Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Battle Report - 1850 Grey Knights VS Daemons - Warhammer 40k - South Mississippi Gamers
In this match up Jkpz28's Grey Knights from SMG called out Pat's Daemons from SMG. These 2 know there armies very well and both armies were painted plus the terrain was all painted. We hope in the future to be able to give you quality battle reports with table top painted armies and terrain. So any recommendations or questions please leave the comments below. Please subscribe to our channels and The 19th Legions on YouTube.

http://southmsgamers.blogspot.com/2013/06/battle-report-1850-grey-knights-vs.html

Good game. Kind of funny to see, I ran a similar Daemons list against almost an identical GK build, and used the exact opposite strategy. I kited Draigowing and killed everything else. My only real complaint, it would be nice to know which unit had the Grimoire buff on the recaps (assuming Pat took it, and if he didn't.....he should), and to know where FW's reroll got used. Strange to see a FMC getting grounded to fairly limited shooting in a FW Army (possible, just not super common).

Pat, you should consider a Lash Prince or a LoC over the Thirster, they're just better utility units. (Lash Prince for legit anti air and more biomancy/telepathy, LoC for shooting, divination buffs, and he's actually better in assault than a Thirster most of the time)