Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2012/01/08 14:13:43
Subject: How can this possibly actually be a point of contention?
Most christians are not against evolution or science. Its representative of a few who have extremist views, like branding all muslims terrorists because the people who flew into the WTC were muslims.
Evolution should be taught not just because its a scientific view, but also because both religion and science agree on it. It's a little thing called not taking the bible literally and applying it for issues within our times. Just sometimes people take it too far.
This exactly, there are many people of varying faiths in the UK yet we manage to teach evolution and science in general.
2012/01/08 14:20:37
Subject: Re:How can this possibly actually be a point of contention?
Why are these women asked such a question? I believe in evolution, but I think that they should have asked from someone else expect some fashion models.
Evolution and sciences should be taught in school because in the future I want my planes, bridges and power stations designed by people who can make them work. I want my doctors to understand biology so they can cure my illness.
I've got nothing against aspects of religion being taught in schools within the context of history, sociology and philosophy. I know there is an issue in the USA about religion in public schools.
The problem with taht Kilkrazy is we get nutjobs like the pieces of feces disguised as human beings amonst the Texas Board of Education that basically try to remove non-religious people from history and lie about the religious beliefs of others. The US' founding fathers come to mind.
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog
2012/01/08 21:47:00
Subject: Re:How can this possibly actually be a point of contention?
BlapBlapBlap wrote:This man has no idea that heat cannot pass through a vacuum, does he?
Wait, are you saying that heat can't pass through a vacuum?
Heat is a very dodgy word to use in the context of physics, if you use "heat" to mean thermal energy then it can't travel through a vacuum as it is a property of matter whereas if you use "heat" to mean infra-red radiation then it obviously can.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/01/08 22:28:38
2012/01/08 22:32:49
Subject: How can this possibly actually be a point of contention?
BlapBlapBlap wrote:This man has no idea that heat cannot pass through a vacuum, does he?
Wait, are you saying that heat can't pass through a vacuum?
Heat is a very dodgy word to use in the context of physics, if you use "heat" to mean thermal energy then it can't travel through a vacuum as it is a property of matter whereas if you use "heat" to mean infra-red radiation then it obviously can.
I was thinking the same thing.
Otherwise that sunlight wouldn't be helping much, moving across ~96 million miles of vacuum.
Drink deeply and lustily from the foamy draught of evil.
W: 1.756 Quadrillion L: 0 D: 2
Haters gon' hate.
2012/01/09 00:23:26
Subject: How can this possibly actually be a point of contention?
I think the point biccat was making is that heat normally refers to the property of matter rather than infra-red radiation which is simply the wavelength of electromagnetic radiation often emitted by hot things so obviously heat itself cannot travel in a vacuum.
2012/01/09 01:37:55
Subject: How can this possibly actually be a point of contention?
Melissia wrote:The problem with taht Kilkrazy is we get nutjobs like the pieces of feces disguised as human beings amonst the Texas Board of Education that basically try to remove non-religious people from history and lie about the religious beliefs of others. The US' founding fathers come to mind.
Oh look, it's Melissa. Fancy a cheese with that vintage?
Avatar 720 wrote: You see, to Auston, everyone is a Death Star; there's only one way you can take it and that's through a small gap at the back.
Powder Burns wrote:what they need to make is a fullsize leatherman, like 14" long folded, with a bone saw, notches for bowstring, signaling flare, electrical hand crank generator, bolt cutters..
2012/01/09 01:41:21
Subject: How can this possibly actually be a point of contention?
Warboss Gutrip wrote:Tell them they're wrong, watch them jump up and down in protest
But seriously, this is ridiculous. People this stupid should not be idolized.
In all fairness, pageant models aren't people. They're told they're people, they're made to act like people, hell, they may even think they're people, but they're not people.
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/01/09 01:53:10
2012/01/09 05:15:07
Subject: How can this possibly actually be a point of contention?
Warboss Gutrip wrote:People this stupid should not be idolized.
I follow celebrity gossip and pop culture more than is healthy, and I couldn't tell the name of any recent pageant winner.
They're not idolized, and I doubt many of them respond to questions in an honest fashion.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
DickBandit wrote:
Most of the women gave a straightforward response and did bring up the point that the Theory of Evolution is still changing today.
I think the objection is that a number of them made some variation of the "Its just a theory." argument which, as arguments about evolution go, is about the worst one.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/01/09 05:33:58
Life does not cease to be funny when people die any more than it ceases to be serious when people laugh.
2012/01/09 05:45:55
Subject: How can this possibly actually be a point of contention?
Might as well ask them if the Theory of Gravity should be taught. As others have mentioned. Or whether the "God holds everything down" theory should be taught alongside it.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/01/09 05:46:29
Adepticon 2015: Team Tourney Best Imperial Team- Team Ironguts, Adepticon 2014: Team Tourney 6th/120, Best Imperial Team- Cold Steel Mercs 2, 40k Championship Qualifier ~25/226
More2010-2014 GT/Major RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 78-20-9 // SW: 8-1-2 (Golden Ticket with SW), BA: 29-9-4 6th Ed GT & RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 36-12-2 // BA: 11-4-1 // SW: 1-1-1
DT:70S++++G(FAQ)M++B++I+Pw40k99#+D+++A+++/sWD105R+++T(T)DM+++++ A better way to score Sportsmanship in tournaments The 40K Rulebook & Codex FAQs. You should have these bookmarked if you play this game.
The Dakka Dakka Forum Rules You agreed to abide by these when you signed up.
And pretty much only issues from someone who isn't scientifically literate.
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog
2012/01/09 09:00:49
Subject: How can this possibly actually be a point of contention?
Melissia wrote:The problem with taht Kilkrazy is we get nutjobs like the pieces of feces disguised as human beings amonst the Texas Board of Education that basically try to remove non-religious people from history and lie about the religious beliefs of others. The US' founding fathers come to mind.
Oh look, it's Melissa. Fancy a cheese with that vintage?
Are you suggesting it's actually a good thing to try and cast history in a manner that's consistent only with your religious beliefs, regardless of the reality of it?
That seems a perfectly valid thing to complain about.
2012/01/09 09:35:24
Subject: How can this possibly actually be a point of contention?
Evolution = Evidence based observation Creationism = Faith.
Science has built the Computer you write you posts on, the internet, your car, your life, everything!. Literally everything mankind has built with mathematics science and engineering, faith creates nothing tangible. Churches are not built by faith, but by money and engineering, by a powerbase giving their money to organisation on the basis of an unspoken tacit agreement they will be ok in the afterlife.
I love discussing religion with so called religious people, who quote the bible. I mean 90% of them don't know about Constantine's changes, and the council of Nicene and the numerous missing books. Man is fallible, Man wrote the Bible, therefore Bible is equally fallible. They often say "Oh wow, thats why that prayer is called the Nicene creed".
We don't understand life , the universe or consciousness completely but lack of evidence at this time doesn't mean we should automatically assume it is evidence of a deity.
To fly in the face of all mankinds achievements, and to have the audacity to write up an anti-scientific standpoint on a PC/MAC/Laptop(built by engineers) on the Internet (Built by scientists) is the ultimate in not understanding the weaknesses in their own argument. I have at least some respect for the Amish in this regard.
Flying spaghetti monster FTW.
This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2012/01/09 09:41:46
Collecting Forge World 30k????? If you prefix any Thread Subject line on 30k or Pre-heresy or Horus Heresy with [30K] we can convince LEGO and the Admin team to create a 30K mini board if we can show there is enough interest!
2012/01/09 10:03:49
Subject: How can this possibly actually be a point of contention?
Mannahnin wrote:Might as well ask them if the Theory of Gravity should be taught. As others have mentioned. Or whether the "God holds everything down" theory should be taught alongside it.
Mannahnin wrote:Might as well ask them if the Theory of Gravity should be taught. As others have mentioned. Or whether the "God holds everything down" theory should be taught alongside it.
That's the theory of Intelligent Falling.
That genuinely amused me.
Collecting Forge World 30k????? If you prefix any Thread Subject line on 30k or Pre-heresy or Horus Heresy with [30K] we can convince LEGO and the Admin team to create a 30K mini board if we can show there is enough interest!
2012/01/09 13:52:20
Subject: How can this possibly actually be a point of contention?
BlapBlapBlap wrote:This man has no idea that heat cannot pass through a vacuum, does he?
Wait, are you saying that heat can't pass through a vacuum?
Uh, yes? It's proven by this crazy thing called Physics.
Having an engineering degree that involved at least 6 credits of Heat Transfer, I'm going to go ahead and assume you don't know what you're talking about.
I've never understood religious arguments against evolution, as an agnostic. There is no reason that evolution can't co-exist as a tool deployed by God to do exactly what was intended, like a shell script. Who are these people, to claim to know the will of God? Where were they, when He created the universe? I mean, when even the Pope doesn't see a problem with this line of thought, then you're just trolling.
Well, someday those mice will have it figured out, and then it will be a moot point.
lord_blackfang wrote: Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.
Flinty wrote: The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock
2012/01/09 14:32:31
Subject: Re:How can this possibly actually be a point of contention?
mattyrm wrote: I was impressed that the last chick (Miss Minnesota?) knew about Jean Paul II's views on evolution though!
Minnesota! Woot!
We have a reputation for quality education for a reason!
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Ouze wrote:I've never understood religious arguments against evolution, as an agnostic. There is no reason that evolution can't co-exist as a tool deployed by God to do exactly what was intended, like a shell script. Who are these people, to claim to know the will of God? Where were they, when He created the universe? I mean, when even the Pope doesn't see a problem with this line of thought, then you're just trolling.
Because if you are a biblical "Literalist" i.e. everything in the Bible is absolute truth and not just an alagory, you can not allow Evolution to stand, because all creatures were created by God "exactly" the way they were now. Or something like that....
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/01/09 14:37:18
Support Blood and Spectacles Publishing:
https://www.patreon.com/Bloodandspectaclespublishing
2012/01/09 15:45:47
Subject: How can this possibly actually be a point of contention?
How can 300 years of scientific progess since the renaissance be right when it stands against the weight of a book written by desert dwelling cow sacrificing zealots.
More have died in the name of normality than ever for strangeness. Beware of normal people.
He who asks a question is a fool for 5 minutes; He who does not is a fool forever. (Confucius).
How can 300 years of scientific progess since the renaissance be right when it stands against the weight of a book written by desert dwelling cow sacrificing zealots.
Mithrians?
Your knowledge of obscure religious tradition is heartening. I now have hope for America's future.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/01/09 15:51:03
Avatar 720 wrote: You see, to Auston, everyone is a Death Star; there's only one way you can take it and that's through a small gap at the back.
Powder Burns wrote:what they need to make is a fullsize leatherman, like 14" long folded, with a bone saw, notches for bowstring, signaling flare, electrical hand crank generator, bolt cutters..