Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

So it's time to start gearing up my WarGamesCon army and getting it ready for June. Traditionally I take what the internet considers a "weaker" army. Last year it was tyranids and I ended up doing fairly well. So please place your votes, write ins welcome.

try blood angels

You should design your list using your own comp rules. Go pure dark eldar.

Tyranids! Let's make them work.

In the next tournament after the LVO, I'm probably going to take my bugs out.

 Dozer Blades wrote:
You should design your list using your own comp rules. Go pure dark eldar.

Why would I apply rules for one tournament to another?

@jy2: Nids are looking tempting. I'm still trying to find a good way to balance them though. I think I need more synapse than the old book.

I would go for the most expensive so you can prove your 2" manliness.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
2" is the roughly the size of the average trooper.

Imperial Guard

PanzerLeader wrote:

 Dozer Blades wrote:
You should design your list using your own comp rules. Go pure dark eldar.

Why would I apply rules for one tournament to another?

@jy2: Nids are looking tempting. I'm still trying to find a good way to balance them though. I think I need more synapse than the old book.

It would show your dedication to your lofty ideals.

 Dozer Blades wrote:

PanzerLeader wrote:

 Dozer Blades wrote:
You should design your list using your own comp rules. Go pure dark eldar.

Why would I apply rules for one tournament to another?

@jy2: Nids are looking tempting. I'm still trying to find a good way to balance them though. I think I need more synapse than the old book.

It would show your dedication to your lofty ideals.

Hah. I don't know if its worth the dollar investment for me because I don't really like the DE look/fluff, but it'd be something like:

Archon, Shadowfield, Huskblade, Combat Drugs
6x Incubi, Raider, Night Shield, Flicker Field
5x Warriors, Blaster, Venom w/dual splinter cannons
5x Warriors, Blaster, Venom w/dual splinter cannons
5x Warriors, Blaster, Venom w/dual splinter cannons
5x Warriors, Blaster, Venom w/dual splinter cannons
20x Warriors, 2x Dark Lance, Raider
20x Warriors, 2x Dark Lance, Raider
Ravager, Night Shield, Flicker Field
Ravager, Night Shield, Flicker Field
Beast Pack, 4x Beastmaster, 18x Khymerae

Thats 1851 right now so I'd have to play with the stats a little but should be easy to tweak. And no allies, per your request. Doesn't really seem weak to me though. 16 Dark Lance shots that can split at 7 targets, ridicilous amounts of poison 4+ weapons, a decent counter assault unit in the Archon/Incubi, and a major disruption unit in the 4++ beast pack. Should also still be a 20 in comp. No triplicates in heavy/fast/elite, all below the points treshhold. And the troops are well above the minimum.

Looks pretty darn good to me!