Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Wow! While I would be inclined to complain when one of my threads takes comes to such a screeching halt, this thread has clearly turned into the Best Thing Ever. It's like bran muffin day in the primate pavilion.

To Mortis: nobody likes a shill. I will counteract your counteraction by noting that Mortis is a stupid name and that you are primarily composed of delicous ham.

To 5deadly: you've missed the point. The point is over there. You cannot reach it from where you are standing. Here's the thing- we don't like White Dwarf, and we aren't buying it. While you were working out your incredible theory of "don't buy White Dwarf" using your advanced space math, we came to the same conclusion, intuitively, a long time ago. Here's what everybody but you managed to get out of this thread: (1) we don't like WD (2) we aren't buying it (3) GW is in the toilet and has limited resources (4) GW has bigger problems than the quality of WD (5) why not sacrifice WD in order to make improvements elsewhere. Note how "well then don't buy GW wargames" fails to address any of these points. Flush the sand out of your weepy man-gina and make logical posts instead of just d6ing it.

@Nyarlathotep- You just keep using the one you got, po'bucker. They don't wear out.

 

mmmmm... ham...

I think white dwarf should be written by burnthexenos, with new rules for everyone.