Switch Theme:

Jetbikes... in a Wave Serpent?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Fresh-Faced New User




Is there any reason you cannot put a Farseer with Warlock retinue on Jetbikes in a Wave Serpent?

P1. Farseer HQ entry with Warlocks may choose to take a Wave Serpent.
P2. Farseer HQ entry with Warlocks may all choose equipment from the Eldar Wargear list. Eldar Jetbikes are on the Eldar Wargear list.
P3. The Wave Serpent entry says it may carry up to "10 models" (or 5 Wraithguard and 1 Warlock, but that should not apply to the scope of this argument)

Conclusion: A Farseer with 5 Warlocks, all on jetbikes, could buy a Wave Serpent as transport.

Don't ask me WHY you'd want to do this, but the question came up last night in a friendly game (as a "what if") and we couldn't find any reason why you couldn't fit jetbikes in a Wave Serpent. Doesn't necessarily make much sense - jetbikes would seem to be larger than the normal Eldar model that fits in - but there doesn't seem to be anything that says "a model with a jetbike is no longer a model" for purposes of fitting in the "10 model" allotment for Wave Serpents.
   
Made in us
Master of the Hunt





Angmar

How about,

"Only infantry may embark in transports unless the transporting vehicle's rules specify otherwise." - BGB p 62 "Passenger Capacity"

Infantry mounted on Jetbikes cease to be Unit type: Infantry and become instead Unit type: Jetbikes.

No 'Infantry' status + no rules that 'specify otherwise' = no transport.

"It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.
It is by the seed of Arabica that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains, the stains become a warning.
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion."
 
   
Made in de
Spawn of Chaos




Germany

@ blue loki: What about p.53 BGB, first paragraph, last sentence: [....] Unless stated in this section, these unit types will follow the rules for infantry. ?

'War is a problem, not the solution' - Unknown Source
I play: , , , , (+ legions w/o smiley), (traitors) and (their rules, 'cause 4th C:CSM sucks) 
   
Made in us
Master of the Hunt





Angmar

But it is not a particular quality of the Infantry classification we are talking about, it is model being classified as "Infantry" itself that is important.

Were the transport rule to state that "Models that move or assault as Infantry may embark..." you would be correct.

Jetbikes are not "Infantry", they are "Jetbikes", as defined on page 54.

"It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.
It is by the seed of Arabica that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains, the stains become a warning.
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion."
 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: