Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2017/01/30 18:32:31
Subject: Re:PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Well thanks to PETA you must pull off all those velum purity seals from every single space marine you own!
|
|
|
|
2017/01/30 18:32:59
Subject: Re:PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Member of a Lodge? I Can't Say
|
Their president protests against animal-based life saving medication (going so far as to literally state that people should be denied that medication) yet she herself is a diabetic that uses insulin.
Just a petty gripe from someone in pharmacy here - insulin hasn't been derived from animals for a while now, it's all made using bacteria with the right genes inserted.
|
I prefer to buy from miniature manufacturers that *don't* support the overthrow of democracy. |
|
|
|
2017/01/30 19:05:32
Subject: Re:PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Posts with Authority
|
Um... might want to rephrase that.
What do you do if you see a space wolf or stormcast model wearing fur, anyway? Throw a pot of Tamiya clear red over it?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/01/30 19:05:47
|
|
|
|
2017/01/30 19:10:54
Subject: Re:PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Why? There have been documented incidents of PETA workers euthanizing people's pets that were taken as "strays."
|
|
|
|
2017/01/30 19:18:06
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
?
It's still there. There might have been one of those double post corrections that happen from time to time.
Link: https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/716033.page#9169882
|
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
|
|
|
|
2017/01/30 19:42:46
Subject: Re:PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Posts with Authority
|
DarkTraveler777 wrote:
Why? There have been documented incidents of PETA workers euthanizing people's pets that were taken as "strays."
I mean, I'd rather they didn't stick to it.
|
|
|
|
|
2017/01/30 19:46:13
Subject: Re:PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Vermis wrote: DarkTraveler777 wrote:
Why? There have been documented incidents of PETA workers euthanizing people's pets that were taken as "strays."
I mean, I'd rather they didn't stick to it.
Sarcasm detector on the fritz?
|
|
|
|
2017/01/30 20:00:45
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Ship's Officer
|
I'm currently working on my night lords characters ATM, imagining a grin on the night hunter's face when he reply to PETAs request, "I will oblige, but I am cold, so so cold!"
|
|
|
|
2017/01/30 20:08:26
Subject: Re:PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Shade of Despair and Torment
|
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________
. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ,.-‘”. . . . . . . . . .``~.,
. . . . . . . .. . . . . .,.-”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .“-.,
. . . . .. . . . . . ..,/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ”:,
. . . . . . . .. .,?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\,
. . . . . . . . . /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,}
. . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`^`.}
. . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:”. . . ./
. . . . . . .?. . . __. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :`. . . ./
. . . . . . . /__.(. . .“~-,_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`. . . .. ./
. . . . . . /(_. . ”~,_. . . ..“~,_. . . . . . . . . .,:`. . . . _/
. . . .. .{.._$;_. . .”=,_. . . .“-,_. . . ,.-~-,}, .~”; /. .. .}
. . .. . .((. . .*~_. . . .”=-._. . .“;,,./`. . /” . . . ./. .. ../
. . . .. . .\`~,. . ..“~.,. . . . . . . . . ..`. . .}. . . . . . ../
. . . . . .(. ..`=-,,. . . .`. . . . . . . . . . . ..(. . . ;_,,-”
. . . . . ../.`~,. . ..`-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..\. . /\
. . . . . . \`~.*-,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|,./.....\,__
,,_. . . . . }.>-._\. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|. . . . . . ..`=~-,
. .. `=~-,_\_. . . `\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
. . . . . . . . . .`=~-,,.\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `:,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . `\. . . . . . ..__
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .`=-,. . . . . . . . . .,%`>--==``
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _\. . . . . ._,-%. . . ..`\
|
|
|
|
|
2017/01/30 20:21:22
Subject: Re:PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Flashy Flashgitz
|
The best reply would be saying "Well, we can't get rid of the fur, 'cos in 40k mankind is made up of complete donkey-caves and wearing fur is part of that". But best reaction would be to just ignore thouse retards.
|
|
|
|
2017/01/30 20:40:22
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Good to know nobody here actually supports PETA.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
|
|
2017/01/30 20:41:56
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Militant Hippyism never works. See also: Greenpeace.
|
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
|
|
|
|
2017/01/30 20:43:55
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Ancient Space Wolves Venerable Dreadnought
|
It's all the fault of the Beastmen and Wulfen - how DARE they wear fur...
|
I don't break the rules but I'll bend them as far as they'll go. |
|
|
|
2017/01/30 21:13:18
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Keeper of the Holy Orb of Antioch
avoiding the lorax on Crion
|
Id be happy if GW dis not send a letter in 40k style with stamps declaring it no, we shall not.
All printed up nicely and made as... Got to send classy letters to utter idiots.
Id be more disappointed if they caved in. Just no...
|
Sgt. Vanden - OOC Hey, that was your doing. I didn't choose to fly in the "Dongerprise'.
"May the odds be ever in your favour"
Hybrid Son Of Oxayotl wrote:
I have no clue how Dakka's moderation work. I expect it involves throwing a lot of d100 and looking at many random tables.
FudgeDumper - It could be that you are just so uncomfortable with the idea of your chapters primarch having his way with a docile tyranid spore cyst, that you must deny they have any feelings at all. |
|
|
|
2017/01/30 21:18:03
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Road-Raging Blood Angel Biker
|
Man, it would be great if the Regimental Standard did an article tomorrow about PETT, People for the Ethical Treatment of Tyranids, doing some kind of protest of some sort. There were no survivors.
|
|
|
|
2017/01/30 21:20:15
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Keeper of the Holy Orb of Antioch
avoiding the lorax on Crion
|
Lol.. I like how they take offense of fenris wolves...
A wolf that's most deadly hunter going, capable of killing a power armoured marine.
And that's defenceless creature lol.
|
Sgt. Vanden - OOC Hey, that was your doing. I didn't choose to fly in the "Dongerprise'.
"May the odds be ever in your favour"
Hybrid Son Of Oxayotl wrote:
I have no clue how Dakka's moderation work. I expect it involves throwing a lot of d100 and looking at many random tables.
FudgeDumper - It could be that you are just so uncomfortable with the idea of your chapters primarch having his way with a docile tyranid spore cyst, that you must deny they have any feelings at all. |
|
|
|
2017/01/30 21:56:10
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Fresh-Faced New User
Ireland
|
|
|
|
|
2017/01/30 22:10:47
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
Imagine you are in the middle of a game at your local store and a PITA character pops in and drenches your minis in a bucket of red paint!
Hilarity ensues.
|
|
|
|
2017/01/30 22:17:57
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Must say that I used to have a favorable opinion of PETA. Turns out that they are a bunch of imbeciles. How ridiculous and absurd Automatically Appended Next Post:
Lol Greatness
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/01/30 22:20:39
lost and damned log
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/519978.page#6525039 |
|
|
|
2017/01/30 22:31:44
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Crazed Spirit of the Defiler
Newcastle
|
As utterly ridiculous as this is, it does make me nervous that triggered snowflakes are paying attention to 40k. Hopefully GW ignore this crap and it goes no further
|
Hydra Dominatus |
|
|
|
2017/01/30 22:32:09
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Hallowed Canoness
|
This is one of the dumbest thing I ever saw.
PETA makes their usual publicity stunt, and the usual ultra-thin skinned people lose their gak.
Gamers in general (mostly video game and apparently wargaming too) seem to have no shortage of ultra-thin skinned people who need to grow up a bit, mature, stop failing for the most obvious of baits, and not go into full unbridled fury at the slightest perceived offense…
|
"Our fantasy settings are grim and dark, but that is not a reflection of who we are or how we feel the real world should be. [...] We will continue to diversify the cast of characters we portray [...] so everyone can find representation and heroes they can relate to. [...] If [you don't feel the same way], you will not be missed"
https://twitter.com/WarComTeam/status/1268665798467432449/photo/1 |
|
|
|
2017/01/30 22:35:30
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Considering what PETA just did I have a lot of objections with calling this petition one of the dumbest thing ever
|
lost and damned log
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/519978.page#6525039 |
|
|
|
2017/01/30 22:37:30
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Hallowed Canoness
|
Snake Tortoise wrote:As utterly ridiculous as this is, it does make me nervous that triggered snowflakes are paying attention to 40k. Hopefully GW ignore this crap and it goes no further
If there are triggered snowflakes involved, it's definitely those that wrote, signed, and took that petition seriously. That got to be the most absurd thing ever. GW is known for NOT engaging into any meaningful conversation with its fanbase. They would never listen to any petition, and you should know it. Especially not a petition that asks them to do something that could only hurt from a PR statement. PETA is doing this kind of publicity stunts all the freaking time. Don't you remember the Pokemon one? And the Mario one? And the other Pokemon one? And… They do it because it works. It works because thin-skin outraged gamers spread the word far and loud. Automatically Appended Next Post: streetsamurai wrote:Considering what PETA just did I have a lot of objections with calling this petition one of the dumbest thing ever
PETA's publicity stunt, while not very clever, definitely is much more cunning and efficient at reaching their goal than that literally useless and pitiful (66 needed to reach 100 LOLOLOL) petition is.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/01/30 23:03:59
"Our fantasy settings are grim and dark, but that is not a reflection of who we are or how we feel the real world should be. [...] We will continue to diversify the cast of characters we portray [...] so everyone can find representation and heroes they can relate to. [...] If [you don't feel the same way], you will not be missed"
https://twitter.com/WarComTeam/status/1268665798467432449/photo/1 |
|
|
|
2017/01/30 22:42:40
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Keeper of the Holy Orb of Antioch
avoiding the lorax on Crion
|
Hybrid Son Of Oxayotl wrote: Snake Tortoise wrote:As utterly ridiculous as this is, it does make me nervous that triggered snowflakes are paying attention to 40k. Hopefully GW ignore this crap and it goes no further
You are the one posting internet petitions asking for GW (of all companies…) to make a public statement against PETA. If there are triggered snowflakes involved, you definitely are among the most triggered. Unless you were posting the petition on jest while not supporting it …
Seriously, that got to be the most absurd thing ever. GW is known for NOT engaging into any meaningful conversation with its fanbase. They would never listen to any petition, and you should know it. Especially not a petition that asks them to do something that could only hurt from a PR statement. PETA is doing this kind of publicity stunts all the freaking time. Don't you remember the Pokemon one? And the Mario one? And the other Pokemon one? And… They do it because it works. It works because thin-skin outraged gamers spread the word far and loud.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
streetsamurai wrote:Considering what PETA just did I have a lot of objections with calling this petition one of the dumbest thing ever
PETA's publicity stunt, while not very clever, definitely is much more cunning and efficient at reaching their goal than that literally useless and pitiful (66 needed to reach 100 LOLOLOL) petition is.
Not a irrational reaction.
All they need to send is a polite neatly made up no letter to Peta.
No fuss, no anger just a firm refusal.
|
Sgt. Vanden - OOC Hey, that was your doing. I didn't choose to fly in the "Dongerprise'.
"May the odds be ever in your favour"
Hybrid Son Of Oxayotl wrote:
I have no clue how Dakka's moderation work. I expect it involves throwing a lot of d100 and looking at many random tables.
FudgeDumper - It could be that you are just so uncomfortable with the idea of your chapters primarch having his way with a docile tyranid spore cyst, that you must deny they have any feelings at all. |
|
|
|
2017/01/30 22:50:59
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Hallowed Canoness
|
jhe90 wrote:All they need to send is a polite neatly made up no letter to Peta.
No fuss, no anger just a firm refusal.
What a great idea! So that then, the media can write tons of article about it, giving PETA more publicity, and encouraging them to that kind of things again.
I mean, great idea if you are a PETA supporter. If you are a PETA hater, that's the dumbest idea ever. Personally I'm quite neutral toward PETA, but I am completely appalled by how thin-skinned AND short-sighted PETA haters that want to promote that petition are.
Because if you looked at all the stuff we could petition GW to do, and you decided the most important was not terrible price, not terrible rules and imbalances, not the canning of a whole game (RIP WFB), but answering on your behalf to a publicity stunt, you DEFINITELY need to grow a thicker skin, and try to learn to ignore trolls.
Also still 66 needed .
|
"Our fantasy settings are grim and dark, but that is not a reflection of who we are or how we feel the real world should be. [...] We will continue to diversify the cast of characters we portray [...] so everyone can find representation and heroes they can relate to. [...] If [you don't feel the same way], you will not be missed"
https://twitter.com/WarComTeam/status/1268665798467432449/photo/1 |
|
|
|
2017/01/30 22:53:11
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Does anyone know how hierarchical PETA is ? Are these sort of letters the result of well planned tough out media strategies by large teams of experts or is any person in their organisation free to do whatever as long as the net result might just be less animal cruelty. For it seems that they completely misunderstand the whole distopian nightmare part of the setting.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/01/30 22:59:31
Inactive, user. New profile might pop up in a while |
|
|
|
2017/01/30 22:56:53
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch
|
Hybrid Son Of Oxayotl wrote: Snake Tortoise wrote:As utterly ridiculous as this is, it does make me nervous that triggered snowflakes are paying attention to 40k. Hopefully GW ignore this crap and it goes no further
You are the one posting internet petitions asking for GW (of all companies…) to make a public statement against PETA. If there are triggered snowflakes involved, you definitely are among the most triggered. Unless you were posting the petition on jest while not supporting it …
You got the wrong guy there lol
It's also worth noting that the person that DID post the petition was doing it as their first post. So they came in to join the dakka community because this letter hit them so hard they couldn't ignore it and had to jump on their
|
|
|
|
2017/01/30 23:02:27
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Hallowed Canoness
|
Indeed, my bad.
Jacksmiles wrote:It's also worth noting that the person that DID post the petition was doing it as their first post. So they came in to join the dakka community because this letter hit them so hard they couldn't ignore it and had to jump on their
Seeing how easy it is to manipulate people makes me lose my faith in humanity more and more. Especially with recent political stuff…
|
"Our fantasy settings are grim and dark, but that is not a reflection of who we are or how we feel the real world should be. [...] We will continue to diversify the cast of characters we portray [...] so everyone can find representation and heroes they can relate to. [...] If [you don't feel the same way], you will not be missed"
https://twitter.com/WarComTeam/status/1268665798467432449/photo/1 |
|
|
|
2017/01/30 23:13:22
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Its kinda sad how they managed to find one of the few models who are not decorated with human remains.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/01/30 23:13:53
Inactive, user. New profile might pop up in a while |
|
|
|
2017/01/30 23:14:04
Subject: PETA asks GW to ban Fur from Warhammer characters
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
Relapse wrote:Imagine you are in the middle of a game at your local store and a PITA character pops in and drenches your minis in a bucket of red paint!
Hilarity ensues.
Knowing the group I play with, it would be a big boot party immediately afterwards.
And many of them wear steel toed boots...
|
CHAOS! PANIC! DISORDER!
My job here is done. |
|
|
|
|