Wouldn't an Inquisitor or Interrogator's acolytes already have sworn allegiance to the Inquisition (and probably wouldn't need to due to being indoctrinated into the IOM)? It's a rather silly thing to give sensitive data and missions to people you don't already trust. In any case swearing allegiance to a thing probably isn't that momentous an occasion for an acolyte to warrant a career change. Regarding the retirement option, I'm not sure I understand you. Do you mean they get booted back to civilian life, or do you mean they get another assignment (which would not be retirement)? ======================== If you're looking to provide an opportunity for a character's career change, you could do it like any military would: provide training modules. At rest intervals where the party is allowed some leave you could give them an option to train as a kind of specialist, maybe they take a Marksmanship course to be better at sniping, or perhaps take an Escape & Evasion course. They could even be given instruction on surveillance or data monitoring techniques. ======================== I do like the Red/Blue pill scenario, but both choices need some weighting. Perhaps the party is told that there is a choice to either go deeper and solve the mystery, or to simply be reassigned. The mission is beyond their current abilities, and would require training. This training would reveal to them methods and information that the general population is not permitted to know, and would mean that once taken in, this is their path for life. There is no backing out. There is no way home. They leave only on death. Reassignment to another mission allows them to retain some greater agency, and they can "opt-out". Retaining the party in that scenario is not a priority for the Inquisition, and they will receive less scrutiny. But they will also not get cool top-secret doodads, and they miss out on a greater mystery. The "choice" here is not actually a choice, however. The party will choose to pursue the mystery deeper, and will find the alternative boring. It does present a good "character tweaking" option, however. Alternative take: The IOM is highly authoritarian, and acolyte personal agency probably doesn't really mean anything. It could be an interesting narrative dynamic that the Inquisition simply tells them what they do next, forces the Redpill scenario, and sends them into the breach without so much as a pat on the back. This would give the party a conflict to slowly work with - they are loyal to the IOM, but it treats them like an abusive father.
|