Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

This is that bottom. Whether its the internet, a cesspool, or a barrel bottoms are important.

Aww, thanks I cherish your comments, too.

It's been said ITT that Miley Cyrus is two steps short of a porn star. I say, that's two steps too many.

Manchu wrote:

This is that bottom. Whether its the internet, a cesspool, or a barrel bottoms are important.

Aww, thanks I cherish your comments, too.

It's been said ITT that Miley Cyrus is two steps short of a porn star. I say, that's two steps too many.

And don't worry, I'll stay classy.

orkmoticonwithsunglasses

Eagerly awaiting the inevitable downward spiral and nude photos or sex tape, preferably co starring me.
I was hot for the Olsen twins too...until they were legal. Maybe Miley can keep my heart.

But yeah, I'd hit MC.

AustonT wrote:I was hot for the Olsen twins too...until they were legal.

Look, I get that girls who are not 18 can be hot. But this one I never got. All I ever saw was "Michelle." As a little kid, I thought "that baby" looked like a troll doll. Growing up, my opinion of them didn't change. I guess I do understand the purity fetish.

Miley isn't very pretty, either, really. Earlier, C_t_U posted a pic of her in latex pants and high heels and ... I'm sure she had some kind of top on. Frankly, there's not much to write home about above the waist. The only reason her posing in sexy clothing is sexy is because she was also labeled PURE. I have a feeling teenage boys won't give half a gak about her if she brags about weed or sex. But that's the sort of thing teenage girls love.

DSL, I guess, right.

It's called growing with your audience, as others here have pointed out. As for being crude, hell, we're talking about a meat market. This chick is never going to give our culture Hamlet or the Divine Comendy.

I guess I do understand the purity fetish.

I think that's where you're going wrong in understanding it.

Extrapolate, oh terse one.

Don't you know? If it's under a paragraph Shuma is clearly just joking.

I don't like to assume with Shuma. He may be prickly but I still enjoy reading his barbs, which often contain more than poison, and so don't particularly mind when they're directed my way.

Manchu wrote:
Miley isn't very pretty, either, really. Earlier, C_t_U posted a pic of her in latex pants and high heels and ... I'm sure she had some kind of top on. Frankly, there's not much to write home about above the waist. The only reason her posing in sexy clothing is sexy is because she was also labeled PURE.

While agree she's not as hot as say someone like Scarlett Johansson, Christina Hendrix, 80's Cassandra Peterson, etc I would say she's still bangable though.

MORE than poison you say?

Cheesecat wrote:I would say she's still bangable though.

No argument. And bangability's what we selling/buying here, just so there's no confusion or frustrated expectations.

Cheesecat wrote:

Samus_aran115 wrote:Boo-hoo. I say good riddance. She's the daughter of a two-bit, no talent hick. She's notoriously promiscuous (remember when she was grinding all over an older man, uh, when she was SEVENTEEN?) and has in general lost her way.

How much older was the guy? Because most women seem to prefer men who are older than them.

I'm not sure but I do know that my college psychology teacher made a compelling argument for why there are such things as cougars...

Apparently its biologically more favorable for older women to be coupled with younger men...

Manchu wrote:I don't like to assume with Shuma. He may be prickly but I still enjoy reading his barbs, which often contain more than poison, and so don't particularly mind when they're directed my way.

It wasn't a bard, general attraction to underage celebs like Miley is more of a debasement and dirtyness thing. It's not an individual being attracted to snow white. When the Olsens wore rave gear and pasties that stuff exploded. That said it's always very personal so its subject to change.

Crossed wires. I was referring to the sexiness of "corruption" requiring a fetish for purity. You've got to put something on a pedestal before you can knock it off to smash on the floor.

Manchu wrote:Crossed wires. I was referring to the sexiness of "corruption" requiring a fetish for purity. You've got to put something on a pedestal before you can knock it off to smash on the floor.

Is "smash it on the floor" what we are calling what we want to see happen to Ms.Cyrus?

Manchu wrote:

Cheesecat wrote:I would say she's still bangable though.

No argument. And bangability's what we selling/buying here, just so there's no confusion or frustrated expectations.

I disagree. Thats not selling.

She had talent as a child star. Some her recent music is quite good (at least in comparison to other dross). A better method is to actually sing well vs. the stupid Keisha route which lleads to oblivion within a year.

Manchu wrote:Crossed wires. I was referring to the sexiness of "corruption" requiring a fetish for purity. You've got to put something on a pedestal before you can knock it off to smash on the floor.

Ahh, nevermind then. Looks like we're on the same page.

Singing well or being talented hasn't played a role in popular music for probably 30+ years.

AustonT wrote:MORE than poison you say?

I also throw in salt and prickly needles!

I want to bang her, and bang a load of other girls too, but they must all have saved themselves and be pure as snow for me, unknown by man - otherwise they are WHORES!



Internet logic.

Howard A Treesong wrote:I want to bang her, and bang a load of other girls too, but they must all have saved themselves and be pure as snow for me, unknown by man - otherwise they are WHORES!



Internet logic.

Corruption and debasement is a fetish as old as man! They wrote about that gak before they had math.

Cannerus

Its my fantas...eerrrrr.....drea...no......thoughts...and when my thoughts are in charge then their LEATHER PANTS!!

why do I get a feeling some of you all would turn down a 18 yrs old advance?......sh's no where near beer goggle status

ShumaGorath wrote:

AustonT wrote:MORE than poison you say?

I also throw in salt and prickly needles!

how does one put needles into a barb...
NVM, I'll just go with it.
I think he meant you also have salient points in there somewhere, which I can attest to seeing on occasion.

Ahtman wrote:Singing well or being talented hasn't played a role in popular music for probably 30+ years.

Respectfully, while sadly often the case, that doesn't account for many, if not most.

U2
Rolling Stones
Norah Jones
Metallica
Michael Jackson

Sure...
but would Aretha Franklin make it today? I'm sure I could think of more but that requires more effort than Im willing to allow for.

AustonT wrote:Sure...
but would Aretha Franklin make it today? I'm sure I could think of more but that requires more effort than Im willing to allow for.

You betcha. There's always been pasty top 40 crap, and there's always been teeny boppper crap, and there's always been Wilson Pickett in the wilderness.

Frazzled wrote:

Ahtman wrote:Singing well or being talented hasn't played a role in popular music for probably 30+ years.

Respectfully, while sadly often the case, that doesn't account for many, if not most.

U2
Rolling Stones
Norah Jones
Metallica
Michael Jackson

I didn't say there were no talented people in the industry, just that it doesn't really matter. I wish I could remember who said it (either a Rolling Stone or Ringo Starr?) that the difference in the music industry today and from when they started was that if they approached a label with a new artist back then they would ask to hear them, but today they would ask to see them.

Howard A Treesong wrote:

Samus_aran115 wrote:Boo-hoo. I say good riddance. She's the daughter of a two-bit, no talent hick. She's notoriously promiscuous (remember when she was grinding all over an older man, uh, when she was SEVENTEEN?) and has in general lost her way.

I don't think you know what 'promiscuous' means, but you are young and seem to be a particularly delicate flower.

Promiscuous (Adj.): Characterized by or involving indiscriminate mingling or association, especially having sexual relations with a number of partners on a casual basis.