Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2006/06/13 12:42:40
Subject: vehicle desing rules
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
WHERE IS IT ?!!! I cheked the gw site but cant figure out where it is
|
Dakka, entropic Immortal, Destroyer of Disease and Fighter against Destruction Behold I have returned! After a year and a half in the USMC I decided I needed my hobbie back In a man to man fight the winneris he who has one more round in his magazine. -Erwin Rommel page 50 of Infantry Attacks |
|
|
|
2006/06/23 04:43:41
Subject: RE: vehicle desing rules
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
helo? dose any one know where the vehicle desing rules are?
|
Dakka, entropic Immortal, Destroyer of Disease and Fighter against Destruction Behold I have returned! After a year and a half in the USMC I decided I needed my hobbie back In a man to man fight the winneris he who has one more round in his magazine. -Erwin Rommel page 50 of Infantry Attacks |
|
|
|
2006/06/24 03:40:22
Subject: RE: vehicle desing rules
|
|
Dominating Dominatrix
|
try the Inomine Imperatoris Books. if you can get them. GW said that you can use all 3rd edition rules for 4th
|
|
|
|
2006/06/24 20:29:34
Subject: RE: vehicle desing rules
|
|
Been Around the Block
|
What in the world according to Garp are the vehicle desing rules?
|
Green iz best |
|
|
|
2006/06/25 08:59:04
Subject: RE: vehicle desing rules
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
their rules that allow you to make your coustom vehicles baleneced and still have fluff any help you can offer will be welcome
|
Dakka, entropic Immortal, Destroyer of Disease and Fighter against Destruction Behold I have returned! After a year and a half in the USMC I decided I needed my hobbie back In a man to man fight the winneris he who has one more round in his magazine. -Erwin Rommel page 50 of Infantry Attacks |
|
|
|
2006/06/25 15:16:29
Subject: RE: vehicle desing rules
|
|
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
Murfreesboro, TN
|
The VDR are 3rd edition; they were not continued into 4th. The book they were printed in is gone; it was one of the Chapter Approved.
|
As a rule of thumb, the designers do not hide "easter eggs" in the rules. If clever reading is required to unlock some sort of hidden option, then it is most likely the result of wishful thinking.
But there's no sense crying over every mistake;
You just keep on trying till you run out of cake.
Member of the "No Retreat for Calgar" Club |
|
|
|
2006/06/25 16:50:08
Subject: RE: vehicle desing rules
|
|
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
The VDR are 3rd edition; they were not continued into 4th.
Of course they were. 4th Edition merely replaced the core rules, it didn't invalaidate everything else already in place. Given that the VDR were optional rules requiring your opponent's consent anyway, they're every bit as valid to use now as they ever were. their rules that allow you to make your coustom vehicles baleneced and still have fluff
Well, not quite. They are merely rules that provide a framework for you to design rules for custom-built vehicles. They didn't really put too much effort into balancing the VDR... they just upped the points costs to try to keep the worst of the possible abusive combinations under control and encourage people to use them for fun instead of to build game-winning vehicles, which is why they required opponent's consent.
|
|
|
|
|
2006/06/25 17:41:20
Subject: RE: vehicle desing rules
|
|
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
Murfreesboro, TN
|
Iwasn't saying they were invalid; they just haven't been actively maintained by GW as "current" materials. If everything from 3rd was invalid now, there'd be some pissed Eldar players.
|
As a rule of thumb, the designers do not hide "easter eggs" in the rules. If clever reading is required to unlock some sort of hidden option, then it is most likely the result of wishful thinking.
But there's no sense crying over every mistake;
You just keep on trying till you run out of cake.
Member of the "No Retreat for Calgar" Club |
|
|
|
2006/06/26 09:30:13
Subject: RE: vehicle desing rules
|
|
Dominating Dominatrix
|
well, they said more than once, if you create a Vehicle for the effect it will have in your games, then you are using them wrong... I wonder how Non-Ork players used them?
|
|
|
|
|