Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/22 15:58:23
Subject: Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Furious Fire Dragon
|
Does a Warlock attached to a Guardians unit cost as an HQ choice? I'm assuming it does, but I just wanted to make sure.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/22 16:11:45
Subject: Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Fighter Pilot
|
See the codex - it is a unit upgrade.
You can take Warlocks as an HQ choice provided you have a Farseer, but a Warlock is not necessarily an HQ.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/22 16:20:13
Subject: Re:Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
A warlock bought for a guardian squad does NOT take up a HQ slot on the FOC.
He is also part of a troop choice, so if he's the only surviving member of the squad, he can capture objectives.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/22 23:31:59
Subject: Re:Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Furious Fire Dragon
|
So then he wouldn't count as a separate KP either, right?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/22 23:43:52
Subject: Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Anti-Armour Swiss Guard
|
Nope.
Models bought as upgrades to units are not a separate kill point. They are part of the unit they are bought for.
A Warlock from the HQ unit CANNOT be attached to another unit (they are NOT ICs) anyway.
|
I'm OVER 50 (and so far over everyone's BS, too).
Old enough to know better, young enough to not give a ****.
That is not dead which can eternal lie ...
... and yet, with strange aeons, even death may die.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/24 14:32:24
Subject: Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Furious Fire Dragon
|
chromedog wrote:A Warlock from the HQ unit CANNOT be attached to another unit (they are NOT ICs) anyway.
So a warlock brought in as an IC ( HQ unit), and then attached to a unit - banshees, for example - would count as a separate KP? Not that you'd probably do it this way, but could you attach a warlock ( IC) to a unit of guardians? Is it basically like the dedicated transport, where it doesn't take up a slot in the FOC? If the guardians are all killed off, does the warlock become an IC?
Wel, I think I've gone well beyond what would probably happen in a game  , but I'm just curious now.
Thanks!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/24 15:12:12
Subject: Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
mars2024 wrote:So a warlock brought in as an IC (HQ unit)...
As has already been noted, a Warlock is not an Independent Character.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/24 15:40:38
Subject: Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Furious Fire Dragon
|
Right, sorry, I just looked it up - they're a squad (3 to 10 models). So ICs (farseer, autarch, ect.) can attach to them. They can just cast onto a nearby unit (ie banshees), but not actually join them. I think I get it now.
Thanks everyone.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/24 16:57:44
Subject: Re:Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Infiltrating Oniwaban
|
Warlocks can't "cast" anything onto another unit except Destructor and that's a flamer template usable only on enemy units.
|
The Imperial Navy, A Galatic Force for Good. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/24 17:09:30
Subject: Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Furious Fire Dragon
|
So all the powers only apply to the warlock's unit. And that's only guardians and any ICs attached to the warlock unit.
Grr. Honest - I have read the codex. Obviously, I need a refresher.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/24 18:45:32
Subject: Re:Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Infiltrating Oniwaban
|
Yep. And apart from Destructor they are always "on."
|
The Imperial Navy, A Galatic Force for Good. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/24 19:25:37
Subject: Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Deadly Dire Avenger
|
My understanding is they can only join another unit if said unit is allowed the upgrade i.e Guardians. I don't think they can join Banshees. When they come in squads it is for the purpose of attaching them to their relevant HQ choice i.e Farseer/jet council.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/24 19:40:40
Subject: Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
Technically, Destructor is also always "on", it just isn't used except in your Shooting phase. Oc, running around with a template perma-attached to a warlock to simulate Destructor always being on, would make for an interesting game.
|
Greebo had spent an irritating two minutes in that box. Technically, a cat locked in a box may be alive or it may be dead. You never know until you look. In fact, the mere act of opening the box will determine the state of the cat, although in this case there were three determinate states the cat could be in: these being Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
Orks always ride in single file to hide their strength and numbers.
Gozer the Gozerian, Gozer the Destructor, Volguus Zildrohar, Gozer the Traveler, and Lord of the Sebouillia |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/24 21:24:22
Subject: Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Furious Fire Dragon
|
neilvicks wrote:My understanding is they can only join another unit if said unit is allowed the upgrade i.e Guardians. I don't think they can join Banshees.
Right.
neilvicks wrote:When they come in squads it is for the purpose of attaching them to their relevant HQ choice i.e Farseer/jet council.
So then I could have a list that has an Autarch, Farseer, and Warlock squad - if the warlocks were attached to the Farseer (or Autarch) without violating FOC?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/24 21:33:52
Subject: Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Monstrous Master Moulder
Sacramento, CA
|
mars2024 wrote:
So then I could have a list that has an Autarch, Farseer, and Warlock squad - if the warlocks were attached to the Farseer (or Autarch) without violating FOC?
Yes, and it is not in fact necessary to attach an IC to the warlock squad. Having a Farseer in your army allows you to buy a Warlock squad, one warlock squad per farseer. The warlock squads don't count against the number of HQ choices you are allowed to use. Most players attach the farseer (who is an IC) to the warlocks but it's entirely permissible to run them as separate units. This is a change from the previous codex in which the Warlock squad was a retinue, which forced the Farseer to join them if you bought them and wouldn't let him leave.
|
Agitator noster fulminis percussus est |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/24 22:31:19
Subject: Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Furious Fire Dragon
|
Raxmei wrote:Yes, and it is not in fact necessary to attach an IC to the warlock squad. Having a Farseer in your army allows you to buy a Warlock squad, one warlock squad per farseer. The warlock squads don't count against the number of HQ choices you are allowed to use. Most players attach the farseer (who is an IC) to the warlocks but it's entirely permissible to run them as separate units. This is a change from the previous codex in which the Warlock squad was a retinue, which forced the Farseer to join them if you bought them and wouldn't let him leave.
So the Warlock squad is a 'free' unit?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/24 23:11:25
Subject: Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
More or less. It is an HQ unit that does not use an FOC slot, similar to a dedicated transport (at least, a DT for an HQ choice anyway).
|
Greebo had spent an irritating two minutes in that box. Technically, a cat locked in a box may be alive or it may be dead. You never know until you look. In fact, the mere act of opening the box will determine the state of the cat, although in this case there were three determinate states the cat could be in: these being Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
Orks always ride in single file to hide their strength and numbers.
Gozer the Gozerian, Gozer the Destructor, Volguus Zildrohar, Gozer the Traveler, and Lord of the Sebouillia |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/26 20:18:05
Subject: Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Deadly Dire Avenger
|
As above, but you wouldn't really want the Farseer running around without them IMO.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/26 20:48:29
Subject: Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
- The warlock squad doesn't take up an FAQ slot buy for all other purposes counts as an HQ choice.
- The farseer is an IC so it can attach to a diff squad then thw warlocks i you take them.
- the warlock that can be take with guardians or heavy support weapons counts as a member of that unit, so thw warlock w the guardian troops counts a a troop. It can not leave the sqaud.
- warlock power are innate and do not require a psychic test to use. Their powers, except deateutor obviously, only work on the group they are member of.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/03 22:59:46
Subject: Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Furious Fire Dragon
|
So could you attach a Farseer (with Warlock retinue) to another unit? I don't know if you'd ever do such a thing, but that might make Banshees, or one of the other elites more interesting.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/03 23:26:18
Subject: Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
The Hive Mind
|
Warlocks are not a retinue I'm pretty sure.
And even if they were, an IC loses the IC status while his retinue is still alive.
|
My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/03 23:28:45
Subject: Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Heroic Senior Officer
|
mars2024 wrote:So could you attach a Farseer (with Warlock retinue) to another unit? I don't know if you'd ever do such a thing, but that might make Banshees, or one of the other elites more interesting.
Given that the Warlocks are not a retinue, the Farseer can join the Warlocks just as an IC can join a unit. Of course, once he does so, he is part of that unit and can only join another unit by leaving the first unit. So no, A Farseer joined to Warlocks cannot merge both Warlocks and Banshees into a single uber-unit.
|
Don "MONDO"
www.ironfistleague.com
Northern VA/Southern MD |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/03 23:41:06
Subject: Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
[DCM]
Tilter at Windmills
|
Exactly.
Historical Trivia: Back in 3rd edition, there was an expansion booklet for Codex: Eldar called Codex: Craftworld Eldar, containing special lists for Beil-Tan, Iyanden, Alaitoc and Saim-Hann craftworlds. Iyanden had an option to take IC Warlock Wraithseers. Which helped nearby Wraith units, but had no restriction preventing them from joining other squads, and they coould take the normal Warlock powers. Enhance on a unit of Banshees or Scorpions was nasty.
|
Adepticon 2015: Team Tourney Best Imperial Team- Team Ironguts, Adepticon 2014: Team Tourney 6th/120, Best Imperial Team- Cold Steel Mercs 2, 40k Championship Qualifier ~25/226
More 2010-2014 GT/Major RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 78-20-9 // SW: 8-1-2 (Golden Ticket with SW), BA: 29-9-4 6th Ed GT & RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 36-12-2 // BA: 11-4-1 // SW: 1-1-1
DT:70S++++G(FAQ)M++B++I+Pw40k99#+D+++A+++/sWD105R+++T(T)DM+++++
A better way to score Sportsmanship in tournaments
The 40K Rulebook & Codex FAQs. You should have these bookmarked if you play this game.
The Dakka Dakka Forum Rules You agreed to abide by these when you signed up.
Maelstrom's Edge! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/03 23:44:36
Subject: Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Monstrous Master Moulder
Sacramento, CA
|
mars2024 wrote:So could you attach a Farseer (with Warlock retinue) to another unit? I don't know if you'd ever do such a thing, but that might make Banshees, or one of the other elites more interesting.
You can attach a Farseer to whatever squad you like but not the warlocks. Since the warlocks are not themselves ICs they can't join other units. If the Farseer ends movement within coherency of both a warlock squad and a banshee squad his player has to declare which one he's joining. See also rigeld2's post about the warlocks not being a retinue, and how even if they were that would prevent the farseer from joining other squads while they still lived.
There was a brief period of time in which the Craftworld codex gave Iyanden spiritseers IC status, but that was quickly taken away in errata. When that rule was still in effect it did allow warlocks to join aspect squads.
|
Agitator noster fulminis percussus est |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/05 05:35:58
Subject: Re:Warlock attached to Guardians
|
 |
Nervous Accuser
|
Also in the 3rd normal 'dex, and this is when i think some confusion may be coming from, you would separate a warlock from the counsel to lead a guardian squad, similar to how cryptecks work now. But this is not the case in the 4th ed book, guardian and waithguard warlocks are sergeants, nothing more.
|
|
 |
 |
|