's tone be?
|
|
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar
|
CthuluIsSpy wrote:I don't know how it is nowadays, but my professors told me not to use wikipedia as a primary source and to dig deeper. I take it my teachers were in poor form?
Emphasis on primary source. Wikipedia *is* incredibly useful in academic work as a repository for other primary sources. Yes, never cite your work as coming from Wikipedia, but you'd be foolish if you didn't see the use of Wikipedia in locating primary sources which you *can* quote from. I don't think people in this thread are claiming to use Wikipedia as a primary source, only that dismissing it "because Wikipedia" is equally myopic.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2021/08/01 20:02:22
They/them
|
|
|
|
2021/08/01 20:13:33
Subject: What should 40k's tone be?
|
|
Dakka Veteran
Dudley, UK
|
In response to a subthread that started out with a poster who had not done any source reading citing "somebody told me" as a basis from which to argue with the scholarship and spawned such spicy takes as "No True Fascism" no less...
All that said, I think that how the game's various media *addresses* the spectre of fascism and other authoritarianism is pretty important to hitting the right tone for 40k in terms of whether it's doing something interesting and subversive, or just pedalling Triumph Of The Will nazi tripe in spaaaace.
|
|
|
|
2021/08/01 20:48:15
Subject: What should 40k's tone be?
|
|
Assassin with Black Lotus Poison
|
flamingkillamajig wrote:Eldar view other species as lesser and sacrifice millions or billions to save a handful of their own.
So does the Imperium. Dark eldar torture others to extend their life and have husks for souls.
So does the Imperium. How many people are sacrificed daily to fuel the Emperors chair? Tau have a lot more subtlety with their mind control, brainwashing and castration of some citizens.
The Imperium also does all of this. Chaos is basically selling your soul for power and is in many ways self destructive and does a lot of awful stuff.
See Space Marines. Also, the Inquisition. So everything bad that the other species in 40k do, the Imperium does on top of all of the other awful stuff it does. It is effectively the combination of all of the bad traits of every other species in the setting, plus some extra on top.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2021/08/01 20:51:18
The Laws of Thermodynamics:
1) You cannot win. 2) You cannot break even. 3) You cannot stop playing the game.
Colonel Flagg wrote:You think you're real smart. But you're not smart; you're dumb. Very dumb. But you've met your match in me. |
|
|
|
2021/08/01 21:13:13
Subject: Re:What should 40k's tone be?
|
|
Stubborn Dark Angels Veteran Sergeant
|
There is no good/pure faction in 40k, and that is the tone, and the tone that should be maintained, with it's injections of satirical humour here and there. The best human characters the lore has ever created are all flawed anti-heroes who are guaranteed to cross the line.
The imperium is arguably the worst faction, though in regards to the best of the rest, it is not the Eldar or the Tau. The Eldar because they are just as fascist as the imperium, whilst the tau's experimentation on their own populace is only not on par with the imperium due to not having the same amount of population.
|
My hobby instagram account: @the_shroud_of_vigilance
My Shroud of Vigilance Hobby update blog for me detailed updates and lore on the faction:
Blog |
|
|
|
2021/08/01 21:17:19
Subject: What should 40k's tone be?
|
|
Ork Admiral Kroozin Da Kosmos on Da Hulk
|
Orks view every other species as guys worth fightin'. Except when they are weedy, then they are enslaved or killed or blown up.
Dark eldar torture others to extend their life and have husks for souls.
So does the Imperium. How many people are sacrificed daily to fuel the Emperors chair?
Orks fight and kill each other when bored or for other trivial reasons. They also like to sacrifice others to see if a new gubbin' works or just for the explosion.
Tau have a lot more subtlety with their mind control, brainwashing and castration of some citizens.
The Imperium also does all of this.
If you don't listen to your boss, he will punch you in the face or stomp on your head.
Chaos is basically selling your soul for power and is in many ways self destructive and does a lot of awful stuff.
See Space Marines. Also, the Inquisition.
Orks are self-destructive to go fasta, fly higher, have more dakka or get more scrap. Also their psykers (and vehicles, some guns and also some melee weapons) can pretty much explode at any moment and are just roughly pointed in the correct direction.
So everything bad that the other species in 40k do, the Imperium does on top of all of the other awful stuff it does. It is effectively the combination of all of the bad traits of every other species in the setting, plus some extra on top.
So do orks. Except they are doing it for their enjoyment.
|
7 Ork facts people always get wrong:
Ragnar did not win against Thrakka, but suffered two crushing defeats within a few days of each other.
A lasgun is powerful enough to sever an ork's appendage or head in a single, well aimed shot.
Orks meks have a better understanding of electrics and mechanics than most Tech Priests.
Orks do not think that purple makes them harder to see. They do think that camouflage does however, without knowing why.
Gharkull Blackfang did not even come close to killing the emperor.
Orks can be corrupted by chaos, but few of them have any interest in what chaos offers.
Orks do not have the power of believe. |
|
|
|
2021/08/01 21:32:10
Subject: What should 40k's tone be?
|
|
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
Labelling everything in 40k as 'fascist' is remarkably reductive.
|
|
|
|
|
2021/08/01 21:58:13
Subject: What should 40k's tone be?
|
|
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
H.B.M.C. wrote:Labelling everything in 40k as 'fascist' is remarkably reductive.
Wild over-generalizations and reductive statements in an Internet argument? Who would ever have thought?
|
|
|
|
|
2021/08/01 21:58:56
Subject: Re:What should 40k's tone be?
|
|
[MOD]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
Cozy cockpit of an Imperial Knight
|
Given the amount of reports this thread is generating and the round and round nature of the discussion, I've decided to lock this thread, we have well reached JAM levels right now and I'd rather not see this go FLOPSY BUNNY.
Let's stay CAKEY, okay?
|
Fatum Iustum Stultorum
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
|
|
|
|
|