Switch Theme:

What kind of Daemons can be bound to a Daemonhost?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Missionary On A Mission






If you could suck the Daemon out of a Daemonhost and put it in a bag, what kind would it be? Would it be something from the Daemons army list, or something different altogether?

Their current stats (much the same as they were in 3rd) suggest it's at least as powerful as a Herald, but the stats they had in 5th-7th weren't much more than a Lesser Daemon.

- - - - - - -
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut




.. I don't think there are any rules to this as such..
Cherubael was a daemon prince.

Dark heresy has some fun rules for generating daemon hosts. The strength was based on the number of bindings rather than the source daemon.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Ooh there's one in black crusade which is a daemonette bound in a dark eldar called a cackling abomination


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Another tidbit is that to bind a daemon you have to know it's name.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2018/03/17 14:45:13


DFTT 
   
Made in gb
Missionary On A Mission






Captyn_Bob wrote:
Cherubael was a daemon prince.


I'm re-reading Eisenhorn for the 8923rd time and Cherubael's Super Saiyan power level is the reason for the question; seemed to be at odds with how hard Daemonhosts sucked in-game (and still do, I guess).

Where do you find out he's a Daemon Prince? Also how does a single DP take out a Titan?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/03/17 15:11:33


- - - - - - -
   
Made in se
Longtime Dakkanaut




The codex rules for a daemon host wouldn't necessarily indicate what daemon it really is, other than perhaps lesser daemons having a cap on what they can do. A greater daemon can simply be very firmly bound and thus have little real control over itself, or it could find itself in an area of reality with a weak link to the warp so that it couldn't draw on much power at all.

The host is basically a kind of submarine that allows the daemon to interact with places that are outside of the levels of warp flux that a daemon would otherwise require to manifest. One could also imagine that some hosts are better put together than others, increasing further variance in capability.
   
Made in gb
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain





Earth

 BBAP wrote:
Captyn_Bob wrote:
Cherubael was a daemon prince.


I'm re-reading Eisenhorn for the 8923rd time and Cherubael's Super Saiyan power level is the reason for the question; seemed to be at odds with how hard Daemonhosts sucked in-game (and still do, I guess).

Where do you find out he's a Daemon Prince? Also how does a single DP take out a Titan?



It was a newly activated Titan that did not have its voids or anything, Cherubael flew into the cockpit and hilarity ensued.
   
Made in au
Anti-Armour Swiss Guard






Newcastle, OZ

That titan didn't have it's plot armour up yet.

I'm OVER 50 (and so far over everyone's BS, too).
Old enough to know better, young enough to not give a ****.

That is not dead which can eternal lie ...

... and yet, with strange aeons, even death may die.
 
   
Made in ca
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion





 chromedog wrote:
That titan didn't have it's plot armour up yet.


SO THATS WHAT VOID SHIELDS ARE?!

Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two 
   
Made in ca
Renegade Inquisitor with a Bound Daemon





Tied and gagged in the back of your car

They're usually supposed to be Heralds or Daemon Princes.

Sadly, the rules never really caught up with that.
   
Made in gb
Angered Reaver Arena Champion




Connah's Quay, North Wales

Cherubael doesn't fit neatly into our concept of the Chaos Gods. I think it's mentioned once that he was a 'prince', however I very much doubt he has ever been mortal and we've never had any indication at all that he has a Patron God, which is apart from Be'Lakor as far as I know a requirement for being a Daemon Prince.

I think Cherubael wasn't a Daemon of the 4 Chaos Gods, but some other unaligned entity. He says he remembers the Daemon King who lived in realspace, something the rest of us know nothing about, so it's clear either the Eisenhorn universe is slightly different from the 40K universe or Cherubael is something we haven't encountered yet.

So power wise I'd put him at around Daemon Prince level. He ain't a planet buster, but I'm pretty sure he could level a city unchained and there ain't much around that could stop him bar an express visit from some determined Grey Knights.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/03/18 20:04:18


 
   
Made in se
Longtime Dakkanaut




From 3rd edition 40k to, man idk, at least until the first Daemons codex was released, princes that didn't have a singular patron god were perfectly possible. You could give them the mark of chaos undivided in both 40K and WHFB without problems. Princes needing one of the big four to exist is new.
   
Made in ca
Renegade Inquisitor with a Bound Daemon





Tied and gagged in the back of your car

Wait... Princes needing a single patron to ascend is a thing now?
   
Made in gb
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain





Earth

 ALEXisAWESOME wrote:
Cherubael doesn't fit neatly into our concept of the Chaos Gods. I think it's mentioned once that he was a 'prince', however I very much doubt he has ever been mortal and we've never had any indication at all that he has a Patron God, which is apart from Be'Lakor as far as I know a requirement for being a Daemon Prince.

I think Cherubael wasn't a Daemon of the 4 Chaos Gods, but some other unaligned entity. He says he remembers the Daemon King who lived in realspace, something the rest of us know nothing about, so it's clear either the Eisenhorn universe is slightly different from the 40K universe or Cherubael is something we haven't encountered yet.

So power wise I'd put him at around Daemon Prince level. He ain't a planet buster, but I'm pretty sure he could level a city unchained and there ain't much around that could stop him bar an express visit from some determined Grey Knights.


Since Eisenhorn and the Ravenor series have Enuncia and the Cognitai, they are very much prime 40k universe, Lorgar uses Enuncia and the Cognitai are in Prospero burns.

The Deamon King (Ghul) was forced into real space after it died, its tomb is where Glaw goes to end the 40k universe.

Not all deamons are aligned with the gods, some are older than the gods, Drach'Nyan is an unaligned creature of chaos that is incredibly powerful, more so than any deamon prince ever portrayed before it, it fought the emperor and won, thats crazy.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 Fafnir wrote:
Wait... Princes needing a single patron to ascend is a thing now?


Nope, just codex nonsense, the greater fluff still has Undivided DP (peturabo and Lorgar) but as GW doesnt make rules for undivided it doesnt show them in the fluff that much anymore, they are still out there though.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/03/18 23:48:15


 
   
Made in us
Changing Our Legion's Name





wisconsin

*cough* Dan-iverse *cough*

Iron without, Iron within
 
   
Made in gb
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain





Earth

 Demented duo wrote:
*cough* Dan-iverse *cough*


I would say I agreed with this until they started putting his stuff in other books, bloody good writer though.
   
Made in gb
Keeper of the Holy Orb of Antioch





avoiding the lorax on Crion

Cherub ale is a demon Prince though his alignment is never detailed and left in the open..

However, he is a pretty powerful and extremely dangerous one, even thrice bound it defeated a less restricted deamon host. Seems to favour planning but also can be cruel and extremely directly lethal.

Alignment is likely undivided, Petarbo, Logar, belakor, thr majority was however in the aligned aspects.

As for binding deamons, its a very exact and precise task. Getting one rune or symbol wrong and it might easily turn round and slaughter you.

Its one of those particularly risky tasks.
Also there always working to break Thete bonds, work against you. Or worse.



Sgt. Vanden - OOC Hey, that was your doing. I didn't choose to fly in the "Dongerprise'.

"May the odds be ever in your favour"

Hybrid Son Of Oxayotl wrote:
I have no clue how Dakka's moderation work. I expect it involves throwing a lot of d100 and looking at many random tables.

FudgeDumper - It could be that you are just so uncomfortable with the idea of your chapters primarch having his way with a docile tyranid spore cyst, that you must deny they have any feelings at all.  
   
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka






 Formosa wrote:
 ALEXisAWESOME wrote:
Cherubael doesn't fit neatly into our concept of the Chaos Gods. I think it's mentioned once that he was a 'prince', however I very much doubt he has ever been mortal and we've never had any indication at all that he has a Patron God, which is apart from Be'Lakor as far as I know a requirement for being a Daemon Prince.

I think Cherubael wasn't a Daemon of the 4 Chaos Gods, but some other unaligned entity. He says he remembers the Daemon King who lived in realspace, something the rest of us know nothing about, so it's clear either the Eisenhorn universe is slightly different from the 40K universe or Cherubael is something we haven't encountered yet.

So power wise I'd put him at around Daemon Prince level. He ain't a planet buster, but I'm pretty sure he could level a city unchained and there ain't much around that could stop him bar an express visit from some determined Grey Knights.


Since Eisenhorn and the Ravenor series have Enuncia and the Cognitai, they are very much prime 40k universe,


Well, that's true. But only because Dan Abnett made them up.

Basically, Cherubael is different to other Chaos entities because Dan Abnett's idea of Chaos is somewhat different to other authors', or he's more comfortable making things up - see also the flects, the way the chaos forces in the Gaunt's Ghosts series behave and the things like stalk-tanks and wirewolves and whatnot that we never see anywhere else.

Lorgar uses Enuncia and the Cognitai are in Prospero burns.
Prospero Burns is also by Dan Abnett; that would explain the Cognitae appearing.

It looks like daemonhosts are a form of possession forced by a third party, binding the possessing daemon and the possessed host to limit the power of the daemon. Unbound, Cherubael would probably be a powerful greater daemon or something of equivalent power
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Background
Go to: