Switch Theme:

What does "counts as having been destroyed" mean?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Dakka Veteran




Side tangenting from the discussion on Reserves/Reinforcements/T1 deployment zones; re-reading the rules made me think of a question:

"Finally, any unit that has not arrived on the battlefield by the end of the third battle round in a matched play game counts as having been destroyed."

Counts as having been destroyed isn't the same as, "IS DESTROYED", is it? If it is, why not just write that instead?

Is there a possibility that the units still in reserve give up VP as "having been destroyed", but can still enter the field and do their job; since technically they were merely "counting as" destroyed, and not actually "destroyed"?
   
Made in gb
Norn Queen






fe40k wrote:
Side tangenting from the discussion on Reserves/Reinforcements/T1 deployment zones; re-reading the rules made me think of a question:

"Finally, any unit that has not arrived on the battlefield by the end of the third battle round in a matched play game counts as having been destroyed."

Counts as having been destroyed isn't the same as, "IS DESTROYED", is it? If it is, why not just write that instead?

Is there a possibility that the units still in reserve give up VP as "having been destroyed", but can still enter the field and do their job; since technically they were merely "counting as" destroyed, and not actually "destroyed"?
It means that for rules purposes, the answer to "is this unit destroyed" is yes, despite them not having been actually destroyed by being reduced to 0 wounds or some other destroy event.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2018/05/21 20:52:41


 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: