Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I havent had a chance to get the 7th ed rule book yet, but did they change anything about Ord. weapons/Heavy tanks, or anything to justify the point vaules of the LRBT and Demolisher?

Nope, nothing changed as far as I'm aware.

damage to vehicles now requires AP2 or AP1, or open topped to get explosions. so ordnance went into 6th and lost their own vehicle damage chart with big explosion possibilities, then into 7th where a battlecannon can only wreck a vehicle, it can't explode it. demolishers are much better at anti-tank now.

They still suck, go for the other ones

As far as I know the ord rule no longer says anything about having to snapfire hull weapons.

Can anyone correct me? Don't have the book near me.

 Las wrote:
As far as I know the ord rule no longer says anything about having to snapfire hull weapons.

Can anyone correct me? Don't have the book near me.

If this is true, gimme dat Demolisher with las/MM right meow.

 Smokeydubbs wrote:

 Las wrote:
As far as I know the ord rule no longer says anything about having to snapfire hull weapons.

Can anyone correct me? Don't have the book near me.

If this is true, gimme dat Demolisher with las/MM right meow.

It isn't true so don't get your hopes up.